[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 4982077 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1381 Oakhaven is Overrun Game Over - Mafiascum.net
good? I wonder if he's missed out on tentatively reading anyone yet?
Excuse me, WHAT? I have no idea what this is suppose to mean or how its scummy. Like either you are working on some higher level thinking or this just makes no sense.
HA! Indeed, I think I was a bit hasty with my faux-RVS on Greywing. Looking back over the thread I can see he actually questioned the basis of a vote from Thane on Luigi (which is now me), so that's a major point in his favour, soft as the defence was.
UNVOTE: Greywing
Mala, Mala, Mala. Thanks for being welcoming, but I think this is Freudian, despite (or perhaps because of) needing sleep, and your explanation doesn't make sense:
Post
Post #116 (isolation #3) » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:37 am
Postby talah »
So really.. timezones notwithstanding.. I need to triple-post for a reaction?
Let's just win the 'quickest knewb game' award by lynching Mala and Thane in quick succession.
(caveat -
@Mala
, you said you were V/LA for a couple of days so I'm prepared to wait for a non-sleep-deprived explanation, if you have one.
)
@Thane
, can you explain please why you think Mala would defend your position; in theory if you are Town. You also promised thread activity in Post 62, which hasn't eventuated yet. Here's your chance.
Grey is my top scumread ATM, but I need to reread the last couple of pages. I didn't like luigi and your case on mala seems reaching.
Not sure about Greywing. Honeybee seems alright at this stage too.
As I was looking through earlier to get some opinions I found myself with a +1 or 2 scummy on Luigi... and then realised I'd subbed in for same
So TBH my arguments regarding Mala / Thane voting him seem to have been probably more null than anything. I'd really like to quiz Mala on her idea that she wanted to prevent a 'scumflip', however. Even if it does seem a reach, the answer might be important. If (s?)he's V/LA at the moment I may need to focus elsewhere and ask again later.
Just asking, and not saying in this case it's relevant, but can V/LA at times be used as a tool to avoid questions?
Post
Post #124 (isolation #7) » Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:12 am
Postby talah »
In post 121, Malakittens wrote:
Wait, you're voting me because I'm caring about your prior slot putting someone at L-2?
I'm not sure what type of response you are expecting from me in regards to this. I could suggest you meta me regarding this, but it's your call. I don't like early L-1/L-2 wagons because there's not much information to go off in-case of a quick lynch. If there's a flip (regardless of alignment) due to interactions with everyone it brings me one step closer to figuring out the scum from town members.
Well, no, I'm not voting for you to be lynched because of
your vote
on the previous slot exactly. I only know that the previous slot is now my slot, which is Town (and which Scum would know, and therefore be a target of). However, Luigi was abrasive so that's a very very weak tell for me to criticise you voting against.
I also admit I'm reaching by questioning the 'don't want you to flip scum' quote itself, but the answer was incoherent, if you don't mind me saying (which I'm sure you shouldn't):
Malakittens wrote: I'm not, but I don't want you to flip scum looking for an easy target.
In post 112, Malakittens wrote:Meaning.. If he ends up flipping scum and I didn't push hard enough - ill be annoyed at myself.
So it's kinda like I think he could be scum going after an easy target and I don't want to not push and allow him to slide straight by incase he's actually scum.
I think I need sleep
Regarding lynch-vote-counting, it's not so much that my predecessor placed a vote which you then disliked. More the fact that a vote post had not been recently submitted by the mod and you were able to quote it immediately without saying 'I checked back on the vote count and.. Thane is L-2'. I would imagine that this might be something that a mafia role would be more aware of in post-RVS Day 1, and I hadn't thought about it except slightly and certainly not to cite in-thread. But then again, I subbed in and might be skewed... so looking forward to analysis on my own contributions.
Thanks, I didn't want that to be taken personally by you but thanks for clarifying anyway. Thanks also for mentioning you *have* seen it used elsewhere, cuz I suspect I have too.
Malakittens wrote:
I never said I wanted to 'prevent' a scum flip. I am very paranoid that JMO's vote on Thane is just sitting there. I don't feel that he's hunting anyone else and that his vote is just sitting on Thane. If JMO happens to flip scum and I didn't push *this* case hard enough - I'll be pissed off because I let him slide by halfway unnoticed.
Fair enough I reckon. I have noted you've been a bit paranoid earlier so I hope you'll be happy enough to answer any questions later. Is your vote on JMO right now? Last votecount I can see he doesn't have any. Maybe he needs to splains hisself.
Post
Post #136 (isolation #9) » Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:27 pm
Postby talah »
Oh-ho, we have some fire!
