In post 21, Oversoul wrote:Llama, did you spend tokens on this game?
Not sure I like this question.
VOTE: Oversoul
In post 21, Oversoul wrote:Llama, did you spend tokens on this game?
In post 72, Aeronaut wrote:In post 68, theelkspeaks wrote:So guys, how does ika have 4 votes already? Like he's kinda not saying much of anything useful, but I don't see anything abysmal in his posts either, it feels more like "pre-game banter" from a player who doesn't have reads yet.
I'm keeping a moderately suspicious eye on this wagon.
What's wrong with a wagon?
In post 80, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 74, theelkspeaks wrote:Might just be a playstyle thing, might be from playing on another (non-mafia but having mafia games) site with different rules and a meta resulting from that, but I tend to think a quickly building wagon without a solid case, especially at the start of an early day, probably has at least one scum. Don't have good rules for identifying which of the votes is the scum though.
Why would you need rules? Can't you just look at the votes and see if any of them seem off or scummy (e.g. Cheery Dog or from your perspective maybe Bluetoffee)?
In post 79, Llamarble wrote:but neither Regfan nor CES has towned very hard yet.
Were you expecting us to?
In post 84, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:64 - Correct Psyche, I was more interested in trying to get you to join the ika wagon.
67 - I just know you're gonna elaborate on this, Zach.
68 - This post is pretty bad by elk. Who is suspicious on the ika wagon? Why?
If you don't like the wagon, why are not inquiring about the people on it?
VOTE: Elk
83 - Ika, if you think scum is voting you, you should probably do something about that.
In post 113, Llamarble wrote:In post 110, Psyche wrote:i don't really understand what you mean by that llama
Town usually go depth-first and put some time into analyzing one player, then another. Scum focus on understanding the game as a whole so they can make sure the day doesn't head down a path that will hurt them.
In post 116, Llamarble wrote:Elk, what is your opinion of Cheery Dog? Also, why would an analysis of the votes for ika take a long time? There are like 100 posts in this thread and only 4 votes for ika.
In post 118, Llamarble wrote:In post 115, theelkspeaks wrote:
I actually disagree with that. As town, I find I need to understand where the game as a whole is going before I can see who looks scummy. As scum, I'd prefer to try to see how far I can push a player than to understand the game as a whole.
Can you link me a game where you did this as scum?
In post 357, theelkspeaks wrote:In post 356, Zachrulez wrote:That's all it takes to be town for you?
Zach is scum.
In post 382, Regfan wrote:I don't know why I agreed to work on a public holiday, I do have the next two days off though so big rereads coming up then.
Llama, can understand and agree with the BBT, Zach and CES reads. Don't get your town read on Elk even remotely, comments you're town-reading are part of the reason why I'm scum-reading him and I'm not alone in believing that on my team, mind asking Nacho and Ffyer to at minimum ISO him and give me their thoughts on him because I really really don't like a) His avoidance of my point that if "Token discussion = anti-town" him voting Oversoul over me makes no sense and b) The timing and placement of his Psyche vote as well as attempting to claim he always scum-read him (Maybe get them to ISO me to see our teams thought process re; Elk too?). Think Ika should be much higher on your town list, much much higher.
Elk, I want Coppers (and your) explanation on the Psyche scum-read and the exact progression of how you came about having it as I don't buy Post 369 at all.
In post 365, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:You know we don't have to actually solve the game, right? I'm just aiming to win it in three lynches and that seems pretty doable.
Solving the game is the fun part, no? Gives me something to do during breaks at work, on the bus, instead of being able to fall asleep. Okay, maybe I'm just crazy but I like to feel like I've got a very good grasp on the scum-team and have a solid group of town reads I'd bank on and I'm not having it this game yet.
In post 368, Aeronaut wrote:I actually feel like there's probably one scum within the Zach, BBT thing. That whole fight feels forced to me.
BBT touches on this above (We're both agreeing on something, the universe will explode) but this stance makes no sense whatsoever (Thinking something is SvS or TvT does make some sense but SvT doesn't) as it implies that one of them would be town in this conversation acting awkwardly making nothing stopping from both people being town. The whole "1 scum in X/Y" is something I see scum using a lot to a) Make it look like they're taking a stance at the moment while not really and b) Allows them to line-up reasoning to throw down a vote based on flips alone later (Especially in this setup). So explain why you think the whole fight is forced for me and why you think there's probably one scum in them as opposed to both being scum or both being town.
In post 505, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 491, theelkspeaks wrote:ika's play here feels kinda like some of his play in Hilariously Unbalanced 2, where he was town (in a hydra with mollie) - in that game he went back and forth between super-argumentative and the way he's playing here.
that's a decent part of why I think his wagon isn't great.
I'm currently the only one on it, does the wagon not being great mean anything towards my alignment?
