Shadowrun Mafia - Game Over
-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
VOTE: Firebringer
I will accept this as a vote for Grovyle this time, but in the future, you must vote for the hydra.Last edited by Bold Vote Scientist on Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
lolIn post 178, Grovyle wrote:I really don't think jailing people we think are town is a good strategy lol, because we don't know if jail actually protects them from night kills or not, and neutralizing towns strong players roles, seems like a terrible idea.
Forget I suggested it
~FireIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
looks like fun from koggz perspective
In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
fire townIn post 334, Grovyle wrote:Do I know you?
your avi seems familiar.....
koggz worst player bbmolla seenIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
no remember much eitherIn post 343, Grovyle wrote:bbmolla has seen alot of bad players, probably don't rememebr that one so well because I hydraed
And Jeanne hosted it.
ANd I try to blck out all jeanne games..
~Fire
this first game in a while
koggz rustyIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
In post 161, Grovyle wrote:
Ugh, I am pretty sure based on this wording theres one scum at least that can escape jail, I also don't know how released works, I am guessing a town has the ability to release players that have been put in jail?In post 1, Bold Vote Scientist wrote:Lynched players wind up in prison, rather than killed outright. A maximum of two players may return from the game after being imprisoned. Lynched players do not flip until no one can be released from prison anymore. There may or may not be mechanics that allow people to communicate with those in prison. When no one can escape or be released from prison anymore, all players in prison will flip and will die. All flips are confirmed accurate (no actresses/tricksters, death millers, godfathers, etc).
more wording support possible scum escape roleIn post 369, Bold Vote Scientist wrote:Prison by lynch or public mechanic vanillaizes a player unless specified.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
is not being able to walk a straight line a bad thing?In post 385, Reasonably Rational wrote:Oh, general notice here: anyone with any sort of negative utility aspects to your role, such that targeting you is bad, please make sure you claim it ASAP. I will be very upset with anyone attempting to claim ascetic/miller/pgo/some variant thereof after today.
I had something else to say, but it's completely left my mind.
-Cerb
Pedit: Karnos, there are more town than scum. It is almost certain that an all town composition can be created to deal with ANY mission in this game. Prioritizing certain success over denying scum power is very dumb.
-CerbIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
VOTE: space cowboyIn post 439, Space Cowboy wrote:
I'm not backpedaling. I'm simply speaking how it is. Yes, letting scum into missions is bad for a variety of reasons. Yes, it could potentially doom the town (although it's not likely). And yes, the game probably isn't unbalanced enough for one single mission to absolutely doom the town (key word probably).In post 436, karnos wrote:
Okay, specifics please. You can't make a claim like that without backing it up with some examples.In post 431, Space Cowboy wrote:
Cerb, the thing is, his posts are so misguided that there is noconceivableway that someone could be this dense/misguided. He is saying things that anyone with any sort of game experience would know aren't true. He's evidently gotsomeexperience, so he has to know they aren't true, ergo he must be trying to misguide others.
I refuse to believe that someone could be that wrong. It's a ridiculous premise.
Here is this will proceed: you quote the exact statement I made that "anyone with any sort of game experience would know aren't true". Then I will show you an example from another game where a town player said essentially the same thing, and then we will proceed to lynch you, because you are obvious scum going for what you think is an easy town lynch.
All of your specific examples of why I am "obviously wrong" are based around your experience in a couple specific games. Not general mafia/werewolf games at all.
Look at this backpedaling. Earlier you were making it sound like we were doomed forever if a single scum got into a mission. Now you seem to be saying it's not really a big deal, it's only dangerous if scum get to run on 3-4 missions. I think you realized you overplayed your hand, said pretty obvious BS in your eagerness to get me lynched, and now are moving the goalposts.Space Cowboy wrote:Additionally, the "broken combination" was very difficult to get. Even if I was universally town-read, I would still have had to go on an adventure 3-4 times!
It's possible to balance out powerful combinations (not broken) by making them require an extensively large amount of effort to get.
You're pushing really really hard for my lynch because you don't agree with my mechanics analysis... I have been on the receiving end of some pretty shitty pushes, but this takes the cake.
