Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:23 pm
LESBIANSIn post 399, nancy wrote:LESBIANS LESBIANS LESBIANS
LESBIANSIn post 399, nancy wrote:LESBIANS LESBIANS LESBIANS
He certainly wasn't before but he lost a good deal of his cool since he got that award.In post 351, Ginngie wrote:"The paragon of mafiascum is lynchbait"
>_>
<_<
Is that really what story you want too sell?
I mean in comparison, it is townier than the negative approach I thought he did at first. In itself it's just ok/not scummy.In post 393, Imperium wrote:I don't think the word you're looking for here is "townier", just that there's a productive approach and a not so productive approach here.In post 272, Polar Vortex wrote:Directly confronting them does show a townier mindset than complaining about them and calling them scum.
People always say stuff like this and then go on to lose.In post 404, Ginngie wrote:This feels too easy
Cautious optimism, but nothing actually worth a mention yet.In post 406, Prism wrote:Sounds like you've done a lot of making sure I'm not townread for anything silly, Imperium, but do you have any thoughts yourself on my alignment?
In post 359, Imperium wrote:ANTIHERO - I was gonna say let's have a wine and cheese night tonight and then I found out I have to wake up before dawn in the morning. . I'm still planning to drink some wine and catch up tonight, but it will be with less abandon. But hopefully without too much bitching because I'm in a grumpy ass mood today.
Anyway hi to all! I'm not really here yet; I just mostly wanted to complain about above, but I should be back in a little bit
I'm not really getting this. This is the type of thing you walk up to your hydra partner and just say "Hey, mind taking a look at Spiffeh for me?". Dunno what kind of underhanded signaling you need to get your own hydra partner to look at something. I'm still not really doubting this slot-I'd put it at my top slot next to Ginn-but this just makes me go ???In post 340, Imperium wrote:Spiffeh, me putting you on the bottom of the list doesn't mean that you're my strongest scumread; in fact, it meant that you were the last person who I thought to place in that group. I thought that you actively doing nothing at that point (whether you were aware of it or not) was a line you'd be more likely to take as scum over town, but the biggest reason I put you on that list was so Tammy would look at you specifically since it's not like I have any real capacity to read you.
Okay, so he hasn't done much, that's a shame, but his entrance is still fine.In post 226, Caryatid wrote:Spiffeh was so high because I really liked his opening and I think the "predict the scum" thing, while silly, is something I'll want to look back on later in the game once we have some flips because I do think scum would answer that differently than town would. Unfortunately, he's done literally nothing since then, so probably I jumped the gun there. I liked his entrance though.
Oh, okay. I guess this is for pressure, he hadn't done anything since 140ish at this point. Carya had just given an Ahsoka read that was really worth pushing before but again, okay sure. Next mention:In post 232, Caryatid wrote:VOTE: Spiffeh L-2
This is a really strong feeling about Spiffeh, with no clear basis. He had posted plenty since their pressure vote but there's no critique of any of that content from Carya.In post 327, Caryatid wrote:I think if they're town then it'll really shine through in their posting and if they're not then we'll know. Spiffeh's the one I'm more worried about slipping away.
This feels so, so fake to me. And again, what they've verbalized about Spiffeh so far is that they liked Spiffeh's entrance but just not his lack of content. The phrasing of it as a question is just weird to me. What's the goal here? NMS going to solve your paranoia just because they know you are? This reads like banter but it's the type of banter that's meant to break into a townbloc.In post 327, Caryatid wrote:Mastina do you know why 317 makes me a little paranoid of you? But I like that you're pushing Spiffeh so I'm setting it aside for now but I just...want it noted...for postgame cred or something...that it was page 13 when I started worrying.
This is just a wild read that comes off as faking indecisiveness.In post 230, Caryatid wrote:The way I feel about camn is that I really liked 118 because it made me laugh and it was off the cuff and cute and I liked her push on Ginngie at first and then in 180 she was talking about awareness and it struck me as odd because I think in general as scum it's easier to have a better awareness of the game state than as town and you have more information to work with, so I feel just about the opposite about situation awareness as camn seems to :/ but her longer explanation in 182 was okay? If it's about nervousness and misreading the town and way her actions would come off to this playerlist then that's a different thing from whta I thought it was and it resonates.
I just want to think about her some more before I have a real read but if you have something, I want to hear it.
#180, the post that gave them hesitation, isn't even close to talking about gamestate. It's just about the playerlist, applying to how camn expects Gin to adjust to it as scum:In post 118, camn wrote:Outguess the mod works sometimes?
Her longer explanation actually makes itIn post 180, camn wrote:Its not about 'caring' but about awareness.
I am sure you are AWARE of the playerlist.
If this is at me, it's because I don't usually hit the "quote" button. I copy and paste and add the quote tags in manually.Ginngie wrote:Why do people purposefully take out quote links when quoting people
Not off the top of my head, but it is basically ALWAYS discussed when someone claims negative utility so the perception that it could happen is enough that a lot of scum won't do it. Either way, I think it's much more likely that mastina claimed negative utility because mastina is negative utility than any kind of tinfoil theory that it benefits scum. If mastina is scum, the claim is probably because of something actually related to mastina's real role.Heartless wrote:is a vig killing someone because they're neg utility something you've seen actually happen? if so, link plz
It really wasn't. Sure, you don't have much info yet at that stage of a game so any accuracy is probably difficult to come by, but it'sGinngie wrote:Cards was literally an actual reads list with tiers and it's WAY too early to have that structured of a list
This may be nitpicky, but that makes it sound like you're trying too hard to match your own meta...Ginngie wrote:As it stands it's obvious I'm trying to do my own thing and appealing to no one but my own play style.
