In post 4469, Boonskiies wrote:
I don’t like any of these wagons but the one I hate the least is probably RCE. I really hate feeling this unconfident on D2.
So, unless someone can make a more compelling case? \_0_/
In post 4469, Boonskiies wrote:
Cool let's virtual hug this out and talk about the actual lynch <3In post 4472, Venus and Mars wrote:I didn’t intentionally do that and I’ve already explained that you misinterpreted my post. All I asked and a fair question, was iirc, how is my play remotely different from TBoNTB, because I’m not seeing it.In post 4464, The Fonz wrote:You're just wrong! Literally everyone has hundreds of biases, some they're aware of, some they're not! And we try to compensate as best we can. Like, I know I'm biased toward chkflip because he's a good guy and I enjoy his company. I worry I'm biased towards Auro, just because he's nice and rational and doesn't upset me. Having these biases doesn't make you terrible, it makes you human!In post 4457, Venus and Mars wrote:That’s why I called it a horrible read. You suggesting I tr Titus based not on my actually being competent at mafia but based on you thinking my reads are based on how I feel about people outside of the game. It was this and THIS specifically that I reacted so strongly against because that is 100% not the case and only a horrible mafia player would make reads based on how they feel about people irl.
And I'm probably biased against you because you stress me out to a level that is actually physically unpleasant. I got a poor night's sleep Monday night largely because of how amped up I was as a result of how you spoke to me.
I feel constantly torn between calling you out for hurting me, and knowing that you yourself are vulnerable and that your response is either that you'll internalise it and that'll hurt you, or your response will escalate and hurt me worse. I feel like you are unusually unable to distinguish between normal criticism of your play based on imperfect information, and personal attacks. It feels like everything you think is a normal part of criticising other people's play is like a red rag to a bull to me and chkflip, whilst what we think is well within the bounds of civility seems to set you off. In particular, you seem to have a high bar for how offensive you feel you are allowed to be about other people's level of skill, intelligence, or degree of empathy. You seem to have quite a low one for taking offense at anyone suggesting emotion is affecting your play. Me and Chk, the opposite.
This is why I try to read you based on your stated reads on other people, and not directly attack you until I am convinced I want to lynch you. I don't think I misinterpreted your early play. "Biting my head off" is obviously figurative, but it felt like an extremely aggressive overreaction. That was very much unacceptable to me.
Chk is probably driving me to drink and perhaps that’s spilling over onto you? If so, I’m sorry because I honestly do like you and think you’re a really good guy.
I really really don’t want to be fighting with you like this. Chk, I think just flat out hates me, so I won’t even bother with him.
Yes, I am super stressed and I already explained why at the beginning of the game and I think it’s cruel of Chk to be deliberately ignoring that.
I am truly sorry if I upset you and made you uncomfortable and/or hurt your feelings in any way. I legit have nothing but the highest regard for you as a human being, based off what little I know of you from playing two mafia games with you.
<3In post 4478, The Fonz wrote:Cool let's virtual hug this out and talk about the actual lynch <3In post 4472, Venus and Mars wrote:I didn’t intentionally do that and I’ve already explained that you misinterpreted my post. All I asked and a fair question, was iirc, how is my play remotely different from TBoNTB, because I’m not seeing it.In post 4464, The Fonz wrote:You're just wrong! Literally everyone has hundreds of biases, some they're aware of, some they're not! And we try to compensate as best we can. Like, I know I'm biased toward chkflip because he's a good guy and I enjoy his company. I worry I'm biased towards Auro, just because he's nice and rational and doesn't upset me. Having these biases doesn't make you terrible, it makes you human!In post 4457, Venus and Mars wrote:That’s why I called it a horrible read. You suggesting I tr Titus based not on my actually being competent at mafia but based on you thinking my reads are based on how I feel about people outside of the game. It was this and THIS specifically that I reacted so strongly against because that is 100% not the case and only a horrible mafia player would make reads based on how they feel about people irl.
And I'm probably biased against you because you stress me out to a level that is actually physically unpleasant. I got a poor night's sleep Monday night largely because of how amped up I was as a result of how you spoke to me.