PEdit: I was immune to the passive neutralizer (because I was ascetic and lynchproof). Just so you know. The strongman was the only counter to my combination.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
which words?
In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
really reallyIn post 453, Reasonably Rational wrote:Quoting a post from them is just as bad as a naked vote. Actually, it's worse, because it means you see something wrong with the post, but are refusing to be transparent in your thought process.
Please point out what it is about that post in particular that prompted to vote, as well as any other reasons you have for believing they are scum.
-CerbIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
In post 455, Reasonably Rational wrote:
Really really.In post 454, Koggz wrote:
really reallyIn post 453, Reasonably Rational wrote:Quoting a post from them is just as bad as a naked vote. Actually, it's worse, because it means you see something wrong with the post, but are refusing to be transparent in your thought process.
Please point out what it is about that post in particular that prompted to vote, as well as any other reasons you have for believing they are scum.
-Cerb
-CerbIn post 439, Space Cowboy wrote:You're pushingreally reallyhard for my lynch because you don't agree with my mechanics analysis... I have been on the receiving end of some pretty shitty pushes, but this takes the cake.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
In post 443, Reasonably Rational wrote:Everyone, thoughts on likelihood of scum within those separate groupings?
-Cerb
koggz think this approach is flawedIn post 444, Space Cowboy wrote:I'd say it's safe to assume there's a scum in both groups.
unless alignment not chosen randomlyIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
[quote="In post 460, Reasonably Rational]or do you think they're misrepresenting how hard karnos was pushing for their lynch, or do you think they're misrepresenting the reason why karnos is pushing them? Or some other reason?
-Cerb[/quote]
yes
they do not feel genuine
something is offIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz nominate firebringer for lieutenant
schrodinger mislynch is this true?In post 466, Reasonably Rational wrote:Alignment was not chosen randomly. Each role we drafted had an alignment attached to it.
pressure might get to koggz scumIn post 468, Grovyle wrote:
VOTE: KoggzIn post 452, Koggz wrote:koggz vote on space cowboy not naked and not because think they town
I think this is my biggest scum read so far. I can't really tell. Maybe pressure will help though.
-hebi
koggz town not careIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz reads
grovyle town
spacecowboy scum
else null for now
note
klingoncelt maybe easier to read later
reasonably rational strong player difficult for us to read even late game
if koggz could investigate alignment would investigate reasonably rational early
but cant so moot
who wants drugs?In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
do whatever you want with itIn post 477, JaeReed wrote:Ahh, that was you? Yup, wasn't sure whether you wanted me to use it on myself so I've not done anything with it yet.
koggz give to you because it has effect only works on party leaderIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
is not harmfulIn post 480, Koggz wrote:
do whatever you want with itIn post 477, JaeReed wrote:Ahh, that was you? Yup, wasn't sure whether you wanted me to use it on myself so I've not done anything with it yet.
koggz give to you because it has effect only works on party leader
koggz only ask that you pass it on to the next party leader if you choose not to take it yourselfIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
what are your reads right now?In post 485, Space Cowboy wrote:I'm objectively the worst D1 player on the site and I have more than 2 reads on D1.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
any reason for koggz being scum read other than omgus?In post 491, Space Cowboy wrote:
Town/Null!Town - ABR, grovyle (tentatively), Reasonably Rational, Yume (tentatively)In post 486, Koggz wrote:
what are your reads right now?In post 485, Space Cowboy wrote:I'm objectively the worst D1 player on the site and I have more than 2 reads on D1.
Null - Mathblade, Jaereed, D&D (tentatively. Very close to null!scum)
Scum/Null!Scum - You, karnos
Nobody else has posted enough for me to get a solid read on them. It's kinda bullshit.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
In post 499, Space Cowboy wrote:In post 482, Space Cowboy wrote:Koggz has 2 reads... And has played since the start... I call bullshit on this.
VOTE: Koggz
(if I wasn't already)
koggz thought your reason was bad joke lolIn post 500, Space Cowboy wrote:Calling out an OMGUS for a read I've already given a reason for is also a reason to vote to lynch someone.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
votecount needs workIn post 528, Bold Vote Scientist wrote:Detective Moonlight is being prodded.
