Okay, yeah it was this progression on Ico and JM that I thought was townie. It's not great analysis, but I don't think it's scummy. I think you can see spontaneous read, a read that isn't being embellished even when it's questioned.
The rest of the convo with brass was the second bit I liked. The whole I'm not going to fight you because you're town thing rings townie to me. The apology for not having more in lieu of making literally anything up seems more likely from town than from scum. This is where my read came from
Spoiler:
In post 215, rosterfoster wrote:Iconeum scum reads both me and Jungle (equally?) but tries to push for my lynch when there's a hefty wagon on Jungle.
In post 219, rosterfoster wrote:Also I know you wont believe me but I was literally going to vote Jungle before I got Ninja'd by the post from Draco. I slightly changed the content to make it fit the convo.
In post 220, brassherald wrote:So, your case is that iconeum is scum for protecting Jungle and Jungle is scum because he's being protected by Iconeum?
In post 221, rosterfoster wrote:He's trying to start a counterwagon to stop the buddy from being lynched (scum getting lynched D1 would be tough in this game I think), while still scumreading the buddy so that if the buddy flips he stays kind of town.
In post 222, brassherald wrote:Okay, let's say we flip one of them, and they end up town. Is there still a reason to scum read the other?
In post 225, rosterfoster wrote:I find it really hard to get anything from discussions about meta when I don’t really know the meta of the people involved.
In post 225, rosterfoster wrote:I find it really hard to get anything from discussions about meta when I don’t really know the meta of the people involved.
Sorry.
The talk has not been entirely about meta, though. And even if it was, you should be able to form some opinion from the talk, imo.
Rooster's read on vedith doesn't make sense to me. It sounds like "I town read him twice before for bad reasons and it worked so I'm going for three straight" It doesn't seem like a great way to sort Vedith, imo, but I gotta assume it's a real thing because unless it's vedith + roster, vedith would probably call him out on it.
@roster Was one of the games Gators? Because I don't remember you doing this in Gators.
And then I'm also not sure what I think about roster presenting as frustrated that vedith won't engage with him and then going directly into a defense of that same play as a reason to town read vedith. Part of me wants to call it a fake for being awkward, and part of me can't figure out why scum!roster would fake it.
I think you Rooster and Mary Poppins are town.
I think Starwing might be scum
And the rest I don't care if we lynch wrong because they aren't town reads.
Vedith doesn’t really give townie feelings when held in this mood.
Draco/URAP - I’m on about a mini and large normal we played. Vedith was town in both and was playing to this mood. I have also seen Vedith play strongly, as in Gators. Since (unless ongoing games) I’ve not seen scum Vedith it’s hard to know whether there’s a clear meta thing. I suspect that Vedith can do both as either alignment so it’s not really AI and he could well be playing like this to pocket me.
Tl;Dr I don’t have a clue, but I don’t think Vedith is readable from his style and it’s not really a reason to push.
In post 756, Draco Lucky wrote:@starwing what do you think about Roster transitioning from frustration to pushing his vedith town read there?
-U2
I didn't exactly think he was frustrated, but pushing the Vedith town read is the towniest thing he's done all day.
There's no scum motivation for it, unless Vedith is partners with him.
The last post is confusing, and I don't know what he says about Vedith there.
Draco asks good questions which is why I initially town read him.