well, the cop's down night one... that just sucks. i'd like some dicussion so
p.s lol, mod - great opening act...
Actually, the reason I find mathcam suspicious is not because I think he has a post requirement, that's just one of the explanations to his nothing posts and I don't think it makes a lot of sense, since this game has only the roles JereIC listed in his first post, and none of them have a posting requierment. The real reason for his posts, I think, is to show us he isn't lurking while not doing anything that might seem suspicious. I think that's a very scummy thing to do so my vote stands (although I do think Isaac is acting suspicious, too).Isaac wrote: Mathcam I dont' think is suspicous at all. As I've said before, having aposting requirement is not within itself a scummy thing. I don't even think he has a posting requirement though, it's not like he ever actually posted nonsense. He posted questions: if anything he posted more cogent posts than any of those silly random votes.
Because random voting contributes to the game and nonsense doesn't.You didn't go after anyone else for adding nothing to the game even though most of the first posts were just "random" votes.
Okay, let me see if I this strait:Isaac wrote: "I know!" Isaac said, "I know what I can do for the town as a townie!" It had finally struck Isaac what townies are good for: dying. "If I can be good about it, and try to draw out a lynch on myself for pretty baseless reasons, then I can help draw out who the scum are in the town!"
So he continued with lame responses that were true, but were not likely to convince anyone.
Alright, storytime's over. I'm a townie. I don't expect any of you to actually believe this, however.
What ignorant act? I was (and still am) completely sure there's only one cop in the game and he was killed night one...MeMe wrote:Nowmy question is...did you really just miss it in your read-through? Or is the ignorant act deliberate?
You probably didn't notice what came next...MeMe wrote:This is what I was talking about.No Idea wrote:I'm starting to think that I didn't misunderstand anything, and that you guys are just falling for his defense.
I said that you're excepcional and that you're unvoting himI wrote:Then there's MeMe, unvoting him just becasue Prizm thinks he's inoccent.
Yes, actually there is:Spoon wrote:First of all, you've been misspelling Isaac for a while now. Any reason for that?
How dare he think you're suspicious, everybody know you're innocent!Morpheus wrote:SoVote: Spoonfor making things up and trying to frame me.
So you say that scum is more likely to vote without explaining?Spoon wrote:Also, I think newness/newbieness shouldn't be used as an excuse that much. It can explain some mistakes, but it isn't a reason to jump around and vote for everyone without explanation. As well, there are lot of newbies is this game (including myself) but I don't see them jumping around with no reason.
I wrote:For now, I'll consider this newbieness, but if he'll continue behaving like that I'll definitely vote for him.
He was weird before but this is just too much...Morpheus wrote:Ok, I have no clue what Isaac's role is and thats why I'm not voting yet. But I do think he is kind of suspicous, So if nobody has a problem of losing a posible townie thenvote: Isaac
MeMe wrote:I already did...just flip back a page.
Can you explain why you waited so long to post after being named as a replacement?
Strong case? sbdirt lurked. I replaced him and it took me 10 hours to post. Then because sbdirt said something I said that I'm okay with him instead of me. That's baseless reasons on my book.MeMe wrote:And then said I have "baseless reasons" for voting you, though I gave what I consider to be a rather strong case already?
Because I wasn't paying enough attention. Personally I think we shouldn't be voting until we're agreed on who to lynch, because then the mafia wouldn't be able to speed lynch someone and win. I assumed that was your logic too.MeMe wrote:And why you cited my earlier reason for not voting as waiting until we're all sure that's what we want when I explained to mathcam yesterday that it's only prudent to wait when we might have had an information role (sbdirt/you) yet to weigh in?