@Fropome - good analysis. I pressured Mala because of some bad logic and other things earlier, happy to expand after work if you like. I'll also respond to some of the implicit questions in your last post.
@JMO - I am voting you because, having questioned Mala and getting a reasonable response, I too am interested to know why you've parked your vote on Thane and given only one-liners back. You seem to be doing a lot of 'answer a question with a question' right now.
A don't know what the amished tell is, but I have read a thread in which a character by that name played. This is my first game of Mafia. Also I'm a dude, but meh.
Post
Post #138 (isolation #10) » Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:10 pm
Postby talah »
No, I didn't miss a thing. I think it's a weak reason to say that not using your vote is anti-town, and then park a vote and not use it when more information comes to light.
Why, for example, haven't you voted for me? Actually, scratch that. I'm more interested in your forthcoming responses to Fropome's questions.
Post
Post #140 (isolation #11) » Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:44 pm
Postby talah »
'Kay jmo, this doesn't seem to be getting very far. And I find it difficult to read you.
UNVOTE:
Fropome, I like your moxy. But your read of me as scum is absolutely off. Can I ask if you have any previous games I might check out?
I get the impression that I'm somewhat muddying the waters and not playing 'optimally' by placing vote-for-the-reaction-votes, so more straightforward questions and less combative, perhaps. Regarding the 'amished tell', I'd been going through the thread and noting down each player's behaviour post-by-post. I started at page 1 where everyone seemed to be kicking into Luig for his much-maligned 'you replaced someone derp suspicious lol' vote (his very first post, #14). After that he started to get defensive at the cross-examination and I was noting that down prior to realising I didn't need to.
Post
Post #141 (isolation #12) » Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:30 am
Postby talah »
mothrax, likewise, do you have any other scumreads apart from Greywing?
The cast:
mothrax - the soft-spoken yet self-assured somewhat-inquisitor
Honey Bee - the opinionated inquisitor who's happy to dispense advice
jmo16mla - the stone-skinned questioner.. and questioner
Fropone - the sharp-edged and no bullshit whip with a bad eye for scum
Malakittens - the common-sense and natural emote
Greywing - the '....' scum-reading questioner who finally got an answer out of Tybalt
Tybalt - the listmaker, who needs reasons when you have a list
ThaneAravan - the quotemaster who finally voted.. in retaliation
Regarding Grey, in ISO his posts seem mostly about analysing situational logic and asking reactive questions. He also votes Luigi (me) in post #77:
In post 77, Greywing wrote:@Tybalt: I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
In post 59, Greywing wrote:@Tybalt: Is there anything in particular that is giving you Town reads on Moth and Mala?
There's also been a ridiculous lack of analysis from Luigi so far. There was his well publicised RVS post, and he's only followed it up with posts complaining about people discussing him. I still believe that his RVS vote was intended as a joke, but the lack of content since then makes me think that he's trying to fly under the radar. Mala's looking more Town to me now after a re-read.
UNVOTE: Malakittens VOTE: Luigilewis889
..and the very next time he posts (#99) he is criticising ThaneAravan for his rationale in voting exactly the same way. That's hmm.. well I don't actually find that scummy, just dissonant. But the fact that it's his only real analysis, I wonder if Grey isn't trying to avoid giving out opinions of his own.
VOTE: Greywing
Don't we have a deadline looming?
@RachMarie-Mayor-Mod
- are we able to have a votecount tally and timer please?
Was going to do it last night but was too tired and crashed instead. VC coming up....Rach
Last edited by RachMarie on Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post
Post #144 (isolation #14) » Wed Jun 05, 2013 3:36 am
Postby talah »
Honestly, I'm swimming a bit and grasping at straws. I really would like to find other town and vote with them but it's not a strong-opinion proposition for me. More of an either-or, eg if HB and mothrax and jmo all want to lynch, they're probably likely to be right and I'm happy with that. I feel like you, Fro, jmo, mothrax and mala might be town but I'm unsure of this and have no real clue with the others. My vote is back on Greywing because he seemed to be asking for more information than he was giving, Thane and Tybalt seem to be lurking, and I've already made lame attempts to pump Mala and jmo for info. I'm also terrified that the lynch train is already on me but don't want to be anti-town by accepting my fate or going stupid about it.
Sorry bout the triple posting. Just enthusiastic and GMT+10. I thought the DL was in 2-3 days per the first post, added posting date to timer.
