Did you not read my post, mongrel? Is Scum-Heartless immune to receiving inventions from farside?
In post 1139, Cheetory6 wrote:Also, Sera only started the 1v1 after Heartless made a huge case on them. To act like there's no potential motivation for forcing a big dramatic argument like that is borderline ridiculous.
I see your point. However, Seraphim had other options for engaging and disengaging Heartless between the case and various claim-related things and has chose, in my opinion, the least likely options for scum. His posts in 960-962 (post-case) seem more 'stream of conciousness', as scum would be more likely to dismiss the accusations via case instead of prodding for more claim information. Town are more likely to not worry about case posts such as Heartless.
Do you think scum-Seraphim decided to ignore Heartless, go 'oh shit hold on' and fabricate a false line of reasoning leading into a counterclaim in the two minute span after ignoring them?
Also, you're on Heartless for seeming unrealistically overdramatic. Is Sera not being unrealistically overdramatic over PRmechanic stuff which is realistically in a black box on someone he was hard townreading on D1?
Assume Sera is town. Assume his roleclaim is truthful. Actually, assume you have Sera's role. Someone claims that their role doesn't function the way your does. Even if it's a 'hard townread', would you not react the same way he is (
962,
1017)?
It's possible I am completely wrong, but I feel that my logic here actually holds some merit.
I hope you will actually respond to my points as well, mongrel. I feel you are not critically analyzing the situation and ignoring me will only anger your king - something you want to avoid.
I'm fine with more pressure on BROseidon, Shaft, and Aristophanes. We have plenty of time to settle the Heartless/Seraphim matter.
Preview Edit: re:Heartless, see above.
re:Lurkers, I feel that this 1v1 will be at the forefront for today and we have plenty of time to analyze and discuss. I especially want to pressure BRO for intentionally ignoring the game D1 and continuing to do so D2. I dislike the attitude of being completely useless D1, as it is anti-town at best for multiple reasons I should not need to explain. Other lurkers should also post, but I want to pressure his attitude specifically,
especially
being somewhat familiar with BRO's playstyle, even if he is not aware that I am (well, he knows now).
PE2: Heartless, you are not good enough of a player to be condescending to me. Are you going to elaborate or engage me, or just be immature, passive-aggressive and useless?