Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:16 am
Only if you're not actually an activator. So no.In post 8619, DrewVa wrote:Is there any conceivable way you are both town that doesn't require mod error or a bastard game lol?
VOTE: BEF
VOTE: BEF
Only if you're not actually an activator. So no.In post 8619, DrewVa wrote:Is there any conceivable way you are both town that doesn't require mod error or a bastard game lol?
Nope. This would mean that stickyfruit would have transferred itself to profii's target N1. Penguin.In post 8624, RCEnigma wrote:I think Profiis stickyfruit comment was glossed over. In the rolecard it is implied the stickyfruit has an ability. If the stickyfruit ability transfers itself to the receivers target then it isn't necessarily a cross claim.
Because I would be actively initiating a 1v1 with my hard townread which is ?????In post 8621, Thanos wrote:No, I mean if you didn't retract it Una would still be hard to lynch.
Why would hard townreading Una have anything to do with that?
Retracting the claim was beneficial for scum!you; cause not doing so would get you killed.
In which case shouldn't bef know what it is and therefore be lying by omission?In post 8624, RCEnigma wrote:I think Profiis stickyfruit comment was glossed over. In the rolecard it is implied the stickyfruit has an ability. If the stickyfruit ability transfers itself to the receivers target then it isn't necessarily a cross claim.
In post 8623, Jingle wrote:A town you flip neccessarily means profii is scum. A town profii flip necessarily means you are scum. Thus, dichotomy.In post 8617, BrightEyedFish wrote:How would a town!me flip help the rest solve the problems with the fruit. Because you will have the exact same info you have now--just one less town.
Hmm you're right.In post 8627, Jingle wrote:Nope. This would mean that stickyfruit would have transferred itself to profii's target N1. Penguin.In post 8624, RCEnigma wrote:I think Profiis stickyfruit comment was glossed over. In the rolecard it is implied the stickyfruit has an ability. If the stickyfruit ability transfers itself to the receivers target then it isn't necessarily a cross claim.
Why would Bef know what it is?In post 8629, DrewVa wrote:In which case shouldn't bef know what it is and therefore be lying by omission?In post 8624, RCEnigma wrote:I think Profiis stickyfruit comment was glossed over. In the rolecard it is implied the stickyfruit has an ability. If the stickyfruit ability transfers itself to the receivers target then it isn't necessarily a cross claim.
-d
I feel we're misunderstanding each other.In post 8628, RCEnigma wrote:Because I would be actively initiating a 1v1 with my hard townread which is ?????
I'm just going to assume you think I'm bad scum and move on.
If the dichotomy is because one of them lied about their role, then why BEF? His SFV role is confirmed, no?
I think creature loud makes or breaks thisIn post 8622, profii wrote:I believe Una confirmed receiving the ascetic, he certainly queried me after the fact so I took it that it worked - but I'll let him 100% confirmIn post 8610, DrewVa wrote:Because we need to sort profii/bef nonsense and us being in a loyal hood is the only proof of profii's variant role being realIn post 8606, RCEnigma wrote:Why claim at all then?
-d
Anything that incriminates Penguin incriminates drewva.In post 8633, Jingle wrote:Oh yeah. Creature confirmation and profii townflip incriminates Penguin. BEF scumflip incriminates one of the day 1 winners.
Wouldn't that be in his role card?In post 8632, RCEnigma wrote:Why would Bef know what it is?In post 8629, DrewVa wrote:In which case shouldn't bef know what it is and therefore be lying by omission?In post 8624, RCEnigma wrote:I think Profiis stickyfruit comment was glossed over. In the rolecard it is implied the stickyfruit has an ability. If the stickyfruit ability transfers itself to the receivers target then it isn't necessarily a cross claim.
-d
Because one of you is lying about night action resolution. For TLK to have recieved sticky fruit N2, profii has to have sent TLK sticky fruit N2 or you have to have sent TLK sticky fruit N2. There is no potential redirection role.In post 8630, BrightEyedFish wrote:How? I have no loyal modifiers or anything. I could have given the fruit to town or scum profii.
Nope. For drewva to be incriminated Penguin has to necessarily be telling the truth. It is possible that Penguin isn't actually loyal. It certainly implies that DrewVa would be scum, but in no way confirms it.In post 8637, RCEnigma wrote:Anything that incriminates Penguin incriminates drewva.
+1In post 8636, DrewVa wrote:I think creature loud makes or breaks this
If creature didn't get loud then ss might have jailed you n2 and bef could have fruited tlk
-d
Elsewhere yeah you should know right now thanosIn post 8645, Thanos wrote:Creature received loud and targeted someone, they should be able to verify right?
I agree at least one D1 winner is scum but how does my scum flip confirm that?In post 8633, Jingle wrote:Oh yeah. Creature confirmation and profii townflip incriminates Penguin. BEF scumflip incriminates one of the day 1 winners.