Post
Post #149 (isolation #15) » Wed Jun 05, 2013 10:54 pm
Postby talah »
Tybalt! Dear tybalt:
This is the honest answer to a question:
In post 144, talah wrote:Honestly, I'm swimming a bit and grasping at straws. I really would like to find other town and vote with them but it's not a strong-opinion proposition for me. More of an either-or, eg if HB and mothrax and jmo all want to lynch, they're probably likely to be right and I'm happy with that. I feel like you, Fro, jmo, mothrax and mala might be town but I'm unsure of this and have no real clue with the others. My vote is back on Greywing because he seemed to be asking for more information than he was giving, Thane and Tybalt seem to be lurking, and I've already made lame attempts to pump Mala and jmo for info. I'm also terrified that the lynch train is already on me but don't want to be anti-town by accepting my fate or going stupid about it.
This is an apology for triple posting:
talah wrote:Sorry bout the triple posting. Just enthusiastic and GMT+10. I thought the DL was in 2-3 days per the first post, added posting date to timer.
This might be seen as justification to jump on a wagon later:
In post 145, tybalt wrote:
This post really has absolutely no defense. It's just apology.
And
that
was a defence.
tybalt: I want to know what you think of jmo, actually, and not because of any subtext but because he needs some attention. Lives are at stake.
@Honeybee: Thank you, strong town read. Unafraid to question and not worried about being seen as coaching.
@jmo: You now have outstanding questions from several people. Pull yourself together man!
@greywing: I'm accusing you to prompt you to make some reads. You have been a good questioner. But if I'm scum, there's one left. Who's that?
@Fro: Goodwork, keep it up. I agree with a good chunk of your analysis (very much including your 'this is lol') and the fact you're not afraid to state opinions. Semi-strong town-read. Look elsewhere.
Post
Post #150 (isolation #16) » Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:56 am
Postby talah »
Anyway, because I'm not great at not saying things I think, and because I think RVS is overblown and referred back to, and because also, I want to prove my slot is town:
In post 34, Luigilewis889 wrote:Right, so next time, make it seem sillier. Got it. Maybe I'll put it in pink.
Anyway, onwards!
At that early stage this is totally down the line. And while I agree +1 -1 tracking is going to give you a lot of fuzz on Luigi I think actually, he was straight down the line and not duplicitous about anything. I simply note that because, I think if you are sane, it tells you a lot about the slot. There's generally a lot of crazytown about RVS or perceived RVS and that is a challenge. But I challenge anyone to find anything actually and seriously wrong with Luigi's statements. Defensive, yes. Reasonable? Want to say no just to move things ahead? Think about it.
And that is my from now on two-post nightly update.
Post
Post #152 (isolation #17) » Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:21 pm
Postby talah »
This game is trickier than it seems from the outside, huh.
JMO, why have you gone AWOL? Playing in other games by the looks but nothing to say here. I'm confused by delineation between IC and player. You actually give good responses to total noob questions but for some reason are otherwise hiding behind question question question. Feels like you've posted just one three line sentence and have been re-quoting it as an answer to everything.
mothrax, talah is an easy target. So you've got Grey and you've got me down as suspicious. At least one of these is wrong. Who else is suspicious? Why should I trust you?
Mala, my attempt to do 'something' to 'help the game' was a bad play and unsportsmanlike.
Bah.
Humbug.
I'm going to claim as newb-town at this point. And now I'm going to find the wiki pages on mafia theory.
Post
Post #154 (isolation #18) » Thu Jun 06, 2013 11:54 pm
Postby talah »
Fine, but there's been a lot of comments since you last posted and you really don't have a position yet.
Is that real when you say about using 'is this person posting' 'they're not posting here but they're posting elsewhere' being modkill material? If so I did not know that.
JMO, I so, so want you to be town. I really liked your tack in provoking people by questioning them. Irritating them in that way. I thought it was clever and useful. But you're acting like the ashamed celebrity of the thread where you should be the superstar. Kick it up a notch, please. PLEEEAAASSSEEE!!! ((c) Charlton Heston)
Post
Post #159 (isolation #20) » Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:55 am
Postby talah »
Yeah well I dunno. Maybe because I've been aggressive and irrational, have painted people as scum when I had no real evidence to back it up, have been fishing for reactions.
Are you and Honeybee BFFs yet? Do we have a crew? I'll state now that I like Frobey, don't think he was holding anything back. You're not going to like what I think about Grey.
Five reasons? Because I'm a noob, because I wasn't afraid to throw my vote around, because I can change my mind, because I post regularly, because I defend myself.
Post
Post #170 (isolation #22) » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:01 pm
Postby talah »
Dear Grey,
In post 147, Greywing wrote:So what changed between this post, where you liked my analysis:
In post 114, talah wrote:
HA! Indeed, I think I was a bit hasty with my faux-RVS on Greywing.
And this post, where all of a sudden, it makes me scummy:
In post 141, talah wrote:
Regarding Grey, in ISO his posts seem mostly about analysing situational logic and asking reactive questions.
