Mini Normal 1984: Big Brother is watching.. [END GAME]

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:55 am

I don’t think I’ve ever been policy lynched, so you’ve attempted to policy me, sure, but yeah, I’ve never been actually policied, and haven’t been lynched in Boonskiies as town more than once in three years.

Back to my only quoting thing.

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:57 am

Hot take: I actually think Flavor has provided more content than Sauce.

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:57 am

In post 81, Dunkerdoodles wrote:VOTE: flavor leaf

Dunkerdoodles

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:00 am

If you believe this why are you avoiding interacting with me about my Profii scum read?

Profil

Lalendra · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:02 am

In post 89, acryon wrote:
In post 88, Sauce wrote:
In post 87, acryon wrote:I can't imagine scum playing this recklessly so I'm not going to endorse any vote there.
Reckless how?
Putting a giant target on his head by not posting a single original comment. Best-case scenario he looks like unhelpful town which often end up being lynch-worthy.

Yeah I was thinking the same thing, it's kind of my only misgiving about FL being scum right now - he's a better player than this as scum. But, he also tends to get onto stylistic tangents like this and eventually comes around if he gets mad enough, or if town is dumb enough. (I guess those two are basically the same lol)

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:05 am

viewtopic.php?p=9708888&user_select%5B% ... 7#p9708888

Dunkerdoodles

VOTE: Dunkerdoodles

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:05 am

viewtopic.php?p=9708888&user_select%5B% ... 7#p9708888

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:07 am

Dunkerdoodles 1

acryon · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:12 am

In post 100, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t think I’ve ever been policy lynched, so you’ve attempted to policy me, sure, but yeah, I’ve never been actually policied, and haven’t been lynched in Boonskiies as town more than once in three years.

Back to my only quoting thing.

Yeah it's possible I'm just thinking about a specific game or two where I really

wanted

to PL you and I'm actually mis-remembering that any actually went through.

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:19 am

In post 108, acryon wrote:
In post 100, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t think I’ve ever been policy lynched, so you’ve attempted to policy me, sure, but yeah, I’ve never been actually policied, and haven’t been lynched in Boonskiies as town more than once in three years.

Back to my only quoting thing.
Yeah it's possible I'm just thinking about a specific game or two where I really
wanted
to PL you and I'm actually mis-remembering that any actually went through.

In post 104, Lalendra wrote:
In post 89, acryon wrote:
In post 88, Sauce wrote:
In post 87, acryon wrote:I can't imagine scum playing this recklessly so I'm not going to endorse any vote there.
Reckless how?
Putting a giant target on his head by not posting a single original comment. Best-case scenario he looks like unhelpful town which often end up being lynch-worthy.
Yeah I was thinking the same thing, it's kind of my only misgiving about FL being scum right now - he's a better player than this as scum. But, he also tends to get onto stylistic tangents like this and eventually comes around if he gets mad enough, or if town is dumb enough. (I guess those two are basically the same lol)

Lalendra

Thor665 · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:54 am

In post 103, Flavor Leaf wrote:
If you believe this why are you avoiding interacting with me about my Profii scum read?

Profil

I understand your read on Profii - that was made clear by my question.
Your answer here is a direct dodge of my question.
Want to try again?

profii · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:04 am

In post 97, Sauce wrote:
In post 95, profii wrote:ebwop, content is probably the wrong word, but sauce is very flowery, need to read his other games to see if this is just his thing to be fair
I haven't had a scumgame on this site yet so I advise you to metadive anyone but me if you wish to gain ai insight.

No I was more wondering if spending 4 paragraphs when you could have put “we don’t need to discuss your fos aimed at me” is something you do routinely

It comes over as a wall post that you would hope most people will gloss past when they realise it’s directed at the FOS’er but it was a total shutdown for said FOS’er - that doesn’t matter though, they suspected you anyway.

