NY 184: a help (done)

BROseidon · Post Post #148 (isolation #0) » Wed May 13, 2015 1:43 am

In post 5, VysePresident wrote:VOTE: BROseidon

Heya! Long time no see!

Lol. I need to head back to our homesite now that v6 is starting up.

Also I don't have v5 or v6 access for some reason...

BROseidon · Post Post #150 (isolation #1) » Wed May 13, 2015 1:50 am

In post 41, The Bulge wrote:Jesus Christ slow the fuck down.

If RC reaches any further he's gonna pull a muscle, but this exchange looks like Town vs Town. Both of you pull your heads out of your asses and play the game. You didn't "catch scum" on page 1.

VOTE: Grimmjow

VOTE: bulge

BROseidon · Post Post #151 (isolation #2) » Wed May 13, 2015 1:51 am

In post 45, MattP wrote:VOTE: the bulge

Town

BROseidon · Post Post #152 (isolation #3) » Wed May 13, 2015 1:52 am

In post 49, RadiantCowbells wrote:
VOTE: rc

50% scum read 50% policy

THAT is in this game too.

:\

In all fairness I would push a pl on you if I believed in them so...

BROseidon · Post Post #154 (isolation #4) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:00 am

In post 89, Lostaway wrote:Well, that's an interesting start to the game.

I don't know what to make of the Jake/RC spat at this point, but am happy to see it play out. It's surely better than RVS, simply for the reactions it's garnering. I'm liking how MattP is tackling it so far.

My early observations:

Oversoul, why are you voting Jake when RC implicated you, Pisskop, and Elyse? You agreed that The Bulge calling out the spat as a townie spat is a scummy move, but you're you're more convinced of Jake at this point?

Elyse's first contribution is to sheep Oversoul. Not liking this.

Flubber, why policy lynch RC over Jake? Both have been pretty over-the-top. What distinguishes them to you?

No word from Broseidon or Grimm, even though they received early RVS votes.

Oh my god this hurts. Post better.

BROseidon · Post Post #155 (isolation #5) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:03 am

In post 110, MattP wrote:My ego really appreciates a lot of people coming in, saying "yea matt yea" and then skirting by without providing any actual effort.

It's probably because you're right.

BROseidon · Post Post #156 (isolation #6) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:04 am

In post 114, RadiantCowbells wrote:It's more the fact that everyone is using it as a convenient diversion to avoid addressing me and Jake.

Id rather put a bullet through both of your heads.

BROseidon · Post Post #157 (isolation #7) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:06 am

In post 127, Oversoul wrote:Opinions on Pisskop? He has 3 posts and I already dislike his play.

I kind of think he's useless town who'll get mislynched for reasons that I find obvious but that nobody else will see coming

BROseidon · Post Post #159 (isolation #8) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:08 am

I wish I were the vig :/

BROseidon · Post Post #163 (isolation #9) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:26 am

In post 160, Oversoul wrote:
In post 157, BROseidon wrote:
In post 127, Oversoul wrote:Opinions on Pisskop? He has 3 posts and I already dislike his play.

I kind of think he's useless town who'll get mislynched for reasons that I find obvious but that nobody else will see coming

What do you mean obvious?

In post 159, BROseidon wrote:I wish I were the vig :/

Do you know for a fact a Vig exists?

1) there are certain things that resonate with me that other players tend to miss for whatever reason. The reason I'm getting town vibes from pisskop is one of those.

2) no, but i would bet we have one if I were a betting man.

BROseidon · Post Post #164 (isolation #10) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:27 am

Or maybe a joat with a vig shot.

BROseidon · Post Post #216 (isolation #11) » Wed May 13, 2015 10:23 am

The reason I would pl you is for fakeclaiming cop as town. Regardless of the result, you never do that

BROseidon · Post Post #218 (isolation #12) » Wed May 13, 2015 10:32 am

Doesn't matter.

