In post 9, Alexcellent wrote:Hyper aggressive? No fucks? That sounds like obvscum to me!
VOTE: BlacleWorks
I didn't like this either
In post 9, Alexcellent wrote:Hyper aggressive? No fucks? That sounds like obvscum to me!
VOTE: BlacleWorks
In post 26, Clumsy wrote:In post 25, Maxous wrote:In post 9, Alexcellent wrote:Hyper aggressive? No fucks? That sounds like obvscum to me!
VOTE: BlacleWorks
I didn't like this either
vote: Alexcellent
So this is a serious vote?
In post 35, wgeurts wrote:In post 25, Maxous wrote:In post 9, Alexcellent wrote:Hyper aggressive? No fucks? That sounds like obvscum to me!
VOTE: BlacleWorks
I didn't like this either
vote: Alexcellent
Why?
In post 51, Alexcellent wrote:In post 25, Maxous wrote:In post 9, Alexcellent wrote:Hyper aggressive? No fucks? That sounds like obvscum to me!
VOTE: BlacleWorks
I didn't like thiseither
vote: Alexcellent
Who else didn't like it?
In post 73, texcat wrote:Should we discuss how our town PRs are going to handle their X shots?
In post 95, BlacleWorks wrote:Right now I have a very extremely weak null scum read on Maixmous, Kuroi, and Percival, and Kain Tepes. Each one of these slorts have attempted to push weak cases that no one else is being opportunist about at all.
In post 94, wgeurts wrote:Kuroi if you're town please reread texcats post and take a really good look. That was not a scum over the top defense. Also defending ones self is once again also not a scum tell. It's going "over the top" in your defense displaying over-confidence and/or paranoia that is scummy.
In post 100, BlacleWorks wrote:Yeah we can't wait around for scum to offer themselves on a platter. But when have any of you ever caught scum before they slipped up? I am a firm believer in that your win con ultimately influences your decisions.
That being said I have a theory about all mafia games with the standard 9 player newbie setup. At some point in time before the game ends it goes to either mylo or lylo. It is here that scum has to make its move. Its here that they are forced to deliver themselves up on a platter. I think the best course of action for a VT is to develop your reads as the days progress and try to eliminate players that are anything less than town starting with who is more than likely to be scum. Outside of PR's that is pretty much all you can hope to do as town.
Scum is going to opportunistic at some point because they can and they must in order to win. Spotting it is of course how I intend to catch scum.
Why are you in such a rush to build wagons and force content?Shouldn't you be trying to get to know everyone better right now while we are still very early in the day?
VOTE: Maxous
In post 106, texcat wrote: The wagon that I pushed with my RVS vote all the way to L-3 (! does this just sound ridiculous?) was on Alex. You seem to be voting me for encouraging Kuroi to get out of his tunnel, but Kuroi thinks I'm scummy for pushing Alex to L-3 with my RVS. It seems like Alex might have something to do with it.
In post 88, texcat wrote:In post 84, KuroiXHF wrote:2) He didn't see a problem with it. <- I think he said this is why.
Yep. And I still don't see a problem with it.I do find it strange that you are so focused on it, especially since Alexcellent seemed totally indifferent to the wagon.
In post 151, wgeurts wrote:We can also vote clumsy if anyone's up for that.
In post 235, wgeurts wrote:Mate, I'm probably dying tonight.
In post 265, SirCakez wrote:Regarding the coasting people - I'd put Persivul in that list. He's been noticeably quiet.
In post 269, BlacleWorks wrote:Um more votes on Wgeurts please. Obviously the scummiest person in the game followed by Anenien.
In post 264, Aneninen wrote:TexCat– Matches her town-meta I know. But still too little content. Null-town.
In post 280, BlacleWorks wrote:Wgeurts is the only one who pushed for my lynch and it was indeed a terrible push. I honestly don't know how I got to L-1.