But given the post you quoted from other game apparently that’s your style. The style wasn’t particularly AI but the shutdown aimed at Thor was scummy imo

acryon · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:13 am

In post 111, profii wrote:
In post 97, Sauce wrote:
In post 95, profii wrote:ebwop, content is probably the wrong word, but sauce is very flowery, need to read his other games to see if this is just his thing to be fair
I haven't had a scumgame on this site yet so I advise you to metadive anyone but me if you wish to gain ai insight.
No I was more wondering if spending 4 paragraphs when you could have put “we don’t need to discuss your fos aimed at me” is something you do routinely

It comes over as a wall post that you would hope most people will gloss past when they realise it’s directed at the FOS’er but it was a total shutdown for said FOS’er - that doesn’t matter though, they suspected you anyway.

But given the post you quoted from other game apparently that’s your style. The style wasn’t particularly AI but the shutdown aimed at Thor was scummy imo

Yeah Sauce's posts have really struck me. The are just

weird

. To me it feels more likely to be scummy weird.

Thor665 · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:14 am

I'm not sure it's clear scummy.
Anti-town, sure, but the scum intent behind it is more nebulous.
I kind of feel it's like his setup spec that he defended like mad but as soon as I actually engaged him in a discussion of it he ran and hid.
I get the vibe he's just trying to feel clever by winning empty debate points - but, meh, that's something I sometimes do too because I think I'm smarter than everyone else in the room.

He's not helping town at all though - that's blatantly obvious.

rb · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:43 am

S A U C E I S N E X T

Lalendra · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:51 am

I have a hard time reading sauce because I for sure thought he was scum in a recent game and he wasn't. I think my scumread of him is based on playstyle so I'm holding off on that for now.

Sauce · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:54 am

What do you think of Thor's entrance ?

Thor665 · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:59 am

In post 114, rb wrote:S A U C E I S N E X T

Did you not actually care about your last question and my answer to it - or are you just doing a bad Fate impression right now?

Sauce · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:12 am

How's your scum or derp read on profii progressing?

Sauce · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:22 am

Willing to policy lynch Leaf. Don't think Lalendra and acryon should've encouraged him.

Thor665 · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:58 am

In post 118, Sauce wrote:How's your scum or derp read on profii progressing?

I'm still voting him.

Want to discuss setup yet or are you fully ignoring it now?

acryon · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:34 am

In post 119, Sauce wrote:Willing to policy lynch Leaf. Don't think Lalendra and acryon should've encouraged him.

You're willing to policy lynch someone 2 days into the game? I assume RB and Dunker are quite high on your policy lynch list?

Sauce · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:45 am

In post 121, acryon wrote:
In post 119, Sauce wrote:Willing to policy lynch Leaf. Don't think Lalendra and acryon should've encouraged him.
You're willing to policy lynch someone 2 days into the game? I assume RB and Dunker are quite high on your policy lynch list?

Why?

acryon · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:46 am

In post 122, Sauce wrote:
In post 121, acryon wrote:
In post 119, Sauce wrote:Willing to policy lynch Leaf. Don't think Lalendra and acryon should've encouraged him.
You're willing to policy lynch someone 2 days into the game? I assume RB and Dunker are quite high on your policy lynch list?
Why?

Because their level of contribution is similar to Leaf's. I would say they've contributed less actually.

Sauce · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:49 am

In post 123, acryon wrote:
In post 122, Sauce wrote:
In post 121, acryon wrote:
In post 119, Sauce wrote:Willing to policy lynch Leaf. Don't think Lalendra and acryon should've encouraged him.
You're willing to policy lynch someone 2 days into the game? I assume RB and Dunker are quite high on your policy lynch list?
Why?
Because their level of contribution is similar to Leaf's. I would say they've contributed less actually.

I thought you said it wasn't. Needless to say the reason for policy lynching Leaf is because he has self-imposed the limitation of quote-only gameplay. You must've assumed this was the case, but welcomed the occasion of trying to instigate animosity between rb, Dunker and myself. Smooth