Pasch pings as well. The shiny pokémon is town.
@Kitty: Why did you ignore the TW back and forth?
In post 40, Paschendale wrote:Using magic to trick someone instead of True Love™... I just won't stand for it!
VOTE: Total Wreck
Seems the scummiest out of the 5 people talking.
In post 81, Paschendale wrote:Bulba thinks everything I say is scummy.
In post 87, mastin2 wrote:
Anyway, Total Wreck is probably town.
Why?
Because it'd never be this easy to lynch them as scum.
In post 95, DOMO wrote:I think I've played with pasch once and he was lynch bait, everything he seemed to do was scummy. I think I was scum in that game. I could be remembering badly though. It was back in my reverend days. His comment about everything he posts looking scummy, it pinged but then again town can ping. I'm in no hurry to jump on pasch.
mastin's lunge at me is extremely fabricated. She's gone from "best guess for #3" in the first of a flurry of five posts, then the next four all mention me casually as scum. But there's no reason for it whatsoever. At best it's a bad gut read, at worst she's looking for targets. Feels a lot more like the latter. She's concerned about my first vote? That makes no sense.
VOTE: mastin
In post 114, KittyCupCake wrote:In post 80, Bulbazak wrote:This feels fake:
In post 40, Paschendale wrote:Using magic to trick someone instead of True Love™... I just won't stand for it!
VOTE: Total Wreck
Seems the scummiest out of the 5 people talking.
The first line feels a bit... forced? -Maybe? But that's not uncommon in RVS.
In post 114, KittyCupCake wrote:
That's a good read. I tend to revise my posts heavily while making them. So, I'm not at all surprised if they come off sounding a bit less than organic. However, on the plus side, they tend to be very clear and free of errors, so there is little miscommunication.In post 102, DOMO wrote:This feels awkward. The vote is obviously a rvs joke, farside was yet to post at this stage. But the tone of the post feels unnatural.
I couldn't very well have random voted you for beingIn post 103, farside22 wrote:Anyways long story short I find it odd she proclaims me as scum. Typically when I've gad votes of that nature as a joke it was because the player has played with me when I'm scum and doesn't trust me.
Her reference of me is a town hammer, hence the scum read I have on her for weird reasons.town, now could I?
In post 115, KittyCupCake wrote:In post 88, mastin2 wrote:IF they're scum, though, DOMO's the vote standing out the most on them.
And what if they're town? Which votes stand out then?
I have a feeling I'm going to enjoy playing with you, BTW.
In post 122, mastin2 wrote:
Pasch is the player least guilty of exaggerating of those who could ever be accused of exaggerating. You'd have better luck accusing me of exaggerating.In post 94, farside22 wrote:Everything I read from pasche reads exaggerated, explain town read.
In post 122, mastin2 wrote:
I didn't say they were scummy; I said they were scum!In post 92, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:what is scummy about domo and romitelli?
Which I know because of my VAST wealth of experience, and me seeing things nobody else sees.
You want me talking about people who're scummy (though probably not scum), well, then, that'd be the Total Wreck of a hydra.
In post 129, Total Wreck wrote:
That mastin is reading me as town despite my... peccadilloes... speaks either to her experience & insight, or her possession of outside knowledge (if she is scum, of course she knows I'm not... but why would she say so?)
I'm of the mind that she is town and worth listening to.
In post 146, Total Wreck wrote:In post 143, DOMO wrote:In post 138, Pine wrote:Arright, between TW, Mastina, Farside and I, this game should go smoothly
I don't trust mastin. Otherwise I'm good with this group.
Are you high? I townread mastin more than either of the others right now. Even me.
In post 177, Paschendale wrote:
In post 166, Total Wreck wrote:Nah, not really.
Meta House, I don't care about pressure votes. Or real ones, for that matter.
By all means, get yourself lynched stupidly and cost town information and time.
In post 182, farside22 wrote:I'm pretty comfortable with my scum read of kcc at this point.
The back and forth between tw and her was pretty garbage scum hunting and inquiry from kcc
In post 213, DOMO wrote:ok to those who know mastin's game better than I do...
Does she have a tendancy to push scumreads on extremely thin grounds when town? How about as scum? Does she have a tendancy to bus buddies? I'm too lazy to go through her old games, metadiving is boring.
In post 219, Total Wreck wrote:Leaning Bulbazak scum.
He has much incentive to indict mastin because she is a big threat to scum..
In post 229, Paschendale wrote:
In post 211, KittyCupCake wrote:Okay then.In post 208, Total Wreck wrote:Fair enough.
UNVOTE: Total Wreck
VOTE: Romitelli
Because Rom, despite several posts, hasn't done a single thing that even starts to resemble scum hunting.