In post 752, Ankamius wrote:theelkspeaks: Bulbazak wants to know if #387 is paraphrased.
In post 745, Regfan wrote:Ank, explain that CES scum read for me especially in light of your "reads reset" comment in Post 683.
I hatehatehate his comment about one slot in his scumlist being town making the rest more likely. Nothing about that post looked town to me.
In post 743, Zachrulez wrote:In post 734, Ankamius wrote:Right, so Oversoul's town. theelkspeaks is probably town. I feel okay about Regfan. ika still looks slimy, but I'll wait to see if GIF replaces in and try to read him instead. CES is scum.
In post 695, Zachrulez wrote:I have no idea why Llamarble was killed. My theory of most of the scum being off wagon combines the factors of how scummy Aero looked, how the wagon formed, and where the nightkill was. (With the idea being that scum would tend to kill where they're not hiding.)
Can you go into detail more here please?
It's the zachrulez (tm) wagon analyzer that consists of how I see things from my own point of view. It should be pretty easy to actually see that point of view. I think my position is pretty clear and that your question delves more into gaining activity by making a theory argument that won't actually make any real productive mark in the game.
Don't even try this crap. If it should be so easy to see this point of view, then it shouldn't be difficult to explain at all either.
If Aeronaut was so scummy, why would scum be off the wagon? Scum would just as easily have hopped on to get towncred.
How does the way the wagon formed indicate scum would be off the wagon? I can't think of a single situation where scum would specifically want to all be off of a town wagon unless they really needed that slot alive, which I strongly doubt is the case here.
Why would Llamarble dying indicate scum would be off the wagon? This one just mystifies me, since it more likely indicates that town were the ones that started the wagon... which means scum would want to hop on for towncred.
In post 1519, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Aneninen also makes a lot of sense as partner to either elk or BBT.
Ank, so you no longer think the Cheery Dog was scum-driven?
Regfan, I gave you a thought-out response and everything and you just disappeared on me. Don't make me doubt your town read on you, please.
Elk, what prompted you to look at the mod iso?
In post 1538, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Elk, no response to 1504?
Also, are you willing to vote CES toDay? If not, why not?
In post 1587, ika wrote:well we have me and CES who can lynch annen
i really dont care and nobody seems to also care how opertunistic elk votes looks.
like im kinda at point of wanting to be lynched o i can take over ZZZX game and not wory about this shit cus if we swap now i have to basicly tell him my thought on shit cus hes not reading this
In post 1593, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Elk, can you explain Anen town read?
I'm struggling to swallow the fact you don't have a read on Anti or Regfan either.
In post 411, Regfan wrote:Know CD is probably the best place to throw down a vote given a) I still didn't like his jump on Llama b) I've got several town reads making him more likely scum via PoE and c) The scum-token usage makes him (significantly apparently) more likely to be scum but feel like that would be conceding that CESs early scum read owned me this game already and that's not something I feel like doing, not while we have this much time left anyway.
My team still thinks Aeronaut fits wall-flower scum and that there isn't any real transition in his reads, just questions that try to make him seem contributive, Empires not as bothered as I am about the "Zach v BBT" is SvT saying it could just be bad play (and admittedly he's kind of right) but the real kicker is that he's been very active elsewhere on the site yet hasn't commented on this game despite there being a lot of content since - lack of popping in to comment on Elks super town post reads more like him waiting to see where people would head next. There's a little more to this too but I'll go into that later if needed.
Vote: Aeranaut
In post 1449, Antihero wrote:In post 1429, Zachrulez wrote:I'm not even saying that I think either is scum. Just that if there is scum in CES/Reg, it's one scum and no more.
If I was to bank on one being scum, I'm actually more uneasy about Reg at this point to be honest.
you had your shot. twice.
you blew it.
sheep me.
In post 1583, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 1582, theelkspeaks wrote:Also, Anen didn't mention this
Does that mean you agree with Aneninen's case?
Also, I asked you some questions:
In post 1541, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 1537, theelkspeaks wrote:Mostly on a whim, I thought it might be useful to see the progression of votes over time, and it turned out some interesting thoughts.
When? During the Night?
What do you think of Ank unvoting me near the end of Yesterday? What do you think of the Cheery Doglynch?
Bonus questions: do you think Ank's less scummy now? Did you think ika was scummy previously?
In post 1862, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:It's the Day before LyLo, Regfan strongly thinks you're scum, BBT has unvoted ika and that's the only thing you're drawn to comment on?
VCA is nonsense.
In post 1901, Regfan wrote:
Elks complete lack of reaction towards my vote and point about his Anen/Psyche read not making sense in Post 1861 just strengthens my scum-read there (He's just found something fairly minor/irrelevant to comment on there). Can we just lynch obvscum and end this please.