In post 242, Dannflor wrote:
I'm not super expecting to solve you early, but again the context of my comment was wondering why black moved on from solving you so quickly
Fair, but that's also not really why I think you're scum. Your takes have just seemed easy and hollow this game, when I tend to hold you to a higher standard.
you know I can fake complex and/or hard takes, I think I often have "difficult" takes as scum
not that I necessarily take issue with you being suspicious based off that but I'm surprised you feel "fairly certain"
In post 253, Klick wrote:
You've just reminded me that dumplings exist and now I'm craving chicken and dumplings
I hope you make it from scratch instead of the gross stuff that comes out of a can. Maybe it's better in the UK but I have a traumatic response to canned chicken and dumplings from having to eat it so much as a kid
I'm an hour outside of Chicago for the next two days on a work trip, so it'll be a crapshoot whether the place is good, but your suggestion is accepted.
I'm an hour outside of Chicago for the next two days on a work trip, so it'll be a crapshoot whether the place is good, but your suggestion is accepted.
when Bingle posted again I remembered that wagoning Bingle for tenuous reasons early on day one is kind of like, a tepid approach to solving Bingle's alignment
I also didn't really like cjv joining that wagon w/o really engaging with anything else and honestly I could vote cjv but I don't think it's time yet.
which leads me to look for a better option and I haven't worked either you or Klick out yet so joining you seemed like a treat
wbu
In post 170, Black wrote:
I'm liking ceejay I think. I like 167 in particular because I also felt like Klick's read was a little forced so it's nice to see that ceejay is also finding an issue with it
Bingle's responses to me have been fine. Good enough to want to move on for now
I don't really like this sequence from implosion. Specifically I don't like how he asked the worst about his Klick vote but then didn't respond to him when he came back to the thread. He just unvotes and vanishes
I think 120 is contrarian just for the sake of getting townread. Like an "I could easily pile on Black here but I'm not" type thing. I feel like Bingle would be more interested in confronting others about their Black reads if he were town. This combined with the way he framed my conversation with PC earlier makes me think something is off
I think bingle was responding to me there just didn't quote me. Just for clarification if this changes anything for you. Or am I wrong @bingle?
I have too many townreads sometimes it's just nm and implosion. My guy is telling me that implosion is playing conservatively this game. I don't want to call it scum yet. Especially with the posts implosion has made makes me think town range since implosion isn't hedging a lot. I probably messed up implosions play style with everyone looking at them. That technically might be true for everyone though.
Klick feels a bit unreadable to me. Usually I think they're scum which means they're town and usually they create some sort of conflict as town being proactive instead of letting the game happen. That is just one game I've had with them though.
In post 263, Political Clout wrote:
I think bingle was responding to me there just didn't quote me. Just for clarification if this changes anything for you. Or am I wrong @bingle?
120 was responding to implo which you then responded to. My explanation of the Black read was a mix of responding to you and Black.
In post 252, Klick wrote:
I'm interested in hearing any thoughts you have regarding Dann following reading said game.
Dann in that game seems to have been shotgunning reads left and right from the word go that all seemed like kinda meh takes. The pivot onto Black seemed more like a pivot away from untenable ground than an actual starting point like I was expecting from the byplay here, which makes me less inclined to read into the comparison all that much. It honestly just doesn't seem like Dann's treatment of Black is all that similar while Dann's approach to the thread feels overall pretty same-y.
In post 232, Bingle wrote:
Got ninja'd there. Mind linking the game?
I'm interested in hearing any thoughts you have regarding Dann following reading said game.
I second this btw
It reads really different from how dannflor is in this game. Dannflor uses a lot of buzzwords naked votes to look busy and a lot of no u arguments trying to extend the interactions that are happening with him to create posts and just argue to argue. Doesn't go into reasoning when giving town reads a lot.
In post 265, Black wrote:
Klick do you have any thoughts about your short-lived wagon?
Not particularly
Your vote is the interesting one
I think I buy your reasoning as something you would think as town
Although I'm quite confused by your conception of like, how I play? Do you think my reads don't normally have nuance?
I started out with like a very anti-charismatic but earnest read on Black, and have pivoted to a more charismatic but lazier read on her. She went from lightly scumreading me to null reading me & voting elsewhere. It stood out
In post 222, Black wrote:
I like that description and that's pretty much how I feel about you any time I townread you
it's a little less to do with the worst specifically and more just the state of the game
I don't really have a read I feel good about yet and while slots like Bingle and the worst have had decent posting that alone isn't really enough for me to throw them in the town bin without hesitation
I thought I had a town bin in Political Clout but I didn't really like how PC returned to the thread
same & same
I'm in another position where, in a vacuum, you're the player I think is the towniest rn and I hate that so much.
