Mini Normal 2139: No Flavor Allowed - Game Over

[Auro]

I don't think you would play against your win-con for style points, as trying to lynch me is a risk for you in this scenario. But yes, if that happens I'd be forced to re-evaluate.

[Firebringer]

well ur wrong because i have held back hammer as scum for game ending win for style points.
so joke is on u. Nerd.

[Auro]

Yes, so if you want consolidation onto Hoctac and Looker isn't giving it, it's better with them just gone. That's my point.

looker voting u benefits me if i am scum, no?

Yes but this requires you to successfully lynch me.
If you're town you've already established Hoctac is the safer lynch from your perspective so backtracking and voting me is a bit of a risk, altho now you prolly just can anyway and Umlaut would happily vote me as well.

[Auro]

well ur wrong because i have held back hammer as scum for game ending win for style points.
so joke is on u. Nerd.

Lmao. Which game was this? That's quite evil, but I like it

[Firebringer]

i think it was a micro/mini; it was nearly half a year ago

[Auro]

Well in that case you get "confirmed" for not hammering, here it only provides a little more strength to my belief; Umlaut and Looker may actually just see things for what they are.

[Firebringer]

viewtopic.php?f=84&t=80162
man what a funny ending to a game.

[Auro]

Lolol, Oversoul wasn't shouting at you to hammer in your PT?

[Auro]

I'll do a full re-read of the game to prove my theory, after a while.

[Looker]

If this is going to be a 2v2 I’m not really willing to engage in an argument to convince the other side they’re scum.

If umlaut/looker want to engage I’ll be around to respond

Is it Hoctac/Auro vs Micc/Firebringer? I was starting to get the impression you and Auro were on the same side.

Why would scum!Hoctac perform a killing action on Micc if Micc is scum.

because scum!Hoctac doesn't know Micc is his Traitor.

Do you feel like scum traitors know the identity of the mafia team in this game?

u took a u-turn when u realized that looker is gonna vote u tomorrow anyways.

How was this determined?

---

• I wish Ircher would've put his clarification in-thread. I'm not sure whether failed Disloyal attempts are still trackable. All I currently have is Umlaut's word that that's what the Mod said.
  
• I don't know how I'm supposed to take "You're wrong" as an adequate argument
  
• Auro's trying to bluff me, and, meanwhile, I think Hoctac's starting to actually take his V/LA seriously
  
• I'm going to be personally incapable of lynching Umlaut due to his new avatar

[Auro]

I don't know how I'm supposed to take "You're wrong" as an adequate argument

I know. I'm doing my best to explain. I won't hold you against it.

[Auro]

Looker, you're feeling as though I'm scum with like, everyone => that must say something, no?

[Firebringer]

Do you feel like scum traitors know the identity of the mafia team in this game?

Traitor knows his allies (mafia). Mafia doesn't know traitor.

[Auro]

Looker, if you can finally see what I'm seeing, I'll need your help to convince Umlaut as well.

[Micc]

Spoiler:

If this is going to be a 2v2 I’m not really willing to engage in an argument to convince the other side they’re scum.

If umlaut/looker want to engage I’ll be around to respond

Is it Hoctac/Auro vs Micc/Firebringer? I was starting to get the impression you and Auro were on the same side.

Why would scum!Hoctac perform a killing action on Micc if Micc is scum.

because scum!Hoctac doesn't know Micc is his Traitor.

Do you feel like scum traitors know the identity of the mafia team in this game?

u took a u-turn when u realized that looker is gonna vote u tomorrow anyways.

How was this determined?

---

• I wish Ircher would've put his clarification in-thread. I'm not sure whether failed Disloyal attempts are still trackable. All I currently have is Umlaut's word that that's what the Mod said.
  
• I don't know how I'm supposed to take "You're wrong" as an adequate argument
  
• Auro's trying to bluff me, and, meanwhile, I think Hoctac's starting to actually take his V/LA seriously
  
• I'm going to be personally incapable of lynching Umlaut due to his new avatar

Yes, that is the 2v2 I was referring to.

You should be able to PM Ircher the exact question that Umlaut posted in the thread and get the same answer.

A traitor must know who the group scum are in order to be normal according to the wiki.

[Ircher]

Day 5 VC #3

Micc (2) (L-2): Hoctac (2494), Auro (2501)

Hoctac (3) (L-1): Firebringer (2424), Micc (2500), Umlaut (2572)

Auro (1): Looker (2498)
Not Voting (0):

With 6 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch a player.

This phase will end on June 9, 2020 4:00 PM EDT (GMT-4:00) or in (expired on 2020-06-09 16:00:00).

Moderator Notes

1. If you have regular weekend V/LA, you must either notify me each time or set V/LA tags each time.
2.

Please note the prod timers. You will be prodded after 32 hours on Tuesday-Friday.

[Auro]

So, uh... I went and checked my role PM again... I'm a Cop, I missed it. :X

[Auro]

Sigh

, I might just be the worst town player ever.

[Firebringer]

lol?

[Umlaut]

So, uh... I went and checked my role PM again... I'm a Cop, I missed it. :X

Roll Will save to disbelieve, DC 5

[Umlaut]

Can I please vote Auro now

[Firebringer]

Please dont.

[Firebringer]

auro just hammer Hoctac.

[Auro]

I thought it meant that you all would understand if I couldn't comment on people's Meta (If I'm using this correctly)

I

couldn't

c

omment

o

n

p

eople's Meta (If I'm using this correctly)

See? The crumb.

[Firebringer]

well congrats on being a cop.

Why u not voting Hoctac. He is basiclly CCed ur claim.

Vigi practically cop.