You don't do it.

BROseidon · Post Post #219 (isolation #13) » Wed May 13, 2015 10:35 am

In post 170, Oversoul wrote:
In post 163, BROseidon wrote:1) there are certain things that resonate with me that other players tend to miss for whatever reason. The reason I'm getting town vibes from pisskop is one of those.

What are is the "one thing" that is resonating with you?

It's the way in which he's doing nothing. Not going to post my full intentionality theory, but the tl;dr is that true lack of intentionality comes from town, and I think pisskop has demonstrated true lack of intentionality.

BROseidon · Post Post #221 (isolation #14) » Wed May 13, 2015 10:38 am

In post 194, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 184, Jake from State Farm wrote:long as I am alive nobody will listen to me (nobody ever does)

see?

You and RC are basically white noise at this point. I'm more interested in getting other shit done.

BROseidon · Post Post #233 (isolation #15) » Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 pm

Lol, even people not in the game thought he cheated.

BROseidon · Post Post #240 (isolation #16) » Wed May 13, 2015 1:39 pm

In post 234, Jake from State Farm wrote:Doesn't even matter, what bauss did in that game isn't what RC is doing this game.

So he isn't cheating?

Also, that post had nothing to do with this game.

BROseidon · Post Post #269 (isolation #17) » Wed May 13, 2015 2:29 pm

In post 252, MattP wrote:It would be so cute if you were both scum doing this to disengage town

I've seen jake x-bus as scum. It wasn't nearly this aggressive

BROseidon · Post Post #399 (isolation #18) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:08 am

In post 292, Lostaway wrote:
So here's why I'm equivocating on the whole Jake/RC feud -- aside from the fact that at this point it all comes across as spam to me, being something I really don't want to wrap my head around at all. Seriously, it's been deeply unpleasant from both parties. But it has to be addressed.

Going back to the beginning, and looking specifically how it unfolded:

In post 7, Jake from State Farm wrote:
vote: evil pacman

Cause evil = scum ldo

Ugh, now I need a shower

In post 8, Jake from State Farm wrote:Oh shit forgot to say

Sup

In post 9, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Jake from State Farm

Apologetic about two things already on the first page.

It actually started innocuously enough -- a couple of RVS votes with spurious reasons given. And, I mean, these reasons are both spurious. Voting for someone on the basic of their name, and voting because someone is "apologetic" during the RVS stage.

In post 10, Jake from State Farm wrote:Apologetic? Where did I apologize for anything?

And this is quite interesting, because it's so defensive! I, for one, found the statements of "Ugh, I need a shower" and "Oh shit forgot to say" to be clearly apologetic. Not in a scummy way -- Jake apologizes for his spurious logic of voting Evilpacman on the basis of his name, and apparently forgetting his "Sup" tagline. The apologies were truly innocuous. I'm not so sure, however, about the defensiveness.

Neither was RC, it seems:

In post 11, RadiantCowbells wrote:
Cause evil = scum ldo

Unnecessarily giving reasons for an RVS vote.

Oh shit forgot to say

Sup

Why bring up that you forgot to say it already?

Ugh, now I need a shower

Essentially apologizing for not having showered. Showcases feelings of inadequacy.

Apology wasn't the right word though.

I don't mind RC going on the attack for Jake being defensive, though the language here isn't exactly clear in explaining how Jake was actually being apologetic. It's that lack of precision that Jake latches onto:

In post 12, Jake from State Farm wrote:1. Rvs vote usually comes with some random reason so you fail here
2. I brought it up cause sup is my calling card and I realized I forgot.

3. I didn't apologize for not having taken a shower, it was a reference to feeling dirty and now I need one.

You fail

vote: RC

Serious vote

RC doubles down in 14 with some frankly dubious psychological "logic", and then it all quickly spirals out of control, hinging largely on issues of "meta." Frankly, I don't care about all the "meta" stuff that they both brought up and ground into the dirt. I'm not going to go digging into oodles of past games to verify, especially when game play can and does change over and over again. So that line of argumentation isn't going to pass muster with me. It just makes my eyes glaze over.

