Signs and Void (Game Over) [TM2015]
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
Can you handle... the sweetness??? Are you developing a craving for that sweet sugary goodness between your lips??? No matter what your weakness, Sickeningly Sweet has arrived to assault allfivesix of your senses and leave you powerless to prevent us fromhaving a lot of fun!winning this thing!
(Don't worry about that fiery planeswalker of rage, Ceph's a sweetheart deep down)
Let's get started then, shall we?
I haven't heard from my tooth-achingly delicious friends yet on their thoughts regarding the bane and choice, but my opinion at the moment is that while I wouldn't actually be terribly upset if we went for no bane, the bane should be used as if it were a lynch if we do use it, and that's how I'm intending to use my bane vote at this stage anyway. Oh and I'm Pro-Choice1.
In post 88, Titus wrote:Yes but Alquin's job is to appear scummy so scum do not kill him.
You don't need to be scummy to stop scum from killing you. I understand where you're coming from but I don't think we have to be so anxious regarding the use of bane. Obviously Alquin doesn't want to be lynched, so using the bane as we would a lynch should work ok imo. Besides, if we bane some scummy non-Alquin townie that's a candle, we may even scare scum into killing off a potential mislynch.
What about? I had my team talk me through the mechanics in the pregame phase when we got our role PMs because I had no idea what was going on at first.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
If I didn't care way too much about what people thought of me, I'd be bumbling like an idiot too!
My understanding is that Titus is concerned about Alquin being important because he limits the number of unmakes/kill attempts the scum can make. I might be missing something, but I'm not super scared about bane possibly revealing Alquin, nor do I see any super good reason why we can't discuss it as long as Alquin doesn't stand on top of a mountain shouting out his name or something.
PEdit: That's his current avatar and I didn't know how to find the other one. Plus, inner cuteness and all that jazz.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
Cheetory, can you please explain your current opinions on Tammy and Marquis?
In post 96, Marquis wrote:I keep thinking Alquin is the bad one even though I keep looking to remind myself he's not!
And my head's not really in the right state for this game at the moment, and because this is a special special game, instead of shitposting and talking incessantly on as usual I am going to take a step back and just watch for now!
I skimmed over this before, but would like to say that I very much enjoyed you as a player in our last game and while you are free to play in whichever way you like, your usual incessant talking and "shitposting" is cool too!
Bane: Untrod Tripod
Choice: 1
I've thought about it and I really believe that Choice 1 is better. I think it has great potential to confirm people as town where Choice 2 wouldn't. I'm happy to consider arguments for Choice 2 in the meantime though.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
The annoying thing about protection in this set-up is that you have no idea whether you actually stopped someone from being killed or not. It could have been some sort of roleblock, or the scum not knowing how to tell the difference between candle and stone or some other weird complicated theme thing. The great thing about choice 1 though, is that the successfully protected person is informed of the fact that they were successfully protected! Now the first thought from this is that scum can just claim to have been successfully protected ----> TOTES CONFTOWN, but this carries a great degree of risk for scum, because you know, someone actually needs to have protected you for you to have been successfully protected. I'm pretty sure there's quite a low chance that scum making up the fact that they'd been protected would have happened to be protected that night, so chances are scum are going to be all cowardly and cautious and not make up anything. But this means that town who have actually been successfully protected can claim so, and thus be pretty certainly town, especially since there'll be someone alive who in fact did protect them, which sort of helps matters.
Without Choice 1, we'll have no idea what even happened at night due to the complicated nature of the theme.
When I look at Choice 2 I just find it incredibly underwhelming. I mean, sure, if scum try to kill this protected person with two people it makes a difference, but I figure that if scum are desperate enough to have someone dead that they'd kill them twice, choice 2 will just mean they'll kill them three times. So, the difference doesn't seem that great to me?
As I said though, this is only my opinion and I very well could be missing some disadvantage to choice 1 or some benefit to choice 2. If such things exist, don't hold back!-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 190, Tammy wrote:In post 141, DeasVail wrote:Cheetory, can you please explain your current opinions on Tammy and Marquis?
Why did you specifically ask him and why me and markee?
