This is a bad vote and you should feel bad
VOTE: Disturbed_One
In post 19, Disturbed_One wrote:I figured voting Klick might not be a bad idea, it seems like he could be playing a gambit of some sort. Self-voting seems rather unproductive for town, anyway.
In post 33, Disturbed_One wrote:I realized my vote was bad because my logic for it was faulty. I was assuming Klick could be making a gambit as scum, but I failed to consider that he was actually trying to get out of RVS.
In post 299, Bitmap wrote:Maybe a slight scum read on HerrRudi and Nekoko.
In post 342, Bitmap wrote:Hmm, I'll take a look at Nekoko better later today. I'm sorry I didn't really notice him that much.
In post 378, MagnaofIllusion wrote:@Shamrock– what about Post 299 and Post 342 by Bitmap do you find vote-worthy at all? As far as Bitmap posting goes that’s pretty damn good. I find your hop with that justificantion pretty suspect.
In post 349, Shamrock wrote:If Nekoko was one of Bitmap's only two scumreads coming into the game, wouldn't he remember that? Why would he need to look at him further?
In post 378, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Bitmap is scummy for being inconsistent.
Nekoko is fine (not specifically Town, but fine which is careful use of language to make sure he doesn’t lock himself into a position that he can’t back away from).
In post 391, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 387, Shamrock wrote:Beh?
It's a simple question - why did you vote Bitmap for those quotes?
In post 396, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Those quotes don't support that reasoning at all. He replaces in, has a mild scum-read on Nekoko and proceeds to say "I need to lookMOREinto Nekoko". I've bolded the important word. Having a read based on a read-along and then wanting to more directly dig into that read once you are actually in the game is a Town mindset move.
Your reasoning is bad and vote is bad.
In post 342, Bitmap wrote:Hmm, I'll take a look at Nekoko better later today. I'm sorry I didn't really notice him that much.
In post 403, Bitmap wrote:I'll give you a hint, MoI's scum.
In post 347, Shamrock wrote:In post 299, Bitmap wrote:Maybe a slight scum read on HerrRudi and Nekoko.
In post 342, Bitmap wrote:Hmm, I'll take a look at Nekoko better later today. I'm sorry I didn't really notice him that much.
???
UNVOTE: Nekoko
VOTE: Bitmap
In post 349, Shamrock wrote:Whoa, bigpost. If Nekoko was one of Bitmap's only two scumreads coming into the game, wouldn't he remember that? Why would he need to look at him further?
In post 430, Shamrock wrote:And more importantly, if he was a scumread how did you "not notice him that much"
In post 659, the director wrote:In post 657, Shamrock wrote:Why aren't you voting me if you think I'm scum?
Cause I'm voting guille, durr.
In post 690, MagnaofIllusion wrote:If she somehow flips Town I think a shot between LordM and Potato by the Vig (meaning don’t JK them) nets scum.
In post 714, Lord Mhork wrote:MoI, say that the mafia actually shot the director? What would that mean?
In post 720, Disturbed_One wrote:MoI thinks I should claim, and I don't see any reason why I shouldn't at this point. I am a vanilla townie. Not quite sure how this affects the current situation.
I'm not sure who's town and who's scum between Guille and Cheery. As scum, would it make sense for Cheery to counter-claim at this point? Or if Guille is scum, does it make any sense for him to claim? I'm asking these questions because I'm not quite sure myself. I'd appreciate any opinions anyone might have on this subject.
Should Shamrock and A_Potato claim as well?
In post 718, Cheery Dog wrote:I didn't want to stop MoI from being able to use the role cop, didn't want to be stopping the vig shot going through, yet wanted to stop the mafia kill. I figured the mafia kill would be coming from the person being vigged of they were mafia. so I went with who I felt the kill would be most likely to be on besides the confirmed town which I didn't want to role block.
I tried to look at why grey was killed, and decided out probably wasn't because of his suspicions which weren't very strong - his slot however was in klick's do not kill ever list, so I went and looked at that for possible night 2 targets and found myself and disturbed on said list, thus since I can't jail myself I jailed the other person on that list.