Mini 1413 - The Mind Reader Mafia - Game Over
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Malakittens, I confirmed about two hours (two hours, eighteen minutes) after my role PM arrived in my inbox. At which point I checked out the thread and saw that everyone else had confirmed. So I think it's more a matter of everyone being really quick to confirm.
Why do you think it's relevant, given that the Mafia are guaranteed to have daytalk in this set-up for the first day, since everyone's still alive? (therefore the Mafia Psychic is around to facilitate it, for those who may not have read the set-up details)
Junpei, why do you want us to speculate about that in the game thread? And we're supposed to discuss that without elaborating on strategy or meta...what are you expecting, us to rate their utility on a scale of 1-10? That's a fishing expedition for certain.
UNVOTE: Loranthaceae (joke's totally on me for having to check your name's spelling again to unvote...)
VOTE: Junpei-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 18, Loranthaceae wrote:In post 12, penguin_alien wrote: wrote:Malakittens, I confirmed about two hours (two hours, eighteen minutes) after my role PM arrived in my inbox. At which point I checked out the thread and saw that everyone else had confirmed. So I think it's more a matter of everyone being really quick to confirm.
Why do you think it's relevant, given that the Mafia are guaranteed to have daytalk in this set-up for the first day, since everyone's still alive? (therefore the Mafia Psychic is around to facilitate it, for those who may not have read the set-up details)
Junpei, why do you want us to speculate about that in the game thread? And we're supposed to discuss that without elaborating on strategy or meta...what are you expecting, us to rate their utility on a scale of 1-10? That's a fishing expedition for certain.
UNVOTE: Loranthaceae (joke's totally on me for having to check your name's spelling again to unvote...)
VOTE: Junpei
To rephrase, generally I've seen late confirmations questioned as a delaying tactic by scum to extend their pre-game QT time. Since this set-up has daytalk for scum as long as the Mafia Psychic is alive, there is no benefit to delaying confirmation/game start intentionally. That makes it irrelevant in my mind how long I took to confirm, beyond that it would have been rude to blow off confirming intentionally.
I have no idea what the timeline was on the sending of role PMs. All I can attest to is my own actions.
@penguin Can you rephrase the middle paragraph?
Concerning confirmation, what you said cannot be true unless there was an error with the role PM and it had to be resent. The wave of confirmations which left you special came at least 6 hours after I sent out my confirmation PM. Can anyone else confirm this?
p-edit: I am not lying.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Yes, I checked AM/PM.
I do ask again how it's relevant in a game with scum daytalk.
Junpei, given that you phrased your question in a way that indicated you wanted an answer, but not anything that discussed strategy or metagaming, it's not clear that you wanted to do anything but stir up conversation in a way that would make it possible for you to point to someone as giving away too much strategic information as scum.
(also, I messed up the quote tags in my last post; sorry for the integrated answers to Loranthaceae's questions.)-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
I get that, except he artificially limited any responses we could make. Beyond Jal's saying the QTs are as useful as we make them, which is true, it's not clear what else we could say that would be true or useful without violating the 'no elaborating on strategy' edict. Maybe he is just attempting to elicit conversation, but it seems like it's also a really good way to trap people into saying something he can declare anti-town at the least.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 49, Junpei wrote:It has scumhunting purpose, but the results won't allow me to make any of those kinds of conclusions no matter what.
At this point I'm just confused. You don't anticipate anyone answering in a way that's scummy or anti-town? But you can scumhunt with the answers? What am I missing here?-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 54, Mehdi2277 wrote:Scum hunting purpose =/= searching for alignment. Understanding the set up might not directly give a read on someone but can help scum hunt overall.
What's to understand about the set-up? We're all in one-way contact with someone who's confirmed town but with a hidden identity. Like lots of Mason or Neighbor groups depending on the alignment of the writer. In the meantime we play it like a vanilla game and scum try to mislead the Mind Reader. I suspect people of both alignments will attempt different strategies, but to speculate further on that gets into territory Junpei said we should avoid.
