Open 629: C9++ (Game over!)

[Reubus Swagrid]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNsPF3GVvig

I can confirm this is my homeland

VOTE: Creature

His claim of being a creature early doesn't sit well with me

[Reubus Swagrid]

Oh jaysys. I'm bach from my long weekend, forgive me for my afkness. Will catch up tomorrow cuz assessments

[Reubus Swagrid]

Wait wot.

Ranger how did you find scumsies

[Reubus Swagrid]

@Mod if that's kingdom hearts I'm actually spontaneously combusting because that was the best thing ever as a kid

[Reubus Swagrid]

Oh wow Creature is still the center of discussion?

I'm not gonna lie, this is mostly a prodge because I've been busy IRL. But while skimming through the walls of text I noticed somewhere that Creature was at L-2 at some point and the wagon seemed too fast to me. So naturally I believe at least 1 scum in on the wagon. Especially since I was town reading Creature's posts thusfar anyway.

Voting VOTE: Ranger because she's picking and choosing her shots and being too careful.

I was under the assumption that his vote on creature was only the second and I wasn't really even sure if it was an RVS vote or not. Besides picking people who have voted for creature you have like 5 people that you could assume may be scum and Ranger is the only person you can really make a case for.


VOTE: ɀefiend

[Reubus Swagrid]

I do feel very odd about ɀefiend making that call. He himself has sorta just been able to hide in the shadows and make that call. I like his vote better than the whole Creature circlejerk we have going on at the moment but that case is a bit meh. Please share your Creature townread btw.

Like:

Wagon is fast
Scum must be on that fast wagon, probably just 1
The one that picks and chooses careful shots (for the record I think this is silly because all I see him doing is calling out what he thinks)
Therefore Ranger is scum

As I said meh case but I'm not gonna place any emphasis on that. I'm more interesting in who the case is coming from, 3 posts and you pulled this out of nowhere. I would call you lurky but hey look who's talking. And a vote + case over a skim read? wot?

[Reubus Swagrid]

Anyway a case for Creature town would really help him out if you could put it to his voters ɀefiend

[Reubus Swagrid]

Anyway a case for Creature town would really help him out if you could put it to his voters ɀefiend

Burden of proof is on the accuser, especially day 1, where it is very hard to see who is town because there is less information/time available for scumhunting to work with.

Regardless would it not help?

[Reubus Swagrid]

VOTE: Reubus Swagrid
talks like scum

What mean?

[Reubus Swagrid]

I do feel very odd about ɀefiend making that call. He himself has sorta just been able to hide in the shadows and make that call. I like his vote better than the whole Creature circlejerk we have going on at the moment but that case is a bit meh. Please share your Creature townread btw.

Like:

Wagon is fast
Scum must be on that fast wagon, probably just 1
The one that picks and chooses careful shots (for the record I think this is silly because all I see him doing is calling out what he thinks)
Therefore Ranger is scum

As I said meh case but I'm not gonna place any emphasis on that. I'm more interesting in who the case is coming from, 3 posts and you pulled this out of nowhere. I would call you lurky but hey look who's talking. And a vote + case over a skim read? wot?

this post. it's bad. u waffle and make a bunch of non-statements with no commitment also i kind of just don't follow what u said i think?????

That's what my teacher says as well. Long story short I don't like his case but the real thing I'm concerned with where it's coming from (the player and the reasons for the case). He said he also pulled this case out of a skim read which I thought was a little off. Thus I voted him. Provoked some interesting discussion as well. I would like to see how he responds before I go back or forwards with this.

[Reubus Swagrid]

After re-reading, looking at how Creature has played so far makes me lean town. I hadn't paid that much attention to him as what I paid to who was pushing for and against him and Ranger. Slight scum lean on Ranger on the basis of ɀefiend's case.
UNVOTE: ɀefiend

[Reubus Swagrid]

Literally impossible lol CAUGHT
VOTE: Klingoncelt

That's a ridiculously strong reaction to a single player ScumLean reading you.

You're calling that OMGUS?

[Reubus Swagrid]

Very confusing.

Well idk. We cant officially talk about ongoing games or content from them

But if you think for a moment that I would discard meta from another game just because it was 'ongoing' youre nutters.

And I presume klingy would feel the same way, whether shed admit it and risk trouble or not.

But, more importantly, do you think its alignment indicative?

Her Marathon Weekend games are finished.

I can't possibly go through any player's ongoings, because I have no way of knowing their alignment until they flip.

