Mafiascum.net

i dont even have marci near the top of my TRs? ur drawing such odd conclusions

im on a roll with these pagetops

The police are coming for you Mana

holy shit.

[Saudade, ssbm, max]
[Roden, Salsa, N_M]
[geraint, marci, goofball] null
[Titus, Dwlee]
[owo]

so this is out there

is it owo or omo

depends on my mood

its owo upsidedown

Is everyone just ignoring I claimed mason? Ok

also why am I scum again, manatee?

In post 408, Dwlee99 wrote:Is everyone just ignoring I claimed mason? Ok

No

In post 395, marcistar wrote:

In post 390, Roden wrote:Why are the three of you so opposed to scum reading each other?

should i scumread people who i dont actually think are scum???

-i feel sort of like max needs to post more before i would be able to have a confident read on them
-manatee, i had a fairly big townread on before, but im not as sure anymore as of recently. ^.^

Not what I said. It's just strange that all three of you had zero suspicions on each other despite not really interacting much or even questioning each other.

In post 396, ManateeDude wrote:

In post 393, Roden wrote:

In post 388, ManateeDude wrote:roden i think ur focusing on theorycrafting instead of reading.

u responded defensively to a vote on you. marci didnt respond in a way i scumread regardless of whether it was objectively good or bad

What theory crafting? I looked at your interactions after you literally told me to do so.

Your refusal to even look at Marci is what's pinging me. You actually got very defensive of her yourself when I voted her. Why is that?

i literally just clarified a pretty obvious point that u didn't read properly? im not sure how that adds up to "very defensive"

I just read the post where you got defensive of Marci. You immediately jumped in and voted me and defended her the moment I voted her.

In post 399, ManateeDude wrote:Roden i think ur theorycrafting bc ur reading into normal interactions on a way deeper level

Can you explain this? Because this sounds like a fake observation. A major part of Mafia is analyzing interactions, and brushing that off as just useless theory crafting is not a good look.

can we move on from looking at this small'ish sample size of people we're looking at for the moment,
we can go back here later but there are players who hardly said anything who are going to be very hard to read by the time the day ends and we need to decide who to neck

In post 404, ManateeDude wrote:[Saudade, ssbm, max]
[Roden, Salsa, N_M]
[geraint, marci, goofball] null
[Titus, Dwlee]
[owo]

so this is out there

I agree about Dwlee's placement the most here. Their ISO is awful but idk if that's just their playstyle.

In post 408, Dwlee99 wrote:Is everyone just ignoring I claimed mason? Ok

The real masons are probably the ones not claiming mason.

In post 413, Roden wrote:Their ISO is awful but idk if that's just their playstyle.

How?

In post 399, ManateeDude wrote:Roden i think ur theorycrafting bc ur reading into normal interactions on a way deeper level

You mean like me who you sheeped in voting Rowen?
VOTE: manatee

Also marci and manatee are suddenly distancing here, again not what I was expecting to see

In post 416, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 399, ManateeDude wrote:Roden i think ur theorycrafting bc ur reading into normal interactions on a way deeper level

You mean like me who you sheeped in voting Rowen?
VOTE: manatee

what r u referring to

In post 417, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Also marci and manatee are suddenly distancing here, again not what I was expecting to see

weird to call it distancing when we've interacted like twice and we're just clarifying under weird scrutiny

watching kyoukos read on me flip like 3 times is pretty amusing

In post 388, ManateeDude wrote:roden i think ur focusing on theorycrafting instead of reading.

u responded defensively to a vote on you. marci didnt respond in a way i scumread regardless of whether it was objectively good or bad

This reads like theorycrafting is a bad or scummy thing that you are pushing Roden for. Roden asked what theorycrafting was and you defined it. It sounded like what I did in my wall read on Roden, and you sheeped that read.

So Roden is scummy for theorycrafting, but you sheeped my theorycrafting. So you say one thing and do another.

Also you are quite clearly distancing now, because before you two were being all buddy buddy and TRing each other, then shortly after you even said "am I letting Marci pocket me? Maybe" which pinged me then but I thought I'd let that go on the off chance you two are playing a weird style of masons, but with distancing that is happening now I don't entertain that as a possibility anymore. You're both both pretending like it never happened lmao

Watching Roden's hero solve flip 3 for 3 is going to be amusing tbh

Or was it omo's hero solve actually

i didnt think the TRs were meant to be taken seriously given it was like the first page. i didnt think i presented theorycrafting as inherently scummy but that i thought he should focus on reads instead of drawing on weird interpersonal theories that were pretty flimsy in their reasoning