VOTE: Frozen angel
Because the only type of angel that is made of ice is with a cold heart.
In post 12, Zulfy wrote:It's called an introduction, Fenrir. Everyone's so eager to RVS that we all forget the formalities.
In post 47, Zoronos wrote:VOTE: Frozen Angel I like this better, but explaining why is hard. Frozen's language feels like she's keeping herself at arm's length from her reasoning. RC's vote 'can simply be considered a spam vote' -> Sure, you can consider it, but is it?
Says Zulfy's vote on RC is scummy, doesn't vote Zulfy (and is voting with Zulfy).
idk. Bad gut vibes!
In post 58, Frozen Angel wrote:hey hey since when staying on RVS vote when we didn't even reach the 4th page is that such a big deal?!!!
UNVOTE: RC
this is just ...
I'm not confident enough to vote zolfy yet. keyser and RC knows my way of scum haunting ... My real scum hunting begun when a real wagon is going on ...
In post 41, Frozen Angel wrote:RC's vote can simply be considered as a spam vote. But I can't read zulfy's vote ... its slightly scum leaning ...
In post 61, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm not having a scum read on zulfy! just a bad gut feeling about his voting style...
and yet no other scum reads ...
give me more time please!
In post 174, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 170, Keyser Söze wrote:By the way, I won't be making a roleclaim unless the mod confirms the rule regarding claiming scum with another player.
looking at the game and site rules, there is no such rule. Unless it is disguised as something else but a search for the word "scum" or "claim" yielded no results
In post 170, Keyser Söze wrote:By the way, I won't be making a roleclaim unless the mod confirms the rule regarding claiming scum with another player.
In post 261, RadiantCowbells wrote:Elyse literally has not managed to make one post that hasn't triggered my scumdar.
VOTE: Elyse
Being a hypocrite doesn't make one scumIn post 265, RadiantCowbells wrote:What the fuck do you even mean Garmr?
This isn't about what she said it's about how she said it's about the fact that she's discussing that and in that fashion.
In post 267, RadiantCowbells wrote:OH MY GOD DUDE WHAT ARE YOU SAYING
In post 270, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, I never fully fleshed out the thought.
You decided to jump to conclusions of what my reason for the vote was and hard defend her for it.
You don't even know why the fuck I was scumreading her and you just decided to invent your own reason and refute it.
In post 272, RadiantCowbells wrote:Why are you so resolved to defend Elyse?
You didn't hear my reasons and you were already dead set on defending her.
In post 291, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 175, Garmr wrote:I'm a bit iffy with keyser at the moment since he did just beat me in a game he we just finished as mafia.
Why should that be a reason to scum-read me inthisgame? It is a logical fallacy Garmr, and you should know this.
[/size][/font]
In post 375, TheLhix wrote:In post 361, Garmr wrote:Well basically after isoing zulfy then reading which made me iso keyser again and I realized it wasn't as strong as I thought. The only point that still sticks is the lack of reads early in his game. It seems like he putting off putting out a solid scum read. This by itself isn't really that scummy. Also going to Sydney tomorrow so will be having fun there.
Could you give more information as to how its a solid scum read?
In post 610, Mathilda wrote:Is it the same girl in the avatars of both Firebringer and RC? They're both wearing fake cat ears, have similar length hair and are carrying a teddy bear.
Can not say since I have no clue and I don't know you would have a better clue to that since one of them was your slot. He has practically destroyed at least 3 games if he only does it as scum through.In post 614, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 612, Garmr wrote:Ok After looking at linx I looked through some of his games and in each one he was in he calls out that he is scum and I think he calls out a apparent scum buddy. I don't think his ban is tied down to one game in general.
Was he scum in those games?
In post 676, RadiantCowbells wrote:Yeah, I'm honestly not really buying this whole double confirmed scum shenanigans, though I do think that the Keyser slot could easily be scum independently.
In post 682, Aneninen wrote:Hi, Suzune!