I'm leaning towards agreeing with you here. Though, I'm not nearly as confident as you seem to be yet.
I don't like this at all. This and the interaction leading up to it look extremely contrived.
In post 249, KittyCupCake wrote:When is it customary to claim around here?
In post 272, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:In post 270, Bulbazak wrote:I really don't like this Kitty wagon.
either wking scum or partner
my gut says the former but that wont make me stop lynching kitty
R~
In post 287, Aronis wrote:In post 279, Bulbazak wrote:Wisdom, one of these days you'll learn how to actually scumhunt. Why is Kitty scum? Why is everyone on her wagon town? Because that's what you're suggesting. You have taken zero interest in figuring out her or my alignment. If you thought my stance was BS, then you should have asked me how I came to my reads on everyone. I've been very clear on my Kitty, TW, and Pasch reads. Less so on my Aronis and Jeckel reads, mostly because they are developing. Aronis's first and only post is opportunistic as crap and exactly what I'd expect from scum him. Jeckel might be town, but his first post, which jumped on the emerging Kitty wagon, felt very mechanical. The only legit vote I've seen is Farside, and that looks to be largely personal. So again, what's the Kitty case?
I was the second person on the kitty wagon.
In post 296, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:I could personally go for Wreck, and farside atm. maybe domo. thoughts?
~L
In post 297, mastin2 wrote:Explain why you're questioning someone supporting your push in that way.
In post 300, KittyCupCake wrote:
BTW, I did get information from my discussion with TW: I learned a bit about what kind of player he is, how he thinks about the game, and what type of mindset and motivations I should expect/be looking for when reading him. -Which are all very useful things.
In post 302, KittyCupCake wrote:So, jumping in to defend a townie, then. -Is it used to refer to times when the scum is doing it to earn favor withIn post 301, Pine wrote:White knighting. It confused me too, but I figured it out using contextthattownie, when the scum is doing it to hopefully earn some respect for being right when that player later dies and flips town, both equally, both but usually one more than the other, or some other situation?
In post 306, KittyCupCake wrote:
I'd rather not discuss that much. -I have some ideas of what I should look for to discern his alignment, but spelling out in the thread what he should and shouldn't do to make me read him as town doesn't seem smart.
In post 322, Paschendale wrote:In post 270, Bulbazak wrote:I really don't like this Kitty wagon.
Got a better one in mind?
In post 325, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:note; when bulba flips scum, look at all those attempts to discredit my push on him
R~
In post 326, mastin2 wrote:
Because he is?In post 228, Bulbazak wrote:@Mastin: Remind me why Romi is scum again.
Like, his posting's not only faked but also not original.
In post 336, mastin2 wrote:
Definitely in my mind as well.In post 324, Wisdom wrote:note; when bulba flips scum, look at all those attempts to discredit my push on him
In post 337, mastin2 wrote:Pretty sure Romi isn't.In post 327, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:you dont make sense, mastin. Romi is town
I think that we'll overall work together well in spite of this disagreement, though.
In post 356, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:Feel free to, expect me to scumread you for it if you're using it as an excuse to not scumhunt and/or discredit our opinions
~R
In post 418, DOMO wrote:It's the enthusiasm that stands out as the dinstinct difference. This game, he waits until last to post, makes a couple of posts, then he's gone while others drive the conversation. It's similar in PC. But CoC he's much more involved through the inital stages.
In post 423, Total Wreck wrote:VOTE: Bulbazak
Out of his three scum reads, he picks the one last likely to actually get a wagon on D1.
That and other stuff.
In post 426, Aronis wrote:
In post 318, Bulbazak wrote:Actually, that was pretty town posting from Aronis. He's much more obvious as scum.
You just really don't understand my game do you? Why do you even bother trying to read me?
In post 449, mastin2 wrote:
You might recall I actually WKed you in CoC for the towncred and buddying to you. (And because antagonizing Wisdom is always masochistic fun when I'm scum. ) Situation's not identical, true, but what's the scum motivation in me acting in an entirely-different manner?Seeing as how you were scum in Chain of Command,the other game where Wisdom ruthlessly tunneled me, this statement definitely stands out. Town Mastin should know better than to say this knowing that I seem to be perpetually on Wisdom's tunnel list. This looks more like you fanning the flames.
I'm fanning the flames on you because, surprise! I actually think you're scum.
In post 467, mastin2 wrote:Shiny Hydreigon
KittyCupcake
DoubleSlap
Total Wreck
Aronis
farside22
Pine
Paschendale
DOMO
Eckleberg
Romitelli
Bulbazak
There's one or two inaccuracies, but close enough.
In post 477, mastin2 wrote:YES I FUCKING HAVE.In [url=/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6412613#p6412613]post 473[/url], Shiny Hydreigon wrote:You never explained Romi, and you never will, because you can't.
