What happened? Were youe xpecting Korts to attack you thast why you attacked him first? And now that he supports my lynch you're going to reread?
Die please.
Not true. Didnt you just say that Korts wasn't pushing your lynch?destructor wrote:If anyone's being opportunistic, it's you. How can you even begin to suggest I'm exploiting this situation considering the fact that there are already three players who are willing to vote for me? You started this day encouraging Korts to finish his read and get me lynched. Why did you wait this long to vote for me if you were so sure then?
What do you think Im doing?destructor wrote:And Ihavebeen posting my case on BM butno onehas responded to it. I've asked you and k7 to look at BM's play in the last two days and neither have apparently done so. I don't see why I should have to do more than that.Youare all supposed to be scum-hunting too.
I didn't. I was arguing that your reaction was. Your reasoning was "opportunism". My response is that there's nothing opportunistic about reconsidering your read. Sound fair? Regarding the rest of your case, see below.populartajo wrote:Minimizing my case against you to an OMGUS is just ridiculous.
And I replied to these every time. Since you rarely responded, I (and the other players) don't know what you thought about my replies.pop wrote:Ive thought you're scum since yesterday and Ive explained why.
Obviously I think it's one of Korts or you.pop wrote:Kay destructor then who's scum?
My feelings on BM11..destructor wrote:And Ihavebeen posting my case on BM butno onehas responded to it. I've asked you and k7 to look at BM's play in the last two days and neither have apparently done so. I don't see why I should have to do more than that.Youare all supposed to be scum-hunting too.
I agree with you that you only expressed healthy suspicion, but you stating that your behaviour points against you being scum is WIFOM; being opportunistic and jumping on pop when I expressed suspicion of him wouldn've been a sure-fire way of you winning as scum at all, because you'd still have k7 to convince that you're not being opportunistic and pop is worth lynching.destructor wrote: Look at my play today, if I'd have flipped immediately after Korts said he suspected you I'd understand you calling me opportunistic. But I went out of my way, before you even replied, to say that I thought you weren't likely to be scum. Why would I do that if I was planning to flip later? And Ihaven'teven flipped, which what makes your reaction ridiculous. All I've said is that I'm reconsidering my read of you, which is a shitload different from saying I think you're scum. You're reaction feel like a whole load of overstated OMGUS given that you're calling me reconsidering things opportunistic, which is FAR from the case. What I posted was completely reasonable.
destructor wrote:Why was BM asking me to explain why I thought camn was town? Why would he suggest my refusal to explain it was scummy? Why didn't he push ckd's lynch?
Haha, thanks. I don't know why BM did some things, either. My best guess would be that, considering his posting frequency at that time, he only had the spare time to skim, and couldn't provide a deeper contribution.populartajo wrote:I'll let Korts answer that.
Considering the town had TWO Trackers and TWO Doctors, I don't think two Roleblockers are out of the question at all.Korts wrote:k7's plan sounds pretty good, though. I'm trying to find plotholes in it, but the only one that springs to mind is if the scum have a second RB, which I think would be overpowered for them. A scum doctor wouldn't be unreasonable, but two blocks is just too much.
Ive only been a mafia roleblocker once, and i wasnt alowwed to roleblock and kill on the same night. has anyone played in a game where the mafia rolebloacker could block and kill at the same time?destructor wrote:Considering the town had TWO Trackers and TWO Doctors, I don't think two Roleblockers are out of the question at all.Korts wrote:k7's plan sounds pretty good, though. I'm trying to find plotholes in it, but the only one that springs to mind is if the scum have a second RB, which I think would be overpowered for them. A scum doctor wouldn't be unreasonable, but two blocks is just too much.
k7's plan is only good if pop is town. Why are you suddenly convinced?
Pretty much what I was thinking. Also the game got a little bored when you and camn started to fill it with diverse acusations.I don't know why BM did some things, either. My best guess would be that, considering his posting frequency at that time, he only had the spare time to skim, and couldn't provide a deeper contribution.
populartajo wrote:Also, can anyone explain me why are we bandwagoning CKD?
Note both CKD and Anatole flipped scum..curiouskarmadog wrote:QFT, and notedpopulartajo wrote:I dont like this kind of jokes, for the record.Anatole wrote:How are my nice townie friends doing?
About the reread, same here, later today I'll have some time to sit down and read and think. About the so-called slip, why is it damning that I believed pop's claim? The night choices make sense enough to me not to suspect him anymore.destructor wrote:Iwilldo that reread, but Korts' slip on you is looking damning to me. The whole point is that he was supposed to suspect you above all others, yet seems to forget this entirely when agreeing with k7.
His claim, which scum could fake, makes you disregard how you found hisKorts wrote:About the so-called slip, why is it damning that I believed pop's claim? The night choices make sense enough to me not to suspect him anymore.