So I don't have a clear read on either of them. I lean against Jake for the initial defensiveness. I lean against RC for the quick escalation and what seems like seriously-taken dubious logic. The ferocity which RC and Jake end up employing reminds me of my Jack Russell terrier when she's pounced on a new squeaky duck toy, and won't let go -- it's so over-the-top it passes straight through comical and into the territory of the deeply uncomfortable. So I can see how either one could be town, and with egos unchecked are going to play it out to the bitter end.

At this point, if anything is going to sway me one way or the other, it's the personal attacking language of RC, which is admittedly more of a policy-lynch reaction on my part. But I play the game to have fun, and this so far has not been very much fun.

Need a fence to sit on?

BROseidon · Post Post #400 (isolation #19) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:08 am

Wait fuck that didn't compress all of it fml.

BROseidon · Post Post #402 (isolation #20) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:10 am

In post 315, Grimmjow wrote:ALSO HAI KINETIC, HAI BRO

HAI GRIMM.

IMMA BE VISTING YOU IN LIKE 2 WEEKS. I ALSO HAVE NO IDEA WHO IM GONNA BE STAYING WITH.

BROseidon · Post Post #403 (isolation #21) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:13 am

In post 320, Oversoul wrote:Do you think Pisskop is scumhunting?

No. That would require him to be doing something.

BROseidon · Post Post #404 (isolation #22) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:14 am

In post 320, Oversoul wrote:Multiball... in a 14 player game?

10:2:2 would make sense as a way to get to odds/not need to get to odds.

BROseidon · Post Post #405 (isolation #23) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:15 am

Actually VOTE: Flubbernugget

BROseidon · Post Post #406 (isolation #24) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:17 am

In post 348, RadiantCowbells wrote:I really don't like how a bunch of people said that me and Jake were both scum, or that it was decidedly not TvT, and all of them ended up voting me or proclaiming me as their main scumread of the two.

Flubber was the only one who said scum vs. scum definitively.

BROseidon · Post Post #407 (isolation #25) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:19 am

In post 355, Oversoul wrote:RC I think I'm really feeling you on the Jake-scum. The way he refuses to see *any* towniness/intentions in pisskop is mindblowing. He has to be refusing to see the things I am seeing (and others are also apparently seeing) so that he can keep pisskop as a mislynch.

Jake has a fairly broad set of blind spots in his model of what makes someone scum. The way he's attacking pisskop is something I'd expect him to do as either alignment (model blind spot if town, easy place to attack if scum)

BROseidon · Post Post #408 (isolation #26) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:21 am

I don't like EPM's 368 because of how he treats the Bulge wagon in juxtaposition with a stated null read on my and no stated read on Matt.

BROseidon · Post Post #409 (isolation #27) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:24 am

In post 383, RadiantCowbells wrote:Alright just lynch me D1.

VOTE: RadiantCowbells

Jake, Flubber, EPM, Lostaway, Grimm. I guarantee that all or nearly all of the scum are in that pile.

Check your fucking ego. The game doesn't revolve around you.

BROseidon · Post Post #410 (isolation #28) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:25 am

In post 397, Bicephalous Bob wrote:The Bulge (3): MattP, Oversoul, BROseidon

I'm just gonna throw out there how this wagon managed to gain 0 traction and relatively little mention over 10+ pages despite it being driven by:

1) 3 players who are all pretty universally town or null read
2) 3 players who are probably the players with the strongest reputations in the game.

BROseidon · Post Post #412 (isolation #29) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:27 am

Caught up. Bulge, Flubbernugget, and maybe EPM or Lostaway are what I would wagon/push to lynch right now. RC and Jake are both below those in priority because I'm like 50% thinking there's scum there and 50% thinking it's two players with massive egos unable to check those egos at the fucking door and turning this game into a shitfest as a result.