To me it sounded like he was townreading (or at least definitively 'not-scumreading') Marquis, yet seemed to be scumreading you, which was odd to me because I thought that the same thought process that would scumread you would also lead to scumreading Marquis, and the same kind of thing if townreading. I also liked his response though, and while Ceph thinks he's scum I'm more undecided and still have UT as my best guess.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 215, fferyllt wrote:In post 191, DeasVail wrote:In post 190, Tammy wrote:In post 141, DeasVail wrote:Cheetory, can you please explain your current opinions on Tammy and Marquis?
Why did you specifically ask him and why me and markee?
To me it sounded like he was townreading (or at least definitively 'not-scumreading') Marquis, yet seemed to be scumreading you, which was odd to me because I thought that the same thought process that would scumread you would also lead to scumreading Marquis, and the same kind of thing if townreading. I also liked his response though, and while Ceph thinks he's scum I'm more undecided and still have UT as my best guess.
ceph played with him in the Advance Wars theme game. I'm also seeing some differences here from his play in that game.
however, I also meta'd some of his offsite scum/town games in that game, and I'm not really seeing stuff that shouts scum to me atm.
I think it's those differences that Ceph is seeing. I tend to get confused whenever I specifically set out to meta-read people though, so I'm leaving him as possible scum for now, but I've got higher priorities.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 220, ActionDan wrote:Did you ever say why you thought UT was scum? (I also suppose this is an independent read from Ceph.)
Shadoweh wrote:It's really simple, protection doesn't work very accurately. It's better to have less effective protection that gives information then it is to have more effective protection that might not do anything at all.
And mine
I don't like UT's interactions with you nor do I like 41, which seems to be an attempt to be all pro-town and attack TSO for not thinking that there is some super great importance between choosing 1 and 2. I agree in that the choice probably does matter, but I can easily see town being indifferent to it, and the whole post is made even weirder by the fact that there's no real evidence that UT put a lot of thought into his choice. I guess I'm biased in that I still see Choice 2 as quite clearly inferior, but in my opinion if you're going to pick Choice 2 and then attack others for being indifferent to the Choice, you better have a good explanation!
This read did come before Ceph read the game, but he independently didn't like UT's abrasiveness and felt it was unnecessary. And while I think UT is the best bane choice, Ceph would be voting for Cheetory if he was in the game (and can confirm Ffery that Advance Wars is what Ceph was talking about in our PT).-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 239, Marquis wrote:In post 141, DeasVail wrote:I skimmed over this before, but would like to say that I very much enjoyed you as a player in our last game and while you are free to play in whichever way you like, your usual incessant talking and "shitposting" is cool too!
Thank you, DeasVail! I enjoyed your play that game as well; it was minimally offensive, which made sense with you being SK in the end! I hope we can continue to buddy each other in this game without having to worry about you trying to pull the same tricks again!
This indeed won't be necessary unless you are scum. And I do have a ridiculously strong townread on you right now which I'm not sure is that rational, so hopefully not!-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 258, Cheetory6 wrote:I feel like Ceph is comparing my replacegame to my earlygame which is kind of unfair. q.q Although maybe there's more to it than that? Unless he really wants Deas to engage me on that, I'm not really sure I want to get too caught up on a self-centered meta discussion.
It's not a huge focus of mine right now, so there's probably no need at the moment. I'll let you know if Ceph has any questions for you though.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 275, Marquis wrote:Why, thank you! I do wish I could completely return the favor, but in hindsight regarding Quil's game, I would very much love for you to actually explain the townread this time instead of baiting me to stew in my own happiness over it and generally ignore any scum indications as a result! So if you would, that would be very happy and kind of you to do!
Well first I guess I see this change in style you're adopting as pretty unlikely to come from scum. I try to imagine myself posting like that as scum and it just makes me feel all fake and urgh and yeah no way would I actually post like that because I'd expect to be lynched within the hour. From what I know of you though, it's the kind of style I could see you experimenting with as town, but if you were scum I'm pretty sure you'd just stick with how you regularly post, especially with the recent end to Quil's game where you were quite consistently townread iirc.
The not so rational part of my read is that all your posts make me smile and this kind of thing does influence me, probably more than it should! I think you're town for other reasons too though, so I'll convince myself that it's ok.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 290, Zar wrote:In post 285, DeasVail wrote:Zar, would it be possible to elaborate a bit on Empire's meta townread of me?
He's around now, he says that off the top of his head, you're self conscious and a lot more stiff and awkward when you're scum; basically your care a lot more about your image; when you're town you're more relaxed and don't really have a filter (he's going off the top of his head, he hasn't played with you in like a year).
