In post 12, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I hate the RVS so I'm not going to vote.
But how do we progress past it if no one votes?
VOTE: MonkeyMan576
Lots of friendly faces here
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
In post 12, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I hate the RVS so I'm not going to vote.
In post 19, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 16, acryon wrote:@Boon: I promise not to lynch you this game. Well, maybe I don't, but I'll try my best not to.
How do we progress in the game? By voting for the scummy players.
Vote: Acryon
In post 21, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I think you're the scummiest of players available.
In post 25, Flames682 wrote:
In post 29, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 22, acryon wrote:In post 21, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I think you're the scummiest of players available.
So you would say we are out of RVS?
Since my vote was not a RV, yes
In post 83, eektor wrote:I don't like Toon Fighter's entrance. It seems lazy and trying to fly under the radar when we already had a bunch of discussion going on.
VOTE: Toon Fighter
In post 87, copper223 wrote:@Acryon
Aren't you bad at reading Boon? I'm wondering if your smiley entrance means it's payback time.
In post 92, eektor wrote:@Acryon Why do you think Monkey is scum?
In post 112, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You guys are barking up the wrong tree.
In post 114, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Formerfish for attacking people without even understanding what he's attacking about. Either that or blatantly misrepping, because I think I was pretty obvious about why I voted, I mean I even quoted the post I was voting for.
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Well, I thought it would be considered an OMGUS, but if you insist.
Vote: Formerfish
In post 117, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Do you think Formerfish is scum with Acryon MonkeyMan?
Suddenly less relevent.
In post 135, Futan wrote:In post 123, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I invited the attention by my anti-RVS stance, it doesn't make me scum. A lot of people are exaggerating the link between RVS and lynching the bad guys.
I got the impression that it was a site thing that everyone did. Avoiding it and garnering all the attention doesn't seem like a scum move granted.
In post 152, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Or to put this a more factually accurate way; I said you were buddying the IC by saying you liked her vote and sheeped it. I also don't think you can take a few scum wins and I say it's now statistically unlikely you will do anything as scum that would mean a player could catch. In fact it's probably the most spurious argument I've heard in a while.
In post 156, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 153, copper223 wrote:
anyone that can read would catch that, so Acryon for instance should be able to tell you it would be unusual for Copper_scum as I had to navigate a 20 page cc battle without slipping about his role PM.
In fact now that I know the mod put it in after the game started I'm not happy with him about it.
So yet more "I'm so great as scum, the fact that Victor suspects me means I must be town cause scum!me can never be caught". Sigh.
What is spurious is your argument that I did it because I did it, when I gave you a logical breakdown of why I think it's bad for me to do so I would not intentionally and you just ignored it.
Not once have provided any logical explanation for anything, you simply keep telling to me your apparently such a great scum player, you wouldn't be caught out doing scummy things.
I also find really questionable your statement about why shouldn't Itownreadthe IC, because if you know about the IC that statement is a lie, I would not read anything about her as I would already know, your interpretation there is very forced.
It was response to you originally trying to claim that scum wouldn't be publicly town reading the IC. It's trivial for any player of any alignment to call a conftown town. It's simply another case of you trying to force a towntell out of nothing.
In post 158, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 155, acryon wrote:In post 152, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Or to put this a more factually accurate way; I said you were buddying the IC by saying you liked her vote and sheeped it. I also don't think you can take a few scum wins and I say it's now statistically unlikely you will do anything as scum that would mean a player could catch. In fact it's probably the most spurious argument I've heard in a while.
I agree that someone being good or not at playing scum doesn't mean that they will never do X behavior, but I do think it makes it less likely they will. At the same time, a good enough scum is also more capable of next-leveling, so I think it's ultimately close to a wash.
I don't agree that this is what copper is doing, and it does seem like kind of an odd thing to really be driving forward. This would be my 3rd game with you Victor and you are scum in all three?
I remember Friends and Enemies but can't recall the other, what was it?
In post 160, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Oh yeah, I forgot that game. The only notable thing was that it was second time I played with TSO, second time we were scum together, and the second time he replaced out on day 1. I'm still waiting for game 3 to see whether the problem was me all along.
In post 172, Elbirn wrote:Hm. A question for you Acryon, why do you townread Boon? You give some reasoning in 88, but it feels thin. You say he plays like he did in his other games with you. How can you determine that when he hasn't provided enough content to analyze his playstyle? 11 posts with barely any content each, and prod dodging? Even less posts made at the time you made the above post. That doesn't seem to be enough to be indicative of playstyle nor towniness.
