I think the most important thing for all of us to agree upon is that
I'd suggest that
On that note
In post 12, greygnarl wrote:I'm guessing at least one of you played this before. Would it be correct to assume that scum has access to more money then town? Not as a whole but rather that each scum gets a bigger chunk of the pie then each town?
In post 38, SlumberPartyBois wrote:whats do you suggest we talk about then gentle,, we go back to rvs? fuck that im talking about molla being a piece of shit.
In post 130, GreyICE wrote:Scum control roleblocker means NK doesn't go off unless they want it to? NK doesn't go off and RB is claimed at least we can sort things out with hangings.
In post 147, Tammy wrote:Did I think that Matt thought he had a scum read he would let go and push for all it's worth? Absolutely. Was I irritate that someone was acting like they could read me whe they couldn't? Absolutely. Was i also at the same time confident thay the people who knew how to read me would? Absolutley. Do I also have faith in my ability, as town, to prove myself as town? Absolutely. There is o me intentionally subverting my town meta. I don't flip out early day one most days. You can reference the start of mafia behind the maiden to see that's actually true. I didn't start acting like a lunatic until the wagon actually looked like it we going to go through. But, thanks a lot for acting like I can't actually work on my playstyle and attempt to remove some of the more annoying and anti-town aspects.
In post 147, Tammy wrote:As far as regfork being an insult and an ate, you couldn't be farther from the truth. It was just a bit of a joke from when faraday called you that in GvE when you called him scum. And since when would ate be a scum tell from me anyway?
In post 147, Tammy wrote:You actually lied within your post because I called BB town and you reference it. My read on BB flows one hundred percent logical. In both of the games in which he was scum and I was town, he gave me strong town reads without question. But he sometimes calls me scum when he's town to get a read on me. So where's your logical fallacy. I'm soaking from experience absolutely 100%.
In post 147, Tammy wrote:What are you talking about with GI and Sala? He didn't even mention Sala? Are you now saying I'm it allowed to ask someone a question to get a read on them? Because seriously...no seriously? As far as the Matt read...I haven't decided yet. Are you serious that I was supposed to make grand declarations? I love how you pull out my meta, but fail to even acknowledge that I'm a) not the most transparent player in the world and b) often take my time with things.
In post 214, Tazaro wrote:You did not name Seanald.
In post 223, MagnaofIllusion wrote:This makes me scratch my head. Why exactly should I expect ‘lots of players’ outside of scum and the Neighborizor ability (which I don’t think even can have been used at this point) to have QTs? If Grey / Gentlemen are to be believed the last game was effectively Vanilla. Not a lot of other reasons outside of the two groups I mentioned to have a QT. I’m curious why you thought that at all.
In post 223, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Firstly – no … you are wrong. Scum governing a partner does nothing to move up LYLO. The Governor ability prevents a SINGLE player from not being lynched in a Day. The only way it could accelerate LYLO is if multiple scum possessed the Govern ability and cross-used it. And even then it would only accelerate it if every scum could be covered. Massively increasing the chances I think is a gross overstatement (especially since someone scummy being Governed means we have working connections to the rest of his team) and still does not make the statement in question correct. If you specifically discussed the "Extra Vote Can't" with your partner why was it posted in thread.
In post 260, Tammy wrote:in the first game did scum make group bids or personal bids. (that's probably answered somewhere...don't feel like looking right now.)
In post 281, D3f3nd3r wrote:Two posts. 24 hours. No walls of text.
Idk why two posts this early put a target on my back.
In post 313, GreyICE wrote:But basically, I can't help feeling like this is a policy lynch.
In post 352, Mehdi2277 wrote:Reg he didn't say he voted her for her meta, but for using self-meta. Just because he called her town and scum for meta related things doesn't mean they contradict (self meta being disliked and then swap to thinking about her and unvoting). In fact him unvoting when she was still being suspected even if it was going down a bit is a town tell not a scum tell. I concede the point of his activity being scummy, but overall I think he's town still.
In post 355, SlumberPartyBois wrote:WHATS WITH ALL THESE READ LISTS I DONT UNDERSTAND
In post 365, Mehdi2277 wrote:GB is grey still null to you?
In post 366, GreyICE wrote:I honestly don't see him as town. I see him as being the hero who will lead the town to oblivion while no one suspects him. All of that hydra's posts are honestly shit.
In post 261, Pitty wrote:I'm going to clarify this now before someone goes "OMG! Piggy knows what the scum PM says?! Obvscum right there!" I mean that by the fact that it's in it's own separate space, not part of the rest of the role. Meaning it's not an alignment indicator, it's a PM indicator.If all the town got the same PM (except our miller vig...?), and assuming all the scum got the same PM, the only one that wouldn't get something that everyone else has is TP, and if all MoI happens to be referring to is the sample PM on the first page (and I suppose scum could potentially not have that bit at the bottom as well, but that's really really unlikely, since that would give town a huge advantage and cause this whole mishap), well that would easily cause this slip up.
In post 496, SlumberPartyBois wrote:Listen,
Defender case is that he is lurking. Seanald case actually has a LOT more to it, we can lynch Defender tomorrow, please vote Seanald today >.<
In post 520, greygnarl wrote:We don't know if the same items will go up again GB. That's why we need the Oracle.
In post 551, Tammy wrote:@gb - was the offer to make a qt for you in the same place in the pm as the request for your hydra qt?
In post 579, Mehdi2277 wrote:I just noticed NK isn't on reg's list of roles we need to plan on buying which I think it should be. I'd want a town read having it or forcing scum to pay. P-edit: What was the point in claiming then? Well I'm confident matt is town so you're investigating without any trouble. And I want to vote on who you investigate.
In post 587, Mehdi2277 wrote:Even if they kill the NK buyer that just means we're making the game nightless which is great too (and they can only do that if they have the night kill). The night killer buyer would have to volunteer and say I have a lot of money.
In post 594, SlumberPartyBois wrote:want to hear from greyice on our organization before we go through with the lynch since he was so vocal about it previously.
In post 597, Mehdi2277 wrote:And reg how about telling a scummy player to spend all their money on the NK. If they're town scum will then be forced to choose between shooting a scummy player or let a town have the NK. If we can force scum to shoot the new vig that protects other roles like sean and it can be a way to direct the night kill on scummy players we'd have wanted to lynch.