First post was in the spirit of a random vote. Changed my mind when I read through the entire thread and you'd been participating and asking questions. Later ISO'd you (not the best analytical tool but it has its uses), and saw that you hadn't done much analysis of your own (except for the couple of sentences which didn't end in a question mark which were about
what
people had done, and not
why
). More observations than analysis. Asking questions is great imo, but demanding analysis from someone (or citing lack thereof as a reason to vote) and failing to provide this yourself is inconsistent with a good reason to vote.
The trending lack of analysis continues with your latest vote. You cite two reasons, the first finds its roots here:
In post 77, Greywing wrote:@Tybalt: I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
There's also been a ridiculous lack of analysis from Luigi so far. There was his well publicised RVS post, and he's only followed it up with posts complaining about people discussing him. I still believe that his RVS vote was intended as a joke, but the lack of content since then makes me think that he's trying to fly under the radar. Mala's looking more Town to me now after a re-read.
Lack of analysis
and
lack of
content
you originally said.
In post 147, Greywing wrote:
-Talah has come in, and thrown his vote on about half the playerlist in an attempt to make something stick.
True enough, but still an observation. So you're voting me really because... I've made bad analysis? Subterfuge? Because I irritate you?
Post
Post #172 (isolation #23) » Sun Jun 09, 2013 3:24 am
Postby talah »
The Room With No Windows
A modern day parable
Starring: Mafia Goon & Mafia Godfather
Scene opens. Two men sitting at a table in a dank and stink-filled cellar. Cigars and ashtrays. The makings of a poker game scattered among other miscellanous detritus littering floor and table. A conversation takes place.
Goon
:
Hi Greywind! Thanks for subbing in.
Godfather
:
Hi! No worries, glad we got time to talk before the game started up what's the strategy?
Goon
:
I have a few ideas about strategy. Ask heaps of questions. Asking questions is pro-town play and usually doesn't stand up to scrutiny. As long as you throw a few accusations in, too.
Godfather
:
Cool, well I've played a couple scum games too but not as many as you I guess as IC Shall we set up an early vote on each other? Maybe I vote for no reason, and you vote me straight after or something...
Goon
:
Great idea! I could say I was trying to set a good example by calling you on it. I'll say "As I said, if anyone has any questions, feel free to ask me." But it has to be *exactly* this sentence. Then you vote that person and I'll vote you straight back.
Godfather
:
Won't that seem suspicious?
Goon
:
Nah, it'll motivate people to challenge you, but at that stage it'll still be RVS. Say you made the vote deliberately to get us out of RVS. I'll throw some suspicion on you early, you explain your vote (this early any semi-logical explanation will suffice), and I'll move on.
Godfather
:
We'd have to set up a time when we can both be on for that to work... Sunday evening? I'll probably be on about 6 - 8 forum time
Goon
:
That works. When I get the post alert I'll jump straight in. I'm pretty active in the community you know
Godfather
:
What else? How do you pick the best person to accuse? What happens if they start not looking scummy?
Goon
:
You could pick someone who gets defensive? That's usually something you can stick with or come back to. Besides I doubt the thread will be particularly active since it's a newbie game. They're usually most active in the first couple of days and then they die down as people replace out.
Goon
:
If your target doesn't look scummy anymore, reluctantly change your vote close to deadline but stick with your initial pick for D2 / D3 lynch.
Godfather
:
Okay, slowing the pace and 'blending in' suits me anyway, I usually play these games pretty casually.
Goon
:
If I'm feeling like we need to bus close to deadline I'll throw in a few AtE's to make it easier for you. Man it sucks that my first game as IC is scum : P
Godfather
:
We'll get them! Stupid Town. Anything else?
Goon
:
Watch out for mothrax and Mala. They're pretty cluey. I haven't played with the others but will meta them later today.
Goon
:
And I'll deliberately misspell your name call you 'grey wing'
Godfather
:
Heheh, that'll be funny as frock
Goon
:
It should be fine if we stick to the plan. Remember: ask a lot of questions and stick to your guns.
Post
Post #180 (isolation #27) » Sun Jun 09, 2013 2:10 pm
Postby talah »
JMO,
Gah, THAT statement is highly ambiguous. At least use Sarcastica or Super Sarial font to convey tone (credit to Arj Barker), so it doesn't look like you're trying to set up an out.
I clicked through a bit of the meta you have linked in your signature. So if you have this playstyle in neither your scum games nor town games, what's THAT mean? You usually have more statements to make in both by the look. It may be wrong but it's the impression I get (believe me, interesting as I find you I'm not clicking through every single one).