VOTECOUNT 1.04
Space Cowboy (5):Vedith, Daenerys and Dragons, Jaereed, karnos, Koggz
Grovyle (3):Yume, Koggz, Worldzmine
Daenerys and Dragons (2):Albert B. Rampage, Space Cowboy
ABR (1):PeregrineV
karnos (1):Space Cowboy, MathBlade
Yume (1):McMenno
Not Voting (5):Klingoncelt, detective moonlight, Randomidget ,Reasonably Rational, Grovyle
With 17 Alive, it takes 9 to Lynch.: (expired on 2016-08-30 13:00:00)
Deadline
The Party Leader isJaeReed (The Face)
The Leader's Party isDetermined by PM and resolved at hammer.
The Lieutenant is (optional)Determined by PM and resolved at hammer.
The Lieutenant's Party is (optional)Determined by PM and resolved at hammer.
The Chosen Runs areDetermined by PM and resolved at hammer.
spacecowboy voting for koggz
koggz not double voter unless someone secretly gave ability
could be other errors maybe tooIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
because koggz think firebringer town and firebringer only read at that timeIn post 574, Detective Moonlight wrote:@koggz why the naked vote?
because koggz not expect vote for firebringer to count for grovyle
because koggz want to see how entrenched players were in current debate
because koggz curious how people reaction
etc
koggz think you the first to even mention the naked vote other than koggz in post 502
koggz curious why you askIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
what about your play has been intentionally scummy?In post 592, Space Cowboy wrote:Sure thing MC. First off, scummy play comes naturally to me, so a while back I decided capitalize off of it, and what better way to do it than use it to keep me alive?!
The only issue is when stuff like this happens when people try to lynch me because of it...In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
banned for using a known gambit listed in wiki?In post 595, Space Cowboy wrote:
It's not necessarily "I deliberately be a scumfuck." It's more, "I don't change my natural play, which is to be scummy."In post 594, Koggz wrote:
what about your play has been intentionally scummy?In post 592, Space Cowboy wrote:Sure thing MC. First off, scummy play comes naturally to me, so a while back I decided capitalize off of it, and what better way to do it than use it to keep me alive?!
The only issue is when stuff like this happens when people try to lynch me because of it...
There's a huge difference. One gets you banned (the former), and the other just gets you to L-1 every game (the latter).
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... 27s_Gambit
is there anything specific about your natural play you find to be scummy?
or do you simply base this idea on past record of regularly being early mislynched or put at l-1 as town?In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
how do you capitalize off of scummy play to remain alive?In post 592, Space Cowboy wrote:Sure thing MC. First off, scummy play comes naturally to me, so a while back I decided capitalize off of it, and what better way to do it than use it to keep me alive?!
The only issue is when stuff like this happens when people try to lynch me because of it...
could you please explain?In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz got a big nonreactionIn post 600, Detective Moonlight wrote:
Because it did not achieve it's goalIn post 587, Koggz wrote:
because koggz think firebringer town and firebringer only read at that timeIn post 574, Detective Moonlight wrote:@koggz why the naked vote?
because koggz not expect vote for firebringer to count for grovyle
because koggz want to see how entrenched players were in current debate
because koggz curious how people reaction
etc
koggz think you the first to even mention the naked vote other than koggz in post 502
koggz curious why you ask
Did you get any decent reaction out of it?
Of course if it wasnt even meant to be a vote its nothing. Except for: why didnt you unvote after, if it wasnt even intended to be a vote?
-S
it was also intended as a sort of hello to firebringer
koggz saw no reason to unvote until ready to place vote on a suspected scum unless grovyle became at risk of lynchIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz first thought was that space cowboy is attempting to avoid nkIn post 604, Reasonably Rational wrote:@Koggz: it's pretty simple. I do it all the time, though usually it's by deliberately acting in a fashion that doesn't make town like me. Basically, if you're a good late game player, and good at avoiding being mislynched, it's valuable to make yourself appear to be a potential mislynch, so that way scum don't consider shooting you.
Obviously this means it's harder for you to get town to listen to you late game, but if you're confident in the strength of the sort of cases you usually bring, that's not a problem.
