Open 358: Mayo Clinic ÔÇô Game Over


User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #219 (isolation #0) » Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:28 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Checking in. Will read by the end of lunch and tell you what's up. I may have some comments while I am reading.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #221 (isolation #1) » Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:18 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Well, that was a fairly quick read. Again I get to replace in for someone who doesn't put too much thought or effort into their post. As DJPPON states, there isn't a whole lot of solid content yet, but we should have a decent starting point.

1. It sucks that kondi and norman replaced out. I think I could have gotten a decent read on them based on past experiences. Norman was playing in line with his town play. I would have needed more time on Kondi. I currently give the norman slot a town read. Kondi does recognize Norman's VI play and I give him some town credit here for that too.

2. I also have experience with BBMolla & GNR. GNR is a tougher read, so need more time on him. BB's play so far this game strikes me as in stark contrast with their scum play. Post #53 strikes me as very protown and puts BB as my highest town read at this point. Mafia or SK would be dumb to link where a gamebreaking strategy was (even though it doesn't apply exactly how it was used) and discuss why we should delay a massclaim. The massclaim talk is the most telling talk in the game so far.

3. Massclaim talk. I don't like how some players are pushing for a mass claim without a clear plan of action in place. There are going to be exploitable loopholes if not all avenues are thought out first. Whisper apparently has a history with the strategy, so they get a pass from me at this time. Kdowns seems to be the biggest proponent for pushing the claim without really explaining any logical gameplan behind it. Quil takes the idea from kdowns' post #197 and runs with it despite even kdowns saying it probably isn't a good idea. I see immediate flaws in that mafia/sk can just kill any of the unprotected players.

I think maybe kdowns is town because mafia/sk would not want to stick out by pushing for MC. Quil though seems like they are jumping on the chance to promote someone else's bad idea.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: quilford based on this.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #224 (isolation #2) » Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:17 pm

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 223, BBmolla wrote:Bionic, Quilford = Norman.


yuck. Got my replacements mixed up. UNVOTE:
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #230 (isolation #3) » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:16 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 228, fatlikepig wrote:Bionic, what experiences have you had with Norman? Evidently you still thought Quil's ideas were scummy, so why the unvote?

Also, the criticism of his strategy is pretty bad. There are /always/ unprotected players, regardless of massclaim or not.


1. Can't discuss at this time. The town read of Norman outweighs the scum read of Quil. My read on Quil's play wasn't an OMG found OBVSCUM moment by any means, but was worthy of exploration and a P9 vote.

2. Yes there are always unprotected players, but the mafia don't always know who they are. I prefer for the strong town players to not die just because someone else is vig.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #231 (isolation #4) » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:18 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 229, Quilford wrote:
we're outing both our vigilantes so we get two confirmed town.


What happens to your two clears if mafia or SK claim vig?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #232 (isolation #5) » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:25 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

We have a major issue. As long as people are discussing game theory, scumhunting will be very difficult. Theory is easy to discuss from either alignment, so you only end up flushing out those weak at theory. We all need to get back to questioning people to determine their motives and alignment.

kdowns - You still have your random vote up and have made posts with minimal content. You seem to be coasting by.

VOTE: kdowns
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #237 (isolation #6) » Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:22 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Whisper - what are your current thoughts on the game? Will you be working slowly to solve the game setup, or will you be analyzing players also?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #239 (isolation #7) » Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:54 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 238, kdowns wrote:I know I have my Random Vote still up, I was seeing how long it would take as BB is in no immediate danger at all.

UNVOTE:


Seeing how long what would take? Is BB your top suspect? If so, no reason to unvote. Do you have any suspects or thoughts on the game?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #245 (isolation #8) » Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:06 pm

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 244, Quilford wrote:
In post 231, bionicchop2 wrote:
In post 229, Quilford wrote:
we're outing both our vigilantes so we get two confirmed town.


What happens to your two clears if mafia or SK claim vig?

Then we lynch amongst the clears and catch free scum?

Honestly, are you even thinking about these questions before you ask them?


Do you realize how contradictory a statement like 'lynch amongst the clears' is? And you ask me if I think about my questions before asking them?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #250 (isolation #9) » Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:31 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 249, DJPON3 wrote:Kdowns- So you left an RVS vote out there for no reason other than to see how long it would take for the rest of us to notice that you had a vote out?


^^^^^

In post 249, DJPON3 wrote:Also, your solution to counter claims is to "lynch among the clears", effectively making the only real pro to this strategy (ie. two confirmed vigs) irrelevant.


Shhhhh. He will question your intelligence and respond in condescending tone.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #256 (isolation #10) » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:00 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

@ mod
It looks like Haze, BBMolla, Illune, Daftnarwhal and Guy_Named_Riggs are in line for prods today. Please and Thank You.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #258 (isolation #11) » Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:57 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 257, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Am I? My apologies. I didn't realize it has been a while since I posted.