Fun facts:
JMO total Scum reads: 1, (ThaneArvan, in RVS)
JMO total Town reads: 0, (granted not important as said he doesn't town read, playstyle)
Total reads 1,
total reasons for reads 1
(submitted in post #70, reason is generalised behaviour of new-scum)
Greywing total Scum reads: 3, (Mala, in RVS; Luigi, in RVS; talah, mothrax)
Greywing total Town reads: 3, (Honey bee, Malakittens, Fropome)
Total reads 6,
total reasons for reads 3
(Luigi, reason is flying under the radar in RVS; talah, using his vote to scumhunt; mothrax, 'gut feel' immediately after she flagged JMO as suspicious)
None of these reasons look legitimate or defensible to me.
JMO Unanswered questions: Several from various people. I'm not doing the work for you bub but at least a couple asking what you think of *me*, and I am super-uber interested in what you think of Grey right now. That's a question too. Answer it.
Grey Unanswered questions: I *think* you've only got the request for an opinion on JMO from me right now. There might be others outstanding but I'm not your mother - just do your homework. Answer my question please.
TL; DR:
Below is a script for your next post. It'll save you scrolling up three inches to rephrase my statements into questions. Obviously, break it into a few posts to cover your 'contribution' and keep your total post stats up.
JMOs next posts WILL say wrote:
Why is the statement ambiguous? What is Sarcastica font? I'm wondering if the
[insert tell about referencing comedians]
tell is in effect here.
Why does it what says who about me if I started using a certain playstyle recently mean? Why should I make more statements? Why would you get that impression? Why would you find me interesting? Are you coming on to me? Not sure what you're getting at here.
As I said, it's best we don't make associative reads until someone is lynched.
Why would you think that Grey Wand's reasons are indefensible?
[Insert another statement which blurs the line between IC and player regarding what we "do" or "don't" usually do, while failing to answer questions]
Thanks for the script talah, now I can do what I *really* want to do with my day.
Post
Post #207 (isolation #29) » Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:54 pm
Postby talah »
I just don't get your reads reasons.
Everyone else who has given reads has been asked 'why' they're reading in that way. You seem content just to slap a read down without any reasoning. 'Could potentially be scum' is not the point. Why he could potentially be scum, is.
Why do you think JMO could potentially be scum, then?
Post
Post #212 (isolation #30) » Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:18 pm
Postby talah »
Welcome to new blood!
@mothrax:
Hi. You haven't been saying much lately. Input?
@tybalt:
Thoughts on the accusations levelled at you?
@HB:
I did mention at the time the reason for my town read on you, let me add another: you didn't try and tell me what I shouldn't be doing, as a noob, but rather provided feedback on what you perceived. Yours is a very good example of a playstyle and you're not afraid to provide information, and therefore not afraid you're going to trip yourself up later. That's a huge town read to me. Enough of an ego boost? (That last does not need to be answered, btw.)
Regarding tybalt, I think he's faxing his answers in but hasn't been particularly afraid to put himself on the line when he does come out with a statement or two. Also don't understand why he'd try to bus JMO.
Grey's reads (up to the point where you asked) are indefensible because 1) at the time he voted Luigi he actually had zero analysis and very little content of his own. He was voting someone else for something he was doing. 2) His read on me is based not on reasoning, but on a statement of fact without bothering to say why me throwing my vote around is a "bad thing". 3) The mothrax, and all other votes, either have 'gut feel' or simply no reasoning at all. That's unhelpful at best, scum-tactics at worst.
@JMO:
I voted Grey because I don't need any more convincing that you're Mafia. You can have it back in a bit by the looks.
@Grey:
JMO if anyone has reason to be indignant on some kind of personal level at recent posts by me. I'm not comfortable with reads based solely on gut feel. You should try to explain yourself better. I disagree with your immediate scum read on Wolf. He's putting himself out there at least and contradicted himself several times. This seems like an honest first read through.
@Mala:
What's your dilemma?
@Gen_Wolf:
I pursued the Mala case because I wanted information. It's no good gently placing a vote on someone to see how they'll react. This is the one case so far where I've felt slightly uncomfortable about being agressive. There are better ways.
You also took the 'Your wish is granted --> Vote' post well out of context. My vote is Grey's fair payment for repeatedly avoiding stating an opinion on JMO.
Also your scum vibe on me (apart from being wrong) almost exactly mimics Grey's rationale for voting me. You're basically voting Luigi. The problem with that is, Luigi's reasons are the only thing I can't possibly describe the truth of. Poison chalice much.