His posting was a cliched random vote opener.
He has not put in a morsel of effort into scumhunting.
His posting has all been incredibly forced attempts to blend in.
His SOLE contribution to the game was a push on Kitty...which was a CARBON FUCKING COPY of farside's own Kitty push.
Romi is scum.
In post 492, mastin2 wrote:
YOU CANT" SEE THROUGH THE KEYBOARD> YOU CAN'ET SEE THAT MY JAW IS TREBLING, SHAKINGM. YOU CAN'GT FUCLKIGSEEMY HANDS FUCKING TREMBLING. YOU. DON'T. FUCKING. SEE. THE.HATRED. COMING THROUGH.
In post 516, DOMO wrote:In post 422, Bulbazak wrote:In Playing Card, I made an RVS vote shortly before leaving to see a movie. When I came back, I had to fight off a wagon. In Chain of Command, I had access from the very beginning that allowed for those early interactions. As for this game, I posted about 4 hours after the game started, and that was because I was spending some time with family and that was the earliest time I could read the game. My activity in any game is related to availability, not alignment. If you want to double check, I have a whole wiki full of past games that you can look through.
This is such an easy defence to my attack, that it's more natural to question my motive, rather than take your time to explain yourself. You're talking to me here like you have no concern whatsoever about my motive for suddenly finding reason to jump on your wagon. That's more concerning than the activity tell I picked up on, which can easily mean nothing at all.
To be quite honest the reaction I'd expect from town is something along the lines of "are you kidding me".
In post 519, Romitelli wrote:
And I'm not the one pulling the "buddy-buddy I'm a friendly townie" act in attempt to blend in. Your read is crap, get over it.
In post 581, Total Wreck wrote:In post 580, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:that sounded to me like you wanted him to vote me.
Now tell me how making Pine post is wasting time plz
R~
A solo vote isn't going to do much.
And you are being disingenuous about my post regarding Pasche. I clearly wasn't reading him as town given my tone and attitude.
Sounding scummy, Wis.
In post 584, Total Wreck wrote:When Pasche flips scum, I'm tunneling the shit out of Shiny.
In post 608, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:what do you think of TW going from Pasche-null to Pasche-obvscum?
R~
In post 631, DOMO wrote:bulba's reaction to me is really odd. Put yourself in the position of town who is being accused of an activity of the type I accused bulba of. You're town who knows I'm wrong, so how do you react? Are you fucking kidding me, what the fuck is this, something like that. Not to formally explain yourself without even the slightest hint of suspicion about my motivation for attacking. I don not think his reaction to me was that of a townie.
In post 647, Total Wreck wrote:In post 640, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:
And then he confirms my thoughts that such a scumread isn't possible by failing to explain it and giving ridiculous excuses.
R~
The only way your bullshit post (and especially that sentence) makes any damned sense is if you hadn't been scumreading Pasche, then begged off for something inane.
But you did, so take your questions and shove them, scum.
In post 689, Total Wreck wrote:Also, if SH was town, scum would have latched onto an opportunity to rationalize voting for him and jumped on with their own reason, fabricated or not.
That literally I am the only one on his wagon supports my read.
In post 702, DOMO wrote:ladies give it a rest please. I predict there's exactly one scum between you, and we lynch wreck today and if he flips town we lynch shiny tomorrow, and if he flips town then lynch me for lining up mislynches, then when I flip town blame shiny and wreck for shitting all over the thread on d1 with their so certain scum reads.
In post 721, Total Wreck wrote:
Lynch Pasch and my vote goes away. Keep yours off him and mine stays on you.
In post 731, Total Wreck wrote:In post 730, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:In post 726, KittyCupCake wrote:In post 722, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:i am completely relaxed and in no need of any perspective.Youneed to lose your town-tunnel and read what happened instead of assuming it's tvt.
I saw what happened. You were scumreading pasch. TW started scumreading pasch. You wondered why. TW isn't big on explanations. TW wondered why you weren't voting for pasch. And endless loop of miscommunication and chaos ensued.
no, thats not what happened. Thanks for confirming you haven't read shit
R~
That's precisely what happened as evidenced by the fact you still refuse to lynch Pasch.
In post 750, KittyCupCake wrote:
I'm reading this post as negative towards pasch. Granted, it was obviously more about you, but I don't feel TW held pasch in high regard back here.In post 744, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:He didn't actually scumread Pasche.
In post 841, farside22 wrote:
My vote is not personal and I'd like to understand where your town read in her comes from.
