Page 72 of 233

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:43 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1774, Joey_ wrote:I have a meta game questino, why did you replace-in this game?
Because of Titus and Chara. And a bit of Varsoon.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:44 pm
by Kokichi Oma
In post 1770, Joey_ wrote:Koki whats your read on kiana?
Not sure yet. I hear she enjoys being scum more than town, though.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:46 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1776, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 1770, Joey_ wrote:Koki whats your read on kiana?
Not sure yet. I hear she enjoys being scum more than town, though.
Where did you hear this? I don't have a completed game with you, and the only game we have in common is ongoing. Have people been talking about me?

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:49 pm
by Joey_
Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:49 pm
by Chara
In post 1773, Kiana Kaslana wrote:I don't think avoiding Creature's wagon is scummy. Scum on Creature's team would have known that Creature's lynch was almost inevitable and be hard-pressed to bus. Also, someone who didn't know Creature's meta would find it difficult to differentiate Creature's alignment-indicative lurking from other lurking players like Joda and ActionDan.
i don't know about the toneread, but i do see what you mean regarding the comparison to other lurkers and the value in bussing. moreso the former point.
when it isn't late i might go looking for what else gave me a bad feeling. i do think that Klazam and dunker are likely not buddies, but that's for me later.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:50 pm
by Joey_
In post 1779, Chara wrote:
In post 1773, Kiana Kaslana wrote:I don't think avoiding Creature's wagon is scummy. Scum on Creature's team would have known that Creature's lynch was almost inevitable and be hard-pressed to bus. Also, someone who didn't know Creature's meta would find it difficult to differentiate Creature's alignment-indicative lurking from other lurking players like Joda and ActionDan.
i don't know about the toneread, but i do see what you mean regarding the comparison to other lurkers and the value in bussing. moreso the former point.
when it isn't late i might go looking for what else gave me a bad feeling. i do think that Klazam and dunker are likely not buddies, but that's for me later.
Hi chara, why do you scumread dunker?

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:51 pm
by Kokichi Oma
In post 1777, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1776, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 1770, Joey_ wrote:Koki whats your read on kiana?
Not sure yet. I hear she enjoys being scum more than town, though.
Where did you hear this? I don't have a completed game with you, and the only game we have in common is ongoing. Have people been talking about me?
Yes, I've heard it around.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:52 pm
by Chara
oh. i completely forgot to ask in post. Kiana, were you roleplaying or putting on a persona in Purgatory, or was that all incidental and i was seeing patterns that weren't there?
this isn't related to the game, aha.

pedit: ...i think i just explained it, and that i didn't remember what i didn't like in particular, but would go find it later, Joey.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:52 pm
by Kokichi Oma
We do have a game completed, by the way. I just subbed out from the Hydra with Maki. I think we both subbed out of that one actually.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:54 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:54 pm
by Joey_
In post 1782, Chara wrote:oh. i completely forgot to ask in post. Kiana, were you roleplaying or putting on a persona in Purgatory, or was that all incidental and i was seeing patterns that weren't there?
this isn't related to the game, aha.

pedit: ...i think i just explained it, and that i didn't remember what i didn't like in particular, but would go find it later, Joey.
hm okay let's have a date tomorow about this then

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:56 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1782, Chara wrote:oh. i completely forgot to ask in post. Kiana, were you roleplaying or putting on a persona in Purgatory, or was that all incidental and i was seeing patterns that weren't there?
this isn't related to the game, aha.

pedit: ...i think i just explained it, and that i didn't remember what i didn't like in particular, but would go find it later, Joey.
I'm not sure what kind of persona you thought I was putting on. I believe I was posting normally? RadiantCowbells was a polarizing force in the game, but it's only later that I found out he was awful.

You can take a look at my other completed game "Be Yourself Mafia", Kokichi was in it, it's the one he's talking about above. I played with Maki there too.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:56 pm
by Joey_
In post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.
Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or not

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:57 pm
by Shaziro
In post 1742, Klazam wrote:
In post 1734, Dunkerdoodles wrote:yeah ok
dont blame me if this flips town
VOTE: creature
ME NO LIKE THIS POST

Kok, Idgaf if you want me to be vigged. at least im not being antitown like nero.