I'll grant that searching for alignment can encompass finding town reads, making it more inclusive than scum hunting, so if that's what he meant, it's less confusing.
p-edit: The disconnect between what people say they'd do with the QT versus what they actually do could be useful, and I see how you were actually implying that your question would help someone else scumhunt, but since you told us not to answer with any strategy references, I'm not sure how you intended to elicit those types of responses.
Malakittens: Still not lying.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
UNVOTE: Junpei
I don't know if that was the best way to elicit the information you wanted the Mind Reader to have, Junpei, but it tracks with your hoping people would answer without referencing strategy. I'm kind of in agreement about the 'getting on people's good sides' given that he thinks I'm lying unintentionally, like he wants to appease me by excusing what he sees as a lie. But his posts seem to be aimed at getting people to clarify their thoughts in a pro-town way,
Loranthaceae, any plans to indicate why you think Junpei is scum? Or why you unvoted Mehdi2277 when your post before that didn't show you buying his explanation completely? Your reluctance to pursue scumreads sounds like scum wanting to contribute without being on wagons.
VOTE: Loranthaceae-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
I'm saying I don't know when other players received their PMs. The timeline I refer to is encompassing everything the mod sent out, which I obviously can't know about as any alignment under the sun. I don't doubt what everyone else is saying about having confirmed well before I did, as enough people had commented about it for it to be alignment-independent.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 89, penguin_alien wrote:Loranthaceae, any plans to indicate why you think Junpei is scum? Or why you unvoted Mehdi2277 when your post before that didn't show you buying his explanation completely? Your reluctance to pursue scumreads sounds like scum wanting to contribute without being on wagons.
VOTE: Loranthaceae
Given that you're not addressing any of the points made by any of us who are voting for you, I think it's a good wagon.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Apologies for the time it's taken for me to explain my confirmation delay--I didn't know what had happened myself, and once I figured out that it wasn't a matter of you all confirming in two hours, I had to find out what was going on and confirm that I could explain without a) disrupting the integrity of the game or b) violating site ethics in doing so.
When OhGodMyLife sent out the role PMs, he C&P'd the usernames from the Open Queue player listing, where my name was transcribed as 'penguin_allen' rather than 'penguin_alien'. This typo meant I didn't get the PM, so he sent it out late(r) once he figured out what had happened on his end. That's all.
Here endeth the explanation.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 323, Junpei wrote:vote Loranthaceae
If I don't vote him now I might not get to later, will try and read more.
Why would you not getting to vote for Loranthaceae be a problem for you? Presumably that would happen if he was lynched without your vote; why do you want to be on the wagon?
Loranthaceae's posting, claiming his one post was a joke and then a reaction test, and generally voting wherever he perceives the wind to be blowing is making me quite content with my vote.
The case on Adam-12 does seem like the next best thing going. From my POV, I find it a bit odd that he seemed to have a positive read on me early in the day phase, when most of what I'd done was deny lying when it really, really looked like I was.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Mehdi2277, how is #333, with Loranthaceae speculating on a scum group before anyone's flipped, particularly helpful? Or #337:
In post 337, Loranthaceae wrote:Mala and Jal what do you think of each other. The first one to ask me why I'm asking gets a prize
Even if he believes in the scum connection he's positing in #333, it does us little good without a flip, and even with a flip it's a pretty weak case. And I don't know what he would believe in for #337--that Malakittens and Jal interacting is relevant? Which, in general, yes?
T-Bone, why the quick unvoting?-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
T-Bone, I can only guess that you're seeing something I'm not in the posts Mehdi2277 pointed out.
And I don't know if Loranthaceae's post is some AtE or what, but it's rather over the top. And not particularly consistent:
In post 357, Loranthaceae wrote:I'm going to let you know why I think Junpei is scummy whenever I fucking feel like it. THAT's TOWN!