In post 859, Doubleslap wrote:also total wreck has less of a chance of being scum as kittycupcake
In post 868, Doubleslap wrote:ftr seo and I just snapchatted about this game and it was pretty much "kcc hard defending tw" "oh really? im not caught up" "ya im bored" "yea boring" I guess I should probably catch up soon but yeah bulba is a poe plus I think I saw something analyzing his scum meta that sounded legit earlier whatever lol latersss
In post 873, Total Wreck wrote:^^ Doubleslap doing some pretty hardcore scumposting up there. ^^
In post 876, farside22 wrote:
Someone that knows mastin better....is she typically prone to react so aggressively and with such a potty mouth when called out? Reading her post on page 20 and it reads over the top.
In post 880, DOMO wrote:
doubleslap has bulba as scum thanks to poe on d1? Well done, that's impressive.
In post 888, farside22 wrote:
In post 689, Total Wreck wrote:Also, if SH was town, scum would have latched onto an opportunity to rationalize voting for him and jumped on with their own reason, fabricated or not.
That literally I am the only one on his wagon supports my read.
That's pure bs. 4 people have posted since your vote. This reads as try hard.
In post 963, Paschendale wrote:In post 947, Pine wrote:^Opportunistic
I haven't really been buying the Pasch wagon, but that's a big point in its favor
Switching back to my second highest scum read because they did one of the few things that's truly a hot button for me is "opportunistic"? No, it would be opportunistic if I used this to swap to someone I hadn't suspected before, as opposed to one of my strongest scum reads.
In post 1003, Total Wreck wrote:Town folk, please open the spoilered text at the bottom of this post.
Scum brethren/sist...ren... I would like to conspire privately with town members only, so I will ask you to resist the urge to eavesdrop on what I have to say to the townfolk. As you are ethical, moral criminals, I am sure that you can be trusted to honor our privacy.
Spoiler: TOWN EYES ONLY
In post 1048, Marquis wrote:it was a gambit?
haha oops! well at least we're conftown now because our unquestionably genuine confusion due to interpreting a post incorrectly couldn't possibly signal any other scenario
right KFC??
In post 1085, Paschendale wrote:
Because her focus is entirely defensive. She's maneuvering, not scumhunting. She's looking to be townread, rather than find scum. Seriously, ask yourself who her scumreads are. Besides me, who has she really gone after? And how has she supported any of it? Could you honestly say you'd agree with any of her points on their own merit? Of course not, because she's not putting any effort into making any points. She's putting effort into ingratiating herself with people she thinks will protect her.
In post 1095, mastin2 wrote:Because the strength of the Romi read remained about the same (decently-strong), while the strength of my scumread on you grew (to be stronger). But note the fluidity in my lists; a lot of them have held a LOT of interchangeability positional-wise, because the list is just my best guess at to the strength of my reads in that moment.In post 1094, Bulbazak wrote:So why am I suddenly a stronger scum read than Romi, your pet scum read?
In post 1095, mastin2 wrote:
This was addressed literally ages ago, and given that Bulb is skipping over a lot of info, it's something that he had to have deliberately left in in spite of its obsoleteness.However, given that Romi is a new player, these are all null tells, and you would know that Ms. IC.
In post 1095, mastin2 wrote:
THAT would be because it's real, and you fucking know it. The contrast between my rage in this game and the fakerage in L4D is so strong that I don't need to see things from my perspective to tell; blind men can do the same.For spontaneous rage, this is some well thought out prose.
In post 492, mastin2 wrote:
YOU CANT" SEE THROUGH THE KEYBOARD> YOU CAN'ET SEE THAT MY JAW IS TREBLING, SHAKINGM. YOU CAN'GT FUCLKIGSEEMY HANDS FUCKING TREMBLING. YOU. DON'T. FUCKING. SEE. THE.HATRED. COMING THROUGH.
In post 1095, mastin2 wrote:
I'm basically single-handedly the reason we have a Pasch wagon going. I'm pushing plenty hard.However, in those games you were much more engaged in your reads and pushed them harder.
In post 1095, mastin2 wrote:
THAT was the ranting you yourself pointed out.You also had the tendency to dive into lecture mode and to generally get full of yourself.
In post 1131, Paschendale wrote:
In post 1122, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:Pasche: I'm willing to forget everything you've done and start anew. Can you tell me what your scumreads are right now and exactly why? I want to see your full thought process behind each read.
R~
No you aren't, especially since you don't seem to understand what I've done thus far. You know who my scumreads are (one of them is you), and you know why. What no one seems to know, however, is why you're voting for me. You're the one who needs to rehabilitate their image, not me. The wagon on me is the most obvious mislynch in a long time, is really really obviously scumdriven, and nobody who's actually paying attention is going to join it. But you'll be called to answer for it, and you should probably start actually contributing useful content instead of just making noise.
