Mini 1634 - English Premier League Mafia (Game over)
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 41, Red Arrow wrote:what has them reading town? I assume you know them better than me.
BBT's nonchalantness about getting wagoned reads as town to me; he looks like he didn't know/remember that Guyett was already on his wagon when Guyett dropped the 2nd vote, which pings as a more town than scum thing.
Guyett's similar nonchalantness/boldness about the whole wagon thing seems like something more likely to come from town than scum.
It doesn't move the meter a ton, but it's something.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 79, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:35 - Reasons for vote BRO?
I didn't like my vote on you, so I moved it somewhere else at random.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 89, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I hope I'm not the only one who thinks Kaboose's 87 is nothing but fluff.
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 111, Kaboose wrote:Meh I'll just play this game when I can be killed. Let me know when people start dying, because I won't be.
Okay I really want to lynch this now.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 117, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 107, 4burner wrote:
@Massive- You vote @RA for playing in pretty much the exact same fashion as myself. I haven't revisited that thought train either despite being the one to bring it up, and am voting Whiskers for much the same reason. Does that make me scum also?
Similarly, is there a reason you're attacking massive instead of myself (or as well as myself) given I am questioning RA and not you over the exact same thing?
The post has a lot of cool associatives in it!-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 136, Scripten wrote:It's pretty simple. Kaboose's "I'm not playing until you threaten to kill me" is so anti-town that I cannot fathom it coming from a town player. I'm significantly more sure of his scum-ness than I am of 4burner due to a combination of his play and the post I quoted. I can see potential town motivation behind 4burner's posts, but not Kaboose's.
The bigger issue I have with is is that he crumbed BP, which defeats the whole purpose of being BP if town and is a fairly basic claim for scum to make.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 137, Kaboose wrote:Gives two town reads, explains both town reads, and then discredits both town reads. Makes sense.
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 197, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:VOTE: Whiskers
My vote stays here.
All day.
Every day.
Until he is lynched.
#productivity-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 201, Guyett wrote:Now mod confirming flavour is important, if nexus is a liverpool fan then it could be a flavour related Named Townie/Innocent Child thing. Nexus isn't a liverpool fan going by that post so either whiskers is a guilty child or something outed him. Guilty Child fits more with the flavour of the game.
This is dumb.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 210, Ollie wrote:Considering the mod supports Forest, I'd say that Liverpool are likely to be scum in this game. Only team I know their fans don't like cos of Hillsborough. Not sure how else the mod would decide who the scum were, maybe he'd line the clubs up with roles first then work from there? It might be pissing in the wind a bit to try & work out which clubs were allocated to which roles but it still might be worthwhile looking at that.
I hate the 2nd attempt to push this even more
Also, why would you vote Guyett then push his shitty-ass reasoning?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 216, Yiley wrote:I really don't like those whisker posts on the last page. Like really don't. So that's where my vote goes.
VOTE: whiskers
I should be more active now that the holidays are over.
This also needs to be killed with fire.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 220, deathfisaro wrote:@Guyett
I know how BBT's vote ended up in me. It's not that hard to see.
I misjudged Kaboose's PR because he breadcrumbed the opposite direction. He never denied that he was LP even when pressure built up so the possibility of him being more so BP didn't even cross my mind. If he's conditional infinite BP, he should have SUPER towned, not "gonna afk until people start dying". And lynchproof wasn't a far-fetched idea, as Scripten was lynch resistant (which makes way more sense for town).
Take a step back and re-read 199. Does it sound like I'm protecting Whiskers or suspecting you? Try saying you still think I'm protecting Whiskers.
I can only see that as lining up mislynches (actually if Whiskers flips scum I'd likely be next to be lynched because you planted the idea that I "protected" Whiskers? But 1-1 trade is never worth it for scum so... this is so hard).
Both flipped town PRs were strictly pro-town, I'd take a step further and argue that all town PRs are. Two flips so far: one allows you to actively scumhunt and obvtown without fear of NK, the other gives one fewer NK. Nothing grey about these powers. According to people the game's generally believed to be 10-3 and you need a guilty child in the game when there are 10 PRs? I don't think you're outguessing the mod, you're outderping the scum.
In post 190, Mario Balotelli wrote:Kaboose (7-LYNCH)- BROseidon, Guyett, BlueBloodedToffee,Scripten, deathfisaro, 4burner, Whiskers
At least one of these has to be scum, it's too hard to imagine a 7 town mislynch.
Both you and BBT were on Kaboose wagon and now you two are starting day 2 with Whiskers wagon. However, from the opening of day 2 BBT's play makes sense. RA was on Whiskers wagon from yesterday so him joining makes sense. Yours doesn't.
As for who I find scummy from day 1, I need to re-read the whole thing. I was already on vacation when this game started and couldn't follow up closely enough. I'm still busy till 2nd (expecting 14-16 hr work days till then) but I'll try to check in.