Post
Post #221 (isolation #31) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:02 pm
Postby talah »
In post 215, Hyperion wrote:Isoing Honeybee and Talah give me the same feels as my original read through did. Honeybee puts alot of pressure and analyzes into each and every one of her posts. Talah on the other hand, clearly has no idea what he is doing, and looking at the way he is posting, I find it very hard for him to be scum because if he was I feel like he would be making more of an effort to scumhunt instead of posting plays. He is town, but is a liability do to his lack of knowledge/skill. I am 90% sure that both are town.
Will do more later.
Zing. I know when to shut up. Oh no I don't.
Someone has to explain WIFOM properly to me sometime. I get the scenario, poisoner and poisonee, each with a cup of the poisoner's wine in front of them, poisonee's choice of which one to drink. Have seen it applied and explained in different ways to this however.
Post
Post #222 (isolation #32) » Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:36 pm
Postby talah »
Intent to L-2 JMO.
My parable was awesome. The theory derived from facts, not the other way round.
I can't think of any way a person would express they are less committed to a game, than having every single post they make, an obvious derivation of a post just slightly above. Who needs to read through everything and come to any conclusions about anything, at all. Why, ONLY TOWN.
Post
Post #256 (isolation #44) » Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:28 pm
Postby talah »
I'd like to do a more comprehensive catchup later tonight; moar objectivity. So the below are presto-imprezione.
Mala, it's simple: I'm the one that makes you laugh, Tybalt is the one who's piggybacking me. Now had you said Tybalt / Thane (Gen) I would agree with you, as I mixed those guys up a lot earlier, what with neither of them posting. My read on you is still town mostly for the unforced nature of your posts earlier (due for a review, so I'll take a look at this).
Mothrax *still* hasn't said anything, which makes it hard to question her/him if the current groupthink about him/her being town is incorrect. Objectively.
(can you give a hint to the correct pronoun please moth? if not it'll just be 'her' from now on in line with your avatar.)
Don't know what it was that caused Tybalt to change his vote with such apparent realisation. I didn't end up with the implied impression at all. HB, don't lose hope yet. Will take a look.
I will have a proper look at Hyper and Gen too. Gen, sorry for ignoring your posts before, will get back to them. Well maybe not the last one, as I think that was a bit derp what about opinions on others rather than just the current 'targets-dujour'?
Hyper, you're a riddle inside a paradox right now. Correct town read, but undermining credibility, and flagging me as a liability, therefore expendable? Will look into that a bit more, in the meantime have you managed to get any more insight into the other players on this dark stage yet?
Finally, 'JMO Investigates'. I can print the sign for the door if you like.
But hey, :goodjob:
Post
Post #258 (isolation #45) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:48 am
Postby talah »
Self-assessment:
Spoiler:
Going back and reading over everything (including some of the earlier things I posted, which are *cough* somewhat cringe-worthy, and some of which I've avoided reading when they've been re-quoted even), I noticed before that I've been using the word 'vote' at times when I've meant 'suspicion'. The two are almost interchangeable to me, don't know if you've noticed that.
I didn't mind my first post at all, still don't. RVS doesn't end at any specific point, or rather, the point at which it ends may vary due to opinion. I think in this game it ended with uoyeluri's post.
I come into this game thinking it's going to be fun, clever and witty, and a real mind-challenge, and that it's a bit of a sandbox where accusations can be laid down, and people will sometimes leverage Real Life as an excuse in ways which are either genuine or as a tool. That's my experience, having read through probably half a dozen games.
I am a reasonably quick learner, and in making playstyle mistakes I've been forced to go looking for information on how to better that, and importantly, have also adapted my role to become something useful. I'm still not out of the woods, but I'm enjoying this immensely. When it doesn't get too personal, that is, although I've been the main protagonist of this kind of play so I apologise for that where it's gone over the line.
I like applying pressure and questioning motives. Slot is not equal to person is not equal to slot. The person needs to be pressured. You cannot pressure a role PM. I find it very irritating when people think they can make a couple of blithe statements and then rest on their laurels and not contribute anymore. That may be less than objective.
Might I add, this whole game is double-think. You don't realise that until you start playing one.
Objective Self-Rating:
Prob-town but a bit of a bastard at times.
Of Mice and Hyperion
Fropome said something which struck me as an AH-HA! moment:
In post 129, Fropome wrote:I like to try to find town and work with them. It makes it harder for scum when there are a group of town players with good reads on each other, working together.
The rest of the post is quite challenging to people which I identified with immediately.
Hyperion (subbing in for Fropome nee Uo) on the other hand...
In post 215, Hyperion wrote:Isoing Honeybee and Talah give me the same feels as my original read through did. Honeybee puts alot of pressure and analyzes into each and every one of her posts. Talah on the other hand, clearly has no idea what he is doing, and looking at the way he is posting, I find it very hard for him to be scum because if he was I feel like he would be making more of an effort to scumhunt instead of posting plays. He is town, but is a liability do to his lack of knowledge/skill. I am 90% sure that both are town.
