Open 747: Our Love Must Remain Hidden (Game Over)

Eragon · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:43 pm

In post 111, PenguinPower wrote:Why do you scum read Ruby? Seems like she's doing something you don't agree with, but why is it scum indicative?

because it shows a lack of incentive to solve and a laziness that doesnt come from town.

By "random lynching" you prove that you have no motivation to actually scumhunt, and that you'd rather just not play the game and let RNG decide the lynch(not a towny thought)

Even if you are wrong on a lynch, and it flips town, thats still better than a random lynch.

there is absolutely no town motivation to "trust RNG"

and before you ask what the scum motivation is:

Scum can just try to push the plan to use RNG, and if it works, and the person flips town, then they can just say like "oh hey its not my fault its just RNG" and get 0 suspicion off the lynch.

Eragon · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:44 pm

In post 112, Ruby Red wrote:
In post 108, glowball wrote:Why sign up to play a game of mafia and not want to actually hunt scum?

I... I... I just don't understand.

Count me out of that if you're looking for votes. I'm satisfied with Eragon for now.
who said i don't want to hunt scum

In post 110, Robert2424 wrote:Actually I don't like it.

Vote Ruby Red

Sounds more lazy then anything. I didn't sign up to play a numbers game, and allow a machine to tell me what to do. I'd rather scum read and lynch that person. Otherwise, we should play some number game instead of Mafia.
why does that make me scum

you imply you dont want to scumhunt when you decide to follow RNG and pushing an idea revolving around chance instead of actually playing the game you signed up for

PenguinPower · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:44 pm

Ruby is a strong town player so you're going to do more than insult her intelligence to accomplish anything...

What is it that you are trying to accomplish?

p-edit

That question was not directed at you - which should have been obvious because I quoted who it was directed towards. I'm not sure why you feel qualified to answer that question.

PenguinPower · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:45 pm

ok..tbf, I didn't quote it, but it was the next post after who it was direct towards.

Ruby Red · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:48 pm

In post 125, Eragon wrote:because it shows a lack of incentive to solve and a laziness that doesnt come from town.

By "random lynching" you prove that you have no motivation to actually scumhunt, and that you'd rather just not play the game and let RNG decide the lynch(not a towny thought)

yeah dude, wow

i'm so lazy as scum that instead of not posting, or naked voting someone, or continuing to sheep penguinpower, or

not posting and just letting the game stagnate

i decided to describe to everyone publicly my plan to vote someone randomly

:thonking:

PenguinPower · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:50 pm

wow thonking imo

Ruby Red · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:50 pm

let me ask you a very simple, very straightforward question:

why do you think i voted someone using a literal random number generator and then made a show of doing so?

Eragon · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:53 pm

In post 127, PenguinPower wrote:Ruby is a strong town player so you're going to do more than insult her intelligence to accomplish anything...

What is it that you are trying to accomplish?

p-edit

That question was not directed at you - which should have been obvious because I quoted who it was directed towards. I'm not sure why you feel qualified to answer that question.

if shes a strong town player why doesnt she show it and actually play the game.

im stating it how i see it.

playing the game of RNG should literally never happen in a game.

i was responding to that post because i scumread ruby, and felt like it explaining it.

why dont i respond to that post?

PenguinPower · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:55 pm

In post 132, Eragon wrote:why dont i respond to that post?

Because it was directed at a specific individual in the hopes that said individual would answer it without outside influence.

Thought that was obvious given that it was specifically directed at an individual who made a statement.

Eragon · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:56 pm

In post 129, Ruby Red wrote:
In post 125, Eragon wrote:because it shows a lack of incentive to solve and a laziness that doesnt come from town.

By "random lynching" you prove that you have no motivation to actually scumhunt, and that you'd rather just not play the game and let RNG decide the lynch(not a towny thought)
yeah dude, wow

i'm so lazy as scum that instead of not posting, or naked voting someone, or continuing to sheep penguinpower, or
not posting and just letting the game stagnate

i decided to describe to everyone publicly my plan to vote someone randomly

:thonking:

who says the game would stagnate?

also if you are actually "a strong player" you would know that naked voting would be seen as wolfy, continuing to sheep and never having original thoughts on your own is wolfy, and also you put not posting twice, but not posting gets you replaced so :shrug:

so you come up with an "idea" of "RNG'ing" a lynch to push a mislynch without getting scumread for pushing town

Eragon · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:56 pm

In post 133, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 132, Eragon wrote:why dont i respond to that post?
Because it was directed at a specific individual in the hopes that said individual would answer it without outside influence.

Thought that was obvious given that it was specifically directed at an individual who made a statement.

how different would "outside influence" be if i made that post not quoting it?

no different.

exactly.

Eragon · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:58 pm

In post 131, Ruby Red wrote:let me ask you a very simple, very straightforward question:

why do you think i voted someone using a literal random number generator and then made a show of doing so?

because if someone pushed you on it, then you could say this ^, and say that it was just "a joke" and "i made a show of it so its not scummy" and instead of just naked voting or doing nothing, both wolfy options, you decide to do something that you can easily back out of.

and if people actually somehow accept like(like S_S) it might be an easy mislynch that you dont have to work for, and doesnt give you scumcred for a townflip

Eragon · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:58 pm

VOTE: Ruby

PenguinPower · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:59 pm

But you did quote it. And you did answer it.

How about don't do either since it wasn't directed toward you. K? Fun.

p-edit

Holy...

Ruby Red · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:00 pm

ah yes. i am truly unable to play scum in any way that other than one that would get me mislynched. thus i came up with this dastardly plan.

Eragon · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:00 pm

In post 138, PenguinPower wrote:But you did quote it. And you did answer it.

How about don't do either since it wasn't directed toward you. K? Fun.

p-edit

Holy...

so i cant express my reads on Ruby?

Even.
Fricking.
Better.

PenguinPower · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:01 pm

Kinda want to vote Eragon but worried he is mislynch bait.

PenguinPower · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:01 pm

In post 140, Eragon wrote:so i cant express my reads on Ruby?

Expressing your read on Ruby does not require to you to quote or answer my question to another player directly.

Eragon · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:02 pm

In post 142, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 140, Eragon wrote:so i cant express my reads on Ruby?
Expressing your read on Ruby does not require to you to quote or answer my question to another player directly.

how different would "outside influence" be if i made that post not quoting it?

no different.

exactly.

PenguinPower · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:04 pm

A lot, since you wouldn't be directly answering a specifically phrased question.

Eragon · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:05 pm

In post 144, PenguinPower wrote:A lot, since you wouldn't be directly answering a specifically phrased question.

so the only reason it could ever influence someone else is because there is a post that is quoted?

No one

ever

reads the thread and other people's posts when they respond to things?

PenguinPower · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:06 pm

VOTE: Eragon

Can we RNG Eragon?

Eragon · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:08 pm

im gonna take a break from this shithole for a while, ill be back when you find some sense

PenguinPower · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:14 pm

Sure, take a break. If you're town, come back and learn how to work with other people.

glowball · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:16 pm

In post 123, Eragon wrote:
In post 108, glowball wrote:Why sign up to play a game of mafia and not want to actually hunt scum?

I... I... I just don't understand.

Count me out of that if you're looking for votes. I'm satisfied with Eragon for now.
which you still havent explained a scrap of.

p-edit: sorry

I explained in my initial post why I was voting you. Read.

At this point: You've done nothing but reinforce my read. Seemed like you were starting to flail. I'd much rather get you lynched especially because the use of language is insulting and uncalled for.