That wasnt a very useful scumhunting inquiry though.
-Cerb
koggz see other possibility as well such as baiting scum
koggz have reason for want to hear the reason directly from space cowboyIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
the reason koggz ask is because the avoiding nk scenario no longer make sense after spacecowboy claim the playstyle results in quickly becoming entirely townreadIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
post 607 cleared things up enough so that koggz finished in this line of questioningIn post 610, Reasonably Rational wrote:
You know, that's a valid point...my style is meant to keep me as a "mislynch" until mid-late game.In post 609, Koggz wrote:the reason koggz ask is because the avoiding nk scenario no longer make sense after spacecowboy claim the playstyle results in quickly becoming entirely townread
BUT again, a discussion about the way DA views his play styles effects isn't really relevant to anything, I don't believe...unless you have something to say about why this matters?
-Cerb
if space cowboy had claimed avoiding nk as primary reason the dissonance would cause more suspicion
but as resolved questioning leans more towards null
leaving only initial reasoning for vote remaining on space cowboy for nowIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
not townreading jaereed because of the names on jaereed read listIn post 617, Space Cowboy wrote:Umm, aside from Math and Grovyle, all of those are generally universally townread...
I don't see how that readlist could catapult him to town.
Which makes me suspicious...
koggz not like this postIn post 618, Space Cowboy wrote:Thank you sir numbers. Interesting the spread of numbers, but that was probably dangerous to do, as it's a safe assumption that the low stats roles make up for their stats in other abilities... So, if you've got a protective role, DM, Mcmenno, and Koggz are probably good ideas for a target, statisticswise. However, that's to say nothing about your reads on them, which should always be paramount. But if you townread them, and you've got a protective role, then they're likely a good choice.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz be more specific thenIn post 620, Space Cowboy wrote: 1. Then you should probably explain the read, because the only post he made since your last post was that readlist...
2. Yeah yeah yeah, you've beat the dead horse over and over that you don't like my mechanics/setup spec posts. But that's what I do. If you don't like it, I'd suggest you get over it, because that's how I play the game. To me, it's a number game, and by looking at the numbers, I can beat it.
But of course I probably sound like some condescending jerk who thinks that they are above everyone else. So what do I know?
like thisIn post 613, JaeReed wrote:I won't rank my townreads. I'll list them in order of how much information I feel I've given as to my reasonings for why they're townreads, though.
is pro town behavior
not like thisIn post 618, Space Cowboy wrote:So, if you've got a protective role, DM, Mcmenno, and Koggz are probably good ideas for a target, statisticswise.
also
more exaggerationIn post 620, Space Cowboy wrote:2. Yeah yeah yeah, you've beat the dead horse over and over that you don't like my mechanics/setup spec posts. But that's what I do. If you don't like it, I'd suggest you get over it, because that's how I play the game. To me, it's a number game, and by looking at the numbers, I can beat it.
koggz have zero problem with mechanics/setup speculationIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
why you think koggz likes or does not like setup spec?In post 645, MathBlade wrote:
Math wonder why koggz likes setup spec but then is selective about where they like it being used. Math wonders why Koggz is not responding to more players. This worries Math.In post 629, Koggz wrote:
koggz be more specific thenIn post 620, Space Cowboy wrote: 1. Then you should probably explain the read, because the only post he made since your last post was that readlist...
2. Yeah yeah yeah, you've beat the dead horse over and over that you don't like my mechanics/setup spec posts. But that's what I do. If you don't like it, I'd suggest you get over it, because that's how I play the game. To me, it's a number game, and by looking at the numbers, I can beat it.
But of course I probably sound like some condescending jerk who thinks that they are above everyone else. So what do I know?
like thisIn post 613, JaeReed wrote:I won't rank my townreads. I'll list them in order of how much information I feel I've given as to my reasonings for why they're townreads, though.
is pro town behavior
not like thisIn post 618, Space Cowboy wrote:So, if you've got a protective role, DM, Mcmenno, and Koggz are probably good ideas for a target, statisticswise.
also
more exaggerationIn post 620, Space Cowboy wrote:2. Yeah yeah yeah, you've beat the dead horse over and over that you don't like my mechanics/setup spec posts. But that's what I do. If you don't like it, I'd suggest you get over it, because that's how I play the game. To me, it's a number game, and by looking at the numbers, I can beat it.
koggz have zero problem with mechanics/setup speculation
Math is concerned that maybe Cowboy is town lynchbait then Koggz is scum.
