Aw crap, I replaced into a Vanilla game. How very boring. I should pay more attention when I agree to this stuff.
Anyway, read up to page 6. Here's my thoughts so far. Mind you, this is just my initial reaction. I'm writing things down as I think them.
Post 56 Farside "My thoughts are that you (Aegor) are a distraction I want dead. Please tell me your scumbuddies"
A bit odd to call somebody you accuse of being scum a "Distraction". Like you don't really think he's scum, because a scum wouldn't be a discraction, he'd be your enemy.
Post 78 Lquiz "I'm becoming wary of Aegor. He claimed scum, maybe tried to cover it up, I don't know. I don't want to lynch a townie Day 1, so unvote"
This is one insane post. First of all, he says he's becoming wary of Aegor, but unvotes him. Which would mean that he wasn't wary of him when he initially votes him. Secondly, he says he doesn't want to lynch a townie Day 1. When would be a good day to lynch a townie then, hmmmmn? How do you KNOW he's a townie, HMMMMNMNM!!???
Post 79 Lowel "unvote, vote Aegor. Kill all annoyances. "
Annoying =/= scum. Shameless bandwagoning == scummy. Lowell == scum.
Post 81 farside "yellowbounder, the wagon was not trivial. out of the two people who unvoted, you are most suspicious. Vote:you"
Like IH, farside is strongly pro-Aegor-lynch without actually being on the wagon. Farside gets bothered when people started to unvote.
Post 86 IH "Lquiz is too cautious. unvote, if voting, vote LQuiz."
Since when did 'being too cautious' make somebody scum? I mean, I thought his post was suspicious too, but I notice how you used you "let's define speedvoting" bit to unvote when Aegor was at 4 votes, but now that he's at only 2 you completely forget about it and go on the offensive.
ChannelDelibird agrees with IH (post95) about Lquiz being too cautious.