Your prod avoidance post without content has been noted.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #260 (isolation #12) » Sun Nov 20, 2011 8:15 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Kdowns is clearly being intentionally unhelpful. They left their random vote up to "see how long until somebody noticed" and acknowledged they are not contributing anything. I think they need more votes.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #262 (isolation #13) » Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:00 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Now we're making strides.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #266 (isolation #14) » Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:20 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 265, BBmolla wrote:Alright I'm here. Waiting for Awesoma to be replaced because I still think the slot is scum.


O HAI! Replaced in days ago and have been actively posting. I feel so ignored.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #275 (isolation #15) » Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:25 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 274, Haze wrote:
Fitz&Bionic: how scummy do you find lurking?


Lurking in and of itself is not 'scummy' because unfortunately town do it. It is a good place for scum to hide though when there are town players lurking. Consistently posting non-content when you do actually post I do consider scummy.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #292 (isolation #16) » Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:07 pm

Post by bionicchop2 »

I will say
no
unless there is a back-up plan to account for a 3rd vig claim. We need a plan that avoids chaos if mafia/sk don't just willingly go along with whatever is layed out and claim doc.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #294 (isolation #17) » Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:36 pm

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 293, Haze wrote:Whisper, you have each 2 docs on each vig.

What happens when the docblock hits a doc on a vig, and SK + Maf both hit that vig? 1 doc blocks 1 gunshot, there'll be 2 shots and the vig is down.


She acknowledges that in her second bullet point. It is statistically improbable that everything would line up perfectly for that. It would take SK assuming mafia would try to take out vig and guessing which one they would target.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #312 (isolation #18) » Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:05 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

I am starting to care less and less about whether or not we mass claim since we obviously are not going to have any useful discussion while the concept is still floating around. Count me as a
meh
towards whichever gets a majority at this point. Since I have replaced in, about 10% of the posts have been scum hunting related and this strategy discussion is making it near impossible to decipher who is town and who is mafia going along for the ride.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #332 (isolation #19) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:28 pm

Post by bionicchop2 »

Welcome Whiskers. We meet again.

As for the claiming thing, just let me know when. I don't know the first thing about proper d1 massclaim order and protocol. Let's just get this done so I can get to the fun stuff like calling you all scum.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #344 (isolation #20) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:19 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Let's do this before the feastivus begins.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #346 (isolation #21) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:47 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 345, DJPON3 wrote:
Also, you Americans are celebrating Thanksgiving a month too late. Go Canada!


We have been celebrating it all month *burp*.

America!
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #348 (isolation #22) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:04 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

DJPON3: here
bionicchop2: here
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #357 (isolation #23) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:47 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

I am a vigilante
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #359 (isolation #24) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:51 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

I am off to start cooking in a bit, hopefully we get all claims soon and can move forward.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #360 (isolation #25) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:11 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

whisper - why did you choose not to claim?

Also, I am shooting off the list of docs that will not be on the vigs right? How will that list be determined when there has been very little opportunity for scumhunting? I would suggest players with lower activity levels since we will have less to judge them on later.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #363 (isolation #26) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:21 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 361, whispersilk wrote:you must choose your target completely randomly.


Like zero scumhunting random (roll dice) or just not announcing my shot?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #365 (isolation #27) » Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:44 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

OK. Off for the rest of the day. Have a list ready for me upon my return!
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #398 (isolation #28) » Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:57 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

UNVOTE:
VOTE: haze

There is no way whisper took the time to put together a plan she knew was never going to be used since she would be counterclaiming as mafia.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #401 (isolation #29) » Fri Nov 25, 2011 5:17 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 399, havingfitz wrote:Bionic (and Haze for that matter). How do we know whisper is not the one fakeclaiming?


Did you not read the post directly above yours? The one where I voted Haze and said why I believe whisper isn't faking. Do you really think she took the time to map out a plan for 2 vigs when she knew there would be 3+ claims?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #427 (isolation #30) » Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:16 pm

Post by bionicchop2 »

Expressiing my read =/= buddying. From your posts Haze you have clearly decided Whisper is not mafia. Just because you feigned suspicion for a minute doesn't make you town.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #445 (isolation #31) » Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:54 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 380, havingfitz wrote:Looking forward to the 3rd Vig claim plan but I would lean towards Bionicchop2 as the fake one. He was awfully quick to claim it when he could have waited a bit longer. I think for the cred of being first to do so.


I was online waiting to claim before I went to Thanksgiving festivities. If I was so anxious to claim and be first for cred, why would I have objected to massclaiming for the majority of the day?
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #447 (isolation #32) » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:27 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

In post 446, Whiskers wrote:I don't know. Why were you against massclaiming the majority of the day?


Read my posts where I explain.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #455 (isolation #33) » Sun Nov 27, 2011 5:35 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

Plan A looks more appealing at first glance.
The above written statement is pro-town.
User avatar
bionicchop2
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bionicchop2
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3069
Joined: March 12, 2008

Post Post #461 (isolation #34) » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:36 am

Post by bionicchop2 »

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch
The above written statement is pro-town.

Return to “Completed Open Games”