In post 357, Loranthaceae wrote:Do you feel like you're some fucking judge or something.. you are supposed to go in depth, explain to me what is in your head.
Oddly enough I don't feel particularly motivated to respond any further to someone who uses OMGUS as a mode of gameplay and writes in such a condescending fashion.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Feeling better after a night's rest; V/LA over.
Loranthaceae attempting to call the scum team on rather weak associations looks like scum lining up future lynches. Or overeager town, although I'd think that without any flips, it's rather premature as a pro-town play.
I'm waiting to see if guille2015's next catch-up post is more substantive; from his first one #241 what stands out to me is his worry that someone is being put at L-2 without what he deems to be a sufficiently good reason, plus I'm not sure why he feels the need to guess as to whom GreyICE is voting for. I'm on the same page with not quite getting the 'reading comprehension' motivation, but I think it was pretty clear GreyICE had his vote on Adam-12 at the time of the post. Casting doubt on this basic fact seems gratuitous. As for the L-2 point, guille2015, why do you think it's so dangerous to put someone at L-2 specifically?
CityElectric doesn't seem particularly scummy to me. What there is to her answers reads as genuine. Right now at worst I'd put her as a null read.
Malakittens' case on Adam-12 reads as reasonable, and I'd disagree with, I think it was guille2015, that Loranthaceae and Adam-12 couldn't be scum together, as I've seen scum infighting used to good effect. Adam-12, what made you say this:
In post 75, Adam-12 wrote:Jun is good posting. I like Juls & Penguin.
specifically your read on me, at that point in the game?-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
I agree about the efficacy of lining up future lynches, but that doesn't mean that Loranthaceae doesn't believe himself to have said credibility and power. In the meantime it's a great way to look busy and insightful with nothing of substance being contributed.
I have a stronger scum read on Loranthaceae, but I don't get the vibe from his exchanges with Adam-12 that him being scum excludes Adam-12 as scum. I want to see how Adam-12 responds to some of the more recent posting before determining if he's overtaking Loranthaceae in my scumdar. His not posting for four days doesn't help that. (unless I missed a V/LA?)-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
I meant substance for the town as a whole. But that is a good point that you'd think if he's scum he'd have been counseled to be less inflammatory. Unless they think it's worth bussing him, particularly if they can use his QT to their advantage in manipulating the MR, but I'd think you're right that they'd try to get him to become less of a target before resigning themselves to bussing where they need four mislynches to win. I don't think it's enough to unvote him, as if daytalk let scum play an infallible game it would never be used, but it's certainly worth considering.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
mastin2, you're on page three and you think GreyICE is the best scumhunter in the game? I can only assume you've read more recent pages of the game as well then, as he doesn't have his first post until page six.
And while I don't know what you're basing your read of me on, if you haven't gotten there, allow me to save time and direct you to #106-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 476, guille2015 wrote:I think Loran is just talking meaningless drivel. But I honestly skipped most of what he wrote. I don't think I missed much.
You have no interest in, if your vote is anything to go by, your strongest scum read?
In post 436, penguin_alien wrote:[W]hat stands out to me is [guille2015's] worry that someone is being put at L-2 without what he deems to be a sufficiently good reason, plus I'm not sure why he feels the need to guess as to whom GreyICE is voting for. I'm on the same page with not quite getting the 'reading comprehension' motivation, but I think it was pretty clear GreyICE had his vote on Adam-12 at the time of the post. Casting doubt on this basic fact seems gratuitous.As for the L-2 point, guille2015, why do you think it's so dangerous to put someone at L-2 specifically?