BROseidon · Post Post #413 (isolation #30) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:28 am

In post 411, Oversoul wrote:I really don't understand the RC self-vote. It makes little sense to me.

He's being a whiny bitch about not getting what he wants. Pretty soon he'll be faking a day cop guilty on Jake to get his way.

BROseidon · Post Post #415 (isolation #31) » Sat May 16, 2015 10:33 am

Oversoul, I'm going to dinner right now, but if we can connect later I want to flesh stuff out.

BROseidon · Post Post #439 (isolation #32) » Sat May 16, 2015 11:18 pm

In post 430, VysePresident wrote:
In post 148, BROseidon wrote:
In post 5, VysePresident wrote:VOTE: BROseidon

Heya! Long time no see!

Lol. I need to head back to our homesite now that v6 is starting up.

Also I don't have v5 or v6 access for some reason...

That'd be cool! I'd like to play you again sometime, back home.

Incidentally, does Penguin still play here at all?

Oh god I hate playing mafia back home. Not have a vote tag is literally satan.

Also penguin doesn't play too much anymore. She mostly posts in the GD threads nowadays.

BROseidon · Post Post #541 (isolation #33) » Sun May 17, 2015 4:23 pm

In post 474, Oversoul wrote:Or look at Broseidon and say he is a strong player even though I don't think I have actually ever played with him.

We were masons QQ

BROseidon · Post Post #545 (isolation #34) » Sun May 17, 2015 4:29 pm

In post 542, Oversoul wrote:What game was that though

POTUS

BROseidon · Post Post #546 (isolation #35) » Sun May 17, 2015 4:29 pm

In post 544, Oversoul wrote:Bro, did you read the GS role pm on the first page? I had no idea it existed until tonight

I never read the sample PMs.

BROseidon · Post Post #863 (isolation #36) » Wed May 20, 2015 2:11 am

In post 642, MattP wrote:Oh yay ilu bro

Dude wtf is it with us being on wagons and nobody voting them despite the wagons obviously being sound.

BROseidon · Post Post #864 (isolation #37) » Wed May 20, 2015 2:12 am

In post 861, Flubbernugget wrote:Bulge/OS/RC(??)/Grimm/Piss(??) scumteam

Too many scum, try again

BROseidon · Post Post #865 (isolation #38) » Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 am

Train just pulled up to my stop. Will catch up more later.

BROseidon · Post Post #963 (isolation #39) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:47 am

In post 961, MattP wrote:Ugh

I'm starting to get disturbed by how frequently I read your posts and feel the same way.

BROseidon · Post Post #964 (isolation #40) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:47 am

And we aren't lynching RC because he's town.

BROseidon · Post Post #992 (isolation #41) » Sat May 23, 2015 11:04 am

#lynchflubber

BROseidon · Post Post #1054 (isolation #42) » Tue May 26, 2015 4:30 am

I still don't understand why Flubber isn't happening when he's obviously scum but w/e I give up.

VOTE: Lost

BROseidon · Post Post #1066 (isolation #43) » Tue May 26, 2015 9:41 am

In post 1059, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 1054, BROseidon wrote:I still don't understand why Flubber isn't happening when he's obviously scum but w/e I give up.

VOTE: Lost

Expressing more than a half-assed accusation of a scum slip from me might get you more mileage

I've never said you've scum slipped. I've said you're scum.

Because you are.

BROseidon · Post Post #1102 (isolation #44) » Wed May 27, 2015 8:31 am

RC is town. That should be really obvious at this point.

Flubber and maybe bulge are probably better lynches, but I could do Ank

BROseidon · Post Post #1179 (isolation #45) » Sat May 30, 2015 4:22 pm

Lololol Grimm

BROseidon · Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:26 pm

VOTE: Flubber

Let's try this again.

