I think this is the fault in your play today and, once again, if there's evidence of this that you can point to in my play, I can discuss them or admit that you're right. I've done this before and I've done this with other criticisms of my play.In post 2643, Infinity 324 wrote:I think you are neglecting some posts, picking out things and not looking very much at the overall picture.
I don't get how these two things are related. Do you want me to point out where he uses weak reasoning and/or strong? I think I have. I don't get how this is about whether or not we agree on scumtells. His case against Bins was full of points and generalisations which are false, same in his case against me. I pointed these out. The cases were weak.Take your case on vedith for example. One of your main points is that he uses weak reasoning in some places and strong reasoning in others. This is quite shallow and ignores the possibility that vedith agrees with you on some scumtells but disagrees with you on others.
It's not necessary for me that he would have a strong town read of Dunn in order to buddy him. He wanted Dunn to think he's town. He did this by scumreading Bins. My evidence for this is his weak case against Bins, when he finally made one, after agreeing with Dunn's post without analysing it. Also, this is when he first entered the game when he was town-reading Dunn.You also say he is buddying dunn, seemingly just because he scumreads the same people that dunn does. Yet vedith doesn't even have a strong townread on dunn or interact with dunn when he replaces in. I also doubt you would ignore that if you were town.
Ok, but that will definitely make me salty when the game finishes. I get that this is back and forth and it's frustrating to me as well but I'm motivated to change your mind. I guess you're not motivated because you think I'm scum. It's difficult.Literally this discussion is getting nowhere can we just stop. I'm sorry if you are town but I'm just not seeing it.
I have town explanations for all my play because I'm town. That's one point. There's nothing about my play which is not explainable by looking at from a town perspective. Nothing I've done which could only be done by scum. On top of that, the picture being painted of my play as scum is either false or lazy.
Do you think it's symptomatic of my scum game that I disappear when I'm under no pressure? Is that how you see my play during this game? Or is it possible that that's an offhand comment relating to yesterday which has no relevance and can't be a genuine proposition about my play or reason that I could be scum.In post 2644, Infinity 324 wrote:You can say it was a coincidence, but you can't say it's false that you posted less content between the time your lynch seemed to be inevitable and the time peoples' votes switched to DGB.