Bolded my question to you for emphasis, guille2015. Until I get an answer:
UNVOTE: Loranthaceae
VOTE: guille2015
This is L-1
p-edit: Ninja'd by Malakittens WRT his not reading Loranthaceae's posts.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Malakittens, around the time of #469, guille2015 was indicating that he was in the process of catching up. If that was the case, he would have come across my question and addressed it. Later on, when it was clear that he wasn't addressing it, I quoted it and added a vote to emphasize that I really did think this was scummy (along with the point about his reading Loranthaceae's posts) as I generally find people are more willing to answer questions when there's a vote on the line. Yes, it was L-1, but I wasn't remotely expecting Loranthaceae to waltz in and hammer like that. You say I should have avoided putting him at L-1 in case of a hammer, but in a game where there's a PR to claim, one really doesn't expect a hammer to come like that. Maybe if scum wants to cut off conversation, but usually that's a sign that the lynch in question will flip scum anyways, which reduces the utility of receiving an answer in any event.
As to why I didn't vote guille2015 when my initial question came up in #436, at that point I still had a scum read on Loranthaceae. The only reason I changed my mind there and moved to guille2015 as my top suspect was because of Mehdi2277's argument that Loranthaceae was unlikely to be scum on a team with day talk and still posting in such an erratic fashion. That that argument persuaded me off a wagon I now think was likely town onto a scum wagon moves Mehdi2277 from leaning scum to town in my books.
I find it very interesting that Malakittens managed to go from a tentative town read on me for overlapping on a reason to find guille2015 scummy (and seeming to have no objection to my L-1 vote) to opening the day finding me scummy, if I'm interpreting her posting correctly. Then she confuses my vote with Loranthaceae's hammer, when she specifically commented on the hammer at the end of the day, like she's reaching for reasons to find me scummy. I'm not saying that people don't become genuinely mixed up over the night phase, but I don't think I've ever quick-hammered in a game with Malakittens, even in places where I should (!) so why she'd have me in memory as the quickhammer, I don't know.
I'm also not quite sure about her NK speculation. My understanding through three town-Malakittens games is that she prides herself on NK analysis. I do see that she's speculated a bit that CityElectric might have guided the NK to T-Bone because he didn't like her lurking, but if that's what she really thinks, I'd expect her to spend more time pushing the read, even if she doesn't emphasize where it comes from; instead she's letting herself be diverted into weakly supported arguments.
That being said, Malakittens is correct that CityElectric hasn't been particularly pro-town in her postings, plus #526 is daring us to lynch her. Which is scummy as all get-out. I'm willing to see what CityElectric comes up with under increased pressure, so VOTE: CityElectric-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
mastin2, by 'interesting' I mean worth taking note of but not conclusive in my mind. There's something different about Malakittens in my reading, but I don't trust my read there entirely due to her push on my confirmation issue making me a bit frustrated at her for a lot of Day One, even though it wasn't unreasonable, plus even though I've seen her play as town in a few games, I think our overlap time there averaged a day phase or less per game.
In post 589, Loranthaceae wrote:Maybe it's just me but as someone-else-townie I wouldn't ask that question again. I mean not even I, the guy she's voting, is interested in the answer because it's probably just gonna be some excuse or something. Looks to me like he's scratching for something he knows isn't there because he knows the bone is somewhere else but doesn't want us to know. It's one of those easy things that scum can fake input on.
Even if someone is a top scum suspect, that doesn't mean that their answers to questions are worthless. We could be wrong about her alignment. Her answer could be revealing about how the scum team's thinking if she flips scum. And given that Mehdi2277's case on GreyICE is at least partly based on him early bussing guille2015, it's not unreasonable to consider that guille2015 could have been early bussing you. Yes, the fallout of Day One does point to your being town, but frankly it's all indirect evidence to me, i.e. that if you had daychat with a scum team you would have been told to tone it down sooner, or that one flipped scum was on your wagon. Your postings, coupled with your quick jump off the CityElectric wagon, don't contribute to my putting you in the town category at present.
CityElectric, that you have zero reads on anyone except the person you're voting and the person that pushed through a scum lynch is rather weak. How about this: do you think scum bussed, and if so, was it early or late on the wagon?