In post 1151, mastin2 wrote:Then you haven't been paying attention.In post 1140, Bulbazak wrote:Either I forgot about it during the holiday or missed it during your all caps rant, but can you point where you developed a Pasch scum read? Last I remember, you were calling him town.
I've held the Pasch scumread for so long that I don't remember where it began.
In post 1177, Paschendale wrote:Really? I'm not allowed to have a tipping point?
In post 1207, farside22 wrote:Bulba: I've been leaning town for tw sometime. I'm not the type to say one post makes them auto scum.
I noted you were not buying pasch scum read on kcc....so is he a scum read, thrown or null.
In post 1208, KittyCupCake wrote:How am I less bothered by his suspicion of me than you are? -I get where his thoughts are coming from there. It's a reasonable theory, other than the fact that it's based on an incorrect remembering of events, but even then, I understand why he had the impression he did.In post 1199, Bulbazak wrote:This is scum posting. The whole "scum please don't read this!!!" is manufactured and fake, and he's definitely setting up a Kitty lynch with this post.
As for the "scum don't read this," I'vedonethings like that as town. Actually, I'veonlydone things like that as town.
No, that doesn't make him auto-town, but it's certainly not something I'd consider scummy.
In post 1208, KittyCupCake wrote:
422 is a bit easier: I don't think I liked that you listed your scum reads as pasch (an agreed read), TW (an understood read), and mastin (a read I couldn't have more strongly disagreed with) and that you then placed your vote onmastin, of the 3. I noted it as being potential distancing with pasch. Obviously, it's a point that means nothing on it's own, but I wanted to remember it for when we got more alignment info, which is why I have you down as being worth monitoring and not really a scum read.
As a partially related aside, I actually really, really like your recent mastin analysis.
In post 1210, KittyCupCake wrote:
On the other hand, if you look at it from the perspective of a scum TW talking to a scum pasch about a town SH, then it's a simple (if not very stealthy) call for his buddy to jump on the wagon (which is partially why I have TW/pasch as an unlikely-maybe scumteam, though this hinting feels alittletoo out in the open to be true).
In post 1213, KittyCupCake wrote:You don't really need to panic anyway; there aren't deadline no-lynches in this game. It goes to highest voted.
In post 1221, mastin2 wrote:
Yes, which is what the fucking ranting was all about.In those games I linked, you essentially stroked your own ego and turned the threads into mini Mastin academies.
In post 1221, mastin2 wrote:
Which is why I'm showing up where need be and saying what I can to help. Like dismantle tVt fights
In post 1221, mastin2 wrote:
and direct attention in the vague area I want it to (one of the four between you/Pasch/Rom-Mafia/Pine).
In post 1222, mastin2 wrote:Seriously, those Shiny/TW wagons suck ass.In post 1202, ArcAngel9 wrote:Shiny Hydreigon- Pine, Aronis
DOMO- Not_Mafia,
KittyCupCake-, DrTJEckleburg,
Total Wreck- Paschendale, Bulbazak, Doubleslap
Not_Mafia- farside22 ,
Paschendale- mastin2, KittyCupCake, Shiny Hydreigon,Total Wreck, DOMO
In contrast? The weakest vote on Pasch is DOMO. (Oh, and Bulb, note the order of the votes. Like I said. We have the Pasch wagon because of me. TW might have pushed it harder, and Shiny pushed it first. But both of them got distracted on tangents. I can't claim all the credit for putting them back onto it. But I certainly can claim SOME credit.) All the other votes are solid. Not only in reasoning, but in the players making the vote.
In post 1223, mastin2 wrote:Name it, because while I've had plenty of fucking people use BS, nobody's reasoning has stank more of bullshit than Bulb's. My rage was very much real, because my reads (the thing I was raging about), my alignment regardless, have been very much real. And Bulb's argument is attacking those. (If he attacked theIn post 1208, KittyCupCake wrote:As a partially related aside, I actually really, really like your recent mastin analysis.motivationbehind said reads, rather than 'doubting' the existence of said reads, that'd be more understandable, but aside from one quip I saw that raised a valid point about my style, he wasn't.)
In post 1224, mastin2 wrote:So let me get this straight, you think that a scumteam with me at the helm (because with that scumteam composition, it would be me), we'd decide to spontaneously (because it would not have been planned given the progression of the read) become power-bussers of our scumbuddy?In post 1215, Bulbazak wrote: Pasch is a scum read that I occasionally waffle on when he makes a good post. He's definitely the weakest scumread I have, with TW and Mastin being much stronger.
(No, seriously. I laughed, legitimately, out loud when reading this, and it's still making me chuckle. <--That emote is basically my face every time the thought's at the forefront of my brain when typing this.)
