In post 47, Mister Rogers wrote:We are both accusing ourselves opf the same thing, just in different words. :shrug:
What
Frick no
You are accusing me of making stuff up about your play motivation
I’m saying you’re posts are phrased in such a way as to make me look shitty
Not the same thing
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
I have reread them.
Multiple times.
And if I’m “objectively” defending Hugo, then you are “objectively” shading me.
Except it’s not objective. You’re posts are worded to shade me.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 53, Mister Rogers wrote:And this is the basic misunderstanding that drives your attack.
That’s not a misunderstanding
They are not the same thing
Because I’m not fricking making stuff up like you are accusing me of doing
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 54, Inferno390 wrote:I have reread them.
Multiple times.
And if I’m “objectively” defending Hugo, then you are “objectively” shading me.
Except it’s not objective. You’re posts are worded to shade me.
In post 55, Mister Rogers wrote:Unless you want to quote your scum meta where you only do this as scum.
Haha
Sucks for you
I don’t have a scum meta
Also I have no idea what this post is supposed to mean
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 54, Inferno390 wrote:I have reread them.
Multiple times.
And if I’m “objectively” defending Hugo, then you are “objectively” shading me.
Except it’s not objective. You’re posts are worded to shade me.
Again, we are both saying the same thing here.
No we are not. How is this in an indication in any way of us saying the same thing?
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
I mean heck
If you weren’t shading me in the first place, why didn’t you say that in response to 23 instead of this?
You are more or less saying you are shading me for “defending” Hugo because you want him to defend himself.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 54, Inferno390 wrote:I have reread them.
Multiple times.
And if I’m “objectively” defending Hugo, then you are “objectively” shading me.
Except it’s not objective. You’re posts are worded to shade me.
Again, we are both saying the same thing here.
No we are not. How is this in an indication in any way of us saying the same thing?
We both queried each other for REASONS. We both agree that those REASONS are potentially scummy. The only difference is you have gone one step further and objectively fabricated a motive concerning defending, where if you actually read all of my posts concerning RVS flow, it should be quite clear what I mean and how I mean it.
How can I not read your posts as a whole when I’m literally in a 1v1 with you.
That makes zero sense.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 49, xx2008 wrote:Hello guys! This is my first game on the site, and I'm quite excited about it.
VOTE: Mister Rogers
Welcome to the game! It is definitely a tonne of fun!
1) What does "L-3" mean to you?
2) Any particular reason for your vote?
3) Where else have you played Mafia?
1. "L-3" means it takes three more votes against a player to lynch them.
2. Not really, just started the game, where everyone is randomly voting.
3. Just a couple games IRL.
Look, you can't erase the fact that in my notes, you are potentially connected to Hugo here. Is this some kind of massive huge case on both of you that is iron clad evidence etc? No, of course not but if you take the time to understand what I mean by RVS flow and subtle scum hunting, you will clearly see that the timing of your query interfered with a possible read. Is it huge or massive? No but is it noteworthy? Of course and you can't erase it and neither will I, even if you get me lynched over it.
In post 49, xx2008 wrote:Hello guys! This is my first game on the site, and I'm quite excited about it.
VOTE: Mister Rogers
Welcome to the game! It is definitely a tonne of fun!
1) What does "L-3" mean to you?
2) Any particular reason for your vote?
3) Where else have you played Mafia?
1. "L-3" means it takes three more votes against a player to lynch them.
2. Not really, just started the game, where everyone is randomly voting.
3. Just a couple games IRL.
Kewl! Real life play is amazing huh?
So, what is the quality of your vote at this point? Just RVS huh? You didn't notice that I was at L=3?
In post 65, Mister Rogers wrote:Look, you can't erase the fact that in my notes, you are potentially connected to Hugo here. Is this some kind of massive huge case on both of you that is iron clad evidence etc? No, of course not but if you take the time to understand what I mean by RVS flow and subtle scum hunting, you will clearly see that the timing of your query interfered with a possible read. Is it huge or massive? No but is it noteworthy? Of course and you can't erase it and neither will I, even if you get me lynched over it.
Okay
But this does not necessitate the huge amounts of shade you’ve thrown at me in the last three pages
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Hey look, if "shading" was a scum claim, nobody would be able to play or scumhunt. I QUERY, you QUERY, we all do. Otherwise how can we strengthen our reads?
In post 69, Mister Rogers wrote:Hey, XX, while you are at it, do you mind reading the thread and commenting on posts thus far?
I forgot to read the second page.
Now that I've read it, you appear to be constantly attacking inferno, which I agree that this shading makes you seem scummy.
In post 71, Mister Rogers wrote:Hey look, if "shading" was a scum claim, nobody would be able to play or scumhunt. I QUERY, you QUERY, we all do. Otherwise how can we strengthen our reads?
Constantly going after one player during RVS stage raises suspicions. Inferno doesn't look scummy to me. This is RVS so I guess people all make mistakes.
"Won't you be my neighbor?"