I can't tell if this is overthinking or spot on, but either way it feels genuine.camn wrote:Stop being silly... your command of English is excellent.
There is a context to actions.
In a different game.. I think a player like you, AS SCUM OR TOWN, consider self-voting because it shows emotion.. it shows lack of concern over votes, or otherwise expresses a towniness to players who will read into things on that level. It is manipulative, but that is not really the worst. You as town manipulating people into overcoming thier suspicions and thinking you are town is fine, and pro-town.
BUT HERE, I think you MUST know that we would see through that shit, because you are certainly aware of the experience level of this playerlist.
So, AS TOWN, I think you would realize that the risk of that kind of attempts at manipulation is more than in a game with a different playerlist.
But AS SCUM, maybe you are a little nervous that we are just gonna catch you.. so you go for it. The possible benefit is a little greater, and outweighs the risk.
That was my calculus.
Is it correct? Maybe. Maybe not.
Would I even be talking about it if you didn't keep bringing it up?
Probably not.
I liked your subsequent responses and I am over it.
Do I love parsing posts word by word?
Not really, it's boring af.
camn wrote:Would I even be talking about it if you didn't keep bringing it up?
Probably not.
This post following those two lines of camn's post, however, feels like an attempt to shake pressure after JUST saying that Ginngie doesn't mind votes. So I'm leaning towards camn's observation being spot on rather than overthinking.Ginngie wrote:You're a good noodle :3
The idea of a vig shooting negative utilities is nothing new. It seems unnecessarily risky for scum. It's just one dangerous trade off for I don't even know what benefit. I can only remember one time where scum fakeclaimed a negative utility and survived to endgame and that was in like 2009. Yes, I have townreads on both mastina and camn. The mastina one is still pretty weak because I haven't seen enough from that slot to have a confident read. The one on camn is a little stronger because I liked the exchange with Ginngie.Imperium wrote:Why do you think that mastina's 48 was the equivalent of putting a "vig me" post it note on her own bag? I mean, maybe I have a different approach to the game than you do, but I can't say that I'd think that "our role is negative utility if another role exists in the game but I don't currently think the chances of that are very high" is anywhere near a "this is going to fuck the game over, kill" it claim as something like camn's Hated claim would be.
Does this mean that you're townreading mastina and camn? How strong are your townreads on each of them?
What didn't I answer?Imperium wrote: Already asked the same question Prism did, but I don't think that you actually answered all of his questions here.
You listed him as an angry face (scum read?) so I have to ask. Was the "predict the scum" thing scummy to you?Imperium wrote:Why was Spiffeh so high - the only thing he did was the "predict the scum" thing and I don't understand why that looks town at all
Fully agree except that I'm not sure of the meta part. The post about scum reads was pretty bad though. I could probably vote on that alone.Cary wrote:Ahsoka's entrance sucked. At that time she only had the one post where she wanted to know why people were scumreading her when she hadn't posted. But since then it just seems like she's having trouble getting her feet and she is the sort of player who has trouble getting her feet as scum so I don't like it.
This feels manipulative. Like someone who is more in control than they are letting on and trying to get people to town read them.Prism wrote: Any questions for a drunk Prism who presumably is more sloppy as scum or more genuine as town now's your chance
Your quote from earlier, this one:In post 419, Ginngie wrote:Prism makes me doubt the ever living shit out of my Cary read
is actually another example of those rote, tiny ingrained behaviors I meant, and I fundamentally disagree with townreading it. From new players I can see the argument but this was extremely trivial to fake as scum.In post 227, Ginngie wrote:Not gonna lie, I don't see scum caring about details like this.In post 226, Caryatid wrote:That tier is just above "null, hasn't posted, but it's the middle of the night in their time zone" tier (you), just above "null, hasn't posted, but it's daytime in their time zone" (Shadowphant). I originally had fewer tiers but I kept finding I did feel a little bit more strongly about one person than another.
Agree so much. The question of course being WHAT was Gin trying to accomplish?In post 417, Kmd4390 wrote:ginngie comes off pretty calm and collected so I can only see it as a joke (doesn't come off that way at all) or a calculated attempt to accomplish something.
We will see. I certainly would rather see a D1 lynch on Spiffeh right now than on Gin.In post 420, Prism wrote:Specifically, where I think camn went wrong in #182 is that I think she got them mixed up.
Ignoring obvious underexplained reads, second part is just weird. "Don't self even if you're town," does Maxwell think it's scum? town? NAI? Implied they're confused by it by saying it generally confuses townies but that confusion is not apparent at all. Just a regular "Don't be antitown as town!" and then move along.In post 134, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Prisms town! Totes.
VOTE: Ahsoka Tano
Ginngie pls dont self if youre town even as a joke its just confusing to us good honest folks
See: fake nuanceIn post 271, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Hey all Ill get into this soon, been pretty damn sick
Ahsokas posting hasn't improved but w the consistent weirdness im not sure if i find it AI anymore