Mehdi2277, I kind of see where you're going with the GreyICE case, but I think it's a lot weaker than the CityElectric case. His outrage at the quickhammer isn't necessarily scummy: guille2015 could have been a Mind Reader who wasn't into the game because he got overwhelmed at the prospect of reading so many QTs in addition to the game thread. Even with him being correctly lynched, if he'd made a last-ditch attempt to save himself, we might have gotten more information. GreyICE not participating this day phase beyond voting for Malakittens doesn't improve his standing, but given how little guille2015 interacted with anyone, and given that CityElectric is an unknown quantity at present, I'm in agreement that CityElectric is scummier than GreyICE even, or perhaps especially, based on that associative case.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 660, GreyICE wrote:We lynch scum today, and we win, so why are you fucking about?
What's this supposed to mean? Are you saying that with a scum lynch today we'd have the victory? Why?
Mod, if Adam-12 and Junpei haven't answered their prods, can we please get replacements? Thanks!
Loranthaceae, can you please explain in slightly more objective terms what makes LastSurvivor scummier than CityElectric? Because I'm not following your case at all.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
CityElectric, why is your vote on Loranthaceae rather than Malakittens? If you find Loranthaceae, Malakittens, and me all suspicious, and Loranthaceae trumps us other two, where is your case on him? Particularly since there is support for a Malakittens lynch in the game.
In post 675, CityElectric wrote:I don't find Penguin's explanation for his 'this is L-1' before the P-edit completely satisfactory, so that's slightly off-putting.
(I'm a she) What's not satisfactory about wanting to be clear about my vote putting someone at L-1? Obviously it didn't end up mattering with the Loranthaceae quickhammer, but my impression is that p-edits are usually used to acknowledge that some point has been made redundant or happens to overlap with something someone said while one was compiling a post.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 695, Lastsurvivor wrote:
Eh. I would have expected scumCE to subtly shift positions on Loran in response to my question about him in order to appease me. Instead, CE stood her ground, and that's pretty townie.
Loran might actually have some sort of point. CE doesn't seem to be worried about the pressure on her at all, and that also makes me think she's town.
Given that Loranthaceae is being read as town by most everyone, CityElectric leaving her vote on him actually works to obfuscate things if she flips scum. There's no real case that she's making beyond thinking Loranthaceae is scum for unspecified reasons. So I ask again:
In post 680, penguin_alien wrote:CityElectric, why is your vote on Loranthaceae[?]
(quote truncated to address the main point I want answered)
Loranthaceae, I'm not anywhere near convinced by your case on LastSurvivor. It's so dependent on conjecture and assuming people are playing unethically that I can't take it seriously. I've played in a game with LastSurvivor before and saw zero evidence that he would flout the site ethics.
mastin2, what points from Loranthaceae are resonating with you? I have him as town, but really more in spite of his whacky postings rather than because of them.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
mastin2, I suppose I just have a hard time taking Loranthaceae seriously when he's so downright hostile, but I've been led down the garden path by assuming that people whose thought processes/approaches match mine must be the good guys. Lastsurvivor's response to your fleshing out where you stand on Loranthaceae's case looks pretty bad. I still think CityElectric is a better lynch, not least because she's not engaging or giving us any indication of scum hunting.
Double-ISOing Lastsurvivor and Loranthaceae shows some inconsistencies from both. Where Loranthaceae claims that Lastsurvivor tried to brush off the former's case as "insane" it's not really accurate; Lastsurvivor is pointing out that Loranthaceae's accusations of lurking are rather without merit. The whole thing seems to stem from Lastsurvivor wanting CityElectric to answer a question about her read on Loranthaceae, which Loranthaceae dismissed as a useless question, a stance I among others disagree with.