Why does he have a confident read in me then if it's off the top of his head?-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 276, Zar wrote:Also, fferry, Empire is also townreading DV for meta and he potentially thinks shadoweh is town but isn't as confident in that read as in DV because he doesn't have that great a track-record with her.
This made the read on me sound pretty confident.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 295, Tammy wrote:Because they are bullshitting a conversation they are not actually having. Well I mean they're having it now, but it's because they're pretending to discuss reads instead of actually have them.
Empire knows that I know he can read me pretty well and he'd be happy to catch me as scum. In the last westeros game, when MINA wasn't sure if I was scum she depended on empires read, who was spectating the game. Empire was my other head in fantasy camp; he has a pretty good insight into my scum game. And if you remember last year or so's yoloville he said he knew how to make me town tell if he wanted.
He'd tell me where I was going wrong on shadoweh if that slot was actually town and town reading shadoweh because he'd want a perfect town win here if possible and he wouldn't want me going off on a tangent he thought was wrong, and because he knows how I think about this game, he'd talk to me about it not just put me down.
If he were in this game, he'd probably do something close to that anyway because he'd be 1) playing to get a town read from me and 2) wouldn't want conflict. He can not do these things here because he wouldn't care because he's not the one in the direct conflict and leaving a message that's just putting me down instead of doing anything constructive he knows would bite and get me upset and then discredit me. And that slot is doing it on purpose because they're svum.
I think you may be onto something, but I'm wondering whether if Zar is scum, Empire etc. would feel a certain amount of pressure to conform to such expectations.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 311, Tammy wrote:DV wrong the last time he played against him, so his meta read makes no sense.
This is a concern of mine too, especially with Zar being unable to decide whether it's a confident read or not, but I'd like to hear more first!-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 319, Zar wrote:In post 315, DeasVail wrote:In post 311, Tammy wrote:DV wrong the last time he played against him, so his meta read makes no sense.
This is a concern of mine too, especially with Zar being unable to decide whether it's a confident read or not, but I'd like to hear more first!
No. Empire says he has a strong read on you. He is basing it on the meta on you off the top of his head, though.
Thanks, that makes sense and I think I read you wrong before.
In post 340, Titus wrote:@GiF, Espy's in this game but he is a little nuts so I am giving him a little leeway. He will obvtown or obvscum without pressure...hopefully.
Espe is great and I'm super excited to be playing with him.
In post 341, Bulbazak wrote:Ceph has it right. You should listen to him.
If you're going to say stuff like this to me please back it up. I can be incredibly stubborn when it comes down to it and this isn't going to help. Why should I not be giving bane to UT? Why should I think that Cheetory being less analytical and more inclined to take potshots in early game here than in later-game elsewhere means he's scum? Why are you acting all superior and telling me to bane Cheetory when you're giving bane to Zar?
-
Oh, and unrelated, but I'm probably not going to be forming reads on people before they post and I don't get the benefit of giving bane to people who haven't posted. The only reason I can see is that because the bane target is not here we get to pretend that we're actually not giving the bane to anyone, so obviously I'm missing something.
Oh and regarding Cheetory's stance on Zar, I think it's pretty reasonable and quite similar to my own stance so it seems weird that Bulb would scumread him for it. I've been scared myself of getting swept up by what is actually a pretty good-sounding case and lynching a team that I think has great players who I'd love to have around if they're town. Obviously this isn't going to stop me from lynching them if I think they're scum, but I'm going to actually think it through, and Tammy's reaction is quite emotional, so it's reasonable to think it possible that she'd be less passionate about it later on. I don't think she will be, but for someone who isn't very familiar with the players, it makes a lot of sense.
I am concerned about Zar, particularly the team's townread on me which feels almost like it's because it's what all the cool kids are doing, and Tammy's words hold a lot of weight imo, but I've decided that I'd still rather bane targets such as UT or Bulbazak, who has more recently started to concern me. I probably can't explain why in coherent terms, but for me they just fit in my mind better as scum. If Zar is baned then I'm not going to be upset over it since my confidence in him not being scum is probably lower than this post makes out, but the sudden increase in interest in baning Zar (bulbazak's jump onto it is particularly bad imo) has me all cautious, and I don't know whether it's me being too much of a worry wart or not but it is what it is.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
Sorry for probably being more abrasive than I should have been before.
