in addition, 4th vote on a bussy wagon is always sussy for that bussy
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
im so glad i got to say "sussy for that bussy" in a game of mafia
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
It does come from after the t3 flip, but I would still expect someone who found out t3 could shoot for certain to use language with less certainty to it. It reads like it was written by someone who already knew T3 could shoot before the flip. It's hard to say for certain if this is a scumslip but I'm pretty sure that it is just a very subtle scumslip.
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 253, bugspray wrote:It does come from after the t3 flip, but I would still expect someone who found out t3 could shoot for certain to use language with less certainty to it. It reads like it was written by someone who already knew T3 could shoot before the flip. It's hard to say for certain if this is a scumslip but I'm
very sure (p>.75)
that it is just a very subtle scumslip.
EBWOP
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
I caught shelby on that sussy bussy and now shelby is gonna be both bussy sucka and sussy baka.
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
T3---> Shelby ---> luke ----> bugs ----> Oka ---> Jessica ----> enchant
VOTE: shelby
Can you elaborate on this? I currently feel best about you and Luke.
is this scum guessing who two masons might be and seeing if they can get them to say something about the other like "tr but idk why hahah (jk its bcs we are masons!)" for easy yeet
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 167, Jessica Rabbit wrote:Soley going by VCA, Shelby’s votes on both wagons don’t look great.
Uhhh, you shouldn't solely go by VCA, then You missed the part where I put T3 on E-1 and then goaded Enchant to hammer
before T3 had a chance to shoot anyone
.
implies already knew that t3
could
shoot
I see what your misunderstanding here is, but I was explaining why I wouldn't make sense as T3's partner, because in that world I would have known for sure he had a vigshot. That said though, yeah I was pretty damn confident in my read atp, hence why I...was calling for a quickhammer in the first place.
If there was some bussing, I don't think both scum would be bussing him so quickly into the day, so I think that there is likely at least 1 scum in [Jessica , Enchant]. Especially since votes all are strange to be bus votes, makes it harder to believe that 2 of them are.
I would be voting Enchant right now, but mom seems to be against it, and that makes me want to hold off
T3---> Shelby ---> luke ----> bugs ----> Oka ---> Jessica ----> enchant
VOTE: shelby
Can you elaborate on this? I currently feel best about you and Luke.
is this scum guessing who two masons might be and seeing if they can get them to say something about the other like "tr but idk why hahah (jk its bcs we are masons!)" for easy yeet
Saying I feel the best about two players being town, in your mind translates to a mason guess? Please regale us with the brilliant logic that that led to this assessment.
I could do Jessica today looking back. I had her as m*son from her reaction to NM's fakeclaim, but her posting as of late has been pinging me even more than her early stuff, lots of LAMIST-type posts, and not a whole lot of pushing the game forward. She never actually voted Enchant throughout their entire 1v1? I can't shake my Enchant SR, if it weren't for other factors rn my vote would be locked in. Definitely don't want to do Mom or Luke.
In post 267, Lukewarm wrote:I would not call her early post "derailing" the NM wagon, when at the time the only vote against him appeared to be a an RVS vote.
And she seems to be trying to lean into it for cred
In post 267, Lukewarm wrote:I would not call her early post "derailing" the NM wagon, when at the time the only vote against him appeared to be a an RVS vote.
And she seems to be trying to lean into it for cred
Did you not check out the link I posted from Deco, which is why I was the most suspicious of T3’s vote?
Anybody who knows NM knows he opens literally every single game with that exact same post. You can stop acting like you were the one who broke the story lol
In post 269, Uncle Shelby wrote:I could do Jessica today looking back. I had her as m*son from her reaction to NM's fakeclaim, but her posting as of late has been pinging me even more than her early stuff, lots of LAMIST-type posts, and not a whole lot of pushing the game forward. She never actually voted Enchant throughout their entire 1v1? I can't shake my Enchant SR, if it weren't for other factors rn my vote would be locked in. Definitely don't want to do Mom or Luke.
You missed the part where I put T3 on E-1 and then goaded Enchant to hammer before T3 had a chance to shoot anyone.couldshoot
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
I’m not bad, I’m just drawn that way.
