New York 152 Niiightless Game Over!

mb53 · Post Post #78 (isolation #0) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:30 pm

In post 25, Pine wrote:
In post 21, crypto wrote:
In post 20, Pine wrote:
Policy Lynch Vote: crypto

Yarly
You're not going to get that so you should probably not use it as an excuse to contribute absolutely nothing for the duration of the day/game.

This is the kind of ad hom attack that I dislike. You call one post within an hour or so of thread opening "dong nothing for the duration etc". It's bullshit and personally offensive.

--
I don't think red is scum, I think he's just an idiot.

mb53 · Post Post #134 (isolation #1) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:53 pm

In post 133, BBmolla wrote:
Pine is scum because he isn't yelling and pushing a bullshit case.

I don't follow. meta reasons?

Vote: Major Minor

I don't like the timing of the vote (right after BB said pine was scum) and I don't like the reasons for the vote ("He's just skirting by in the shadows, not saying much of anything, hoping nobody will notice." When the he has proposed a policy lynch/the game hasn't even been up for 24 hours).

mb53 · Post Post #142 (isolation #2) » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:34 pm

Oh no, anything but talking like a normal person in a mafia game

She's actually contributing stuff.

mb53 · Post Post #164 (isolation #3) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:09 pm

@crypto people who change votes way too much bother me

Why? I disagree.

mb53 · Post Post #165 (isolation #4) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:09 pm

How does changing your vote often make someone scum?

mb53 · Post Post #171 (isolation #5) » Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:12 pm

unvote, vote: inte

mb53 · Post Post #184 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:29 am

Seriously?
... I do not think red was scum. Meh.

And BB isn't scum either.

mb53 · Post Post #186 (isolation #7) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:09 am

Yes, I am.

mb53 · Post Post #197 (isolation #8) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:13 am

In post 192, BK201 wrote:
In post 184, mb53 wrote:Seriously?
... I do not think red was scum. Meh.

And BB isn't scum either.

buddying or maybe even defending scum partner(s). +1 for me.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: mb53

Oh yes, calling someone town is TOTALLY buddying. Especially when I was an idiot and thought one of them was dead.

In post 193, redFF wrote:gonna go ahead and
vote:mb

the fact that he didn't know the dayvig was a joke suggests he's not reading the thread/paying attention.

And that makes me scum... how?

mb53 · Post Post #206 (isolation #9) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:55 am

In post 200, crypto wrote:
In post 197, mb53 wrote:
In post 193, redFF wrote:gonna go ahead and
vote:mb

the fact that he didn't know the dayvig was a joke suggests he's not reading the thread/paying attention.

And that makes me scum... how?
Were you paying attention to the thread or not?

Answer honestly. I often gloss over a lot of stuff as town, so.

I have been trying to pay attention. I didn't think much about whether the daykill was serious though. I blame posting right after I woke up.

mb53 · Post Post #208 (isolation #10) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:20 pm

I just have a gut read on red really. I don't see any real scummyness from him, and I get the general sense he is town.

When I posted that BB is town, I still thought the daykill was real and thought the mafia wouldn't have one. So I recant what I said.

mb53 · Post Post #221 (isolation #11) » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:58 pm

I would like to get an inte wagon going

mb53 · Post Post #248 (isolation #12) » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:20 pm

Cmon guys, screw red, inte wagon ahoy.

He's supposedly got a scum read, but isn't voting for him and refusing to elaborate. And flat out contradicting himself in his first two posts

lets do this

PEdit:

mm wrote:
In post 134, mb53 wrote:
Vote: Major Minor

I don't like the timing of the vote (right after BB said pine was scum) and I don't like the reasons for the vote ("He's just skirting by in the shadows, not saying much of anything, hoping nobody will notice." When the he has proposed a policy lynch/the game hasn't even been up for 24 hours).

It was my first post of the game... so... I don't think the timing argument really works. I read the game and assessed my reads; if this had been my fourth or fifth post and then SUDDENLY I decided to go after Pine at that moment, I could buy this. But as it stands, it's weak. Furthermore, why is someone flying under the radar a bad reason? There had been several weaker reasons thrown out at that point (see: your vote) and yet someone playing too cautiously is bad? Also, I never proposed a policy lynch... I'm not sure who your last sentence is even addressing.

I was saying that pine hasn't been "skirting in the shadows", considering he had attempted a policy lynch + the game just started.

mm wrote:

In post 150, BBmolla wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Pine

My vote on Pine was scummy, so you join me on the wagon without providing a single reason?
Really?

Uh, he did give a reason.

Maybe you should start paying attention to the game, NS.

I lol'd, given the quote above

This is really, really bad. You see, mb53? THIS is opportunistic wagon hopping where timing is an actual argument. Two votes already on redFF and a ton of suspicion circling his way, and all Mogri does is point to two posts and setup speculation as reasons. I'll point out again: redFF is not the only one to speculate about this setup being all vanilla, and yet nobody said a damn word about anyone else. His soft suspicion on Pine & crypto is very half-assed as well.

This is good, and I'm glad you pointed it out. I totally agree. A wagon worth pursuing.

Even better than inte.

unvote
vote: morgi

mb53 · Post Post #265 (isolation #13) » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:24 pm

I have no idea how you are not dead yet

mb53 · Post Post #289 (isolation #14) » Tue May 01, 2012 1:24 pm

What, did you miss this?

In post 197, mb53 wrote:
In post 192, BK201 wrote:
In post 184, mb53 wrote:Seriously?
... I do not think red was scum. Meh.