I'm picking up what your putting down. However, I happen to think that Wgeurts is actually scum and tried to push a scum myslynch on what appeared to be a weak player(me). I think your vote would be better on Wgeurts than anything else. Wgeurts flip will give you more traction for your push on Texcat if he flips town, and it wont damage your traction if Wgeurts flips scum.
In post 327, wgeurts wrote:
In post 233, Persivul wrote:I thought that was implied, but FTR, intent to hammer.
Personally I think the guy is town trying to play too tricksy, but at this point he's going to be a distraction for as long as he's here, and his flip will help analysis. Absent a claim he needs to go.
This seems like an opportunistic grab at town-credit as well as a chance to hammer.
In post 242, Persivul wrote:In post 241, wgeurts wrote:No JK should def be protecting the confirmed town lol
We can't keep him alive long enough to make a difference, unless you're proposing we don't use any of our actions for cop investigations. We just protect one wild conftown every night and gain no new information from our PRs.
VOTE: wgeurts
Votes me for theory just as BW becomes town and I'd be the obvious person recieving scrutiny for driving that wagon single-handedly.
In post 323, Alexcellent wrote:And I'm starting to have some second thoughts about her based on some of the weaker votes on her wagon. I want to hear some more justifications for the vote on her, particularly from Masquerade and KT.
In post 334, Persivul wrote:In post 331, Maxous wrote:yeah, these 2 posts don't look great.
*and* I felt that Texcat's #307 felt kinda town.
Yet you stayed on the texcat wagon. Your presence there was part of the reason I joined it. It's odd that now you would try to disclaim the validity of the wagon to throw shade at me, when you wer eon it before me and stayed on it despite a "kinda town" post from her.
In post 347, Masquerade wrote:UNVOTE:
I was lazy and just went to look into your iso andhad a gutfeeling you were scum so I jumped the wagon. I normally check the votecount, no idea why I didn't this time.
In post 309, Masquerade wrote:VOTE: Texcat
I'd need to make a quotewall to explain myself and I'd rather not do that. Instead, if you don't agree point me to a post you think is town and I'll explain why it's scum.
In post 339, texcat wrote:Maxousfollowed along because he thought Kuroi was scum hunting and that his tunnel of the L-3 RVS was good.
In post 370, BlacleWorks wrote:those match up
In post 380, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Then the rest of his posts are nothing but spreading confusion and WIFOM.
In post 384, Alexcellent wrote:Maxous - has your tex read changed at all? Who are your scum reads?
In post 391, Alexcellent wrote:Like this, if he's scum and he's already being called out for not explaining his votes, why does he keep doing it so blatantly?
In post 20, KainTepes wrote:VOTE: shotty
calling me a VI implies that you know I am town........ can you explain how you know that?
In post 518, Clumsy wrote:All three he's got here are not among the top three for the game. While not necessarily indicative, does seem like scum distancing from the lynch today.
In post 571, BlacleWorks wrote:His Vote is an OMGUS because there was no scumhunting, there was no gradual progression to his scumread. He just suddenly knew someone else was scum. If it was happening to you, it would be easier to see given that you know your alignment. This is how scum appears to be scumhunting because they can't just do nothing and town posture in every post...
In post 624, wgeurts wrote:The reason I've gone silent is that you are all being completely mislead. Anyone in the bloody world could see that Shotty was a mislynch-compromise. The fact everyone went silent and things went stale is already a pretty good indicator of this. What do we gain from this lynch? Absolutely nothing besides the town hopefully opening their eyes and realising that they need to sort out the real question such as Persivul ect.
In post 707, Aneninen wrote:I still think Wgeurts is scum.
His Twilight post looks fake knowing the flip. Also, anyone can examine the difference between his reactions to the shotty wagon and my one to the Texcat wagon.
As far as I remember he told it was the same.
I think he was hesitant to take the risk to derail the shottx wagon actively.
