as not-VT, rather.In post 975, Umlaut wrote:identifying Maxwell as not-PR
and felt the need to quote it for posterity
I guess not, trying to figure things out on setup spec has burnt me pretty bad -In post 977, Umlaut wrote:No one has anything to say about this, then?
This is understandable, but hopefully you at least understand why I chose to hide that role modifier? I didn't think outing it served potown utility, but I hadn't considered the possibility I'd simply been rolecopped (even though this is the ssecond time I've fallen for a bad vanilla cop claim)In post 981, Umlaut wrote:I feel like both Maxwell's and Fuzzy's new role modifications are too convenient. Fuzzy's allows him to avoid giving a new result until lylo (when he' would presumably red-check Sam or something), and Maxwell's allows him to explain why he didn't stop the Cabd kill.
If the one of you who is town had justtold the whole storyabout your role, I would pretty much auto-vote the other today when they tried to change it up. That's what you get for being coy.
In post 979, maxwell wrote:I guess not, trying to figure things out on setup spec has burnt me pretty bad -In post 977, Umlaut wrote:No one has anything to say about this, then?
oh, wait, if fuzzy is, say, a mafia rolecop, they'd know I wasn't able to protect cabd anyway, and suddenly the mafia's play yesterday makes sense. Lurker slot is kind of a typical rolecop target, too, which makes more sense than his explanation.
In post 138, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Maduisha- As I stated it was just first thoughts. Scum like easy targets and since newbie are still adjusting to the new playstyle of a new site ( all mafia sites plays differently) it makes them easy targets. Scum also sometimes like to fish. That is to test the water to see if other players will join in the elimination.A lot of time they do it before voting. On the other hand, I could just be paranoid which for me is very possible.
In post 252, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Dakoba- the first few post of Koba were blah. 150 is okay I guess. I would like to hear what exactly the approach Zufy took that gave Koba the scum read. I like the pressure she is putting on Madisha here 159. I read Koba other posts and honestly, there was nothing there. I dont what to make out of her drop in quality
In post 271, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:all my thoughts are based on page 5 and on....same as the above list
Umlaut
131 liking the push back on Zulfy here. This is something that needed clarity. 153 is weak.I am not getting why he is town reading Maduesha . If it because of her previous post there was nothing in particular that would push for a particular alignment. I found her post pretty null.I think the read needs a better explanation. I would say the same thing about his strong town read on Clidd in 165. He seems to be interacting with Clidd a lot and I dont know if it because he trying to form a town alliance or if he just budddying him. 172 feels a bit vague. what exactly about Clidds reads that he likes? 248 seems odd to me. He scum reads me then suddenly remember that in my old game I was lunchbait. Not sure what to make of this sudden revelation.
In fact, he never bothers expressing a read on her at all until she's at E-1 and suddenly he's okay with hammering her. Didn't even address her when he was doing individual reads on everyone. Would say this looks like partner avoidance.In post 879, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Intent to hammer.....
Maduessa seems like frustrated scum then frustrated townie. I been and seen both and from my experience, it seems like she the former more than the latter. I know this is WIFOM but I think that my gut is right on this
will hammer when Clidd is ready
In post 495, Maduisha wrote:The only way I can work that logic is "it's fine if they cc me, they die the next day for lying." But it would only make sense if it means he is not willing to fight to get the liar eliminated instead...
@Fuzzy please address this whenever you come back.
Is something like wanting to maintain skepticism of fuzzy but not really push on him.In post 499, Maduisha wrote:I will vote wherever the majority does, but I still want to hear Fuzzy out if possible because of that confusing cc argument of his that is confusing me in terms of the logic that went through his mind when he typed it the way he did. It's giving me bad vibes combined with Cabd's role existing as I'm not used to PR heavy games or role type overlapping.
I don't really scumread Zulfy, but he's in my pool of weakest reads right now, so if it ends up being like that, I will support it.
I'd like the y/n answers from Nepenthe before the D1 turn ends, too...
In post 576, Maduisha wrote:Actually, wouldn't it have been more logical for Fuzzy to check whether Cabd was actually PR or lying, considering he made posts like this:
VOTE: TheFuzzylogic99In post 523, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Maybe I am wrong but Cabd's claim seems like a bluff or a gambit atp . if that is true I dont know if that makes him town or scum. I would lean town as it would be a wierd gambit /bluff coming town. His action does not seem to match up with what one would expect from a player with that role. I guess he could be a JOAT but I have my doubts atm.
Why did you think an inactive slot was worth spending your action on instead of a player you were calling out for bluffing like this?
Just for the record, I never make this post yesterday as scum when sam was placed at E-1. I know I later reversed my read and that's my bad, but if an opportunity to eliminate town comes up, I say, "sure, let's go for it" and hammer rather than making a stink about it only to freak out when the predictable outcome of my partner getting voted happens instead. I don't necessarily expect that to get believed but that's what we have the miseliminaion for. Just for the record, though: scum rarely ever plays the way I did, because they gain nothing from it.In post 763, maxwell wrote:Near absolute certain sam flips town and the game is fast-tracked to a loss when it happens.
What haven't I "accurately explained"? I'm not "pushing a narrative", I'm speculating as to who the last scum is based on the info I have. You've only responded by making vague attacks and ignoring any of the points I'm making while just making arguments about my claim being "convenient". Tell me again why you didn't mention your non-consecutive modifier earlier?In post 994, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Also you have yet to accurately explain anything and keep pushing the narrative to me.
What??? Where? How does this address ANYTHING I have said? Why are you avoiding actually responding to my questions?In post 998, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Max- You realize that you are using WIFOM.