BROseidon · Wed Jun 03, 2015 12:27 pm

Also lol @ that nightkill.

BROseidon · Post Post #1296 (isolation #48) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:29 pm

This entire conversation was dumb.

BROseidon · Post Post #1297 (isolation #49) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:29 pm

We should lynch flubber.

BROseidon · Post Post #1299 (isolation #50) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:46 pm

He's been all over the place, but there's flubber and the bulge to lynch.

BROseidon · Post Post #1310 (isolation #51) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 3:12 pm

In post 1304, Ankamius wrote:BROseidon: Show your work, please.

I'm lazy :/

BROseidon · Post Post #1312 (isolation #52) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 3:14 pm

It's mostly how he derp-tunneled on RC day 1 while softly pushing bulge.

BROseidon · Post Post #1314 (isolation #53) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 3:26 pm

VOTE: Bulge

Since apparently nobody wants to join me on my quest to get flubber lynched

BROseidon · Post Post #1328 (isolation #54) » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:05 am

In post 1322, RadiantCowbells wrote:I think Elyse is town though. Elyse is not a known busser and she was way too casual about the Lostaway push.

Elyse is 100% town.

I could sort of do pisskop, but bulge and flubber are SO SHINY.

BROseidon · Post Post #1377 (isolation #55) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:37 am

Titus post more things so I can decide whether to move my vote.

BROseidon · Post Post #1378 (isolation #56) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:37 am

Also Matt I disagree about flubber

BROseidon · Post Post #1393 (isolation #57) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 3:39 pm

In post 1385, RadiantCowbells wrote:Town needs to not get caught on VIs or anti-town players like OS, Bulge, Flubber and start making real things happen.

Uh, OS was a top 3 player on the original player list so I have no idea what you're smoking.

BROseidon · Post Post #1394 (isolation #58) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 3:41 pm

Actually, lynching slots from weakest to strongest would probably just end in a town win because I'm town and I'm very confident in my MattP read so...

BROseidon · Post Post #1398 (isolation #59) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:18 pm

Uh, 2 goons vs a pair of masons and an x-shot role blocker in a mini is balanced >.>

11-2 mountainous is like 60% EV for scum.

Not gonna comment on that scum game given the fact that we never technically proved that Likeabauss was cheating...

BROseidon · Post Post #1401 (isolation #60) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:21 pm

Uh, we forfeited because Bauss was cheating and TIP had the guilty on sangres.

You didn't do anything because while your read on me was right, you couldn't get town to go along with you.

Also that time you were scum I dunked your partner and made you have to basically out yourself to get me lynched, so...

BROseidon · Post Post #1402 (isolation #61) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:21 pm

EPM flipping scum is fine - I haven't town read him at any point this game.

BROseidon · Post Post #1403 (isolation #62) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:21 pm

Your shit day 1 read on Elyse bears mentioning, though.

BROseidon · Post Post #1406 (isolation #63) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:26 pm

Elyse didn't drive a wagon on her partner while you were a viable lynch option. She's 100% town.

BROseidon · Post Post #1407 (isolation #64) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:26 pm

In post 1405, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't care who is better at getting town support or avoiding the lynch. I'm the one who catches scum here.

Too bad that isn't 100% of mafia.

BROseidon · Post Post #1409 (isolation #65) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:28 pm

Scum would time a bus on that player day 2 or 3, not day 1 when there are viable options open.

It's unnecessary.

BROseidon · Post Post #1411 (isolation #66) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:30 pm

You're wrong.

I'm gonna sit and wait for Titus to post before making my decision as to whether I'm keeping my vote there or moving it to flubber or EPM.

BROseidon · Post Post #1412 (isolation #67) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:30 pm

Also Vyse needs to be replaced and I'd be interested to see what his replacement posts.

BROseidon · Post Post #1414 (isolation #68) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:33 pm

I'm not letting Titus's slot off the hook until Titus towns it the fuck up.

