Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 8:38 am
yeah dang i thought i had you so badIn post 398, Donempire wrote:Gg clem
That castle throw made me feel bad though lets play sometime again
late game is my weakness
yeah dang i thought i had you so badIn post 398, Donempire wrote:Gg clem
That castle throw made me feel bad though lets play sometime again
The mod confirmed to only me and Clem and Michael is scum.
There’s a simple reason and it’s that OK and I have already found scum, and you two aren’t lynching me. So they literally can’t back down on that stance. They’re locked in. One pair is stupid and one is scum.In post 397, Michael Scott wrote:So @Bambi and @Clemency, do either of you have a trulylegitimateargument for why town shouldn't strive to have that 5:3 town:scum ratio on day two rather than a 4:3 town:scum ratio via lynching a claimed VT today rather than a claimed town lover pair?
Both of you have been shading our slot all game long for extremely bad reasons, and yet neither of you have made anintelligentargument as to why lynching a claimed town lover pair over a claimed VT is the optimal strategy that gives the town the greatest chance of winning the game on day two in the event that the day one lynch is a mislynch.
There is simply no logical reason to fight the strategy of lynching within the claimed VT pool as town.
- Volxen (Date Mike)
Said Michael's third partner.In post 402, LolWagons wrote:There’s a simple reason and it’s that OK and I have already found scum, and you two aren’t lynching me. So they literally can’t back down on that stance. They’re locked in. One pair is stupid and one is scum.In post 397, Michael Scott wrote:So @Bambi and @Clemency, do either of you have a trulylegitimateargument for why town shouldn't strive to have that 5:3 town:scum ratio on day two rather than a 4:3 town:scum ratio via lynching a claimed VT today rather than a claimed town lover pair?
Both of you have been shading our slot all game long for extremely bad reasons, and yet neither of you have made anintelligentargument as to why lynching a claimed town lover pair over a claimed VT is the optimal strategy that gives the town the greatest chance of winning the game on day two in the event that the day one lynch is a mislynch.
There is simply no logical reason to fight the strategy of lynching within the claimed VT pool as town.
- Volxen (Date Mike)
Tag me in coach. I can beat em, let me at em.In post 411, Clemency wrote:if bambs is scum i can beat her
What are you talking about? The two lovers in a pair don't have to vote the same way, and their votes aren't tied to each other. So if the day two town:scum ratio is 5:3 and the five townies are {town lover A, town lover B}, {town lover C, town lover D}, {VT E}, and A votes with scum but B,C, D, and E all correctly vote for scum FIRST, then town still wins in spite of the fact that A voted for a fellow townie. This scenario is possible with a 5:3 ratio but not with a 4:3 ratio.In post 388, Bambi Jay wrote:The lovers votes come in pairs bro. If we lynch a vt it's still basically the same thing as 3:4.
What happened to you being the "necessary sacrifice"? Fricken weird that that disappeared.
Clearly you don't want to lynch the pairs so I get to be scummy af now without repercussions: if we don't go through this plan and kill YOU, then I will only vote you tommorow. If Clem also agrees, well look where you are.
NOPEIn post 416, Bambi Jay wrote:Srsly tho I got family to hang out with, lets kill Michael and be on our merry way.
Ruby get back on Michael. Dont fall for their lies.
You don’t even to have to solve the damn pairs I’ve solved the VTs alreadyIn post 417, Ruby Red wrote:i have no idea who's deepwolfing me right now and i'm not voting either one of them until i figure it out
Well that buffer is useless anyway since me and Clem are voting you tommorow, and clearly 1 of us is town in your eyes.In post 415, Michael Scott wrote:What are you talking about? The two lovers in a pair don't have to vote the same way, and their votes aren't tied to each other. So if the day two town:scum ratio is 5:3 and the five townies are {town lover A, town lover B}, {town lover C, town lover D}, {VT E}, and A votes with scum but B,C, D, and E all correctly vote for scum FIRST, then town still wins in spite of the fact that A voted for a fellow townie. This scenario is possible with a 5:3 ratio but not with a 4:3 ratio.In post 388, Bambi Jay wrote:The lovers votes come in pairs bro. If we lynch a vt it's still basically the same thing as 3:4.
What happened to you being the "necessary sacrifice"? Fricken weird that that disappeared.
Clearly you don't want to lynch the pairs so I get to be scummy af now without repercussions: if we don't go through this plan and kill YOU, then I will only vote you tommorow. If Clem also agrees, well look where you are.
So yes, the 5:3 ratio does make a difference, and it clearly favors the town. You want to take away that advantage by sending us into day two with a 4:3 ratio, which doesn't give the town that buffer of still being able to win if one townie has bad reads and votes with scum.
- Volxen (Date Mike)
Yeah, the scum team Michael/Lolwagon/McQueen are lynching the other 2 vts. So smart. Such scum. Much wow.In post 420, LolWagons wrote:You don’t even to have to solve the damn pairs I’ve solved the VTs alreadyIn post 417, Ruby Red wrote:i have no idea who's deepwolfing me right now and i'm not voting either one of them until i figure it out