Any particular reason for the third person talk Koggz? Would Koggz prefer a specific pronoun?
koggz only say have no problem with setup spec
nothing koggz has liked or disliked about any post this game has anything to do with setup specIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz could choose to participate in either ptIn post 671, McMenno wrote:I would like all people who can view the matrix/astral pt to claim this, please
instead chose to gift something special to jaereedIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
you think koggz like setup spec because koggz respond to reasonably rational question?In post 688, MathBlade wrote:
Because Koggz participate in setup spec in a small way and Koggz says they have no problem with it. Ergo Koggz likes setup spec. Koggz doesn't have to say certain words to leave an impression.In post 464, Koggz wrote:In post 443, Reasonably Rational wrote:Everyone, thoughts on likelihood of scum within those separate groupings?
-Cerb
koggz think this approach is flawedIn post 444, Space Cowboy wrote:I'd say it's safe to assume there's a scum in both groups.
unless alignment not chosen randomly
@KlingonCelt -- Neither is yours. In this case it is my perception of you and I am that arbiter. Right now you are not lurking. Before you were.
And I do not expect that no. I wanted to see how you responded to that question because IMHO you respond to pressure as town and scum as different alignments.
why the leap to assume koggz like setup spec?
why the further leap to assume koggz is selective about where koggz like it being used?
koggz neither like nor dislike setup speculationIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
it is more like koggz asking if you believe in god and then if you give an answer assuming you like to talk about religionIn post 691, MathBlade wrote:Math thinks Koggz likes setup spec because of how they responded not because they did.
It is not a leap. If Math says they have zero problems with cheese and then is seen eating cheese, it is therefore a logical conclusion math likes cheese. Similarly you did the same. The last question Math does not follow.
anyways
math assumptions about koggz were wrong
math explanation feels dishonest
show where koggz is selective about like and not like setup speculationIn post 645, MathBlade wrote:Math wonder why koggz likes setup spec but then is selective about where they like it being used. Math wonders why Koggz is not responding to more players. This worries Math.
Math is concerned that maybe Cowboy is town lynchbait then Koggz is scum.
Any particular reason for the third person talk Koggz? Would Koggz prefer a specific pronoun?
show where someone ask koggz question and koggz refuse to respond
math is in koggz scum pile right under space cowboyIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
In post 697, MathBlade wrote:@Koggz Math cannot show what Math did not say. Math merely stated their perceptions.
where did you perceive koggz being selective about like and not like setup speculation?In post 645, MathBlade wrote:Math wonder why koggz likes setup spec but then is selective about where they like it being used.
In post 697, MathBlade wrote:Koggz has answered all questions. Again math did not imply you didn't.In post 645, MathBlade wrote:Math wonders why Koggz is not responding to more players.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz was more specific which part of post is not liked in post 629In post 709, MathBlade wrote:
Here is an example for Koggz.In post 619, Koggz wrote:
not townreading jaereed because of the names on jaereed read listIn post 617, Space Cowboy wrote:Umm, aside from Math and Grovyle, all of those are generally universally townread...
I don't see how that readlist could catapult him to town.
Which makes me suspicious...
koggz not like this postIn post 618, Space Cowboy wrote:Thank you sir numbers. Interesting the spread of numbers, but that was probably dangerous to do, as it's a safe assumption that the low stats roles make up for their stats in other abilities... So, if you've got a protective role, DM, Mcmenno, and Koggz are probably good ideas for a target, statisticswise. However, that's to say nothing about your reads on them, which should always be paramount. But if you townread them, and you've got a protective role, then they're likely a good choice.
Koggz says they don't like Cowboy's post that was nothing but mechanics. So why does Koggz think it is bad for Cowboy to do yet has zero problems with it?