In post 174, acryon wrote:In post 172, Elbirn wrote:Hm. A question for you Acryon, why do you townread Boon? You give some reasoning in 88, but it feels thin. You say he plays like he did in his other games with you. How can you determine that when he hasn't provided enough content to analyze his playstyle? 11 posts with barely any content each, and prod dodging? Even less posts made at the time you made the above post. That doesn't seem to be enough to be indicative of playstyle nor towniness.
It's not that I'm townreading him as much as I'm not scumreading him. His play this game feels exactly the same as his play in the other two games I've played with him where he was town. He hasn't done anything that seems scummy to me, and anything that he has done that seems at all weird seems very Boon to me.
In post 176, Elbirn wrote:I still don't see how he qualifies for a "Town-read", which to my understanding means "I believe this person is town", nor do I see how he qualifies for a "Town-lean", which to my understanding means "This person might possibly be town". What I WILL accept is your statement that he's not a person worth pursuing at this stage, because from my perspective he has done nothing alignment indicative either way so far, and we have better things to do than pursue nullreads. I'd like if we get pressure him into being a more active participant so we can get a read on him however, his lurkiness isn't helpful to anyone.
In post 180, SiX wrote:
I possess the eye of providence, whether I'm here in person or not is of little importance.
Seriously though, I've read through a few pages. But I'm still at loss with the big picture and would therefore be glad if anyone could provide me the big picture sincemost of the posts seems to be unconstructive and just a pain scrolling through.
In post 184, copper223 wrote:@Acryon
I'm also not a fan of your play this game, why are you hedging so much on your opinions?
In post 194, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, why would you want me to explain what I see scummy in someone's play and in doing so allow for them to correct it?
In post 224, Cheetory6 wrote:
Acryon assuming missingICclaim is a townslip feels nasty. Fact that it didn't strike you as a nulltell more than anything strikes me as shallow analysis of the situation.
In post 103, acryon wrote:If anything, missing Radiant as IC is a townslip IMO.Not saying it is, but I think it's far more likely that a townie misses something like that than scum.
In post 224, Cheetory6 wrote:acryon wrote:Half of my lost games as town involved mislynches on Boon, so I think it makes sense to be more careful with him this time around.
If you want to be more careful with Boon, why are you throwing a townread at him without trying to engage him first?
In post 228, Cheetory6 wrote:The fact that you leaned town vs null on it feels like surface deep analysis of the situation.acryon wrote:I wonder how much more explicitly I can possible say things?
Why so overdefensive? Are you worried if you don't call something said against you a misrep it might look somewhat convincing?
In post 229, Cheetory6 wrote:Tell me the townpros and scumcons for each of them that're making this difficult for you.In post 226, acryon wrote:I don't think VictorvCopper is TvT. Just not sure which side is which.
In post 231, Cheetory6 wrote:So rude.
I see what you're saying now, but your eagerness to jump at me for misrepping rather than trying to see if I'm making some kind of misunderstanding feels strongly like it's coming from a position that isn't trying to sort me and is instead trying to posture.
In post 235, copper223 wrote:why?
In post 238, Cheetory6 wrote:Check it out acryon. Someone else didn't understand what you meant either.copper223 wrote:@All
In our previous game town_Acryon and a lot of the playerbase thought blindmewithscience, who did not see one of the players was a hydra, might be townslipping, so that's not scum indicative for him.
In post 238, Cheetory6 wrote:Tell me what you think of copper's misguided defense of you here given your explanation of what you meant.
In post 238, Cheetory6 wrote:acryon wrote:I've only ever played with both of them when they were scum, so I don't really get the general town-feels I normally would from a player if I had never played with them before or had played with them as town. Some of Victor's attack on copper has been good, and some has been really reachy. Some of copper's defense has been good, and some has been weak. The primary issue with Victor is that his tunneling on copper is keeping him from bringing much else to the table, so knowing where he is at on others may be helpful.@Victor, you hear dat? Give some reads on other peoplies.
@acryon, what do you expect from Victor's scumgame?
In post 240, copper223 wrote:This is how I interpreted it after the correction, paraphrasing: I see it as a null tell, I made that statement to counterbalance the idea that it was a scumslip, because if you want to view it as a slip I'd say it's more likely a townslip.
