So
In post 298, Shattiel wrote: In post 140, Garmr wrote:
In post 87, profii wrote: In post 86, Flubbernugget wrote: In post 80, profii wrote:I think we are referring to garmr as trolling (I certainly was)
Yes.
Why would it make sense to rate posts as like/dislike as opposed to scummy/not scummy?
@creature can you weigh in on this?
One theory could be that by RAG rating every post you “appear” transparent because you can’t hide your opinion on anything
But calling it like / dislike could be just giving yourself wiggle room if it all goes wrong
It’s tricky to decide because it’s very early and imo it’s not AI to change your mind, so potentially at some point Creature may go “player X was 10-2-1 but Y happened so now the score is 2-4-7” and I’m interested to see if he will overcome that scenario
Idk
This I don't like as it's trying to explain creatures actions despite him saying earlier it's better to ask why.
So my opinion is mixed and I'm trying to sort him out in my head.
I liked profii's first few posts but I agree with this one.
Ok agree's with me here But what I find odd is
In post 381, Shattiel wrote: In post 283, Garmr wrote: In post 271, Maxous wrote:Seph - Nos slapfight seems like both town.
I'd be more confident about Sephiroth.
Creature is actually getting scummy in my book. He's keeps flailing when people ask him simple questions to explain what he wrote.
I agree with this but in reverse I'm more confident in Nos than seph. Want to join the creature wagon then apply more pressure?
garmr is still doing nothing in the pretense of "pressuring" creature because his vote is on him.
This statement doesn't seem consistent from someone who agreed with me on a point earlier on a slot that wasn't creature. Especially since it ignores my interactions with proifi,faq and others that aren't about creature. Sure I do mention creature a lot to drum up support but it wasn't like I exclusively talked about creature to coast by like this post implies.
^While it's possible that a bad town could make the points above i don't think it is when combined with the next point. You would think a town shat would move their vote to me since it's like the only point they made. So I think they were just throwing shade and to afraid to argue with someone like me that goes off and drags people into the spot light.
In post 397, Shattiel wrote: In post 363, xx2008 wrote:
Regarding your view on shattiel, I think your post is kind of scummy, because at the point of this post, shattiel has only made two posts. I very slightly feel like you're trying to shade shattiel with your post.
But after you made your post, shattiel began posting, which could imply lurking, because if shattiel was simply inactive, she would not have had the time to read that many posts she missed and see your post about her inactivity. If you're town, then I can see a scum shattiel.
lurking = scum seems easy and his read on me is based on someone else meta anyway
His posts was on latest page at that so I saw it while I was scrolling down to post
Tries to justify the fact she was lurking her. But if you notice when shat's name is mentioned they seem to pop up and be more active. I would expect town that lurks to drop a post and not change their activity patterns based on what people say.
Her unvote seems convenient here because being on a slot that's being replaced could earn you the attention of others. But if shat actually scum read the slot why not keep the vote on a scum read replacing out doesn't change the alignment. This shows shat is worried about image.
This post feels off but I can't put my finger on it.
In post 514, Shattiel wrote: In post 83, xx2008 wrote:@Creature, that chart is for posts you like, don't like, or find neutral, as I've found while Reading through. But why do you say like/don't like rather than scummy or town?
Let me vote you.
VOTE: creature
In post 151, xx2008 wrote:
This is another reason why I'm townreading creature, which I forgot to point out. This accounts for the fact that not all posts are black and white. He's just stating whether he's liking, not liking, or finding neutral those posts. Town players generally will have a somewhat concrete read, by that I mean they aren't changing opinions too quickly, but they won't be extremely concrete, because there is always other possibilities.
In post 221, xx2008 wrote:@sephiroth, for some reason, I think your posts were attempting to tunnel. You also took back what you said immediately after. I don't think those are likely to come from someone who is town.
VOTE: sephiroth, at least for now.
In post 282, xx2008 wrote:I think the Nosferatu and Sephiroth 1v1 could either be a TvT or a SvT. I think it's more of a TvT, though, because it appears more like a misunderstanding. I don't expect two scum to be doing this, though, for that would attract too much attention, especially due to the fact that this 1v1 lasted for a long time in terms of pages, and anyone skimming through the game could have noticed it.
In post 363, xx2008 wrote:
Regarding your view on shattiel, I think your post is kind of scummy, because at the point of this post, shattiel has only made two posts. I very slightly feel like you're trying to shade shattiel with your post.
But after you made your post, shattiel began posting, which could imply lurking, because if shattiel was simply inactive, she would not have had the time to read that many posts she missed and see your post about her inactivity. If you're town, then I can see a scum shattiel.
I've been taking a look at few isos I think someone may have pointed this out before? Not sure
But you voted him for the same reason you townread him later?
I don't think your question to creature even clarified anything.
Then theres Seph push then pull also the posts in reply to AP's about me.
Theres alot of throwing shits to see what sticks.
xx2008 is prob a newbie but I don't think he deserves a vip pass
This just seems like a attempt to look like they are doing something under pressure. The points in the post just seem like throwing shade as shat doesn't say his scum but throws a lot of points together. Some of them I can agree (bolded) with but 1 or 2 good points aren't exclusively town It's how they are handled and I don't think the
VOTE: Shattiel