I don't know that Lastsurvivor's doing an awesome job defending himself, but I recall him getting run up in another game we played together (Open 459) and being unable to dissuade the wagon. Which was another case of someone picking on something small and blowing it up the more Lastsurvivor tried to refute it. Or that's how I remember it; I was scum there trying to stay off what looked like a lousy wagon, so my memory might be biased.
mastin2, what's your current take on CityElectric, given that she's done a runner in this game as far as I can tell? I know you initially said you had a scum read on her but didn't like the people on the wagon; has that changed? I do agree that the Adam-12 case is not worth pursuing.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
We're at < 72 hours to deadline by my count based off this post going into a weekend. With nine players active (although counting CityElectric and GreyICE as active is a stretch) and six needed for a lynch, something's got to give. My first choice is still CityElectric, but I'd rather get some information than no lynch. Here's the latest vote count I found, and it doesn't seem like anything's shifted since then:
CityElectric: 3 (Malakittens, penguin_alien, Mehdi2277)
Malakittens: 2 (Lastsurvivor, GreyICE)
Lastsurvivor: 2 (Loranthaceae, mastin2)
Loranthaceae: 1 (CityElectric)
[edited to fix number for Lastsurvivor]
Jal, where do you stand?-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
I like AngryPidgeon's town reasoning on CityElectric, actually, and I think the strength of his town read on Malakittens is about right. AngryPidgeon's posting in general makes me comfortable calling the Adam-12/AngryPidgeon slot town. Yet I don't see what he sees in Jal or Mehdi2277 being such surefire scum reads. I've seen Mehdi2277 get a bit more zealous when he has a strong scum read, but his focus on GreyICE seemed in line with that. And Jal, I have nothing. If it's PoE, why are you more comfortable with putting Jal as the scum over Lastsurvivor when you said you'd compromise on Lastsurvivor?
UNVOTE: CityElectric-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Jal, while I do agree that AngryPidgeon's VCA is light on analysis and not backing up his colors (although he's given the reads that led to those color choices elsewhere) working from the assumption that the Day One wagon on Loranthaceae was on town, CityElectric being scum with guille2015 puts two of the three scum heavily invested in a town wagon. From my limited experience, I've participated in early and heavy bussing of a scum buddy when they were imploding, but that doesn't seem to be the case here if we're right about town-Loranthaceae. Which would mean that it's unlikely CityElectric is scum especially given that they can coordinate via daychat. Junpei, maybe, but with his slot MIA and T-Bone's quick jump on and off, I'd rather hunt scum off the wagon.
To that end, mastin2 pushing the lynch on guille2015 leaves him out. Loranthaceae, also a town read. Which leaves GreyICE, Lastsurvivor, Malakittens, Mehdi2277, and you (Jal). I believe there's at least one scum in this group, possibly two. Rereading your (Jal's) ISO I don't see what AngryPidgeon does, which given that it's a gut read follows. I'd put you at leaning town myself. The GreyICE case tracks from CityElectric being part of the scum trio, and him disappearing for a week-plus isn't helping my read, I suspect that will sort itself out later. Mehdi2277 has been moving toward a town read.
I don't have as strong a town read as I have in the past WRT Malakittens. On the flipside of that, it may be that I'm being lazy, since the last two games I played with Malakittens, I was scum who knew and was nearly certain of her town alignment respectively. I didn't love Lastsurvivor's jumping on mastin2 posting the thoughts I'd requested, and at this point I could do worse than follow a strong town read.
VOTE: Lastsurvivor-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 706, Lastsurvivor wrote:Mastin's definitely just playing up both sides atm.
Yes, it was in response to Loranthaceae asking what you thought of mastin2. Your conclusion, that he was playing both sides, was incorrect, as I'd asked him to point out the statements from Loranthaceae that he didn't agree with; he still agreed with the general case and made a point of maintaining that stance even in responding to my query. I asked that to get a sense of where his thinking diverged from Loranthaceae's. You dodged the question of taking a stance on him as town- or scum-leaning by saying you couldn't be objective when he was voting you.