I feel constantly torn between calling you out for hurting me, and knowing that you yourself are vulnerable and that your response is either that you'll internalise it and that'll hurt you, or your response will escalate and hurt me worse. I feel like you are unusually unable to distinguish between normal criticism of your play based on imperfect information, and personal attacks. It feels like everything you think is a normal part of criticising other people's play is like a red rag to a bull to me and chkflip, whilst what we think is well within the bounds of civility seems to set you off. In particular, you seem to have a high bar for how offensive you feel you are allowed to be about other people's level of skill, intelligence, or degree of empathy. You seem to have quite a low one for taking offense at anyone suggesting emotion is affecting your play. Me and Chk, the opposite.
This is why I try to read you based on your stated reads on other people, and not directly attack you until I am convinced I want to lynch you. I don't think I misinterpreted your early play. "Biting my head off" is obviously figurative, but it felt like an extremely aggressive overreaction. That was very much unacceptable to me.
Chk is probably driving me to drink and perhaps that’s spilling over onto you? If so, I’m sorry because I honestly do like you and think you’re a really good guy.
I really really don’t want to be fighting with you like this. Chk, I think just flat out hates me, so I won’t even bother with him.
Yes, I am super stressed and I already explained why at the beginning of the game and I think it’s cruel of Chk to be deliberately ignoring that.
I am truly sorry if I upset you and made you uncomfortable and/or hurt your feelings in any way. I legit have nothing but the highest regard for you as a human being, based off what little I know of you from playing two mafia games with you.
I will have to go on YouTube as it’s apparently not available in my country.In post 4480, Michael Scott wrote:ok not exactly, just the hugging part.
@Everyone, just vote George, let's see what happens.
It is definitely weird that she never even mentioned sr him before this. It is within her meta to try to distance a buddy this way. She has done that with both Varsoon and Creature.In post 3006, Titus wrote:Sush, just ignore nom and let's scumhunt.In post 3004, Venus and Mars wrote:what didnt someone just say tha tit didnt count for them in the item coutner ?In post 3002, nomnomnom wrote:Boon confirmed to me in PM just now that the virus is an itemIn post 2999, Venus and Mars wrote:The virus isnt an item, the sticky fruits are.In post 2996, nomnomnom wrote:Therefore my conclusion is that she gave the Virus a disloyal modifier, making K/K and potentially Chkflip unable to target any scum with their items.
~Venus
Talk to me about George.
Explain.In post 4483, GeorgeBailey wrote:Conspire
Why Conspire? How are they scummy?In post 4483, GeorgeBailey wrote: I think I know what you're trying to do Michael. Sorry, I've just been lost.
I'm having a bit of trouble keeping up with reads but I think Conspire or RC are better choices than JJH.
Hmm, given all of this, your data becomes invalid @BooneyTunzExpert; can't argue that it's likelier she doesn't mention her buddies.In post 4485, Venus and Mars wrote:She has done that with both Varsoon and Creature.
When Titus was being lynched in two of her games she suddenly shaded her buddy. In HW, it was Creature and in I don’t know the game, it was Varsoon, so yes, it is possible.In post 4489, Michael Scott wrote:Hmm, given all of this, your data becomes invalid @BooneyTunzExpert; can't argue that it's likelier she doesn't mention her buddies.In post 4485, Venus and Mars wrote:She has done that with both Varsoon and Creature.
Agree?
See this, this I TR you for.In post 4482, Venus and Mars wrote:I will have to go on YouTube as it’s apparently not available in my country.In post 4480, Michael Scott wrote:ok not exactly, just the hugging part.
@Everyone, just vote George, let's see what happens.
VOTE: GeorgeBailey
I just looked up his posts and he’s posting elsewhere. In MfD, he was way more invested in that game to have put himself into prodge range.
His reads also lack conviction.
At least you didn't go with the sweet roll commentIn post 4493, chkflip wrote:Psst. I know who you are. Hail Sithis.
"Mike's tell" when Nancy pointed it out first and Fonz said he was going to check that anywayIn post 4495, chkflip wrote:I will say that Mike's tell is dirty pool and I'm not excited to see the rules of mafia get skirted around by saying someone is posting somewhere else.