Isn't he though? The pairs he made were 1)Transcend / Me 2) Something_Smart / Hiraki.In post 74, Hiraki wrote:You are correct. There is no valid reason to SR someone for conjecture only if they act on said conjecture.In post 73, Draynth wrote:You're saying that Transcend is wrong to scumread BTD6 for 'not voting off of pre-flip associations.' . Am I right or wrong with that understanding?
At the time BTD6 townread me, therefore by his pairing method (ie. pre-flip association) he thinks Transcend is scum. He votes him, ignoring the other pair entirely.
His White Flag Gambit point is shaky at best, so his main reasoning must be this pairing.
Bolded is irrelevant, I'm not talking about your argument with Something_SmartIn post 74, Hiraki wrote:I'm arguing with you no?In post 73, Draynth wrote:This has nothing to do with playstyle, it makes you seem like you're not bothered actually making a valid argument since you just play it off by being sarcastic.How on earth do you argue with someone who says "you're doing X" when you're CLEARLY not doing it and whatever your doing (i.e. asking a question) has literally ZERO scum implications?Do you just tell him nicely that he's wrong or do it my own way? I'll pick the latter tyvm
BTD hadn't made a single post at this point.In post 70, Hiraki wrote:Yeah,In post 67, Draynth wrote:You buddied up to BTD despite the fact that Transcend didn't mention him at all.I'll throw away the running gag based on who I'm talking to- seriously?
The first post you mentioned BTD was talking to me, the second was talking to Transcend.
Scum have day talk, what's the likelihood this was a scum slip?