How about bolded
Let the game begin.
@ T&L the mechanics listed are true, but could be misleading. Be careful of what you believe.
In post 32, Thor and Loki wrote:I don't aim to quicklynch, but if we did aim to quicklynch, I'd want to kill notscience.
In post 51, White Narcissus wrote:Also you've guys spent 2 pages already discussing deadlines and pseudovotes rather than actually scumhunting, save a couple, why? (Mostly directed at Zelink and Taly)
In post 42, SXTLHGaiden wrote:i believe it is a valid question to see how many people scum can affect per night.
In post 44, Taly wrote:It seemed like a valid idea to raise given on how we don't really know what can happen at night.
In post 45, Skold wrote:I do find SXTL's post really perplexing though.
In post 77, SXTLHGaiden wrote:now i'm really tempted to start voting all the things
In post 89, notscience wrote:just for that you aren't invited to my tea party
In post 94, notscience wrote:Taly is our lynch today.
In post 47, Shadowcat wrote:FoS: Zelbecause using MafTiger is a clear scumtell. (But mostly because I feel uneasy about him.)
In post 74, ZeL1nK2 wrote:Actually Skold didn't technically talk about spreading darkness to multiple players, but that was the underlying implication behind not being able to raise darkness to 100% for anyone reading between the lines. But I also don't think speculation in general is more likely to come from scum, anyway. It's null at best.
In post 76, White Narcissus wrote:Oh well we have nothing to scumhunt on, so we can't scumhunt, la la la~"
In post 65, White Narcissus wrote:In post 63, Thor and Loki wrote:It's too early to have a town read on us, I'd assume. It's not like I've really done anything particularly exciting as of late.
Neither has anyone else, and you dont see the issue with this?
And still the only townread i have is the Zymf or whatever person, tho Wis doesn't seem to see the issues i see with Zelink.
We both dislike Taly.
Do you have any reads?
~Sakura
Though, that last part sounds a bit scummy imoZymf wrote:[quote="In post 7quote="In post 69, Witness Protection"]But where is there to scum hunt (at the time of this post?), some casual conversation's a great place to start getting base line reads. Then we go from there.In post 51, White Narcissus wrote:Also you've guys spent 2 pages already discussing deadlines and pseudovotes rather than actually scumhunting, save a couple, why? (Mostly directed at Zelink and Taly)ButI do want me some scum!
In post 185, White Narcissus wrote:Why does everyone seem to think that everything scum does is a premeditated move from some sort of backwater agenda?
In post 186, Mikazuki wrote:Real life calls, I have an important assignment due tomorrow so not much free time today, sorry. I'll be sure to catch up tomorrow though.
In post 186, Mikazuki wrote:White: Voting first thing with this game mech wasn't good, but probably a honest mistake
In post 186, Mikazuki wrote:Dislikes Zelink's overexplanation for focusing on game setup/mechanics which I disagree with.
In post 192, ZeL1nK2 wrote:In post 188, White Narcissus wrote:Annoyance =/= "HOLY SHIT IM GOING TO BE LYNCHED TODAY" from a single vote and pseudovote, specially with people like Zelink hard defending him.
I don't think your assessment of "overreacting" was correct, either. Whatever tone you read in the wall he wrote back on page four was entirely different to how I read it...
I get that he was stressing certain points while responding in detail, but it was more in an "I don't understand how anyone could possibly think like you do" kind of way.
In post 201, ZZZX wrote:Also refusing the system is anti town for now
Nothing of not in last two pages. But why are you so wishy washy when it comes to your read on Mikazuki? You repeat others suspicions about her, then say " I don't completely understand the suspicion on Mika", doesn't seem to mesh.
In post 257, Zymf wrote:I think a timelimit of 2-3 days would be enough to decide who to lynch. The longer we wait, the more time we give Shinozaki Sachiko and her team to defend and manipulate the conversation.
In post 258, Zymf wrote:Also, on the first couple of pages, people were wondering how many percentages Shinozaki Sachiko and her team could give a single person overnight, and to this I want to add: We don't know if they even add percentages at all.. maybe they multiply all percentages by 10 or something.
Hold on I'll look it up for you. I just finished his ISO, but timing of some of his comments, not saying anything new. Things like that. But I'll be back.
In post 257, Zymf wrote:I generally dislike people who play based on meta... But I like the way he questions everything and doesn't just "go with the flow"
Though, that last part sounds a bit scummy imoIn post 69, Witness Protection wrote:In post 51, White Narcissus wrote:Also you've guys spent 2 pages already discussing deadlines and pseudovotes rather than actually scumhunting, save a couple, why? (Mostly directed at Zelink and Taly)
But where is there to scum hunt (at the time of this post?), some casual conversation's a great place to start getting base line reads. Then we go from there.ButI do want me some scum!
FoS: Witness Protection
I think a timelimit of 2-3 days would be enough to decide who to lynch. The longer we wait, the more time we give Shinozaki Sachiko and her team to defend and manipulate the conversation.
In post 258, Zymf wrote:Also, on the first couple of pages, people were wondering how many percentages Shinozaki Sachiko and her team could give a single person overnight, and to this I want to add:
- We don't know if they even add percentages at all.. maybe they multiply all percentages by 10 or something.
