Mafiascum.net

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

In post 1375, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

Okay...Let's assume that the consensus is I am a shitty Town player.

Instead of saying "I suck" help me better. Don't just say "Miss" or "Its math" tell me what I can do better. Connect the dots.

In post 1376, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1375, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

Okay...Let's assume that the consensus is I am a shitty Town player.

Instead of saying "I suck" help me better. Don't just say "Miss" or "Its math" tell me what I can do better. Connect the dots.

"Help me see what you see." Terrible tone. Far fetched reasoning with more bad tone.

My read on Lucca's slot (Math) is wavering. Lucca was almost lock-town for me. I mean I know Math can tunnel people and push town, he regularly does this. But this just feels fake. It doesn't even seem like he's trying to look at people. There's 3 scum and he's so dead-set on me being scum that he's failing to reason out who would have to be my two partners.

Even in Maki's quote I was looking at Maki and Epic since D1. I'm beginning to see a Maki, Epic, and Math team potential.

In post 1378, CommKnight wrote:My read on Lucca's slot (Math) is wavering. Lucca was almost lock-town for me. I mean I know Math can tunnel people and push town, he regularly does this. But this just feels fake. It doesn't even seem like he's trying to look at people. There's 3 scum and he's so dead-set on me being scum that he's failing to reason out who would have to be my two partners.

Even in Maki's quote I was looking at Maki and Epic since D1. I'm beginning to see a Maki, Epic, and Math team potential.

Not true. Hes said it was you me and Epic.

In post 1378, CommKnight wrote:My read on Lucca's slot (Math) is wavering. Lucca was almost lock-town for me. I mean I know Math can tunnel people and push town, he regularly does this. But this just feels fake. It doesn't even seem like he's trying to look at people. There's 3 scum and he's so dead-set on me being scum that he's failing to reason out who would have to be my two partners.

Even in Maki's quote I was looking at Maki and Epic since D1. I'm beginning to see a Maki, Epic, and Math team potential.

They...If you're gonna insist that I am scum or no longer lock Town simply because I scumread you get my pronoun right.

In post 1379, Quick wrote:

In post 1378, CommKnight wrote:My read on Lucca's slot (Math) is wavering. Lucca was almost lock-town for me. I mean I know Math can tunnel people and push town, he regularly does this. But this just feels fake. It doesn't even seem like he's trying to look at people. There's 3 scum and he's so dead-set on me being scum that he's failing to reason out who would have to be my two partners.

Even in Maki's quote I was looking at Maki and Epic since D1. I'm beginning to see a Maki, Epic, and Math team potential.

Not true. Hes said it was you me and Epic.

........

In post 1377, Quick wrote:

In post 1376, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1375, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

Okay...Let's assume that the consensus is I am a shitty Town player.

Instead of saying "I suck" help me better. Don't just say "Miss" or "Its math" tell me what I can do better. Connect the dots.

"Help me see what you see." Terrible tone. Far fetched reasoning with more bad tone.

Tone can't be good or bad. That is emotion. Reasoning far fetched << Why do you think this? If you feel my reasoning is bad tell me why.

In post 1382, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1377, Quick wrote:

In post 1376, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1375, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

Okay...Let's assume that the consensus is I am a shitty Town player.

Instead of saying "I suck" help me better. Don't just say "Miss" or "Its math" tell me what I can do better. Connect the dots.

"Help me see what you see." Terrible tone. Far fetched reasoning with more bad tone.

Tone can't be good or bad. That is emotion. Reasoning far fetched << Why do you think this? If you feel my reasoning is bad tell me why.

Lack of doubt.

In post 1383, Quick wrote:

In post 1382, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1377, Quick wrote:

In post 1376, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1375, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

Okay...Let's assume that the consensus is I am a shitty Town player.

Instead of saying "I suck" help me better. Don't just say "Miss" or "Its math" tell me what I can do better. Connect the dots.

"Help me see what you see." Terrible tone. Far fetched reasoning with more bad tone.

Tone can't be good or bad. That is emotion. Reasoning far fetched << Why do you think this? If you feel my reasoning is bad tell me why.

Lack of doubt.

That isn't a logical flaw.
It can be argued I am arrogant fine. That doesn't mean wrong or far fetched.

I am damn sure 2+2 is 4.
Should I doubt that?
Get specific.
Tell me what on my read is wrong. Show me what I am doing wrong.

In post 1384, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1383, Quick wrote:

In post 1382, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1377, Quick wrote:

In post 1376, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1375, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, MathBlade wrote:So? I don't see anything scum wouldn't do. Or that I haven't done as scum.

He is showing emotion. So what?

Telling what you believe to be the truth (or just the truth in the case of scum) is not alignment indicative else every game I have I would be Town.

Hit

Help me to see what you see. What this reads as to me is desperate scum and the fact neither of the two were lynched to me is suspicious.

Miss.

Stuff like that.

Okay...Let's assume that the consensus is I am a shitty Town player.

Instead of saying "I suck" help me better. Don't just say "Miss" or "Its math" tell me what I can do better. Connect the dots.