I think I explained my thought process pretty thoroughly in my previous post. Anything in particular you want me to address?-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 777, Lastsurvivor wrote:What caused you to switch from defending LS -> voting LS
If you ISOd me like you said you did during your defense, you should have seen the post about Mastin that is the backbone of your vote.
The following is the post in question, yes?
In post 706, Lastsurvivor wrote:I guess. Mastin's definitely just playing up both sides atm. I really don't trust myself to give a read on him due to conf-bias (i.e., he's voting me, thus I have the gut reaction to think he's scum).
You're asked for a read on mastin2; you state (incorrectly) that he's playing both sides and then opt not to give a read.
As far as switching from defending you to voting you, I changed my mind about what CityElectric's posts and voting record implied. I then took a look at the case on you and your ISO. In the meantime I had the experience elsewhere of having someone displaying certain behaviors I thought indicative of town meta flip scum (ongoing game, can't be more specific, yes it's 'convenient') and that led me to reconsider my prior assumption that your lack of stellar defense against attack here was like your play in Open 459 and so a town indicator.
To the contrary, in that game, even when you were under attack you were actively scum-hunting. Here, you have a vote on Malakittens, but you're not pushing her here like you did your scum reads then. Sure, you're asking her questions, but not so much about her play as about other people's, and since voting for her at the start of the day, you've barely attempted to persuade anyone of the correctness of your vote. It's like you either don't care or don't believe in your vote, which isn't town behavior. Admittedly I suspect that I've recently become a frontrunner in your scum reads, but that's really only in the last page or two; what do you consider to be your scum-hunting activity before then? In #633 you give what amounts to null reads on the people Loranthaceae asks you about. This:
In post 695, Lastsurvivor wrote:CE doesn't seem to be worried about the pressure on her at all, and that also makes me think she's town.
is the closest thing I see to a committed read from you from the whole day phase, leaving out your vote on Malakittens. Which is addressed as follows:
In post 518, Lastsurvivor wrote:In post 503, Malakittens wrote:When you find a way to explain a gut feeling. Then you can let me know. I can never explain my gut feels. >_>
VOTE: Malakittens
In post 538, Lastsurvivor wrote:Your read on guille was super fence sitting. Gut-town read, but null. It might as well have been distancing. I mostly have a problem with your answer because you didn't answer it in the first place, and when you did, it was basically "I don't have to explain, it's gut!!" Which makes no sense, because all gut has to have some sort of foundation.
and
In post 550, Lastsurvivor wrote:
In post 541, Jal wrote:What do you make of her vote on Guille, LS?
It looks like a bus. Mala had no real suspicion of Guille beforehand (remember, gut-town null), and then she suddenly votes him once it was pretty obvious that Guille was going down. I think that's why she stuck in that "I still think Adam's scum..." comment at the end...in an attempt to justify her switch.
In post 542, Malakittens wrote:@LS: I did say usually. You happened to pick the one scum game where I didn't bus because there wasn't a need to do so.
Which totally brings your meta defense into question. What makes one game more necessary to bus in than the other? Looking in some of your previous scum games, it looks like you bus one partner more heavily than the other (I'm looking at Murder on the HMS Regalia where you bus BK much more than you do Image). Who's to say you haven't been bussing one partner this entire game while ignoring Guille, who was absent most of yesterday?
Point is: You do not have some conclusive "uber bussing" meta that somehow forbids you from creating a fence-read on Guile.
And then nothing about Malakittens being scummy.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
If your vote's on Malakittens, I assume she's still your best scumread. As such, I'd assume you want others voting for her; why not present your case? How I feel about it: As to what you've been doing since then, I'd say defending yourself and asking people questions; when you get answers, I don't see you making statements that show you felt the answers helped you refine your reads.
As to me seeing your post in your ISO, in my first post after mastin2's answering my question, #737 (I'd link, but I'm on a mobile device that I'm not facile with), I noted that your response to him was bad. Pull up a triple ISO of you, me, and him to see the timeline.