Bulb, if you're town then I appreciate the advice, but I currently think you're scum for a number of reasons, not limited to you telling me what to do. I do form reads emotionally sometimes and I'm aware of this, but I feel it's unfair to dismiss my reads because of this, especially when they are not entirely emotional.
Regarding Cheetory, the stuff about being less analytical and taking pot-shots are the lines along which Ceph is thinking, and I don't know what to think of you claiming to be thinking along the same lines as Ceph when you evidently have no idea what Ceph was thinking. Well actually, I do have a theory, and I'll get to that.
Ultimately, I think you're attempting to manipulate me and doing a poor job of it. It would seem strange for someone to interact with the paragon in such a way, but it's quite common knowledge that I believe I'm not nearly as good as my banner would suggests, and I have been described using such words as meek, indecisive and submissive in the past. So, I do not believe it beyond you, or anyone else, to try manipulating me in such a way if you consider it in your best interests to do so. If you are scum as I suspect then you have vastly underestimated the extent of my paranoia.
You have told me that Ceph is right and that I should listen to him even though it has been proven that you have no idea what he was even saying. You say that I'm indecisive, and while this is a common feature of my play, I have been making a (most likely futile) attempt to live up to the paragon title that has been ascribed to me and don't believe that I've actually been indecisive here. I've been clear about which choice I want, to bane or not to bane, and also who I want to bane (ironically any indecision regarding this is only coming about now). You tell me that I'm lost when the only indication for this is that I don't agree with your reads. You are using my 'emotional side' in an attempt to get me to stop not-scumreading Cheetory when my reasons for disagreeing with you are merely seeing his position on the TammyvZar issue as a sensible one that I could see town taking, and not emotional at all. You claim that my townread on Marquis and lack of super strong scumread on Zar are only due to their buddying of me. However, my main reason for townreading Marquis is unrelated to his buddying (the influence of which on my read I'm quite aware of) and my main concern about Zar is his townread of me.
The above myriad of really strange (and pretty much entirely untrue) claims makes me think that you must be scum. I think it's very likely that people who don't know me well (and in fact probably all but those closest to me) would believe that the best method of defusing me as a threat would be to tell me I'm wrong, sew doubt into me regarding my own reads. Surely meek, indecisive, submissive DV would retreat into his bubble of self-loathing and follow your lead! I even believe that this could happen myself sometimes, and it was in fact my gut reaction to your comments, especially 374.
I guess having this paragon thing has instilled some semblance of confidence within me, and this is dangerous. Whether for town or scum though... that's still to be decided.
Things that give me more confidence in my read are the following:
-His response to Ffery in 341 is the kind of response I could see myself making as scum. Ffery's quote is rather harmless and under normal circumstances shouldn't give Bulbazak any cause for concern. She is aware of her tendency to scumread him or want to scumread him. However, I believe Bulb's reply reveals an underlying self-consciousness/need to be townread.
-Again in 341, I dislike the way he voted to bane Zar, acting as if it wasn't his choice to but rather his team-mate telling him to, when in fact he later claims that he does believe Zar is scum.
Bane: Bulbazak
Though really all I want is to see him lynched.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 383, mastin2 wrote:How about that Choice 2, while not confirming players from the word of the mod, can still confirm players through word of the player, while making said protection stronger, meaning town potentially lives longer?
I don't get what you mean here, so if you could explain in simple terms it would be much appreciated. I do also have a more detailed posts explaining my preference of choice.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 395, mastin2 wrote:
I have words to say on this.In post 376, DeasVail wrote:Bulb, if you're town then I appreciate the advice, but I currently think you're scum for a number of reasons, not limited to you telling me what to do.
I don't want to say them right now.
You may have elaborated on this later in the thread, but if you think I'm wrong then just tell me why. If you think I'm right then you can just say it.
In post 397, mastin2 wrote:
Two gives double the protection on a person, extending the life of a successful protect.In post 384, DeasVail wrote:I don't get what you mean here, so if you could explain in simple terms it would be much appreciated. I do also have a more detailed posts explaining my preference of choice.
A player, be it that person or an external benefactor, can claim it.
Plus ~reasons~.
My understanding is that the double protection will only be of benefit if there are two kill attempts on a player. Additionally, I see little benefit from the claiming of protects due to the number of possible causes of a lack of kill, including scum not getting the sign right, roleblocks, protects and who knows what else? I may be missing something, but I haven't seen anyone bring up anything yet that stops Choice 1 from being the obvious choice for me.