"Help me see what you see." Terrible tone. Far fetched reasoning with more bad tone.

Tone can't be good or bad. That is emotion. Reasoning far fetched << Why do you think this? If you feel my reasoning is bad tell me why.

Lack of doubt.

That isn't a logical flaw.
It can be argued I am arrogant fine. That doesn't mean wrong or far fetched.

I am damn sure 2+2 is 4.
Should I doubt that?
Get specific.
Tell me what on my read is wrong. Show me what

specifically

I am doing wrong.

Logical reasoning and deduction isn't my thing. I didn't make the argument you made a logical error.. That was you putting words in my mouth. I am playing the game of Mafia, IDK if you are playing math or not, but I am not.

Obviously you disagree with my scumread of you.

Obviously you disagree with my scumread of Comm and still haven't followed up with Comm despite my insistence that you should have with your question. Instead you sheep him. What in your reads, not math, am I missing? What makes you not push him?

What specifically makes you not talk about Epic?

What specifically is "Miss" about my play/style here?

In post 1386, MathBlade wrote:Obviously you disagree with my scumread of you.

Obviously you disagree with my scumread of Comm and still haven't followed up with Comm despite my insistence that you should have with your question. Instead you sheep him. What

specifically

in your reads, not math, am I missing? What makes you not push him?

What specifically makes you not talk about Epic?

What specifically is "Miss" about my play/style here?

I have been pushing him.

He doesn't respond. That is for Town to figure out.

Another page? Lolololol, I’ve been thinking this game needed an energy boost but dear god.

In post 1387, Quick wrote:

In post 1386, MathBlade wrote:Obviously you disagree with my scumread of you.

Obviously you disagree with my scumread of Comm and still haven't followed up with Comm despite my insistence that you should have with your question. Instead you sheep him. What

specifically

in your reads, not math, am I missing? What makes you not push him?

What specifically makes you not talk about Epic?

What specifically is "Miss" about my play/style here?

I have been pushing him.

He doesn't respond. That is for Town to figure out.

If you're Town (again I doubt this) you have an opinion on this. Elaborate on your opinion. When I am trying to read you saying it's to read Comm Knight and therefore not yours that is bad. Tell me what YOU think of Comm Knight's play since YOU are sheeping and pushing him two differing reads.

In post 1388, Aubrey wrote:Another page? Lolololol, I’ve been thinking this game needed an energy boost but dear god.

I interact with people in real time. This creates posts.

So, the flood gates shall continue to pour.

--

Just know you've entered a relatively lazy game. If you continue flooding like you are, you'll drown out what little voice some people have. Not only that, but can also add to the general laziness that is already occurring. Basically activity is good, but over-activity is bad.

--

Play as you wish, but consider the above. Personally I'm still way behind, and having been designing behind a computer screen since early in the morning, I really don't care nor look forward to critically reading this mass of info. You'll be lucky if I read half or 3/4ths tonight.

In post 1389, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1387, Quick wrote:

In post 1386, MathBlade wrote:Obviously you disagree with my scumread of you.

Obviously you disagree with my scumread of Comm and still haven't followed up with Comm despite my insistence that you should have with your question. Instead you sheep him. What

specifically

in your reads, not math, am I missing? What makes you not push him?

What specifically makes you not talk about Epic?

What specifically is "Miss" about my play/style here?

I have been pushing him.

He doesn't respond. That is for Town to figure out.

If you're Town (again I doubt this) you have an opinion on this. Elaborate on your opinion. When I am trying to read you saying it's

Town's problem

to read Comm Knight and therefore not yours that is bad. Tell me what YOU think of Comm Knight's play since YOU are sheeping and pushing him two differing reads.

I think Comm has done hardly anything AI at all. He's just spouted Pre-Flip all game based on "gut." Seriously, How do you read that shit?

In post 1391, Aubrey wrote:So, the flood gates shall continue to pour.

--

Just know you've entered a relatively lazy game. If you continue flooding like you are, you'll drown out what little voice some people have. Not only that, but can also add to the general laziness that is already occurring. Basically activity is good, but over-activity is bad.

--

Play as you wish, but consider the above. Personally I'm still way behind, and having been designing behind a computer screen since early in the morning, I really don't care nor look forward to critically reading this mass of info. You'll be lucky if I read half or 3/4ths tonight.

Uhm...

I don't think discouraging content is a good thing to do...

K.

In post 1394, Aubrey wrote:K.

*doesn't feel like overly explaining a simple concept*

It is simple tho.. Content is good for the game, yeah? Like especially when the game has been starved for content?

"Content"

Apparently we have different definitions of that.

There is a whole thread dedicated to what I tried to eloquently say. I don’t care to argue this point further seeing as we are discussing how to play rather than how we regard the Alignment of play. Plus, I’m not against activity, but there is a limit that needs to be considered. If the game continues to grow 4+ pages a day, you’ll become frustrated when only a few ppl are participating. That’s all I’m highlighting and cautioning.

I need to catch up. This game will b be my priority tomorrow

I generally feel that that is just the kind of player Comm is, and it leads to him being town moreso than scum.