In post 28, JacobSavage wrote:Boner Police is 100% Town. For Certain.
100% Confident? On page 2 no less.
In post 28, JacobSavage wrote:Boner Police is 100% Town. For Certain.
In post 136, Bitmap wrote:In post 135, TheReverend wrote:In post 133, Boating Police wrote:Vote Mozamis, read his ISO it's pretty funny
Am I supposed to be all WOW and then vote him as I read his ISO?
I wasn't that wow'ed tbh.
In post 147, Boating Police wrote:In post 146, Vifam wrote:Although I do agree with your thing about his opening post, I don't think his snarkiness is a scumtell
ok fine ur town
In post 148, Vifam wrote:yw
In post 156, Vifam wrote:I have no friends, family, or even a pet. Mafia is all I have keeping me alive, it's a sad story
In post 761, Majiffy wrote:In post 759, I Am Innocent wrote:@Majiffy, re your question in 628 "everyone voting Mollie under the premise of her interactions with Mozamis; Why not just vote Mozamis?" I think while both may be scum, if only one is, it would likely be the one who called the other obvconftown. (possibly looking for town cred for staying off a mislynch)
Not mollie's style as scum.
In post 765, MattP wrote:Like so terrible I have to relook at that slot
In post 767, MattP wrote:IAI I want a full reads list right now
In post 772, pirate mollie wrote:his thoughts mirrored my own at the time.
In post 781, MattP wrote:OOOHHH really, do these 4 players have 20 games of experience with JS?
In post 781, MattP wrote:Why do you ask these useless questions?
In post 785, pirate mollie wrote:In post 780, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 772, pirate mollie wrote:his thoughts mirrored my own at the time.
Can you give me specific examples by quoting some of moz's posts?
this is in reference to the post you quoted? how is this not clear?
In post 787, pirate mollie wrote:In post 783, I Am Innocent wrote:Sorry if you feel they are useless. Every question I ask there is a reason for it. Do you think it is bad to ask players to take stances? I'm guessing not since you yourself has put out multiple lists of your read on every player. But we have some who refuse to do so. We got one (moz) who says, all the high post count players are town and lurkers are scum.You got another (mollie) who says my wagon is too big to do any scumhunting. (BTW, your wagon is at 4 girl....L-7 ain't big) And the list goes on and on.
erm...where did I say that? and when I said that I think 7 or 8 votes on me at the time
In post 1326, TheUnderachivers wrote:I think this is correct Arc
TheUnderachivers - 7 [L-3] Aj the Epic, Vifam, Herobrine, borkjerfkin, zabriel, Majiffy, chkflip, JacobSavage
JacobSavage 4 [L-6] ActionDan, pengiun_alien, I Am Innocent, Moz, TheUnderachivers
UberNinja - 2 [L-9] pirate mollie, PeregrineV
pirate mollie - 1 [L-10] Lord Mhork
Lord Mhork - 1 [L-10] Bitmap
chkflip 1 [L-10] UberNinja
Herobrine 1 [L-10] TheReverend
I Am Innocent - 1 [L-10] MattP
Everyone needs to get off thier vanity wagons and vote for JS.
In post 1332, borkjerfkin wrote:Why is #908 bad (your words)? I thought his explanation made sense in the context of bankable deadlines.
In post 1337, borkjerfkin wrote:p-edit: @IAI -- I don't see any evidence of that in #908 -- he's obviously playing the "I'm sheeping MattP" card, which I still call null.
In post 1203, JacobSavage wrote:Because Im also getting my own reads.
In post 2189, AngryPidgeon wrote:Yes, but its more ridiculous to assume that IaI/Matt are town.
IaI decided to out his PR (which is the strongest in the game) in a mere 17 minute span after a lurkaderp bull****ter claimed a GS on him? Who does that? Add in the fact that Matt had already faked a bs daycop on OotN and IaI isnt even REMOTELY suspicious?
He just claims cop? What if Matt was town and faking? What if Matt was scum and faking?
IaI is either seriously bad at this game, or is mafia
In post 2382, Dreams of Grandeur wrote:DONE WITH THIS BEAST
here's how I'm looking for scumreads:
ArcAngel > mozamis > IaI > PeregrineV > AJ the Epic
In post 2862, TheReverend wrote:In post 2860, I Am Innocent wrote:Since she also knows who the last Mason is, what are everyone's thoughts on if she should make the final call after a lynch is decided on each day, in who I investigate each night, to avoid me wasting an investigation on the last mason?
You want mollie to tell you who to investigate? This would be an excellent way for scum to keep picking off your town confirms. Which would be an excellent way for you to remain alive without it being mega suspicious.
In post 3279, AngryPidgeon wrote:Why? How can you possibly have a read on that slot? We should demand a force replace if anything.
In post 3669, AngryPidgeon wrote:His claim is super legit and definitely not from mafia.
In post 3689, buldermar wrote:You can just control who I target, but scum is going to target someone else then.In post 3688, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 3669, AngryPidgeon wrote:His claim is super legit and definitely not from mafia.
How do you figure? Wouldn't bodyguard be a perfect claim for mafia? 1) I have never played with one, only seen it fake claimed, so not likely to be CC'd right? 2) they could wait until the night flips happen and say oh, I targeted that live player instead.
In post 3703, buldermar wrote:And FWIW the mod did not tell me who JacobSavage protected on night 1 and night 2.
In post 3708, TheReverend wrote:I find it odd that IAI did ask the mod what actions jacob undertook immediately after reading role pm, it's the first thing I do when replacing in.