In post 402, T S O wrote:And this is something I'm beginning to feel repeatedly paranoid about, especially in regards to Choice 1 - that scum will either manufacture a situation where they don't use an Unmake and claim protection, or they go the other route and make everyone paranoid of that so that the net result of someone claiming truthfully about getting a message about being protected ends up being almost zero.
I feel that scum claiming protection in Choice 1 is unlikely and incredibly risky because if no one protected them I feel it will become obvious and yay confscum. If we're treating protect claims as anything alignment-indicative with Choice 2, then I agree, we're screwed.
In post 412, Zar wrote:Basically, by choosing two, it forces the scum to have to focus on the same person to get them killed. Unmake requires them to match the sign correctly to a player to kill them, right? So it forces them to stay away from potential protective targets unless they decide to pile all up.
In that sense Choose: Two
My opinion still is that one is better. In the scenario where someone protects someone, scum still need at least two people to pile up on them if we choose choice 1. The only difference with choice 2 is that they need 3 (and only if their target is being protected), and I feel like the scenarios where this will actually make a difference are limited and not super beneficial compared to the information that can be gained from Choice 1. I guess what I'm imagining is this. If scum want to kill someone and don't know that they're going to be protected, they're probably only going to be submitting one unmake on them, which would not work with either choice 1 or choice 2 in effect. If scum know or strongly suspect that someone is going to be protected they can still kill them with choice 2 in place, just with one extra unmake, or they can avoid them completely and aim for the protective role etc. I'm probably feeling less passionate about 1 > 2 than I was before, since scum having to use that extra unmake to kill someone they really want to kill does limit the damage they can do, but I still feel the potential information gained from 1 makes that choice better.
Oh it's been decided anyway. Never mind!
In post 419, Cheetory6 wrote:
Where exactly am I appealing to DV's emotional side in any of my interactions with him? :/Bulba wrote:Look, I get that you're lost right now, but can you please not let yourself form judgements around who appeals to your emotional side.
Yay I'm not crazy.
In post 428, Titus wrote:Bulba's also pretty town, just in case anyone's wondering.
Why?
--
Ffery, what are your/your team's thoughts on Bulbazak? Ceph tells me that Bulb is the sort of person who could be manipulative in such a way as scum and I think I might have only one game of prior experience with him? Anyway, it's a scumread I'm very interested in but I feel like in-thread thoughts on him have been very limited.
PEdit: Espe! Please don't be scum like people are saying you are!-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 502, Titus wrote:@DV, He asks questions, follows through on the answers and articulates his positions well. This is town Bulba.
Yeah I'm sorry but this doesn't make me feel any better about him.
PEdit: Thanks Espe.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 511, Titus wrote:It's not conftown but I feel really good about Bulba.
How do you explain his ultra-weird post to me where he tells me I'm indecisive, lost and townreading people because they buddied me when none of this is true?-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 518, Espeonage wrote:I've decided I'm going to sass this entire game.
This would be quite excellent.
In post 519, Titus wrote:In post 515, DeasVail wrote:In post 511, Titus wrote:It's not conftown but I feel really good about Bulba.
How do you explain his ultra-weird post to me where he tells me I'm indecisive, lost and townreading people because they buddied me when none of this is true?
I do perceive some buddying with you, from Marquis and then UT. Can't Tell if Marquis is actually buddying or not because of the exclamation points fogging that up. You commented on UT yourself a little.
So I don't see that post as wierd just a disagreement about perceptions.
We do tend to like people who like us, so the alarm isn't wierd.
That's the one thing in his post that's partially true, and even with that I think I have a pretty objective reason for townreading Marquis and even the less objective part is a personal enjoyment of his posts rather than him buddying me. (And I'm pretty sure UT and I have never buddied each other)
This thing about Marquis wouldn't be a concern to me by itself. It's not a huge leap to think I'm townreading Marquis because he's buddying me. But you've kind of ignored all the other stuff which is even less substantiated imo.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
Titus, here are the posts (although I sort of treat them as one post) that especially concern me about Bulbazak. I asked you for your explanation of the things that concern me, which I've bolded here.
Spoiler: Bulb's posts
And this is the question I asked:
In post 515, DeasVail wrote:In post 511, Titus wrote:It's not conftown but I feel really good about Bulba.
How do you explain his ultra-weird post to me where he tells me I'm indecisive, lost and townreading people because they buddied me when none of this is true?