In post 1224, mastin2 wrote:
Also,^Why Bulb is scum with Pasch.That being said, while I'd much prefer a lynch on one of the latter, a Pasch lynch would probably be one of the most informative lynches we could have. I would just prefer a lynch on a strong scumread over an information lynch on a weaker one.
In post 1226, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:Bulba, I find myself agreeing with everything you post about mastin (like, I even thought there is something off with her "rage misspelling" but didn't actually look for what it was exactly), but seriously, you're completely wrong on TW. That post you quoted from him is very town, not only because all that "scum plz dont read it" wording is not something scum would do, but because paranoia about people townreading you is largely a town thing. And Kitty's way of defending him WAS alarming at first glance and completely guarantees such paranoia.
Get on Pasche. We're not lynching TW, and as much as I'd like to clear my paranoia about Mastin asap, we're not lynching Mastin today.
R~
In post 1245, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:I thought you were saying you can't see both kitty and mastin being town defending him, but then i got it
Anyway, he did mention mastin was also defending him, but he found that one natural.
R~
In post 1246, Total Wreck wrote:In post 1003, Total Wreck wrote:Town folk, please open the spoilered text at the bottom of this post.
Scum brethren/sist...ren... I would like to conspire privately with town members only, so I will ask you to resist the urge to eavesdrop on what I have to say to the townfolk. As you are ethical, moral criminals, I am sure that you can be trusted to honor our privacy.
Spoiler: TOWN EYES ONLY
Bulb didn't read the spoilered text. He must be scum!
Ultimate scum hunting.
In post 1252, mastin2 wrote:On the contrary. I know very full and well I wasn't the first vote on the wagon, but that I'm the first CURRENT vote on the wagon proves why II seriously dislike you trying to take credit for the wagon because your vote was first on it when a.) that wasn't the case (Shiny was first and unvoted) and b.) you have done absolutely nothing to push the wagon.havebeen pushing Pasch. See also, breaking up the TvT fight between Shiny and TW and directing their attention to scum enjoying the show.
In post 1252, mastin2 wrote:
Oh, you mean the game whereLeft 4 Dead MafiaIn post 1224, mastin2 wrote:So let me get this straight, you think that a scumteam with me at the helm (because with that scumteam composition, it would be me), we'd decide to spontaneously (because it would not have been planned given the progression of the read) become power-bussers of our scumbuddy?In post 1215, Bulbazak wrote: Pasch is a scum read that I occasionally waffle on when he makes a good post. He's definitely the weakest scumread I have, with TW and Mastin being much stronger.
(No, seriously. I laughed, legitimately, out loud when reading this, and it's still making me chuckle. <--That emote is basically my face every time the thought's at the forefront of my brain when typing this.)from the get-go, I set up across-buswith all my partners butdistanced rather than deathtunneledthem as to prevent them from getting lynched, all because Iplanned my lynch, knowing my meta andintentionally subverting my no-bussing principle? That game?
Yeah. I have every reason to laugh.
In post 1252, mastin2 wrote:
I can say this with 100% confidence.
I would never.
EVER.
Powerbus my scumbuddy D1 again, because I need scumbuddies alive to win. (Also, because I did the powerbus-buddy thing already. It was my ORIGINAL modus operandi back in 2011,, there's a bastard-game micro where I deemed my scumbuddy to be a burden dragging me down so powerbussed them D1, meaning that people no longer think it unfathomable, thus, removing any possible appeal to it.) This isn't, like, a trust tell or anything, because it's not that I refuse to. It's that doing so is a dumb-ass idea, so I'm never going to do it.and
In post 1261, mastin2 wrote:Uh, aside from the "bussing?" comment, I've been defending TW the entire game. No, seriously. I called them, rather explicitly, scummy-but-not-scum basically immediately into the game. (And I already explained that reasoning.) That townread only grew stronger and stronger as the day progressed, so of course I was going to defend TW.In post 1256, Bulbazak wrote: Mastin's defense of TW was the most unnatural one, coming out of nowhere.
In post 1261, mastin2 wrote:
Good luck explaining how lynching Pasch helps me manipulate the town for the win. I'm not exactly getting a ton of towncred from it as you yourself have noted, so there goes it being a bus-for-the-win strategy. I'm not going to get off lightly if Pasch is a mislynch, so there goes your mislynch-one-town-after-another idea, too. Regardless of Pasch's alignment, his lynch gives scuMastin nothing.Left 4 Dead shows that you're not afraid to bus if it will lead to you being able to better manipulate the town for the win.
In post 1261, mastin2 wrote:
Not gonna lie, this is true in theory. In practice, though, it remains the truth. Because when I say there's nothing to gain...I mean there's nothing to gain, and I just demonstrated above why that is so. I get nothing from a Pasch lynch. Frankly, as scum I'd be likely to take the Tales route and lynch those scumreading me (ergo, you) so that I wouldn't have to waste my nightkill on them.Saying that you wouldneveruse a strategy again just opens you up to use it when it's most convenient.