BROseidon · Post Post #1422 (isolation #69) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 8:15 am

BROseidon · Post Post #1458 (isolation #70) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 1:11 am

Titus you're not screaming town yet.

BROseidon · Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:21 pm

One sec...

BROseidon · Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:23 pm

(This may be a very long sec...)

BROseidon · Post Post #1482 (isolation #73) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:08 pm

Okay yeah nevermind.

BROseidon · Post Post #1484 (isolation #74) » Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:56 pm

It took me that long to contact a member of the NRG.

BROseidon · Thu Jun 11, 2015 11:04 am

VOTE: EPM

BROseidon · Thu Jun 11, 2015 11:10 am

Actually I'm kind of eh with who's on this wagon.

VOTE: Boonskies

BROseidon · Post Post #1502 (isolation #77) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:59 pm

VOTE: EMP l-1

BROseidon · Post Post #1503 (isolation #78) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:59 pm

VOTE: EPM

BROseidon · Post Post #1507 (isolation #79) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 3:41 pm

Oh yeah if I die tonight pressure Grimm hard.

BROseidon · Post Post #1508 (isolation #80) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 3:44 pm

Also MattP I have faith in you if I die.

BROseidon · Post Post #1510 (isolation #81) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 3:50 pm

I'm basically claiming my role here >.>

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:21 am

Ugh I'm sad that Grimm got vigged because he neighborized me n1

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:22 am

Also VOTE: flubber

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:20 am

That's wrong.

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:48 am

In post 1548, Titus wrote:VOTE: Bro

Too long.

I was playing league.

I crumbed my inno on Elyse N1 pretty hard, though.

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:49 am

Also I'm pretty sure there's another town gunsmith in the game along with me.

Also vonflare is conftown.

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:56 am

There's probably at least one other thing that returns guilty to me.

I'm pretty sure the schtick this setup is that scum have a bunch of gunsmiths to find town PRs and that town PRs return guilty to investigatives.

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 12:52 pm

Innos on Elyse and Vonflare. Already said that.

BROseidon · Post Post #1573 (isolation #89) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:04 pm

In post 1571, RadiantCowbells wrote:Bro, if this is the case though you royally fucked up.

If you were killed last night, everyone in the game would have assumed your inno was on MattP.

No, I crumbed Elyse really fucking hard.

BROseidon · Post Post #1574 (isolation #90) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:05 pm

In post 1403, BROseidon wrote:Your shit day 1 read on Elyse bears mentioning, though.

In case you missed it - this was my 2nd crumb of the result.

Plus I had claimed to Grimm in the neighborhood.

BROseidon · Post Post #1578 (isolation #91) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:20 pm

In post 1576, RadiantCowbells wrote:Saying that my read is shit versus claiming that you have faith in someone if you die.

That's not even a funny joke.

There's also all the other "Elyse is town" moments I had, plus it being posted in my neighborhood.

BROseidon · Post Post #1582 (isolation #92) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:30 pm

In post 1580, MattP wrote:It's likely there is a GS-immune scum role, and the two that have flipped so far are not GS immune. It's only a 14p setup soo likely 3 scum, which means GS results at this point probably don't serve much purpose

Nope! It's why the PM specifies that there are no mafia docs!

BROseidon · Post Post #1586 (isolation #93) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:32 pm

Matt, given the setup, the mafia basically have a vanilla cop and backup vanilla cop (they miss the neighborizer but it seems like everything else is fair play)

We also probably have a JK instead of a doctor.

BROseidon · Post Post #1587 (isolation #94) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:32 pm

In post 1584, Titus wrote:Godfathers are a thing though.

Gunsmiths get guilties on godfathers.

BROseidon · Post Post #1589 (isolation #95) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:34 pm

I'd be surprised if we didn't have a full one.