And BB isn't scum either.

buddying or maybe even defending scum partner(s). +1 for me.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: mb53

Oh yes, calling someone town is TOTALLY buddying. Especially when I was an idiot and thought one of them was dead.

And add on that I thought the other had a daykill.

mb53 · Post Post #296 (isolation #15) » Wed May 02, 2012 10:21 am

I don't think a town member would really forget who they thought was scum...

mb53 · Post Post #305 (isolation #16) » Wed May 02, 2012 2:07 pm

In post 289, mb53 wrote:What, did you miss this?

In post 197, mb53 wrote:
In post 192, BK201 wrote:
In post 184, mb53 wrote:Seriously?
... I do not think red was scum. Meh.

And BB isn't scum either.

buddying or maybe even defending scum partner(s). +1 for me.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: mb53

Oh yes, calling someone town is TOTALLY buddying. Especially when I was an idiot and thought one of them was dead.

And add on that I thought the other had a daykill.

...

Inte is scum even if it wasn't a slip. I want both him and morgi dead, not sure which more.

mb53 · Post Post #356 (isolation #17) » Sat May 05, 2012 4:41 am

Oh, prod already

I've been following along, I just haven't really had anything I've wanted to say.

BB wagon is... ok. I might jump on it later if we really aren't going to manage to lynch inte or mogri, but I'm not really feeling it right now.

mb53 · Post Post #358 (isolation #18) » Sat May 05, 2012 4:46 am

Cuz u scum.

mb53 · Post Post #398 (isolation #19) » Sat May 05, 2012 4:02 pm

In post 379, UberNinja wrote:I'm pretty fucking sure inte was trying to be ironic here (look at the post numbers).

Which means NS and mb53 come across as either stupid or scum.

He already said he was doing it to prove a point

And I've already proven I'm stupid.

In post 372, UberNinja wrote:
In post 221, mb53 wrote:I would like to get an inte wagon going

This doesn't sound like something scum would say... I'm torn on mb53. I think MM is town but he seems to think he is scum
But then more than one person voted MM for his post so I could be wrong but I really don't think I am

I didn't know two town members disagreeing on reads makes one of them scum. Besides, I'm over MM now, he's a solid null.

In post 394, BK201 wrote:
In post 389, Matias wrote:
In post 374, redFF wrote:And Another Thing...

Oh no you fucking didn't
Lol'd. Not sure what Red or you mean by this.

It's a title he was nominated for because he's known to post something then go "and another thing!" and add more.

mb53 · Post Post #450 (isolation #20) » Sun May 06, 2012 11:40 am

In post 426, crypto wrote:Mb53, What specifically was inte's slip (305)?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p4015927 is what I was referring to. It has since been showed I was wrong anyways.

I gotta re-read, I'll post my thoughts tomorrow most likely

mb53 · Post Post #480 (isolation #21) » Mon May 07, 2012 1:43 pm

Yeah... I'll read up tomorrow. I had marching band nonsense toady and I'm tired as balls. Sorry =/

mb53 · Post Post #566 (isolation #22) » Tue May 08, 2012 3:36 pm

Sup guys reading this/guys pt. 2 right now. Post will come tonight. yippee.

mb53 · Post Post #571 (isolation #23) » Tue May 08, 2012 4:36 pm

In post 543, noraaa wrote:TeCh I think the only person on my radar you really didn't talk about was mb. I can't decide if he's incompetent, or scum (no offense to mb but).

In post 540, Mogri wrote:
In post 485, redFF wrote:How was my early setup spec detrimental to town in any way? I had relevant information and I shared it.

I've explained this already, but Ythan's past setups are not especially relevant to this game. None of the VTs has information on the setup and your speculation is effectively a VT softclaim. Scumteam has better knowledge about the setup, and if they happen to know that this is
not
mountainous, then you've eliminated yourself as a potential PR.

That's assuming you're town. Your motivation as scum is obvious PR-fishing.

PROVE ME WRONG, HATERS

Well, I must say, that read was full of shit and there is nothing I really want to respond to. But after my time off, I have flipped on red. After an ISO, I see the only thing he has done is talk about it being mountainous and join whichever bandwagon he pleases with very 'meh' reasons.

And since morgi doesn't have enough support for a lynch...

unvote, vote: redff

TeCh I think the only person on my radar you really didn't talk about was mb. I can't decide if he's incompetent, or scum (no offense to mb but).

None taken. I know I'm not a mafia-playing master. Not even close.

mb53 · Post Post #572 (isolation #24) » Tue May 08, 2012 4:38 pm

Erm.. ignore those first two quotes in my post.

Seesh, don't click "preview post" one time and this happens...

mb53 · Post Post #574 (isolation #25) » Tue May 08, 2012 4:54 pm

Mogri
Red
Crypto (not helpful to elaborate until after this lynch first though. I'll get to it day 2)

mb53 · Post Post #596 (isolation #26) » Wed May 09, 2012 10:15 am

In post 586, UberNinja wrote:
In post 574, mb53 wrote:Crypto (not helpful to elaborate until after this lynch first though. I'll get to it day 2)

why is it not helpful.

Because there is a 0% chance of him getting lynched today. It will distract us from the current lynch which as nearly at deadline.

mb53 · Post Post #679 (isolation #27) » Wed May 09, 2012 5:03 pm

Crypto on last page looks realy town actually, I have a hard time seeing scum flip-flop like that. Hrm. I really need to put more thought into this game, don't I.