Math is phone posting getting to other quote from Koggz in a second.
even more specifically koggz not like space cowboy directing protection rolesIn post 629, Koggz wrote:
not like thisIn post 618, Space Cowboy wrote:So, if you've got a protective role, DM, Mcmenno, and Koggz are probably good ideas for a target, statisticswise.In post 629, Koggz wrote:koggz have zero problem with mechanics/setup speculationIn post 670, Koggz wrote:nothing koggz has liked or disliked about any post this game has anything to do with setup specIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz comment when have something to sayIn post 711, MathBlade wrote:
Koggz not responding doesn't mean not answering all questions. It means Math wonders where your natural responses are to events in thread. Math doesn't see any.In post 705, Koggz wrote:In post 697, MathBlade wrote:Koggz has answered all questions. Again math did not imply you didn't.In post 645, MathBlade wrote:Math wonders why Koggz is not responding to more players.
koggz respond when asked somethingIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
if you want koggz to comment when nothing to say then better ask questionsIn post 730, MathBlade wrote:
Math says they want you to be more proactive instead of reactive. This is Math's point.In post 726, Koggz wrote:
koggz comment when have something to sayIn post 711, MathBlade wrote:
Koggz not responding doesn't mean not answering all questions. It means Math wonders where your natural responses are to events in thread. Math doesn't see any.In post 705, Koggz wrote:In post 697, MathBlade wrote:Koggz has answered all questions. Again math did not imply you didn't.In post 645, MathBlade wrote:Math wonders why Koggz is not responding to more players.
koggz respond when asked something
Math wonders if they are an attempted counter wagon as Space Cowboy picks up steam.
if comment when have something to say not good enough then fuck you assholeIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
VOTE: mcmenno
koggz can relate since lost previous scum game due to pt slip
koggz may have been doomed regardless but pt slip put nail in coffin
Edit due to rules violation - That quote that was present did not come from the main thread. I refuse to state or imply where it may have came from.
Edit 2: Restored quote. I made a mistake. I thought it was, but it was not.
~TitusLast edited by Bold Vote Scientist on Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
do you think mcmenno intentional slip to frame you?In post 808, Space Cowboy wrote:
Well, I am in no PT right now. Not matrix, not astral, and certainly not a scum PT. He is definitely trying to frame me, so I'd appreciate it if you'd stop falling for it.In post 803, karnos wrote:So here is the thing. Without breaking the rules I can't quote directly what he said in the matrix, but I can say what he said is started to look incredibly weird.
So he posts something along the lines of: 'oh no I slipped, give me advice to dodge the wagon' and then he calls out space cowboy by name.
And then her makes another post claiming the previous post was accidentally posted in the wrong pt.
So, not just scummy, he would have to be really bad scum or perhaps scum pissed off at his teammates, or throwing the game to post anything like that. I don't know the player, maybe someone who has played with him before can speak about whether or not he is likely to make such a grave error and not just slip himself, but also call out a scum buddy.
TBH, it sounds like a fool's tactic. Is there any chance that the game could include a role that has a win condition based on being sent to prison on day 1? Or, maybe I am just reading too much into it, maybe the first slip was real and this is just some lame misdirect slip.
I dunno. If there is some town incentive behind such a gambit I don't see it.
He's a scumfuck who is trying to frame us.
VOTE: Mcmenno
or do you think he first accident slipped then tried to make the most of it by bringing a town down with him?In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
space cowboy is occult investigatorIn post 808, Space Cowboy wrote:Well, I am in no PT right now. Not matrix, not astral, and certainly not a scum PT.
occult investigator has astral access
or is koggz misread your role or the chart in post 3?In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
apologiesIn post 811, Space Cowboy wrote:
Nope. I start with access to neither, but I can get access to both.In post 810, Koggz wrote:
space cowboy is occult investigatorIn post 808, Space Cowboy wrote:Well, I am in no PT right now. Not matrix, not astral, and certainly not a scum PT.
occult investigator has astral access
or is koggz misread your role or the chart in post 3?
was misread chart due to cutoff
Spoiler: chartIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
why?
