And now back to our regularly-scheduled lynching programme.
Scigatt, why triple-post to fix a post that didn't need fixing?
In post 11, maxwell wrote:For the record, I don't require perfect spelling of names and nicknames in votes are fine as long as it's unambiguous which player they refer to. I'm not a robot.
In post 35, Om of the Nom wrote:DOGS COME UNDER SCIENCE.
I CALL IT SCIEDOGOLOGY. THE STUDY OF THE SCIENCE OF DOGS.
In post 48, BS2000 wrote:So does Elmo think VM is town because he is posting irrelevant comments early on?
In post 63, Scigatt wrote:In post 62, Om of the Nom wrote:Uhh, any response to my case Elmo?
FoS:Om of the Nom
He said he was V/LA for several days two posts above yours. It hasn't bee 24 hours yet.
In post 73, Scigatt wrote:In post 71, Voidedmafia wrote:Do you agree with Elmo's townread on me, and the "reasons" stated for it, then?
Not necessarily, but I don't think it is helpful to the town to discuss that type of read in this game at this moment.
In post 133, syndromeofadown wrote:Okay caught up. Only big scumread is on Scigatt. If sci is scum, VM's vote on him and then subsequent unvote is scummy I think. Town reads on elmo and om.
I feel bad just posting this short sentence and not elaborating, but I have to leave right now. Rest assured I plan on being really active this game.
In post 138, syndromeofadown wrote:Notice I clearly put the qualifier "If scigatt is scum" before I said anything about voidedmafia's vote. Now voidedmafia is panicking and questioning why I have a scumread on him BEFORE EVEN SEEING SCI'S FLIP. This says to me he already knows scigatt is scum, because he's partners with him.
Sorry, but you made this way too easy.
In post 140, syndromeofadown wrote:I'm not telling you to do anything.
Syndrome, 136 wrote:If someone gets to L-1 and you have a scumread on them you should be glad.
I just said "if sci is scum, this is probably a scum-tell I think". Questioning the vote isn't the scummy part. The scummy part is unvoting someone you have a scumread on just because someone else voted him.
You're the one blowing a minor thing completely out of proportion. Yes you should question it, and yes I would expect town to question me, but the fact is the reaction you're giving is not a town one and the more you talk the scummier you sound.
In post 151, syndromeofadown wrote:In post 145, Scigatt wrote:What do you think of me FoSing Om instead of voting for him at post 63, when he was at L-2?
The important part about what Voided did was that he votedand then unvoted. This isn't scummy by itself, but it is a possible indication of being scumpartners if you are scum. Since you obviously can't figure out why scum partners would do this let me explain very slowly:
In post 178, syndromeofadown wrote:In post 172, Voidedmafia wrote:You were all "Oh, wow, he's (me) sooooo scummy," were you not? Claiming I was making this easy and all that?
Sounded like you wanted me lynched.
Scigatt is scummier than you
In post 187, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Mod: Im sorry I can't get into any games right now and I've been so beat from work and such. Just to much going on in my life right now for mafia.
Request Replacement.
It has nothing to do with the people in this game mind you. Im just beat every night from work
In post 191, Scigatt wrote:In post 186, syndromeofadown wrote:I wanted to get a reaction out of elmo/om
Om: What do you think of syndromeofadown's vote change?
In post 198, syndromeofadown wrote:In post 196, Scigatt wrote:So getting a reaction is an adequate reason to switch vote?
Is this directed at me?
In post 204, Om of the Nom wrote:But the whole point is to get reactions.
In post 236, Om of the Nom wrote:Obviously I would vote Scigatt.
In post 297, Quinter wrote:6. Mafia Encryptor (giving Mafia daytalk) is heavily dependent on what the scumteam is. If they're good at using the QT, it's absolutely devastating. If not, then it's nigh-useless.
It doesn't matter who the Encryptor is compared to the goon, since if either of the scum dies, they lose QT chat anyways.