End of day scumreads if i do get vigged:

Gamma, Nero, Kok (maybe), dunk
Strange that you assume you will be a vig target rather than a night kill

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:58 pm
by Chara
joey: i'll clear my schedule. <3

pedit: thanks for the answer, Kiana. i may check that out, but your answer is enough for my curiousity.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:58 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1787, Joey_ wrote:
In post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.
Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or not
Your RP-ing allowed you to obfuscate your so-called substance in a way that they could have easily been posted as scum as they would have as town. I saw the "substance", but I don't believe scum would have been incapable of posting that in such a manner.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:58 pm
by Joey_
In post 1788, Shaziro wrote:
In post 1742, Klazam wrote:
In post 1734, Dunkerdoodles wrote:yeah ok
dont blame me if this flips town
VOTE: creature
ME NO LIKE THIS POST

Kok, Idgaf if you want me to be vigged. at least im not being antitown like nero.

End of day scumreads if i do get vigged:

Gamma, Nero, Kok (maybe), dunk
Strange that you assume you will be a vig target rather than a night kill
Maybe because in previous posts Koki asked Klazoum to be shot???

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:58 pm
by Chara
In post 1788, Shaziro wrote:Strange that you assume you will be a vig target rather than a night kill
why would Klazam be nightkilled? and Kokichi was talking about a vig taking down Klazam.

pedit: haha.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:59 pm
by Shaziro
Why don’t people let the person a statement is directed at respond?

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:59 pm
by Joey_
In post 1790, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1787, Joey_ wrote:
In post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.
Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or not
Your RP-ing allowed you to obfuscate your so-called substance in a way that they could have easily been posted as scum as they would have as town. I saw the "substance", but I don't believe scum would have been incapable of posting that in such a manner.
Hey true! But why didnt you say so, you said it felt like a poor excuse to no post substance, yet now you say that 'i did post substance that could easily come from mefia' !! not the same thing lady

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:00 pm
by Shaziro
Like, fucking hell. I was hoping to get a read off a response to that.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:00 pm
by Joey_
In post 1793, Shaziro wrote:Why don’t people let the person a statement is directed at respond?
Why do you not read the thread before posting stuff??

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:01 pm
by Joey_
The premisse of your question was stupido, anything you wouldve got from it (correct or not on klazoum's alignement) wouldnt have been because of your question but because of a coinflip

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:01 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1794, Joey_ wrote:
In post 1790, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1787, Joey_ wrote:
In post 1784, Kiana Kaslana wrote:
In post 1778, Joey_ wrote:Hm, what do you think is inherently anti-town/scummy about my early RP ?
Your early RP allowed you to look funny and likeable while giving yourself an excuse to not post anything of substance. That was pretty scummy, though I thought you were kind of funny.
Yea im a funny dude but that was the wrong answer. My posts had substance, i pushed my agenda, outed reads, scumhunted, gave my impressions about pushes and so on. I wouldve understood if you thought that the format of RP was opaque (and it was), if anything thats the only scummy thing about RPing is that is keeps ppl from reading you correctly. But i had plenty of substance. We will see tomorow if i wanna rope you or not
Your RP-ing allowed you to obfuscate your so-called substance in a way that they could have easily been posted as scum as they would have as town. I saw the "substance", but I don't believe scum would have been incapable of posting that in such a manner.
Hey true! But why didnt you say so, you said it felt like a poor excuse to no post substance, yet now you say that 'i did post substance that could easily come from mefia' !! not the same thing lady
Read again. I said that RP-ing gives yourself an excuse to not post substance. I didn't say you didn't post substance. :roll:

It's like a "Get out of Jail Free Ticket", which is a very scummy ticket.

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:02 pm
by Kiana Kaslana
Anyway, although I have played Monopoly, I haven't played Civ, the game that this mafia game is based on, and so I have entirely no flavor knowledge. I have no idea what's going on with regard to the Delegates and Resolutions and stuff. I'll be relying on my townreads to advice me on my best course of action.