Re: large normal 243: mostly francisco lindor
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 8:29 am
i literally forgot that person existed
You forgot about me?In post 501, Cephrir wrote: i literally forgot that person existed
Vote me if you have a scumcase against me, I need motivation to engage in the game, the push is anti-town but the engagement isn'tIn post 500, GuyInFreezer wrote: Kawaii is also a valid option for today as well.
on the topic of beetlejuicing...In post 502, KawaiiKame wrote:You forgot about me?In post 501, Cephrir wrote: i literally forgot that person existed
Vote me if you have a scumcase against me, I need motivation to engage in the game, the push is anti-town but the engagement isn'tIn post 500, GuyInFreezer wrote: Kawaii is also a valid option for today as well.
Idk what that is, I just got back homeIn post 504, ballpointpen wrote:on the topic of beetlejuicing...In post 502, KawaiiKame wrote:You forgot about me?In post 501, Cephrir wrote: i literally forgot that person existed
Vote me if you have a scumcase against me, I need motivation to engage in the game, the push is anti-town but the engagement isn'tIn post 500, GuyInFreezer wrote: Kawaii is also a valid option for today as well.
this is glitch's first game in 3 years, so we really shouldn't have been expecting too muchIn post 493, Hu Tao wrote: I see people defending Glitch as bad play but is that what they are known for or something? Why is that the defense being given?
its when you conviently appear in the thread when your name is calledIn post 505, KawaiiKame wrote:Idk what that is, I just got back homeIn post 504, ballpointpen wrote:on the topic of beetlejuicing...In post 502, KawaiiKame wrote:You forgot about me?In post 501, Cephrir wrote: i literally forgot that person existed
Vote me if you have a scumcase against me, I need motivation to engage in the game, the push is anti-town but the engagement isn'tIn post 500, GuyInFreezer wrote: Kawaii is also a valid option for today as well.
Why do you think it's Hu Tao?
never returned to this thought? and next response to Glitch feels like the 2 are partnersIn post 110, Hu Tao wrote:Not sure I buy this. But I'll see what you say after your thoughtsIn post 93, Glitch wrote:Actual content sure. Noteworthy and AI, on page 3 not really.In post 55, ballpointpen wrote:you don't think there's anything of note in the last 3 pages?In post 54, Glitch wrote: Lots of talk about RVS and how useful/useless it is so far. Let’s railroad someone and see what happens from there. Maybe some actual content will start.
VOTE: Hu Tao
I will say I’m so glad there’s not 406 pages to read between signing on. My last large I could barely keep up.
Going in to work but I’ll be back with a few thoughts after my work day. VOTE: Unvote
like, this is the next time Hu Tao addresses GlitchIn post 485, Hu Tao wrote:Um? Scum usually claim pr no?In post 371, Glitch wrote: /fascinating/
Soft town pr claim on D1 is either a ballsy scum move or a legitimate claim. I'll let curious live today.
Why don't you think it's Hu Tao?
wasn't that just an RVS thoughtIn post 511, Andante wrote:never returned to this thought? and next response to Glitch feels like the 2 are partnersIn post 110, Hu Tao wrote:Not sure I buy this. But I'll see what you say after your thoughtsIn post 93, Glitch wrote:Actual content sure. Noteworthy and AI, on page 3 not really.In post 55, ballpointpen wrote:you don't think there's anything of note in the last 3 pages?In post 54, Glitch wrote: Lots of talk about RVS and how useful/useless it is so far. Let’s railroad someone and see what happens from there. Maybe some actual content will start.
VOTE: Hu Tao
I will say I’m so glad there’s not 406 pages to read between signing on. My last large I could barely keep up.
Going in to work but I’ll be back with a few thoughts after my work day. VOTE: Unvote
In post 511, Andante wrote: next response to Glitch feels like the 2 are partners
In post 490, Hu Tao wrote:I'm fine with it. Depending on rest of catch upIn post 385, Cephrir wrote:Can we please just eliminate this personIn post 372, Glitch wrote:Spoiler: curious wagon
So now we're actually getting a little action and traction. Hu Tao, Bub, Kitty, Andante, and Kawaii are on the curious wagon. I don't think a PR claim on D1 means that scum is guaranteed to be on the wagon. But I do think it gives sufficient reason for a bit of pressure there. Bub is in my town bucket which leaves me interested in ISO'ing Hu Tao, Kitty, Andante, and Kawaii. I'm gonna do that now.
Will scum say they will be fine with eliminating their partner depending on circumstance then ultimately not follow through?In post 511, Andante wrote: never returned to this thought? and next response to Glitch feels like the 2 are partners
It's a soft pr claim so I don't hold much weight to it, not even karma holds much weight to his own pr claim, if karma hard claims pr/I see someone as scum > karma then I will unvote karmaIn post 515, Andante wrote: Kawaii, why are you still voting a PR claim?
what do you mean karma doesn't hold much weight to his own pr claimIn post 519, KawaiiKame wrote:It's a soft pr claim so I don't hold much weight to it, not even karma holds much weight to his own pr claim, if karma hard claims pr/I see someone as scum > karma then I will unvote karmaIn post 515, Andante wrote: Kawaii, why are you still voting a PR claim?
In post 520, ballpointpen wrote:what do you mean karma doesn't hold much weight to his own pr claimIn post 519, KawaiiKame wrote:It's a soft pr claim so I don't hold much weight to it, not even karma holds much weight to his own pr claim, if karma hard claims pr/I see someone as scum > karma then I will unvote karmaIn post 515, Andante wrote: Kawaii, why are you still voting a PR claim?
Karma is okay with being eliminated, seeing the power role as a potential distraction/not very helpful, soft claims power role but says, "you wont be killing power"In post 370, curiouskarmadog wrote: that being said, my role (if you want to call it that) isnt very helpful, some might even say it would be a distraction. So...if the wagon does swell on me while I am away, it wont hurt you guys much.
now you will be losing my excellent scum hunting ability, but you wont be killing power
A powerless power role that's a potential distraction feels like/implies miller, but why not hard claim miller? Doesn't make senseIn post 521, KawaiiKame wrote:In post 520, ballpointpen wrote:what do you mean karma doesn't hold much weight to his own pr claimIn post 519, KawaiiKame wrote:It's a soft pr claim so I don't hold much weight to it, not even karma holds much weight to his own pr claim, if karma hard claims pr/I see someone as scum > karma then I will unvote karmaIn post 515, Andante wrote: Kawaii, why are you still voting a PR claim?Karma is okay with being eliminated, seeing the power role as a potential distraction/not very helpful, soft claims power role but says, "you wont be killing power"In post 370, curiouskarmadog wrote: that being said, my role (if you want to call it that) isnt very helpful, some might even say it would be a distraction. So...if the wagon does swell on me while I am away, it wont hurt you guys much.
now you will be losing my excellent scum hunting ability, but you wont be killing power