In post 242, VictorDeAngelo wrote:@CheetySince neither the IC slip or Boon townread were what you thought, is Acryon still your top scumread?
In post 238, Cheetory6 wrote:copper223 wrote:
acryon wrote:I've only ever played with both of them when they were scum, so I don't really get the general town-feels I normally would from a player if I had never played with them before or had played with them as town. Some of Victor's attack on copper has been good, and some has been really reachy. Some of copper's defense has been good, and some has been weak. The primary issue with Victor is that his tunneling on copper is keeping him from bringing much else to the table, so knowing where he is at on others may be helpful.@Victor, you hear dat? Give some reads on other peoplies.
I don't think I have been that tunnelly on Cooper, it's just most other players having been giving me much to talk about.
My main scumreads at this point are Cooper, Monkey and Toon_Fighter.
In post 244, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I'm not sure I'd necessarily agree with that statement Acryon, but it was true it wouldn't bother me at all.
In post 246, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 245, acryon wrote:In post 244, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I'm not sure I'd necessarily agree with that statement Acryon, but it was true it wouldn't bother me at all.
Who would you say has had more traction, or currently seems to have more traction?
I would say you and me have more traction than Toon currently.
In post 252, SiX wrote:@VictorDeAngelo
I certainly do.
In post 103, acryon wrote:If anything, missing Radiant as IC is a townslip IMO. Not saying it is, but I think it's far more likely that a townie misses something like that than scum.
I don't think it's uncommon for a scum to townread someone like that to gain favour. Scums generally tend to avoid vaging war upon too many people at a time by e.g. scumreading early on. The reason to this is because the people scumreaded usually scumreads back. What I'm suggesting here is that it looks slightly like white-knighting someone as a scum to gain favour with him. Not saying it is, just a possibility.
In post 319, RadiantCowbells wrote:Many people did not respond to my last request.
Please, everyone, lmk how you feel about:
SiX
Victor
Copper
Futan
In post 332, Futan wrote:In post 331, acryon wrote:Futan - If I had a gun put to my head, I would say he is scum, and his posts seem very active lurking-ish. I don't think he's the biggest fish to fry right now and I think there needs to be more from him before I decided, but I'm leaning scum.
Doubt the mod would have been looking for a replacement if I was active lurking-ish.
In post 338, Futan wrote:If I was active, I wouldn't require replacing, but apparently it was the content of the posts although I'm still not sure what that means.
In post 344, VictorDeAngelo wrote:@Futon - Do you have a previous town game you could link me?
In post 347, Cheetory6 wrote:Acryon y u no vote?
Been shoveling snow/super busy with schoolthings.
Will put some more time into this shortly.
In post 352, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 351, acryon wrote:
Boonwillquickhammer, so no one should put him to L-1 until we are ready.
Boon's already on the wagon.
In post 354, Cheetory6 wrote:@Acryon,
So you think Victor would be more likely to go after people on the side rather than the people at the center of attention as scum?acryon wrote:The only thing that bugs me is that all of his scum-reads have/had some traction of their own, and he doesn't strike me as the type to play that way as scum, although admittedly that is mostly gut.
In post 357, Cheetory6 wrote:So the general logic there is that as scum it'd be weird to scumread the three main wagons because it'd look opportunistic?
In post 359, Cheetory6 wrote:Gotcha.
Tell me what you make of the Elbirn/Victor connection Copper's pushing.
In post 361, Cheetory6 wrote:What parts of the potential connection do you like or not like?
In post 366, copper223 wrote:Fuck you idiot, wait for the guy to flip scum then beg forgiveness, just to reply in kind. If you have a question use a civil tone or don't expectt an answer.
In post 372, copper223 wrote:In post 369, acryon wrote:He was obviously being jokey. Don't get defensive and dodge here cop.
Fuck you, jk. Lol what?
In post 381, Formerfish wrote:Fuck me, I didn't realize that I was in prop territory yet.
I don't like coppers most recent posts, I feel like he is over reacting to things and has lost sight of any kind of objectivity. I agree with VDA that copper seems to be reaching by saying that VDA is setting Acryon up for a later lynch, that connection is weak as hell. I think I have seen enough to convince me that VDA v. Copper is TvS in that order.
Vote: Copper
Is that vote count correct? I could have sworn on my catch up I saw someone mention VDA was at l-2.
In post 393, copper223 wrote:I don't even know what to tell you guys.
1. Discredit again.
2. Lynching = pushing, misrep nr 16500.