I don't understand, first of all, is what Klingon is doing right now legit, are these games in question still ongoing? Good call if you caught

[Reubus Swagrid]

Reubus, do you have any completed Scum games? I could only find the one where you were SK.

No scum games what so ever

[Reubus Swagrid]

Very confusing.

Well idk. We cant officially talk about ongoing games or content from them

But if you think for a moment that I would discard meta from another game just because it was 'ongoing' youre nutters.

And I presume klingy would feel the same way, whether shed admit it and risk trouble or not.

But, more importantly, do you think its alignment indicative?

Her Marathon Weekend games are finished.

I can't possibly go through any player's ongoings, because I have no way of knowing their alignment until they flip.

I don't understand, first of all, is what Klingon is doing right now legit, are these games in question still ongoing? Good call if you caught

It is, in fact, legal, players' posts in all games appear in their profile page ISOs. (However Mason, Neighborhood, Cult, and Scum PTs do not show up until the game is over. Hydra PTs never show up.) Anyway, as long as a player is in the game, I have no way of knowing their alignment, do I?

I couldn't possibly determine someone's meta without knowing their alignment. So going through ongoing games is worthless. I can't possibly do it to any useful end.

However, she did finish some Marathon games, and while brief they do provide some insight.

And yeah, she hardcore OMGUSed. lol.

Enlighten us on that insight that you got through this brief game

[Reubus Swagrid]

Enlighten us on that insight that you got through this brief game

It wasn't a single brief game but a whole weekend's worth.

As Scum she's a hamfisted, fairly silly fluffposter. One is far more likely to learn her dietary habits than learn her reads. She steers clear of any in-depth reads, preferring to go after low-hanging fruit.

I'm seeing that here.

I can't elaborate further because ongoing games.

literally show me where i've been like that this game lol. quote the posts.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=65532

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=65530

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=65551

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=65553


Feel free to show how your play is different this game, Nahdia.

Didn't we agree burden of proof was on the accuser? But for real I'll check this myself. See if there's any correlation between the ISO and that.

[Reubus Swagrid]

Yeah all I'm seeing is a continuation of brief posting that stays consistent which the topics you've provided. Except her posting contains fairly more substance that what those games do, namely her vote on me (not very lengthy but something) and her defense of your arguement, which you have yet to elaborate on. Sorry but I'm not really seeing it.

VOTE: Masquerade

V/LA for a few days need a break from mafia

Noted

I've decided to not talk unless I'm spoken to.

(prodge)

Only substance given is that of 188, get back here

[Reubus Swagrid]

Replace me out of this game. I have 0 interest in playing with this table any longer.

Why spit the dummy this early in the game??

[Reubus Swagrid]

Kek wait who is running away now?

[Reubus Swagrid]

With 4 days left until deadline who do we think our candidates are??

[Reubus Swagrid]

Oh wait nvm you're scumreading me so I doubt you'll be voting with me.

I'm not scumreading you?

[Reubus Swagrid]

Yeah all I'm seeing is a continuation of brief posting that stays consistent which the topics you've provided. Except her posting contains fairly more substance that what those games do, namely her vote on me (not very lengthy but something) and her defense of your arguement, which you have yet to elaborate on. Sorry but I'm not really seeing it.

VOTE: Masquerade

V/LA for a few days need a break from mafia

Noted

I've decided to not talk unless I'm spoken to.

(prodge)

Only substance given is that of 188, get back here

Not a scumread on you, just a get back here post.

[Reubus Swagrid]

The top few lines was about Klingon and Nahdia btw

[Reubus Swagrid]

I think weve already won the game.

Care to share?

[Reubus Swagrid]

I think weve already won the game.

Care to share?

[Reubus Swagrid]

Soz net is playing up

[Reubus Swagrid]

You mean you havent been reading? Ranger, masque, nadia

Lynching in that order??

[Reubus Swagrid]

Isn't most peoples meta ever-changing? Are there many players on the site that play very consistently in certain roles? As I understand peoples metagame would be ever changing. I just find it hard to believe that meta reading is a reliable way to read someone.

[Reubus Swagrid]

Isn't most peoples meta ever-changing? Are there many players on the site that play very consistently in certain roles? As I understand peoples metagame would be ever changing. I just find it hard to believe that meta reading is a reliable way to read someone.

Klingon plz answer this soonish.

We've got just under 3 days to decide, keeping an eye on the deadline would be beneficial

[Reubus Swagrid]

Derp
VOTE: SS

L1