(1) You were saying"Listen, this game is really hard to read, either everyone tries to jump on the same person, or they talk about nothing for long periods of time."AND mentioning Frozen/Firebringer and me... two players who had actually been doing something different. Wow-la!
(2) This"Early game things I noticed was that the current train is built on something weird. I mean, sure do not get me wrong Kling is always scum, but the reason that this train took off is silly."is whut?
(3) This"Right now there are dueling trains, generally speaking when two trains are close in length one is usually scum."is wrong.
(4)"I do not understand Aneninen vote on that slot right now. It mean it almost seems like a safe place vote."And I wish that wagon were growing.
By the way I think you're scum with Mathilda.
In post 680, Garmr wrote:I am unsure about linx through as the person is cancer and has done this over multiple games.
Are you allowed to explain?
Oh, and my intuition feels something terrible. What if we're in a 9:2:2?
In post 82, TheLhix wrote:In post 81, Jake from State Farm wrote:Sup
Kill me and the damn fairy dogs
In post 92, TheLhix wrote:In post 91, Jake from State Farm wrote:No he's not. Just checked
Maybe not. But we can still perform a multiple on the fairy dog from the seventh level
In post 304, Elyse wrote:In post 297, InputPrimary wrote:In post 289, RadiantCowbells wrote:IP looks pretty towny.
No I don't. What is this read? In my first newbie game, RC called me town for no reason and he was scum.
Sorry for the low activity everyone, I'm V/LA until Sunday. I'll be following the thread but probably not posting much because posting from a phone is annoying.
Lol I like this post. Input can be town for now.
@whoever asked
VCA is vote count analysis
@RC
Garmr assumed you had an issue with my VCA post considering you expressed your scumread of me directly after it. You are overreacting.
In post 843, Garmr wrote:In post 304, Elyse wrote:In post 297, InputPrimary wrote:In post 289, RadiantCowbells wrote:IP looks pretty towny.
No I don't. What is this read? In my first newbie game, RC called me town for no reason and he was scum.
Sorry for the low activity everyone, I'm V/LA until Sunday. I'll be following the thread but probably not posting much because posting from a phone is annoying.
Lol I like this post. Input can be town for now.
@whoever asked
VCA is vote count analysis
@RC
Garmr assumed you had an issue with my VCA post considering you expressed your scumread of me directly after it. You are overreacting.
I was going to do everyone but I am to lazy might as well just handle individuals a bit at a time so I don't burn myself out.
.
In post 851, RadiantCowbells wrote:what's your read on me?
In post 856, RadiantCowbells wrote:Yeah, Garmr's posts are ridiculous.
In post 855, Aneninen wrote:In post 852, Garmr wrote:Look through all his post there is only him commenting on events around him and not genuine hunting. This here is the lynch today folks.
That's true. Have Klingonette affect your read on that slot in any direction?
In post 853, Garmr wrote:Off the top of my head
elyse
rc
zulfy
I do how ever find these players scummy
keyser-obviously
scorpius
input
I did find frozen scummy but firebringer actually makes me feel better about this spot just because of my experiences with him in the past and this is how I expect fire to behave. This is all off the top of my head.
What does Zulfy do on the townlist?
What the dancing nymph does Input do on your scumlist? Frankly, I don't get those Input-scumreads at all.
Why do you think Firebringer has made that slot more town-ish?
In post 160, InputPrimary wrote:I've been travelling, not much time to post.
For now I'll just sheep the people who said Keyser's reaction to Lhix's insanity was weird.
VOTE: Keyser Söze
In post 240, InputPrimary wrote:Zulfy, you just "Yep'ed" RC's reason for voting Keyser, the person whose lynch you were trying to derail. What?
In post 545, InputPrimary wrote:Ok, I'm back from vacation. I've read the thread. I'm not going to do a big catch up post.
Right now I'm feeling Mathilda scum. I get bad vibes from her posts, they're overly defensive and don't seem genuine. This especially pinged me.