In post 410, Mikazuki wrote:In post 270, White Narcissus wrote:In post 262, Witness Protection wrote:
I really hate when people use "I have been having real life issues so i can't do anything" instead of just... saying nothing, like i know people have a life and what not, so i don't see the need for people to need to bring them up as excuses, it always looks to me like it's scum that for some reason decided that they need to justify their actions of some sort. And it's not like neither Mika or WP were prod dodging...
Does anyone else have any opinion on that?
~Sakura
Can someone please explain to me what is peoples' problem with explaining why you not going to be around? About 3 different people my my games so far seem to hate it so much that they're willing to immediately scumread for that reason.
Like... if you're supposed to be somewhere doing something but you can't make it, you call up and explain why, you don't just ignore it and then show up a day or two later and pretend that there's no problem, it's just common courtesy right? Does this just not apply here or something? Because I'm happy to just leave without warning next time something comes up if that's more acceptable. This is actually a legit question, can someone please explain this to me?
Either living with all that dangerous wildlife down under has made youIn post 219, Mikazuki wrote:Defensive? Really? Explaining why you're wrong is defensive?
I could do this all daybut I actually do need to go. I'll check back in as much as I can today.
In post 412, Mikazuki wrote:And how do you determine the difference? Maybe I just get a knee jerk reaction, but I find it profoundly irritating to being accused of 'making excuses' when I have a legitimate reason. Unless of course I should care more about this game than my university degree or work, in which case, oops, I've been slacking off.
Ooc - Congrats, I hope you get to take some of that time for yourself.In post 428, ZZZX wrote:FINALLY FINISHED UNI FOR THE TIME BEING (aka for a month :>)
so reading very very soon/
In post 418, Mikazuki wrote:If you like using meta, I'd like to recommend some further reading for you, you may be suprised.
I agree with most of this, and I'm saying I'm having a hard time seeing Mikazuki as Town at this juncture. Maybe it's the sarcasm, the reads, or the messed up formatting. She's not a Town read.In post 198, Mikazuki wrote:Disagreeing with someone is less important than whether or not I can rationalise how you came to that conclusion, and overall attitide and behavior counts for a lot too. Unless your reasoning seems completely ridiculous, it doesn't earn you scum points from me if I disagree with you. Some of my thoughts are just thinking aloud and I wanted to take note of what I thought about your posts.
In post 416, Mikazuki wrote:Catching up slowly.
In post 289, Witness Protection wrote:In post 186, Mikazuki wrote:You disagree with WN a lot, but you stop there. Do you think they're misguided, or scum
Your other two reads are filler.
You don't mind being misquoted, especially in a game of quotes? You wouldn't work it out? Through all this bullshit, I've gotten (imho) better reads. You're looking more like you want to be divisive, than you're looking like a scum hunter atm.In post 439, ZeL1nK2 wrote:I must admit, this was indeed a clever plan if it was what happened, but I do not think that is the case.
In post 435, Mikazuki wrote:must be all those poisonous spiders and jellyfish
In that other game (Micro 454) [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6716094#p6716094]post 1060[/url], Mikazuki wrote:So... If you're town, you're an idiot, and if you're scum, you're a genius, take your pick!
In post 257, Zymf wrote:I think a timelimit of 2-3 days would be enough to decide who to lynch. The longer we wait, the more time we give Shinozaki Sachiko and her team to defend and manipulate the conversation.
In post 387, notscience wrote:As far as I can tell this is a lurker lynch
I read that too, and wondered the same thing.In post 528, ZeL1nK2 wrote:Oh, and one more question, lufan, but this is perhaps somewhat unrelated to the game at hand.
Why were you browsing private topics?
In post 531, White Narcissus wrote:Ok. I wanted to avoid mentioning it, but this is where my certainty about lufan lies. He posted "I am not supposed to be here" in the PT that had just got publicized. My theory is that he thought he was added to another PT, so he posted "I am not supposed to be here" in it. This of course means that he is in another PT, one that he IS supposed to be in.
In post 41, Skold wrote:Psuedovote: Taly
Why did you mention how many people scum could affect?
@Zel loving mafSilver. Why did you send me to mafTiger, shit is ugly.
This is the sum of his "scum hunting" so far. Unless you want to count the post below. The thing is, he's trying to make something you can find out by reading the setup, into a scum tell.In post 43, Skold wrote:In post 42, SXTLHGaiden wrote:i'm not used to this whole "pseudovoting"
Can't we just real vote to accelerate the fun?
that said,p-vote: skold
i believe it is a valid question to see how many people scum can affect per night. it could be something like "You can raise darkness by x% across n players"
He didn't ask a question. It was a statement of ''we don't know''. Pointless, but perhaps a slip. Nothing really substantial. And now we can't real vote, because if we decide a person is town AFTER voting them they gain darkness.
In post 45, Skold wrote:I said in previous post, ''nothing really substantial''. Remember this is Random FOS stage . I do find SXTL's post really perplexing though.
In post 246, Skold wrote:JESUS CHIRST? This much overnight?
UNPsuedovote: I ALWAYS HATED YOU, HATED YOU FROM HELLO: Taly
Catching up soon.
In post 482, Skold wrote:I can't keep up with this xD. There's still time so I'll probably have time tomorrow to fully catch up and give a reads list. #springbreaksoon
In post 500, pieguyn wrote:
In post 859, Witness Protection wrote:a tin foil theory or two before out he goes
In post 1180, Mikazuki wrote:(If anything if my posts makes no sense, please point it out. I'm not sure if my English is working properly right now)