Jal, my voting for CityElectric based on Loranthaceae being town was a matter of her placing a weak vote on someone Day Two for having made a bad case; I wasn't considering Day One voting patterns.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Could we get some prods on people who haven't posted in > 72 hours?
Lastsurvivor, mastin2's post #800 seems reasonable to me. I don't know if I agree with his scum read on Mehdi2277 yet (the lack of deadline and players being MIA is messing with my sense of urgency) but the whole 'hoping to be wrong on the read' is independently shady for it being a reluctant hop on a lynch with an easy excuse ready for the next day phase.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
I'm seeing more town reads of mine on the AngryPidgeon wagon than qwints, and obviously Lastsurvivor is going nowhere. Although I want to investigate whether those self-hammers left a last scum standing with four mislynches to survive or a comparable situation. A lynch trumps a no-lynch, and I'm leaning towards AngryPidgeon. No claim necessary on my account yet, as I want to use the last bit of time here to consider.
UNVOTE: Lastsurvivor-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
OK, Lastsurvivor does have a habit of self-hammering as scum. (Loved the hammer in Author Mafia, BTW!). It doesn't totally make me think he's town, as letting his side go from two scum with daytalk to one isolated scum who could be not-psychic seems like a lousy place to stick a partner, but I get where the argument comes from.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Jal, I haven't had you as a scum read at any point, and by #772 I had you leaning town. I don't know that there's any one thing in particular making me think you're town; more just a general willingness to engage.
I'm not particularly confident on qwints v. Nachomamma8 v. AngryPidgeon, but qwints seems to be pushing the whole 'scum off the guille2015 wagon' pretty hard without much else to support his opinions. I'm not getting a clear read either way from Nachomamma8 partly based on the slot being absent for a while there and partly based on him making some calls that seem hasty (like that Lastsurvivor definitely would have self-hammered), and between Adam-12/AngryPidgeon I don't personally want to lynch that slot.
All things considered, those things including a looming deadline and a really long day phase, I'm fine with a qwints lynch.
VOTE: qwints-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Loranthaceae's play last day phase hurt my town read on him. If qwints is scum, that means Mehdi2277 took pains to get me off my Loranthaceae vote and onto the guille2015 wagon. Which doesn't make sense unless Loranthaceae was more valuable to him than guille2015. And then Loranthaceae quick-hammered. Which doesn't add up well to me. Then Loranthaceae's 'attempt' to jump back on the AngryPidgeon wagon after the hammer had been placed: intentionally erratic, maybe? Blending in without leaving his name behind on the vote count?
I know a couple people have called Loranthaceae as obvtown as of day two, but I'm not seeing it so much. Not ready to call him scum, but he's not a straight-up town read right now.-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
In post 1238, Loranthaceae wrote:@penguin
In post 568, penguin_alien wrote: wrote:
That being said, Malakittens is correct that CityElectric hasn't been particularly pro-town in her postings, plus #526 is daring us to lynch her. Which is scummy as all get-out. I'm willing to see what CityElectric comes up with under increased pressure, so VOTE: CityElectric
Why is that particular post of CEs scummy?
I'd answer this, except a) I don't see why it's grabbed your attention all this time later such that you have a driving need to know, and b) heaven forbid I bore you further.
In post 1240, UberNinja wrote:I have no more energy for epic full-thread readthroughs at this point so I'm just gonna vote who I suspect most:
Vote: Penguin_alien
If you opt to flesh this out further, I'm all ears. Otherwise, keep up the excellent grammar work!-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
Argh, fine, we have time before deadline to see what UberNinja's take on the game is.
UNVOTE: qwints
Not revoting because of GreyICE-UberNinja, Loranthaceae, Malakittens, Nachomamma8, mastin2, Lastsurvivor, and CityElectric I don't have anything new to say. UberNinja, what time frame do you consider to be reasonable for your developing reads?-
-
penguin_alien Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4948
- Joined: August 19, 2012
-