In post 1261, mastin2 wrote:
This is why you're scum, by the way. You're fitting the narrative to the read, rather than the read to the narrative. The reason I shifted towards Pasch being scum in spite of not scumreading him originally is because my read on him changed from town to scum. See, as town, the thought goes, "Okay, but how come she shifted to scumreading Pasch? I can't see the scum motive in it. Maybe that means she's town and I'm wrong."The only thing I don't get is how you both orchestrated your sudden shifts toward Pasch-scum, since neither of you were scumreading him beforehand.
In post 1291, Total Wreck wrote:
You are making excuses for not forming reads you can be held accountable for, and swinging at low hanging fruit.
In post 1309, Doubleslap wrote:i never scumread bulba? wat lol
In post 1328, Total Wreck wrote:
It quite obviously is.
Lynching "null reads" = pro scum
And who would admit to wanting to lynch town? Of course scum is going to make a show of defending their "town reads".
In post 1333, mastin2 wrote:Nice deflection about my point of your thought process not being town. You're still doing it. "I don't know how you managed to time it" is assuming we're scum and doing an action through some mystical reason. Rather than, as town, thinking, "managing this is something I don't know how it'd be possible, so maybe I'm wrong". (Oh, and by the way, I can answer that. A possible explanation would be daytalk. But assuming you're scum, I don't think you have it because if you did have it, then you'd think of daytalk as a possible method it'd be possible.)In post 1264, Bulbazak wrote:Except that you have refused to shed light on when this change of read happened, despite being asked about it. And while I can't figure out how you and TW timed it, I have been noticing both of you aligning yourselves in such a way as to take advantage of a Pasch scum flip, followed by Pasch's reasoning taking a nose dive.In post 1261, mastin2 wrote:This is why you're scum, by the way. You're fitting the narrative to the read, rather than the read to the narrative. The reason I shifted towards Pasch being scum in spite of not scumreading him originally is because my read on him changed from town to scum. See, as town, the thought goes, "Okay, but how come she shifted to scumreading Pasch? I can't see the scum motive in it. Maybe that means she's town and I'm wrong."The only thing I don't get is how you both orchestrated your sudden shifts toward Pasch-scum, since neither of you were scumreading him beforehand.
In post 1333, mastin2 wrote:
Buuuuuuut, just for the heck of it, I'll go down that tangent anyway. The reason I haven't shed light on why the read changed is because simply put, I don't remember why. It just did. It happened. I don't know why. Even at the time, I'm not sure I'd have been able to have given a reason if asked, yet alone, well after the fact. My read changed. It changed so long ago as far as I'm concerned that I have no clue when it changed. It just did.
In post 1334, mastin2 wrote:
Have you considered that, maybe, he's doing the exact thing he's accusing me of having done? That is, sacrificing Pasch in an attempt to paint us as mislynches? (Hey, I do it as scum all the time. My favorite scum tactic, in fact, is to reveal what I'm doing, but to project it onto someone else.)In post 1266, Total Wreck wrote:I will say, however, that Bulb's senseless tirade feels town. Expending such effort to link us together wouldn't benefit scum at all unless the first one lynched was a bus, and that would be a ridiculous amount to sacrifice for little old me.
In post 1354, Paschendale wrote:I definitely think you're barking up the wrong tree with Pine, Mastin.
In post 1360, mastin2 wrote:
You're still. not. addressing. the. point. "I'm just going to go with what I saw (in spite of it not lining up with the evidence) and sort it out later."
That's literally what you're saying.
In post 1360, mastin2 wrote:
Easy 'nuff. The TW townread came from looking at the circumstances surrounding TW and determining, not a chance in hell does this happen to an actual scum player. It's basically just the aura around TW--not only from TW himself, but from those treating TW as scum. Then, knowing House is TW, that reinforced my belief, as I saw his behavior, instantly identified it as being scummy, but knew that if he was actually scum, it'd not be like that.Okay. Now explain your early TW townread.
In post 1377, mastin2 wrote:Maybe the terms (I invent my own), but not the reasoning itself; thatIn post 1362, Bulbazak wrote:That's some BS reasoning, Mastin.isit, as best as I can describe it.
In post 1380, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:In post 1345, Bulbazak wrote:As off as they are, I'm actually liking the more recent Mastin posts. TW is still scum.
No he isn't. And I don't understand what you liked from mastin either.
R~
In post 1459, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:scum reads dont have to be explained, nor understood. She scumreads bulba, and thats it.