BROseidon · Post Post #1605 (isolation #96) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:18 pm

In post 1593, MattP wrote:Actually Im pretty sure it's against normal rules to include modifiers like that in role PMs. Like I don't think you are allowed to say a role is definitely not in the game in a normal role pm

Someone on the NRG approved it, and when I asked AP about it he said it was odd but probably fine (although he didn't consult the rest of the NRG on it)

BROseidon · Post Post #1606 (isolation #97) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:18 pm

In post 1590, Titus wrote:^^^Too much speculation. I have seen mods roll GF as completely investigation immune, not just cops, hence why I asked.

Normal versions of roles. GF returns as having a gun.

BROseidon · Post Post #1607 (isolation #98) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:20 pm

My lynch pool for today is {Flubber, Titus, Boonskies} in that order.

BROseidon · Post Post #1613 (isolation #99) » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:32 pm

Victory!

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:32 pm

It's also probably 1 scum left given that 4:10 is really fucking broken.

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:35 pm

The single kill N1 strongly suggests otherwise.

BROseidon · Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:35 pm

I was about to say that the semantics on how I phrased that fucked up references but you got the point.

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:54 am

In post 1328, BROseidon wrote:
In post 1322, RadiantCowbells wrote:I think Elyse is town though. Elyse is not a known busser and she was way too casual about the Lostaway push.

Elyse is 100% town.

I could sort of do pisskop, but bulge and flubber are SO SHINY.

In post 1403, BROseidon wrote:Your shit day 1 read on Elyse bears mentioning, though.

In post 1406, BROseidon wrote:Elyse didn't drive a wagon on her partner while you were a viable lynch option. She's 100% town.

In post 1411, BROseidon wrote:You're wrong.

I'm gonna sit and wait for Titus to post before making my decision as to whether I'm keeping my vote there or moving it to flubber or EPM.

Omg look at this massive trail I left.

ALONG WITH CLAIMING IT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:55 am

Boonskies is my 3rd choice :/

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:44 am

Because you're not reading it right.

Like, at all.

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:45 am

My comment to mattp was clearly a quip in terms of who I was confident in.

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:30 am

Nope! Grimm's neighborize still went off last night!

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:12 am

I think flubber, Titus, and boonskies are all more likely than Matt

BROseidon · Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:31 am

I like how we're talking about VCA with no data in the thread.

BROseidon · Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:02 am

In post 1753, Titus wrote:Nah, my vca strongly suggested Bro scum, so I pushed. I ever read upon replacing in. If Bro is town, Boonskiies is the only plausible scum left.

VCA where I've been on both lynch wagons for scum suggests I'm scum?

Yeah no.

VOTE: Titus

BROseidon · Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:04 am

In post 1767, MattP wrote:On another note, this game is rly town-sided even with the GS mechanic scum had.

Town doesn't look like they have a defensive PR.

BROseidon · Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:08 am

In post 1823, Boonskiies wrote:@Bro - Flubber should be the check toNight, as he should be the lynch tomorrow if the game doesn't end. That way, if Flubber is innocent, we don't have to waste a lynch on the slot, and in that case, then MattP would be tomorrow's lynch. See, RC? We can lynch him tomorrow. The game ends with Titus, though.

I was thinking MattP, but yeah, Flubber works too.

BROseidon · Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:08 am

I don't think it actually matters which of the two I check unless one of them is secretly a townie with a gun.

BROseidon · Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:39 am

No, we are lynching you because you are scum.

You do realize this game passed normal review, right?

BROseidon · Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:21 am

ggwp RC.

That said, the throws are real. Once Boonskies and I claimed we literally had a guaranteed win >.>

BROseidon · Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:29 am

In post 2271, Ankamius wrote:I kind of saw this coming once I saw Mattp flip town anyway. I never expected to not be lynched anyway since I wasn't really around for half the game.

You really should have just spammed the thread with the fact that pisskop had a cop inno on you.

That would have beat just about any argument.