This is pretty town. Earnest and at times stupid in a way that I wouldn't expect scum to be.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 225, Red Arrow wrote:I said town/not scum... not town outright. Meaning I am just not seeing them as scum right this minute. But I am not really picking up on anything scummy from the other 4.
The word you're looking for is "null"-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 252, Guyett wrote:I have a sneaky feeling scum are being quiet letting town make noise fighting each other
Let's fill the thread with empty posts that look shiny on the surface level but don't actually do anything!-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 285, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 280, BROseidon wrote:BBT and RA are the only people towning it up enough for me to have town reads on them. Death and 4burner are probably the most town after that, but even then I'm not super confident in those reads.
VOTE: Yiley
Jesus Christ.
Can you not town-read RA and death please?
Thanks.
Can you not be wrong?
Thanks.
In all seriousness though he's town. You really should back off when there's actual scum to lynch.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 300, Whiskers wrote:BTW, this is more like an overreaction. (Take note, RA.)
BRO didn't even vote you here. He didn't even vote you, eventually. He just called you out, and you curse at him and throw out an OMGUS vote. Shows how strong your Guyett vote was: not very.
This is on point, except the conclusion. The overreaction is because I hit a nerve.
VOTE: Ollie-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 335, 4burner wrote:Reads;
@RA- Town. I sense a lot of exasperation in his dealings with BBT, and his train of thought regarding the early wagon is pretty similar to mine. I haven't seen him take any scummy positions or noticed anything that made me think "hold on a minute, that's counter to what I'm seeing in this game", and he isn't hiding from the thread. So yeah, town read. A pretty good one.
Also, huge condolences on the loss.
@Massive- Pinged early for his ignorance of me with regards to his RA case, but I can forgive that given the BBT/Massive parallels in pushing RA, largely due to townreading BBT. Granted, this alone doesn't make him town, but questioning the motives behind Kaboose's derpness was town mindset, suspicion of Guyett is following my train of thought, and Post 312/Iso 7 gives me good vibes. Town lean here.
@Yiley- Hrmm. Had to Iso to notice anything here, really. If you want to talk about folks going under the radar, or attempting it, here's your example. Not really getting any great reads by post 60, which is pretty poor, and it's not exactly like page 3 reads have to be ironclad. Reads to me as not wanting to offer anything that could be scumread. Comes through in post 216 finally voting whiskers for shitty reasons, ie none. And then post 327 is just ...pointless as town, filler and prodding as scum. Scumlean here.
GuyettHoo-boy. Spent day 1 not really doing much of note. Then the Whiskers push at D2 start based on really suspicious mod-related guesswork. Then abandoned it pretty quick once BBT came in expressing doubts. Ties with Ollie don't help, but mostly as town I just can't trust the mod-based Whiskers push because it's so flimsy as to be flaccid. Scum. (My Post 332/iso 32 is the gist of the mod stuff)
@BBT- Probably too involved and verbose to be scum, but that's more gut than anything. I like the pushing, and have higher priority targets to focus on for the moment, but the RA case is pinging for reasons given yesterday which I'll come back to if in need. Happy to trust my townread for the moment though.
@Death- Probably town. Setup spec I do a hell of a lot as it helps me frame the game in my mind, and the suspicion of Guyett doesn't seem like it comes from a scumbuddy so based on association I'd call this slot likely town. Could obviously change, though.
@Whiskers- Hrmm. I find this slot quite scummy on D1 but that's fading with other targets cropping up. It is entirely possible the RVS was an RVS and I'm attributing far too meaning into it - we all have our individual styles after all. Furthermore, as outed Liverpool via Mod announcement - I find this more than likely to be a scum move designed to cause havoc. Whiskers hasn't claimed it, nobody has come forward to say town is responsible... Pressing the reset button here and focusing elsewhere. Null to town. (Though I want to go on record as saying what townie hits the submit on a vote with their wagon of choice at L-2 WITHOUT reading the rest of the thread? Shame, Whiskers, Shame.)
@Elk- Needs to be replaced. Or prodded. Something.
@BRO- Agree with the whole Guyett/Ollie modgate suspicion and the Yiley threat but largely null on everything else. Very much on the outside prodding the game, but that seems like BRO's playstyle given a game I'm currently in also, rather than any alignment tell. Benefit of the doubt is to label this slot town, liable to change if we keep hitting town on the lynches though.
@Ollie- Comes in swinging, takes a tone I really don't like, and then tries to game a Mod on a site he's only pretty just freshly joined? Unless he knows them from offsite or something similar. Basically I'm thinking scum due to Whiskers/Liverpool/Mod stuff ala Guyett. And never actually voted Whiskers despite agreeing with the anti-whiskers stuff from memory. Votes BRO over very little, comparatively.
