Look. Break it down. Gonna hate this. Lot of words coming.
Post 89.
Serious uncertainty. Doesn't know what to do. Fair.
Wants to coast on meta. Says Paragons win if you do that. Okay. True.
Asks if Paragons win with or without town. Fair question.
Post 91.
Thought Paragons won with town. Huh.
Few things about this.
First thing. Take this as true. Face value. Paragons win with town? Probably want to share. Maybe don't draw attention to how the rules say no. Maybe hope you're wrong. Even if you're unsure? Maybe some hope in your post. Unless. You know. Come back to that soon.
Second thing. Okay, why do this? Alignment dependent. Town? Dunno. Seems wrong. Come back to this. Mafia? Innocence. "Don't know the rules". "Town slip". For "towncred". Or? Well. Come back to that.
Third thing. Second reading. Make some assumptions. What's the lie? Uncertainty? Doubt it. Uncertainty's just this game. Coast on meta? Could be. Don't think it says anything. Paragons win with town? Okay, could be a lie. Already went over. "Town slip." Another, or that it? Nope, that's it. Barebones posts.
Coming back around now. No lies, got an agenda? Believed Paragons win with town. Wants to coast on meta. Not sure what to do.
Town? Has to be genuine. No motivation. Weak positioning. Extreme confusion. Prone to buddying. Low investment? Good for Mafia. Bad for town. Still feels off, wording not sharing that way. Wanna win? Think Paragons win with town? Drop the main. Unsure? Talk about wanting. Don't talk about would but you lose. While you thought Paragons win with town.
Mafia? Don't share. Don't win with town? Share, you lose. Just makes sense.
"Town slip". Real misunderstanding. Both. All say Mafia.
What says town?
Nothing.
Would vote. But it's one thing. Work with patterns, not tells. Bad start. Pattern could go either way still. So, FoS.
Hate typing this much. Gonna eat.
-Five.
