Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:43 pm
Because of Titus and Chara. And a bit of Varsoon.In post 1774, Joey_ wrote:I have a meta game questino, why did you replace-in this game?
Because of Titus and Chara. And a bit of Varsoon.In post 1774, Joey_ wrote:I have a meta game questino, why did you replace-in this game?
Not sure yet. I hear she enjoys being scum more than town, though.In post 1770, Joey_ wrote:Koki whats your read on kiana?
Where did you hear this? I don't have a completed game with you, and the only game we have in common is ongoing. Have people been talking about me?In post 1776, Kokichi Oma wrote:Not sure yet. I hear she enjoys being scum more than town, though.In post 1770, Joey_ wrote:Koki whats your read on kiana?
i don't know about the toneread, but i do see what you mean regarding the comparison to other lurkers and the value in bussing. moreso the former point.In post 1773, Kiana Kaslana wrote:I don't think avoiding Creature's wagon is scummy. Scum on Creature's team would have known that Creature's lynch was almost inevitable and be hard-pressed to bus. Also, someone who didn't know Creature's meta would find it difficult to differentiate Creature's alignment-indicative lurking from other lurking players like Joda and ActionDan.
Hi chara, why do you scumread dunker?In post 1779, Chara wrote:i don't know about the toneread, but i do see what you mean regarding the comparison to other lurkers and the value in bussing. moreso the former point.In post 1773, Kiana Kaslana wrote:I don't think avoiding Creature's wagon is scummy. Scum on Creature's team would have known that Creature's lynch was almost inevitable and be hard-pressed to bus. Also, someone who didn't know Creature's meta would find it difficult to differentiate Creature's alignment-indicative lurking from other lurking players like Joda and ActionDan.
when it isn't late i might go looking for what else gave me a bad feeling. i do think that Klazam and dunker are likely not buddies, but that's for me later.
Yes, I've heard it around.In post 1777, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Where did you hear this? I don't have a completed game with you, and the only game we have in common is ongoing. Have people been talking about me?In post 1776, Kokichi Oma wrote:Not sure yet. I hear she enjoys being scum more than town, though.In post 1770, Joey_ wrote:Koki whats your read on kiana?
Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
hm okay let's have a date tomorow about this thenIn post 1782, Chara wrote:oh. i completely forgot to ask in post. Kiana, were you roleplaying or putting on a persona in Purgatory, or was that all incidental and i was seeing patterns that weren't there?
this isn't related to the game, aha.
pedit: ...i think i just explained it, and that i didn't remember what i didn't like in particular, but would go find it later, Joey.
I'm not sure what kind of persona you thought I was putting on. I believe I was posting normally? RadiantCowbells was a polarizing force in the game, but it's only later that I found out he was awful.In post 1782, Chara wrote:oh. i completely forgot to ask in post. Kiana, were you roleplaying or putting on a persona in Purgatory, or was that all incidental and i was seeing patterns that weren't there?
this isn't related to the game, aha.
pedit: ...i think i just explained it, and that i didn't remember what i didn't like in particular, but would go find it later, Joey.
Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or notIn post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Strange that you assume you will be a vig target rather than a night killIn post 1742, Klazam wrote:ME NO LIKE THIS POST
Kok, Idgaf if you want me to be vigged. at least im not being antitown like nero.
End of day scumreads if i do get vigged:
Gamma, Nero, Kok (maybe), dunk
Your RP-ing allowed you to obfuscate your so-called substance in a way that they could have easily been posted as scum as they would have as town. I saw the "substance", but I don't believe scum would have been incapable of posting that in such a manner.In post 1787, Joey_ wrote:Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or notIn post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Maybe because in previous posts Koki asked Klazoum to be shot???In post 1788, Shaziro wrote:Strange that you assume you will be a vig target rather than a night killIn post 1742, Klazam wrote:ME NO LIKE THIS POST
Kok, Idgaf if you want me to be vigged. at least im not being antitown like nero.
End of day scumreads if i do get vigged:
Gamma, Nero, Kok (maybe), dunk
why would Klazam be nightkilled? and Kokichi was talking about a vig taking down Klazam.In post 1788, Shaziro wrote:Strange that you assume you will be a vig target rather than a night kill
Hey true! But why didnt you say so, you said it felt like a poor excuse to no post substance, yet now you say that 'i did post substance that could easily come from mefia' !! not the same thing ladyIn post 1790, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Your RP-ing allowed you to obfuscate your so-called substance in a way that they could have easily been posted as scum as they would have as town. I saw the "substance", but I don't believe scum would have been incapable of posting that in such a manner.In post 1787, Joey_ wrote:Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or notIn post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Why do you not read the thread before posting stuff??In post 1793, Shaziro wrote:Why don’t people let the person a statement is directed at respond?
Read again. I said that RP-ing gives yourself an excuse to not post substance. I didn't say you didn't post substance.In post 1794, Joey_ wrote:Hey true! But why didnt you say so, you said it felt like a poor excuse to no post substance, yet now you say that 'i did post substance that could easily come from mefia' !! not the same thing ladyIn post 1790, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Your RP-ing allowed you to obfuscate your so-called substance in a way that they could have easily been posted as scum as they would have as town. I saw the "substance", but I don't believe scum would have been incapable of posting that in such a manner.In post 1787, Joey_ wrote:Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or notIn post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?