In post 3710, TheReverend wrote:In post 3708, TheReverend wrote:I find it odd that IAIdidask the mod what actions jacob undertook immediately after reading role pm, it's the first thing I do when replacing in.
*didn't
I've just smoked a fat spliff.
In post 3772, MattP wrote:SOMEONE probably targeted me N1 then which means I'm maaaybe town just sayin
In post 4164, ActionDan wrote:VOTE: IaI
there's not going to be a framer because it's absolutely useless when there's IC + 3 masons.
In post 4206, UberNinja wrote:Why would you wait and hope that AD wasn't one of the ones that pushed you, so you could get other scum to nibble, but then come out w/results as soon as AD started pushing?
In post 4206, UberNinja wrote:Also how does AD scum result = AD scum? If there's a bus driver, he'd show up town right?
In post 4210, Vifam wrote:Not you I meant IAI
In post 4214, UberNinja wrote:In post 4212, I Am Innocent wrote:When I investigated Matt, if a scum bus driver switched Matt with a member of the mafia, I would have gotten a guilty on matt
Yeah so how does that explain a scum result on ActionDan then
In post 4238, ActionDan wrote:You guys are considering busdrivers. If ANYTHING it's a redirector in the case where IaI is a cop.
In post 4238, ActionDan wrote:IaI basically gave away his reason for picking me as his fake guilty. It's because I was the only one for sure who wasn't thinking he was a cop.
In post 4238, ActionDan wrote:@To the people saying that I'd be hard to push over other people: the goal here is for IaI to simply take a stab at surviving an extra day. going 1v1 vs the guy that was sure to vote him was his best bet.
In post 4257, pirate mollie wrote:which brings up another thing I am wondering about. why nk mozi and perv before me?
In post 4257, pirate mollie wrote:what do you think of IaI's post after I had just voted dan? to me it looked opportunistic, a totally different vibe than what he had given off before. I just happened to vote the scum he had viewed? and if he was looking at reactions, why did he not wait a little longer? he already had me as town so he could not have been waiting for mine and yet I gave him the impetus to his view? the motivation in that single look stinky as hell but if IaI is scum it means he went into the game preparing to fake claim cop and all I can say is wow.
In post 4300, ActionDan wrote:I haven't been in the game since D1. I got back to school and had shit tons of work to do. I was in 5 games at the time and wasn't contributing much across the board. Didn't vote D2 because I didn't feel like it. I'd have voted MattP Zab or JS but didn't really feel confident so I didn't vote. At the end though after Nacho quoted AA's no lynch post I might have voted it. assumed AA9 was noob before so I thought her reading the thread showed townie effort. Saw no-lynch was like, ok. maybe not.
In post 4300, ActionDan wrote:Who's an easy target? Maybe it was the guy who's not been active and called AA9 town D2?
In post 4300, ActionDan wrote:The scum motivation is in claiming to target Matt. Why would a cop target the guy who himself wanted to be targetted.
In post 4300, ActionDan wrote:As for mollie, you didn't talk about her at all one way or the other. And didn't crumb the result at all before the claim.
In post 2405, ActionDan wrote:sorry I'm really mad right now and I didn't finish my read-through. there's a lot of excitement with the claims but just take it a bit slow for now please. I don't want to rush this day. ty.
In post 4386, pirate mollie wrote:something is bugging me...if IaI was so gung ho to listen to requests for views, why did he not listen to me when I asked him to view uber? I made several requests for uber to be viewed cos I don't think anybody except ap and I has the balls to lynch him, really. so his story does not quite add up.
In post 4205, I Am Innocent wrote:At home now.
Here was my thoughts:
1) Matt's flip put one thought in my head. Bus Driver. I've never played with a framer before, but looking that up on wiki I agree that is also a possibility. With town's power, it does makes sense for one of these two to be in the game actually. I realize now that being obvious with the investigation target was not a good idea.
2) With #1 in mind, I wanted to stay away from the likely targets. I looked at D2 again, where AA9 was lynched, and found ActionDan not voting the entire day. His iso matches his predecessors, both as lurkers. That made me feel uneasy. Add in posts like 1217 "ArcAngel is incredibly town now.", I felt this was the best option as well as one of the least to get switched via a bus driver.
3) Got the investigation back, and saw I was still alive. That made me realize scum must think I would be the easy mislynch today. So I sat back, figuring most, but probably not all of the scum would come after me. My hope was AD would be the one who didn't, which would make catching the rest easier. But he was one of the ones pushing, so I came out immediately with my result at that point.
Those are my thoughts/reasons for doing what I've done. It is basically 1 vs 1 at this pt, if I go today, AD goes tomorrow. If AD goes today, I will be confirmed cop and def NK'd tonight. I do not foresee any add'l protective roles, but at least my death will keep the other confirmed townies alive another day.
In post 2361, ActionDan wrote:Nacho might be right on AA.
I saw the quoted post with the no lynch vote and I understand why he feels that way.
bak to reading.
In post 2405, ActionDan wrote:sorry I'm really mad right now and I didn't finish my read-through. there's a lot of excitement with the claims but just take it a bit slow for now please. I don't want to rush this day. ty.
In post 2408, ActionDan wrote:In post 2407, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Re PereV: This is more gut based. But I really feel like I get PV. His early D1 Bitmap push was such a hard sell...I don't think scum PV would go for that. ITs just too far in left field. I think he actually believed he was on to something. Also I thought him asking AA9 for scummeta seemed fairly proactive for him. Also note he later insisted that he had something with his bitmap push and linked to a game he saw something similar. Hes town.
just like to say that's how I got the strong town-read on that slot