So I've got my scumteam as Guyett/Ollie/Yiley, which I'm scarily confident in for a D2 read. But everyone else is basically town bar a few nulls, so let's see how this shakes out.
VOTE: Guyett
It bothers me that your reads are fairly in-line with mine, but that the BBT read reasons are bad.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 339, Ollie wrote:So what? If we had a vig who was forced to shoot the worst player on day 1 then you'd be dead by now. Shit play is no guarantee of anything. He hasn't given us enough to vote on him yet. If it's just a vote to get him to post more then cool, we'll soon see. Yiley might just not be into the game. I couldn't get into a few games on here myself & posted in a similar way. I want these lurking guys to post more so we can get an accurate read.
The thing is, Yiley has given us stuff.
Elk is the one who hasn't.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 348, Guyett wrote:This knocking the idea down because itd "outguessing the mod" is annoying though. Yes it can only go so far but I got Stoke and my power is to do with restricting someone (like a Tony Pulis Stoke team). The mod doesn't like Liverpool so I would be absolutely shocked if he made Liverpool an Innocent Child.
So in my opinion either there is some role that makes the mod confirm a players flavour publicly or he is a Guilty Child type of flavour.
How about this.
We don't assume IC or GC.
Not fucking hard.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 388, 4burner wrote:@BRO - BBT is either being a very proactive scum, blending in with his questions and the like, or just playing a decent town game so far. Either way I'm not going to figure it out today, and I have more productive lines of investigation on the boil anywho.
You're either bad at articulating what you mean, or what you mean is wrong and that's a problem.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 401, Guyett wrote:In post 399, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:@347 - Guyett, how is 4burner scum if Yiley is town?
Either you are scum or there is scum on your wagon.
I have you as town so there must be scum on the wagon. I'm town so either Yiley or 4burner is scum
So why the fuck would you ever vote off a perceived coin flip for scum?
Also:
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 542, Whiskers wrote:And tbh, I'm taking the echoing silence from Elk to be a bit of a scum-tell. I told him several times, "you get one chance," and in his response each time he just complained more that he wasn't good enough. This just kind of looks like a newbie playing AtE and playing the noob card, and then silently trying to wait out the phase under the radar.
[pre-edit]
@BRO, how do we feel about the SS claim? There's a chance that it's fake and he's scum, and a chance that we're wrong. In that case, how do we tactically manoeuvre around the hammer? Such as having Yiley or Elk hammer, in case of true claim?
Do we have enough shit for a Guyett wagon? I think that a different lynch today will give us something to look at that might support a Guyett lynch tomorrow, Ollie or Elk, for instance.
I'm predicting that BRO or massive dies toNight, so "last" reads and cases would be nice.
4burner said he'd be willing to hammer, but id rather have a hammer from Guyett, Elk, or Yiley-slot.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 551, Guyett wrote:VOTE: BroVOTE: BroVOTE: BroVOTE: BroVOTE: BroVOTE: BroVOTE: BroVOTE: Bro
Never ever moving this vote
Not this shit again.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 634, Red Arrow wrote:In post 630, BROseidon wrote:Hopefully Guyett gets modkilled for the post so we can go into night phase without him spamming up the thread like caught scum.
Why so eger to get into night? Surely town would want the game open as long as possible to get as much information as possible to help in future days... VERY quick days like the one you are hoping to get only benefit non town factions like scum who would want the game to close quickly so nothing else gets caught.
vote:Bro
I ask for the day to be as long as possible as scum. Gives me more room to outplay and more room for the game to bog down.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 657, Red Arrow wrote:Don't see any scum motive in what Guyett is doing. Scum already lost 1 to a modkill... why would csum risk another modkill by breaking restrictions/posting role PM.
Guyatt as scum makes no sense right now, he can't talk properly, or answer anything etc... too easy a wagon and too fast a wagon.
I think he's given up and is hoping on his partner to carry.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Why are you ignoring practically conf-scum Guyett-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 682, Guyett wrote:VOTE: Bro VOTE: conf bias-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 744, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You know what I actually cba catching up on like 350 posts.
Reads;
Town; Whiskers, Death
Null/leaning town; massive, RA
Null/leaning scum; Guyett, BRO
Scum; Elk, Yiley.
Although, if what everyone is saying is true and Ollie did go after Yiley hard, then Yiley might not be scum and I would replace him with BRO.
Ollie was on me and Elk the hardest, not Yiley.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 731, Whiskers wrote:Nope. problem is, BBT is still questionable-- I mean, unsure. It's not obvious. Elk is more-obviously scummy and until he's gone, it'll be more difficult to push a lynch on the subtler BBT. As for Guyett, he's out of commission. Sure we can lynch him today, tomorrow, at any time, but I'd like to be able to hold his feet to the fire right up until we do it, make sure he's got nothing we need, then lynch him. We just can't do that now.
What you're talking about with Guyett here doesn't make sense to me.