In post 191, usesPython wrote:
I think if Ircher was recruited he either got new abilities or he was originally Traitor
If Ircher was originally Traitor, that means the scumteam only started with two members, since a Traitor would know the scumteam's identities and thus be disqualified from cult recruitment.
I find this difficult to believe in a 19 player game, but it is POSSIBLE, and would mirror the Masonry's setup.
Maybe the real Mafia was the friends we made along the way
Last night, I had a dream that Radical Rat had a role that gave them access to a PT!
at the start of day 2
Just in case something was a one-shot, causing a false negative since Rautherdir wouldn't currently be able to do those things.
They're logically identical statements, if any of those actions were from them but 1-shot then they're able to do it on that day/night otherwise it wouldn't have gone through
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 191, usesPython wrote:
I think if Ircher was recruited he either got new abilities or he was originally Traitor
If Ircher was originally Traitor, that means the scumteam only started with two members, since a Traitor would know the scumteam's identities and thus be disqualified from cult recruitment.
I find this difficult to believe in a 19 player game, but it is POSSIBLE, and would mirror the Masonry's setup.
Could have sworn someone asked about Traitor recruitment and got a response that it's legal but I can't find it now
@mod can Mafia Traitor get Cult'd while they know the identity of a living Mafia member?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Last night, I had a dream that Radical Rat had a role that gave them access to a PT!
at the start of day 2
Just in case something was a one-shot, causing a false negative since Rautherdir wouldn't currently be able to do those things.
They're logically identical statements, if any of those actions were from them but 1-shot then they're able to do it on that day/night otherwise it wouldn't have gone through
If the question is "Is X able to do Y" then it requires they currently have the ability to do so. "Has X ever been able to do Y" covers expired abilities.
Maybe the real Mafia was the friends we made along the way
In post 208, Radical Rat wrote:
If the question is "Is X able to do Y" then it requires they currently have the ability to do so. "Has X ever been able to do Y" covers expired abilities.
If someone used a 1-shot Publishing TA n1 then by definition they're able to use a 1-shot Publishing TA n1 because by n1 they haven't used it then
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Korina has already established being a stickler for specific phrasing (See Kirigiri getting responses saying how "an invention" could be blocked, despite it being very clear she meant Nightmare Invention, which we know can't be blocked), so I'd rather not leave any ambiguity
Maybe the real Mafia was the friends we made along the way
If it comes down to it, I can move my vote back, though I'd only consider it a true clear for the Chess aspect. If all three of us move, Ranger's vote left behind would be enough to hammer.
Maybe the real Mafia was the friends we made along the way
In post 215, Radical Rat wrote:
If it comes down to it, I can move my vote back, though I'd only consider it a true clear for the Chess aspect. If all three of us move, Ranger's vote left behind would be enough to hammer.
i will be my undoing if i become my obsession.
i will forget the ones i love if i do not serve them.
i will war with others if i refuse to see them.
therefore i choose to turn away from my reflection,
to rely not on myself
but on my brothers and sisters,
to project always outwards
until i disappear.