In post 346, Mathilda wrote:I started to then decided not to. I do understand why you and Aneninan say that. This is Day 1 so all we have to analyse is behaviour and tone. They're things to look out for but they don't build a case. I'm not interested in trying to appear town, I'm just interested in hunting out scum. If that means that I attract attention then I don't mind. It's ultimately all information for town.
Not caring how you appear to others is cool. Declaring how much you don't care how you appear to others, thus showing that you really do care, is scummy.
Post 416 is what really cinches it for me. There is no conviction behind it. There is little analysis, just statements of fact with some slight spin to make them appear scummy. It's exactly the kind of case scum would make against town. It's also the kind of case scum would make against scum. I'm still wary of RC and wouldn't want to clear him if Mathilda flips scum. I think their interaction could be bussing, neither is pushing particularly hard against the other.
VOTE: Mathilda
In post 548, InputPrimary wrote:Keyser essentailly claimed a role. Do we want to be lynching into that day 1? That's a real question, not rhetorical. I've never played a game with a closed set up before.
I am starting to feel like his trying his best to draw attention away from keyser. I mean look at it.In post 623, InputPrimary wrote:Keyser already soft claimed. What happens if we run Keyser up to L-1 and he claims for real? Will you want to lynch him anyway? If you're dead set on a team of Keyser/Lhix/Fire, why is Keyser the one you're going after first?
In post 625, InputPrimary wrote:Ok, then let's move the wagon to Lhix, we have plenty of time. I'll start.
VOTE: TheLhix
In post 874, Zulfy wrote:I'll do a real quick explanation. So much has happened that it'll be really hard to catch up. So in order to get back into things I'm claiming vigilante and deciding that I'ma shoot Aneninen, purely gut-based. I guess I should look back at my pings and ISO him first, but for now that's how I'm feeling.
If anyone would like to appeal this execution please feel free to do so.
I'ma try to review what's been going on, I lost track after Keyser was replaced, but I have a hell of a headache right now and got errands to take care of.
Thank you and have a nice day.
For the record, Mathilda and Elyse seem pretty damn town, RC seems pretty damn weird.
Pedit: Garmr agrees. How was Australia Garmr?
In post 895, Zulfy wrote:In post 894, Zoronos wrote:Zulfy - Report results of your claimed NA please.
What can I say? Sometimes scum is smarter than you think.
Mathilda is now confirmed town. I am actually hider.
In post 1008, Mathilda wrote:In post 991, Zulfy wrote:
Mathilda, there's a high chance you're the night kill tonight. Please give me all your possible thoughts on the game. I chose you for a reason.
without any explanation but only a little while earlier expresses doubt because Lhix played seriously after he gave up trolling #924. That's quite a change around.
In post 1035, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1033, Mathilda wrote:In post 1029, Klingoncelt wrote:
Zulfy, on the other hand, is looking like the scummiest Scum that ever scummed.
VOTE: Zulfy
Would scum benefit from claiming day-vig? On the one hand they can distract any protective roles so they can increase the chance that the night kill succeeds. But the chance of a protective role choosing the same target on night 1 when no one has claimed is slim. Whereas the chance of someone claiming day-vig being investigated is quite high, so it's a high risk strategy with a low chance of reward.
And then at the beginning of the day Zulfy immediately admitted that he is a hider. So any investigative role that got a result on him the night before would know if he was lying.
Why would scum do this?
You're new, aren't you?
The only investigatives that would get a result would be Role Cop, Watcher, or Tracker. And they'd have to target him. (Well, the Watcher would have to target you.)
Investigatives are generally supposed to keep their results quiet until they have 2 guilties, until they're at L-1, or until they're CC'd. (The problem with this is that the investigators are often NK'd before they can spill the beans.)
So even if someone found him not doing what he said, odds are Town won't find out, and if they do he can lie and say it was some sort of gambit.