Will do more later.
...picks the obv-town, the new-town gaining credibility, and Mala (his previous post) (also Mala haven't looked back yet so no classification) as town reads, then smashes the credibility of the new town (three times in four posts no less) while simultaneously trying to appear very sage and making a dubious 'analysis' of Gen's first post or two, which I disagree with immensely (agree/disagree isn't a bad thing on a first skim-through, at least it's input) and don't think was worth even saying.
Then he ups-and-leaves-like-someone-who-has-something-to-avoid.
Although I liked
Ted Dansen
Frobey, it was mainly subjective. Being identified correctly by Hyper also caused me to be quiet for a little while in smug satisfaction (also I wanted to leave others time to say stuff without spamming it up). But in the final analysis this leaves me with a scum lean on Hyperion.
Also No vote, no scum reads, promise of more analysis with three days to deadline has not yet eventuated. I wonder if he'll come back with a 'sorreh gaiz forgot bout teh gaim'?
The Dilemma of Malakittens
Subjectively, I need to give Mala an out. It was real shitty me saying this:
In post 125, talah wrote:I have noted you've been a bit paranoid earlier so I hope you'll be happy enough to answer any questions later.
And despite the fact I've apologised several times for this play, it's going to be difficult for me to objectively criticise. I feel crummy about it. It won't stop me pointing things out, but if my arguments seem weak, that's the reason. And if my opinion is that she's town, it'll be a glowing review
The main problem objectively with Mala is that she's successfully avoided stating opinions (post-RVS) on anybody except for the most controversial protagonists of this haunted merry-go-round. Even conversationally she has not interacted with anyone but JMO, HB and ME.
Someone more objective should pursue this.
Faux-Greywing
I don't even need to review posts or ISO for Greywing. This whole exchange has been so subjective it's engraved on my consciousness. It doesn't mean I've changed my opinion. Maybe slightly. But not much.
Let me show my working:
In post 204, Greywing wrote:First of all, Talah, stop the intentional misspelling of my name in an attempt to insult me. I've treated you with respect throughout this game, and I expect the same in return. Thank you.
This seems highly affected. The statement is, like I mentioned, 'Indignant' rather than defensive or even accurate. The misspelling was twice, no more no less. The first was a 'parable-quote' in which I'm quoting one of JMO's early posts. The second was a Jibe at JMO, effectively clarifying accusing him of faking typing 'grey wing' instead of 'Greywing', even though he'd managed to spell this correctly on a vote previously. That fizzled out a bit, but the question remains: Why would Greywing say this?
I can think of a few reasons.
He genuinely believes it, his statement just came across as affected.
He was trying to get a reaction out of me, despite the fact that I've reacted emotively to virtually nothing up to this point.
He was trying to prove he's town, and I just don't get it.
He wanted to generate some 'plausible inconsistency' by saying he got a laugh out of the play and then grumping up for no reason at a deliberate misspell not aimed at him.
He needed to say something and that was the first thing that sprang to mind.
...and every other explanation in the universe.
Despite anything else, he did respond to my calm questions. Needless to say, I was not satisfied with the responses. "Could potentially be scum" is a nothing, especially when it culminates in a null read upon further questioning. I'd like him to act more townie by answering more questions (and providing more input), and I question his motives and votes. That said, he looks a bit less scummy by virtue of honesty. My biggest criticism is that he's too self-assured about his votes and not saying much.
The quiet, um, achiever?
Mothrax has gone from being a very good player who directs focus in promising directions with very succinct statements, to someone who's not contributing and may have ulterior motives.
To be quite honest I saw her as a very good litmus test on other players to pursue (yes, I've read about appeal to authority and I take full responsibility for my own assessments). Her playstyle is *excellent*. I'd like more feedback and certainly a vote reassessment.
Werewolf art thou Tybalt?
Tybalt in his non-posting, previously, has actually seemed more 'distracted' to me than anything else.
Earlier he seemed happy to lay suspicion down on people for quick fire reasons, but then produced his list (which I criticised) and has since come back with some statements which are explanatory and somewhat hard to squirm out of if he is scum:
In post 149, talah wrote:
tybalt: I want to know what you think of jmo, actually, and not because of any subtext but because he needs some attention. Lives are at stake.
Here is my clear, unbiased opinion on JMO and I am not going to read any other people's opinions of JMO before I say this.
JMO, upon isolation, seems to be trying to withhold from saying anything provocative- trying to stay out of the spotlight if you will.