R~
In post 1475, Total Wreck wrote:In post 1472, Paschendale wrote:In post 1459, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:scum reads dont have to be explained, nor understood. She scumreads bulba, and thats it.
If you can't justify a scumread, I have no reason whatsoever to think that you aren't lying about it. If I think you're lying about it, I certainly won't vote along with you, and will vote for you instead. If you don't justify a read, there's no reason to think you're right, and no one should vote along with you, and so you aren't actually pushing to get your suspects lynched. That means you aren't actually trying to help town win the game. Therefore, you're scum and should be lynched. Don't like it? Then justify your fucking positions.
Good luck getting through to him on that.
Seriously.
I've said pretty much the same thing in the past. He shrugs it off...
In post 1494, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:In post 1489, Bulbazak wrote:Except Mastin-town is more than capable of explaining her reads.
So fucking what? Mastin not playing to your idea of an ideal townie somehow makes her scum? Wash she even asked to explain the read? Why is it a big deal she didn't?
I respect your own points for mastin-scum but farside's ones are a bunch of bullshit.
R~
In post 1508, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:In post 1505, Bulbazak wrote:I thought her reasoning was okay actually.
Then you can't tell non-genuine shallow bullshit
R~
In post 1516, GuyInFreezer wrote:In post 1502, Bulbazak wrote:In post 1494, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:In post 1489, Bulbazak wrote:Except Mastin-town is more than capable of explaining her reads.
So fucking what? Mastin not playing to your idea of an ideal townie somehow makes her scum? Wash she even asked to explain the read? Why is it a big deal she didn't?
I respect your own points for mastin-scum but farside's ones are a bunch of bullshit.
R~
Mastin isn't playing like Mastin-town. Period. Now get your head out of your butt and get off of Farside.
Is he playing like mastin scum?
In post 1523, Total Wreck wrote:In post 1489, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 1475, Total Wreck wrote:In post 1472, Paschendale wrote:In post 1459, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:scum reads dont have to be explained, nor understood. She scumreads bulba, and thats it.
If you can't justify a scumread, I have no reason whatsoever to think that you aren't lying about it. If I think you're lying about it, I certainly won't vote along with you, and will vote for you instead. If you don't justify a read, there's no reason to think you're right, and no one should vote along with you, and so you aren't actually pushing to get your suspects lynched. That means you aren't actually trying to help town win the game. Therefore, you're scum and should be lynched. Don't like it? Then justify your fucking positions.
Good luck getting through to him on that.
Seriously.
I've said pretty much the same thing in the past. He shrugs it off...
Aren't you scum reading Pasch?
How is that in any way relevant to my response to him?
In post 1536, Paschendale wrote:How do you feel about the current Mastin wagon?
In post 1548, mastin2 wrote:That said,Frankly, the wagon on me feels more towndriven than this wagon does. >_<
In post 1551, mastin2 wrote:If Bulb was town, he'd have townread me LONG ago.
In post 1556, mastin2 wrote:
I didn't say it was the basis of the scumread on you. I've had a scumread on you since the game began and your posting. It does, however, contribute one of the strongest reasons as to why you are scum.Bull crap. You don't get to use my scumreading you as a basis for scumreading me. That's BS reasoning Mastin, and you know it.In post 1551, mastin2 wrote:If Bulb was town, he'd have townread me LONG ago.
I am 100% confident that if you were town by this stage, you would have seen as I see and realized that I'm town.
You have not, thus, you knew all along and are scum.
In post 1564, mastin2 wrote:
By post 122, though, it should have been clear enough. Since then, I've only been more and more blatant.
In post 1596, mastin2 wrote:And again...if you were town? You'd see what was town in there. That was the first post in which it was clearly shown, but I've only made it more and more obvious since then. So much so, that I don't think that I'd really be able to quote even close to all the signs. Maybe the strongest of them, or maybe the ones most strongly showing the town trend, but there's so. many. points. That I literally find it impossible for a town-you to not see what I see.In post 1587, Bulbazak wrote:I looked back at that post, and I don't see what I'm supposed to find so towny. In fact, I had several problems with that post, which I remember pointing out. Also, just the fact that you point back at it and say that it's towny makes me distrust it even more.In post 1564, mastin2 wrote:By post 122, though, it should have been clear enough. Since then, I've only been more and more blatant.
I can say it a million times over, and my response each time only grows stronger. Some people being blind and not seeing what I see I can understand. Not from you.
In post 1604, Pine wrote:The only reads I feel confident in even mentioning right now are TW/House as Town and Mastin as Town. From what I can tell this is solidly their Town game
In post 1624, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:We have no idea what is happening, but based on the last 6 posts, we assume that this is scum v scum.
In post 1657, KittyCupCake wrote:
Even with TW, I don't see a NM lynch happening Today, as much as I'd like one.