Yet you only talk about Marquis.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 541, Titus wrote:@DV, Join me on Zar. If you think Bulba's scum discrediting emotional play, then he's indirectly wanting to discredit Tammy. We all know she made an emotional plea to vote Zar based on the Empire stuff. The only reason to do that as scum is Bulba/Zar.
The 'discredit Tammy' theory is too indirect to be conclusive for me and I'm at a position where I actually have some confidence in Bulbazak in being scum whereas I don't have as much in Zar being scum. So, I'm going to try and get Bulbazak baned if I possibly can, but if it gets down to it, I'd probably be willing to compromise on Zar since my team thinks he's scum and he's not exactly a townread for me either.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 576, Shadoweh wrote:It can't be Deevee, he's too cute to be manipulative!
Is this serious, sarcastic or a weird mixture of both?-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 605, Titus wrote:So DV, you haven't seen Tammy scum either in your games?
I saw her in TM2012 and there was one game ages ago where she was scum but I was daykilled 24 hours into the game and was too bitter to actually pay attention. Now every time I play with her she's ridiculously town and then she ends up being town! So, even though I hear rumours of her great scumgame, I have convinced myself that it's ok if I ignore these.
(In all seriousness I do try and read her but suspect that if she were scum in a game she would probably have me fooled)-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 627, Empire wrote:P-edit (DV): Uhh, if you think I would deliberately walk into a scum slot, especially after not having played for like a year, then I'm going to have to ask the admins to remove the banner, sorry.
I would ask them to remove it myself if it wasn't an insult to the whole scummies process! But yeah, I'm ridiculously paranoid and have no real way of telling when I'm being paranoid or perceptive, and it makes sense to me that you'd find some sudden inspiration to shock everyone with a badass scumgame in order to boost your chances of winning this game just because of how town the move looks on the surface. I am, however, prepared to be amazed.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 629, Titus wrote:Not liking the AtE against DV.
I am incredibly confused as to why you are calling out Empire on that, but have no problem with Bulbazak.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
My gut reaction to recent posts is that Espe and Empire are town (Empire's townread on me no longer really bothers me at least), but I don't have the time right now to go over everything as I would like and I think I have the tendency to go Wow! at posts like that as well. I have an exam tomorrow and after that I should have more time! Though Tammy, I would be particularly keen to hear updates from you on your thoughts on Empire as
1. Empire is similar to you in that I think I've only ever seen him as town and probably townread him every time (unless I was scum) and am afraid of going :O big post = town here, and
2. If Empire is town then I'd very much like to realise that because I think his whole team is amazing and would very much like to work with them without the barrier of thinking they're scum beyond base paranoia levels. (And probably another reason why I need someone to tell me if I'm too easily being wooed)
No need to feel any pressure here, and I can't guarantee that I'll agree if you scumread him, but yeah, I think you probably get what I mean.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 681, Marquis wrote:Empire kind of reads here as rubbing the ~effort~ in everyone's face! Scum for the emphasis on it I think!
Is there something beyond the high amount of post content that makes you think this? The actual degree of effort doesn't deviate from my expectations of town-Empire.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 692, Tammy wrote:Like it baffles my mind and you are never ever ever allowed to make that smug claim that people should hang up their shoes and go home or that DV should hang up the banner again. That is nothing you're allowed to say ever again.
Tammy, I appreciate the sentiment, but I took that comment from Empire as pretty light-hearted banter and not something very serious. It sort of matches my expectation of both him and Regfan (who I sort of consider the same person in my head even though I've met one of them which doesn't make any sense but whatever) and is definitely something I could see either of them saying and I'm ok with that. To me it feels completely different from what Bulbazak's approach to me was, but I think I'm going to be stalling making a decision on both reads until Major Day.
In post 717, GuyInFreezer wrote:In post 658, Shadoweh wrote:Bane: Bulbazak
Hey Bulba. Why are you picking a fight with Deasvail if you think he's one of the most obvtown players in the game?
What was your problem with this? I more specifically had a problem with exactly how much effort he was putting into making me realise that my read on him was flawed, but it was the same kind of thing.
In post 883, Titus wrote:Hey, I'd love your thoughts... but please avoid emotion land if you can.
Emotion land is the happiest place on Earth!
In post 941, Tammy wrote:Also whoever gets informed of being protected probably shouldn't out it unless it becomes necessary
This was a recent thought of mine as well.