Has reservations on doing, well, anything.
Post #43 seems to be weird, and another attempt to continue to not provoke anyone. If anyone has played with JMO and knows he is like this every game then I will retract that.
Also #107, the reason for why JMO is voting ThaneArvan, seems sort of like what JMO is doing
Ok, wow. VOTE: JMO
In post 247, tybalt wrote:ughhhah talah and jmo are town VOTE: greywing because of 165'
Honey bee I'm sorry for doing this to you but I will respond later I am so tired so stay tuned
And regarding this, what I really would like to see from Tybalt is the answer to the following questions:
What is it that caused you to change your vote away from JMO?
Why did you then vote Greywing?
What are your assessments of other players?
Unfortunately I can't give a better analysis than that. Although I'm semi-averse to voting him due to a basically null read, I just have to see better reasons for doing so. OTOH Because I want to see more information, I'm happy to vote him to get it.
The new smart kid in town
"Welcome to the Scumhunting Crew"
- Talah, to Gen_Wolf, Newb 1381, now
Apologies but I did a lot of my analysis steam on the above. I read through your contribution first of all, before writing anything else in this post, and have run low on more precise analytical puff. Take the full jar of jam instead. I am very comfortable with your posts.
Your analyses are well reasoned and you're happy to lay opinions down on anyone, and question anything. For a newcomer, you've come in with quite a bang, and made a great impression (objectively, not just because we've agreed on a couple of things). This is good. Thane seemed very time-poor and gracefully frocked off. You seem like town and at this stage I'm prepared to put some trust in you.
(That is your horoscope)
...and
this
is your question: Who's the next most scummy apart from JMO when he fake-claims?
Post
Post #259 (isolation #46) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:58 am
Postby talah »
I'll even go one better:
VOTE: Tybalt
You never explained unvoting JMO at the time and you are tarring he and myself with the same brush. That's bewildering without an explanation and you backed down from HB's interrogation without any 'defence' but rather a few apologetic sentences and a 'Please don't put words in my mouth' statement which comes across as a non-statement. Something to say. I trust HB and a quite prepared to see you lynched for post-mortem analysis.
Post
Post #260 (isolation #47) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:25 am
Postby talah »
In post 257, Gen_Wolf wrote:Activity has been low so it is a really slow going game, especially considering deadline is so close. Will do another read through see if I pick up on anything but
Post
Post #265 (isolation #48) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:22 am
Postby talah »
In post 263, Hyperion wrote:Kitty
Town. Puts alot of pressure in alot of different directions. I might maybe (but probably not due to my schedule) go looking for one of her scum games during night phase to see what she is like as scum, but for now I am still confident in my read of her.
Can you cite some of the pressure you believe Mala has been applying please?
Post
Post #272 (isolation #50) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:59 am
Postby talah »
Thanks Hyper for Mala's analysis, that seems to make sense. But as far as JMO the obligation to teach is the least of my concerns. More to the point is that it is his reputation on the line.
Post
Post #299 (isolation #57) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:52 pm
Postby talah »
@tybalt: I was perhaps a bit unclear. What made you switch your vote away from JMO with such realisation that he was town? You had good arguments for him being scum prior to that and then suddenly drop it with no explanation. Please explain?
It would be good to get a reads post.
@gen: Actually, I was under the impression that people claimed at L-2 with intent to hammer up to L-1, to avoid scumbuddies from dropping the hammer and silencing the target. On reflection it's probably a non-issue in this type of game with only 2 Mafia. Additionally JMO himself posted that I should ask for a claim when I put him at L-2 prior to Tybalt removing his vote. Although I may have misunderstood that post.
Regarding flipping from JMO to Tybalt and back, that's exactly what I did, perhaps you missed the sequence of events and the relative weight of my arguments for each of them. I want JMO to claim because he's wasting everyone's time and until he does claim it's a big anti-focus sitting there staring at everyone. When he got off L-2 I decided Tybalt should have a chance to feel the heat. When Mothrax voted JMO I switched back because i want to hear his claim.
I disagree in this instance that asking JMO for a claim, early or not, is anti-town.
@HB: Yes I want to pressure Tybalt, but that pressure would have been quite weak and transparent, given the content of the previous post. JMO is my preferred lynch. Please someone put him at L-1.
Post
Post #302 (isolation #58) » Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:43 pm
Postby talah »
Surely you can see that everyone wondering whether or not you're town a couple of days before deadline, is bad for town. I'd think it would be up to you to do a better job of proving your authenticity if you were playing a town role.
mothrax I think I bungled badly and could have had a claim by now, if that's what happened with the L-1 before. He wasn't reading. Sorry.