In post 632, davesaz wrote:
drmyshottyizsik(7): SirCakez, Aneninen, Persivul,Alexcellent,BlacleWorks,Masquerade, Maxous (Lynch!)
Persivul(3):wgeurts,drmyshottyizsik,KuroiXHF
wgeurts(1): Clumsy
Masquerade(1):texcat
texcat(1):chilledtea
In post 934, Clumsy wrote:In post 400, Maxous wrote:In post 384, Alexcellent wrote:Maxous - has your tex read changed at all? Who are your scum reads?
i've softened a bit on Texcat.
{KainTepes, Texcat, Masquerade, Persivul} would be the list i'm working off atm
What caused this change Max?
In post 520, Maxous wrote:In post 518, Clumsy wrote:All three he's got here are not among the top three for the game. While not necessarily indicative, does seem like scum distancing from the lynch today.
we still have 3 days left which is plenty of time.
no need to panic and start compromising just yet
In post 540, Maxous wrote:ugh, fine
unvote, VOTE: wguerts
we're just stalling till the deadline at this point
These are just 20 posts away, and the first you argue that we have plenty of time, the second is saying that we're just stalling (as in, we should just end it now.) Why did this change?
In post 514, Maxous wrote:sorry if i'm glazing over this a bit but I still prefer a lynch among {KainTepes, Texcat, Masquerade} if at all possible
Why the hammer here? Weren't you townreading Shotty? Pretty hard actually.
In post 561, Maxous wrote:can nobody hammer until KT gets replaced anyway please?
shotty and pers are both fairly strong town-reads at the moment.
In post 565, Maxous wrote:I thought shotty's push on Kuroi and Persivul was decently reasoned and he doesn't come across as being opportunistic at all regarding pushes or votes.
his #380 was antagonistic to a lot of players (even the ones he was calling town!) in his readlist which I feel like is something scum wouldn't want to do.
I know people are voting him for low content but I think it's just a lazy playstyle more than anything.
-
For Persivul, it's mostly just tonal. Stuff like #426 sounds genuine for example.
I can't really articulate this one, sorry.
I do agree with his latest read-list for the most part though.
Are you still town-reading Persivul?
In post 938, chilledtea wrote:Mostly because scum shotty < scum Pers imo. Maxous hammering shotty like that when I "allowed" it - didn't sound convincing.
In post 958, Aneninen wrote:In post 927, Maxous wrote:
even apart from the result crumb, I would highly doubt that the scum-team is Clumsy & chilledtea.
Which means somebody threw Shotty under a bus big time.
Maybe even both of the buddies.
Why are you ruling out Clumsy?
Oh, Shotty was under a bus? Yesterday's news.
In post 949, Clumsy wrote:What are your other thoughts, because at least with my slot, this is wrong. Obviously anyone would say that, but given that you replaced into the last town PR, you're dying tonight I would think. What other teams could you see? What about Persivul? Why is no one talking about Anen or Cakez?
Back to Clumsy.
You're trying to widen the lynch-pool, which, again, looks like an attempt to save both of your and Maxous's aß.?
We've been talking a lot about Persivul and we've examined SirCakez too, to conclude that he's likely town. If you don't like that there's no talk about me, why don't you launch it
In post 926, Aneninen wrote:Adding the info from the two posts, one scum is in each pair:
Clumsy/Persivul
Maxous/SirCakez
Because of Day3, Persivul looks almost as scummy as Clumsy, but, as for the other pair, Maxous is much scummier than SirCakez.
I would lynch Maxous Today.
In post 967, Aneninen wrote:In post 966, Maxous wrote:i'll explain in depth later but i'm thinking Aneninen is scum here.
I don't like how he is analysing the game at all.
Not only was this post empty as a treasury having checked by a politician native to our country, but it was terrible for another reason, too.
If youreallythought I were scum, you should have voted for me. And as town, you might have added some reasoning, too...
But this, without a vote sounds like testing the waters whether a wagon on me would gain momentum.
VOTE: Maxous