In post 891, Enchant wrote:... Eh. I can bet Don Draper was protected from death.
Ircher? lol, no.
Me? lol!
Vander? Did furtive even townread you? I don't remember.
Pretty sure he did, he made a comment during the CC day where he omitted me from the list of Porkens' possible partners, which I thought was kind of strange at the time since I was arguing to not kill Porkens.
Not that it makes me think I was a lock to get saved or anything, but hopefully it helps prove that me igniting last night is not a thing. I already think it's pretty awful but it's not like I would have been afraid of either furtive or bears' reads.
And if it helps, I've played this set as scum before on a different site, I can link the scum chat if anyone wants.
Maybe you should? I think it’s probably Ircher because he was so sure Scrrdbear was FF but Idk.
In case you can't read it, helpfully, the very first thing I said in the chat was this:
lendunistus Nov 24, 06:04 AM: Hello! You may chat with your teammate here.
lendunistus Nov 24, 06:04 AM: If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here or in your mod chat!
WerewolfHunter Nov 24, 09:46 AM: hello
Vanderscamp Nov 24, 03:07 PM: Yay!
Vanderscamp Nov 24, 03:07 PM: im excited
Vanderscamp Nov 24, 03:07 PM: lets crush
Vanderscamp Nov 24, 03:07 PM: Firstly it seems good to never use the ignite until the last moment
Vanderscamp Nov 24, 03:08 PM: And win there
Treestumps cannot be doused
and Treestumps cannot vote.
Mech was a bit different in that game.
Not really?
Why would you ever douse a treestump?
That would be dumb unless their reads were spot on I guess.
I should probably read some of your MS scumgames but Ircher saying you did it for WIFOM sounds whack to me. I maintain that if town, Ircher was a viable douse, so I think burn last night especially Sccrdbear looks bad for Ircher.
I haven't played many scum games on this site at all, and the one I did play was definitely a meta deviation for me, so your sample there won't be great
In post 884, Vanderscamp wrote:Like, what has Ircher actually done that is town, except for presumably bussing Porkens?
I think both Don and Enchant have both clearly at least made an effort, and while I disagree with a lot of what they've had to say, they've at least showed reasonable thought processes and have given passion.
Ircher has not done anything resembling that for the entire game, and him refusing to talk about his reads or his progression of his reads is a massive massive red flag for me.
That was before both of you took Enchant out of consideration.
Enchant isn't out of consideration for me, he's just must townier than Ircher for me.
But why would me taking him out of consideration make you read me as worse than him?
In post 946, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I lean to it most likely being Ircher. However, why couldn’t Enchant have been doused? Pretty much everyone and their uncle - except Porkens and Bear were tr him.
In post 461, Porkens wrote:Actually that’s wrong. I wouldn’t be happy to eliminate anyone. I have preferences of who I’d like to eliminate but they aren’t based on town/scum reads.
Like: Don Draper x Mistress (hydra of Nancy Drew 39 and Auro)
Love: Porkens
Wary: furtiveglance
Impatient: Herta
Enchanted: Vanderscamp
Wary: Ircher
Like: Titus
Wary: Enchant
Tempted: SCRRRDBEAR
I wonder if the bolded means anything? Could that possibly be a slip that I wasn’t doused? But then furtive for sure protected me and probably Enchant as well because both of us were his top two trs.
So yeah, there have been 3 nights of dousing so far and one night of ignition. Scrrdbear and furtive were two, so Idk why furtive would protect you over both me and Enchant?
Like I don’t see how that makes sense, Furtive either protected me or Enchant because we’re his top two townreads.
I don't remember him having enchant as one of his two top town reads (I'm assuming you're talking about early game?) but that could definitely be the case if you're right
It's more question "Who the fuck from three are atleast one town".
We can execute two people, so it's not problematic. We can as well give Don pass i think (i think) and game solved by killing others. There's other problem.
Who will give ME a pass? Like I can't be sure that Don just decides "Uh Ench blatant scum" and voting me.
Wizard-Mercenary
You need replacement/players ASAP? PM me! I almost always accept.
In post 461, Porkens wrote:Actually that’s wrong. I wouldn’t be happy to eliminate anyone. I have preferences of who I’d like to eliminate but they aren’t based on town/scum reads.
Like: Don Draper x Mistress (hydra of Nancy Drew 39 and Auro)
Love: Porkens
Wary: furtiveglance
Impatient: Herta
Enchanted: Vanderscamp
Wary: Ircher
Like: Titus
Wary: Enchant
Tempted: SCRRRDBEAR
I wonder if the bolded means anything? Could that possibly be a slip that I wasn’t doused? But then furtive for sure protected me and probably Enchant as well because both of us were his top two trs.
So yeah, there have been 3 nights of dousing so far and one night of ignition. Scrrdbear and furtive were two, so Idk why furtive would protect you over both me and Enchant?
Like I don’t see how that makes sense, Furtive either protected me or Enchant because we’re his top two townreads.
I don't remember him having enchant as one of his two top town reads (I'm assuming you're talking about early game?) but that could definitely be the case if you're right
Says the player voteparked on a vanity wagon that no one but you is currently interested in flipping. I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to. I just thought having us, furtive and Enchant as possible Ircher buddies seemed kind’ve whack because neither are anywhere near my PoE.
I will take another look at Scerrredbear and confer with Auro but I’m still not trusting Titus. She just sounds too certain about things and she usually doesn’t d1 without flips. @furtive, you remember how she seemed to not be extremely certain on pretty much anything in Chromavalon d1?
Says the player voteparked on a vanity wagon that no one but you is currently interested in flipping. I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to. I just thought having us, furtive and Enchant as possible Ircher buddies seemed kind’ve whack because neither are anywhere near my PoE.
I will take another look at Scerrredbear and confer with Auro but I’m still not trusting Titus. She just sounds too certain about things and she usually doesn’t d1 without flips. @furtive, you remember how she seemed to not be extremely certain on pretty much anything in Chromavalon d1?
~Nancy
I look back and see a more considered Titus, but I wouldn't characterise her as unsure. As for the change in tone, Chromavalon is a kind of setup where you want to be more considered as town. Also, they seem angry in this game for some reason. I don't really like it. But I don't know why someone would blow up early game as mafia, in a 2 mafia game.
My follow up was here. Basically I'm not sure on Titus. They aren't really towny, but not the most sus either.
As for townreads, I'd go for Don Draper x Mistress and Scrrdbear, maybe you. Enchant is doing a bit more nothing than before. Which can be sus.
In post 48, Ircher wrote:Well Draper is making this big fuss and all, so.......
In post 50, Ircher wrote:It's not, but it's also early. There is merit in looking elsewhere.
Why are you still voting us then?
I didn't want to kill wagon momentum. It was more of a "if you rather" kind of thing. I could move now, but I don't really have a place to go with it, so....
In post 153, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I thought both reactions looked scummy to me: Titus voting me for not doing enough by page freaking 2 and Ircher for apparently no reason whatsoever, advocating wagoning us and I still think this. I no longer think they look aligned like I’ve said recently.
Look, it was early game. I advocated for wagoning you all because I was already voting there. If I started the game voting Titus instead for instance, I would've advocated there instead.
Didn't read too much today as I had a long work day; I just searched for my username to see if anything pressing came up.
In post 291, Ircher wrote:Posts 64 and 111. While I don't necessarily disagree with the argument, I do believe that Titus's conviction is too strong especially given how often Titus has played with you.