In post 972, Espeonage wrote:You self voting is a really bad sign though.
Why?
In post 995, Gammagooey wrote:Gammagooey wrote:
I think we might want to have 2-3 people we think are scummy say that they're detecting tonight to try to find Viktor- since traces always come up null for him we can start clearing people of being Viktor on a successful trace -
I'm a bit wary of saying that we should immediately lynch someone tomorrow if they come up with a couple of trace fails in case scum have something that would make traces fail on other people but we can at least start clearing people of being Viktor in case he/she's wound up as one of the stronger players on their team and doesn't get lynched for a while.
I don't want volunteers for this by the way. It needs to be at least a few people coming to a consensus on scummy people for it to have a chance to actually hit Viktor, not people volunteering to get cleared of being him.
I'm going to finish reading the thread, and then decide what I think of this. I'm still not sure how worth it it is.
In post 1012, Empire wrote:Like, I'm starting to wonder if I'm just being bad or something because it seems like everyone (including apparently at least one of my teammates) think Mr. Boring Quote Strip Guy is plainly scum.
I'm going to reassess at some point, but my conclusion may very well still end up being scum.
In post 1018, Empire wrote:Tammy and/or DV, do you think this CDB sounds like CDB in The Wire?
I will get to this, but not yet. Sorry about the delay.
In post 1031, ChannelDelibird wrote:I can understand you reaching for this if we haven't played together since then, but that game feels like a very long time ago. Pretty sure both of those people have more recent experience with me.
I'm not sure that I do, honestly.
---
Regarding boon, I'm pretty underwhelmed by it honestly. The main thing I'm thinking is that there's no way I want scum getting it because as if we're going to make their job any easier for them. And because of this, I would be ok with getting it, but I also believe that there is potentially someone else who would benefit more from it than I would (who's not scum). As it stands, I would only be comfortable giving it to myself or a strong townread, and these are currently limited to Tammy and Marquis, although while I have finished reading the thread, I haven't put a great deal of thought into my reads yet, so there could be more after I do that. TSO and Vezok are potential contenders.
I'm still not sure whether I'll post a big reads list or keep it quiet, but I'll be back with more thoughts soon enough.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 1063, Shadoweh wrote:There is, actually. For example, the part where Espeonage claimed VT, presumably because he thought he had too much of a chance of being nightkilled. I would say your post on it increased my townread of you but the extended family of We Need a Better Name was already hardtown reading you so. <_<
I guess I have faith in people to be careful about the implications of what they say. Scum are very free to speculate on what I am based on my post but will probably get it wrong no matter what.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 1070, fferyllt wrote:In post 1063, Shadoweh wrote:extended family
interesting (though not really relevant to anything) that you used this word. I've been talking about extended families to Nacho wrt these games.
I'm not sure about the implications the use of this term has on my team.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
In post 1078, Shadoweh wrote:You know what they say Deevee, incest is wincest!
Thank you Shadow.
--
Regarding Gamma's proposal, I've decided that I disagree and don't really want to explain why.
And Empire, when it comes to CDB and The Wire, the only thing I really remember about CDB from that game was that he skated by for a while because of a really 'townie' reaction to some pressure he was getting. Ceph thinks CDB is town but I'm not seeing it. Still have to decide what my overall read is there though, but it will most likely not be based on meta.-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
I'm going to try something new for me because I always enjoy reading posts of this style and this is Team Mafia so why not? It might be the only time I ever do this and knowing me I may very well give up after less than half the playerlist! I do have a lot of time though and nothing better that I'm going to be doing with it, so here we go! Also, Ceph is amazing and has posted some thoughts on this game, so those will be influencing this post as well.
Spoiler: Don't Expect Much
Empire, my admiration for you guys has increased enormously now. My post took less than a 1/4 the effort of the ones you and people like you make and I have already sworn to myself that I'm never attempting anything like this ever again (well maybe not as final as that, but close).-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
-
-
DeasVail he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13314
- Joined: October 7, 2011
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Australia
Oh realised I never did this.
Boon: Tammy
Marquis and TSO are also ok options, but Tammy is preferred due to being the least likely scum imo and also I don't think this boon is the kind of thing that's going to make a huge difference to night kill chances etc. I may not be as concerned about this as I should be though, so as I said Marquis, TSO and maybe vezok are also ok.