Open 93 - Near Vanilla: Game Over, Mafia Win!

[armlx]

. i voted for MafiaSSK because he was lurking and because i dont like the way he tend to play games. plus he hadnt updated his current games list which lead me to believe he was conflicted about his role and didnt know how to put it down. just because other people had voted him earlier doesnt make me scum just means people are on the same page.

That's pretty loose reasoning, sounds like making up excuses to wagon.

Again, it has been said SSK doesn't post really ever. Does him always doing this always make him scum?

[Doktor Per]

Just a rather suspicious and thus shitty player.

I really do hope that he gets more verbacious. Most of the tossers here should, to be honest. Well atleast there are a few good men out there willing to put their balls on the line while a man is running around with a scalpel.

Some of us will die, but if all of us run around with our balls out, the chances of me dying will decrease.

[armlx]

Just a rather suspicious and thus shitty player.

The irony is not lost.

[Darox]

Just a rather suspicious and thus shitty player.

The correct answer is yes, MafiaSSK is always scum.
Nice analogy though.

[Doktor Per]

I realize that I am a suspicious player, but if I weren't I'd be an even SHITTIER player. In my book being suspicion is a mark of being someone who participates. The more you say and act and do, the more people can take from you and run with.

So in that case, yes, I'd rather be suspicious than to be a lurker that rarely votes or goes FoS Scumbuddy (whatever that means) just to stay alive. Give us meat to eat people.

armlx, your posts have been quite unhelpful so far (from my viewpoint atleast), a bit of fingerwaggling, explenation of terminology (though the Mafia definition of Meta is apparently the dictionary definition of Style) an insight into your thought process would be helpful. Lest you got something to hide.

[armlx]

your definition of participation is loose. You finally make 1 attack in this last post, and its an OMGUS.

And if you break down and put my posts out of context, then that is what I did. Or it could be described as attacking wagonning and reasoning a vote swap.

[Doktor Per]

I'm not attacking you, I am saying that what you say is short, aggressive and feels detached. It's not much to go on and thus, not helpful for me.

A good reason to hide stuff, is usually Scum, though it could be a meta reason. (Revolving around itself, not allowing other people get a read on you, for future games)

I just state things as I see them and when they come to me, shitty tactic? Perhaps, but it's worth a shot. (Meta reason, change tactics every single game, that way no one ever gets a read on you)

[armlx]

I just state things as I see them and when they come to me, shitty tactic?

Only if those things are misrepresentations of the truth.

[Doktor Per]

My interpretations of what is put in front of me. Can't get any more honest than that.

[Korts]

The "I wanted the top of the page" Vote Count (AKA Third Vote Count)

(4) retrowiz -Apothecary, Gamma, Sineish, SpamWise

(3) MafiaSSK -Doktor Per, ChaosOmega, thegeckoj
(2) thegeckoj -armlx, Darox
(1) Darox -ZazieR
(1) armlx -killa seven
(1) Gamma -retrowiz

not voting:

MafiaSSK

[retrowiz]

I just state things as I see them and when they come to me, shitty tactic?

Only if those things are misrepresentations of the truth.

there is very little truth in this game. Scum has truth, the rest of us have guesses. interpretation and inuition is all we have.

[ZazieR]

This is a really stupid wago. I can't drag out many scumtells from posts nor do I have the ability to lengthen short little paragraphs. So instead, I post little and scumhunt usually by PBPAing.

MafiaSSK, as said in this quote, you scumhunt though PBPAing. I was wondering what your thoughts were about the reasons the voters against you have given and if you agree with the voters who vote against Retro?

Darox, why is/was Sineish the most scummiest player out of the SSK bandwagon to you? Can you give the quotes which responses you don't like from geckoj and why?

Every voter of the SSK wagon, why did you vote SSK? K7 is also known as a lurker. But all of you choose SSK. Explanation please.

[Gamma]

unvote

because out of all the SSK's wagon, i'd rather

Vote Dokter Per

.

[retrowiz]

why do you rather Dok?

[Sineish]

Also, I didn't say you said he was calling the MafiaSSK vote a bandwagon.

Sorry, my bad. I completely missread the "calling

for

" bit even when copying/pasting it to quote.

Sineish is the person I found most suspicious out of the SSK wagon

I realise that I was spending rather a lot of my posts arguing against a bandwagon on MafiaSSK. I don't think I did this any more that you argued for his bandwagonning though. My concern was that we didn't quick lynch someone based only on their play style, and not on anything they had done in this game.

[armlx]

Darox, what distinguishes Sinesh's behavior from mine.

[Doktor Per]

unvote

because out of all the SSK's wagon, i'd rather

Vote Dokter Per

.

I would love to hear the reasoning behind this!

[Darox]

People questioning MafiaSSK wagon
- 3 votes

4:

Sineish - Votes Doktor Per because he is the only one who

10:

Sineish - Defends SSK, stating that he is not lurking because he has posted 3 one liners.

[Darox]

EBWOP: The first one should read 'Votes Doktor Per because he is the only one who stated a random reason for voting SSK but has been calling for a bandwagon.'

[Apothecary]

To be honest, I thought the MafiaSSK wagon was a bit weak. But that doesn't sound like a good enough reason for Gamma to switch his vote to Dokter.

[Doktor Per]

To be honest, I thought the MafiaSSK wagon was a bit weak.

It was stupid and extremely weak.

[SpamWise]

SpamWise, what do you think of SSK based upon what he has said in this game?

To be honest I think he's a lazy bollocks. And if he's really as bad as everyone says than I wouldn't really have many qualms lynching him for Day 1, but I think his wagon has been his most meaningful contribution so far. As in the reactions that have arisen from it and that kind of jazz.

armlx, your posts have been quite unhelpful so far (from my viewpoint atleast), a bit of fingerwaggling, explenation of terminology (though the Mafia definition of Meta is apparently the dictionary definition of Style) an insight into your thought process would be helpful. Lest you got something to hide.

What, less helpful than calling everyone tossers and berating them into participating more?

FoS:Doktor Per

for straw-clutching. And for calling the kettle black.

Will change my vote when I find a more deserving candidate, but not quite sold on thegecko wagon yet.

[retrowiz]

I will be away till 22nd. I might be able to comment now and again, but sporatic at best..

[Doktor Per]

FoS:Doktor Per

.

Hey mate, care to tell me what FoS means first?
I do hope you don't view me as having double standards, I expect the same from everyone here as I do from myself.

[Darox]

FoS = Finger of suspicion.

Used the show signs of minor suspicion or cataloging all those people you would be voting for if you had enough votes for them all.