Wait how do you know there are hoods plural?In post 1724, Bingle wrote:I lose my ability to rearrange hoods if I vote, which will make my wincon of making the alignments of living players in the hoods match really hard to achieve.In post 1721, Firebringer wrote:VOTE MEEEEEEEEIn post 1720, Bingle wrote: Warm pup might also be scum, btw.
I was not sure what to think about the claim, but yeah him voting 2 posts later made me assume that the claim was a joke.In post 1750, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Wait how do you know there are hoods plural?In post 1724, Bingle wrote:I lose my ability to rearrange hoods if I vote, which will make my wincon of making the alignments of living players in the hoods match really hard to achieve.In post 1721, Firebringer wrote:VOTE MEEEEEEEEIn post 1720, Bingle wrote: Warm pup might also be scum, btw.
p-edit: oh, maybe
Oblivion's Dethy speculation is similar to where I'm at in that I feel as though it's probably best to table the Dethy hood for a day unless we feel really good about an elimination there.In post 1744, Hermit Crab wrote: The interaction with me began around 990, with the morph interaction beginning around 1026. I also like the read retraction on marci in the sequence of posts beginning in 1059 also felt town to me.
Liar.In post 1752, Firebringer wrote: I think
.....In post 1745, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I think your use of emojis at the end of sentences gives you away. Or do you remember when I read biancospino off of the Activity Overview?In post 1619, Firebagel wrote:Well I'm not even sure that you have! You're being vague enough about it. I don't think it's unreasonable that you could guess who I am but I wasn't expecting anyone to do so here so your level of confidence in both that and your read is strange to me.In post 1604, Cat Scratch Fever wrote: I don't know quite frankly. Maybe you're surprised by how quickly I was able to figure out who you were? I'm not sure why you would be though.
And I sorta feel like if you're guessing right, this conversation should give you some more doubt on your read.
What is this?
Hey I was in that game!
A game in which both ceph and I were scum and there was a derby gimmick hood, likely informing game design on this game.
I was talking to Firebringer hereIn post 1463, Spiffeh wrote: I am hesitant with you because you have not yet struck the balance between troll!bringer and content!bringer that I have come to expect from your Town game. In Kemusan on Day 1, you were shooting the shit like usual but also had a very confident scum read on ffery that you were pushing at every opportunity. I'm not all that impressed with any of your game-related posts yet.
I also think that I am typically someone you focus on and try to sort pretty early, and you've barely mentioned or engaged me whatsoever. So it's off to me that the first time you've mentioned me in a serious way was "scum Spiffeh is an interesting take" as if this was never a consideration for you when I feel like I am usually guilty until proven innocent for you. My immediate thought when reading that post was that you were scared to ruffle my feathers or address me head on in the event that I had a negative reaction to it.
This was more me being passive aggressive towards you because I noticed you echoed a lot of my sentiments and given you have admitted to read me primarily through mindmeld I thought (and still think) it is silly that you 180'd your read on me for my one post about ActionDan.In post 1514, morph the cat wrote: {Dannflor, Spiffeh} On top of other stuff in the thread, I feel like Spiffeh is reaching with his appeal for us to townread him based on mindmeld :/