In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
you were 2 votes away from lynchIn post 831, Space Cowboy wrote:True, but they'd go for someone who people would believe was part of the scumteam with them. That leaves only a few people. (additionally, our wagon had shrunk by a sizable amount. I mean look at it, it's only 4 people now. It's shrunk by half. It was probably a last-ditch effort to reignite it)
then the pts slip happened in main thread
then math move vote from you to mcmenno
then detective moonlight report the slip happened in matrix pt
then koggz and karnos move vote from you to mcmennoIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
koggz think detective moonlight scum
maybe mcmenno space cowboy detecive moonlight scum team
at very first glance detective moonlight got slight town cred for reporting slip
then koggz look at detective moonlight iso and feels off
look at detective moonlight interactions particularly with mcmenno and space cowboy
would go into more detail but koggz falling asleep so will have to wait
will do reread and iso analyze when wake upIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
ok time to look at detective moonlight iso for any spacecowboy and mcmenno interactions
spacecowboy tone scummy af but sees no decent caseIn post 574, Detective Moonlight wrote:As someone said before, cowboy's tone is scummy af. I read a lot based bon tone, but i have the feeling that it will fail for most people here. I havent seen any decent case yet on them though?
-------
Wait
@D&D you say cowboy is lynchbait and then proceed to vote? Since when is lynchbait a scumtell?
-------
Scumreads so far are vedith, grovyle and to a lesser extent cowboy and D&D
Let me try to start a wagon
VOTE: grovyle
-S
since when is lynchbait scumtell seems fair defense but still defense of spacecowboy
spacecowboy lesser scumread behind vedith and grovyle
tone worth shitIn post 582, Detective Moonlight wrote:Like i also said, tone isd probably worth shit in this game
And i also asked for some kind of case because their actions dont seem scummy to me. I find some other player's action way more alarming.
Why do you scumread them, apart from tone?
-S
spacecowboy actions not seem scummy
In post 635, Detective Moonlight wrote:
Same question i asked to RR. Why?In post 618, Space Cowboy wrote:Thank you sir numbers. Interesting the spread of numbers, but that was probably dangerous to do, as it's a safe assumption that the low stats roles make up for their stats in other abilities... So, if you've got a protective role, DM, Mcmenno, and Koggz are probably good ideas for a target, statisticswise. However, that's to say nothing about your reads on them, which should always be paramount. But if you townread them, and you've got a protective role, then they're likely a good choice.
-S
says karnos spacecowboy and self all alignedIn post 649, Detective Moonlight wrote:
Yes all of us are aligned. I dont think scum aligned, though.In post 642, MathBlade wrote:
Horrible post.In post 639, Detective Moonlight wrote:@RR I think that its a bad comment to make, as either alignment. But its also not nonsensical. If it comes from scum it could be a try to buddy, if it comes from town its just baiting scum to the players he mentioned. Both are wrong and should be questioned.
So i would have pointed it out, regardless of who said it. And yes, if it really were you who said that it was more worrying, since im townreading you while i have no clue about cowboy.
Also i believe 21 pages with content is very poor for a 17 player game. I made a catch up post and only koggz and D&D mentioned some part of it. Where is the discussion? Ask away, attack, whatever?
-S
As I posted earlier I was at work. Not even waiting 24 hours before going "hey where's the replies?" is bad. Furthermore if you think something is a horrible comment as either alignment what makes you town read them?
Lastly in your catchup post you said "Let me try to start a wagon...." And the person you try to wagon isn't in your scumreads list and you say Cowboy's posts are scummy as fuck.
Karnos, Space Cowboy, DM all aligned?
I think you should also read a bit more. I never said it was AI, i said it was a bad move. I dont even see the scum motive behind saying such things after a bit of thinking.
I am pretty sure the person i voted for was in my list. Certain, even. It also was a reaction test because they seem to be widely townread when, imo, none of their actions warrant a townread like this, and that makes me suspicious. But, of course, they havent even posted yet.
I said cowboy'stonewas scummy af. I never said their actions were, which is why i'm having problems with reading them. I also asked for a case on them, for that same reason. Do you have any?
-S
doesnt think scum aligned???????
spacecowboy has scummy af tone but not scummy actions
asks for case on spacecowboy
spacecowboy actions possibly slightly townie nowIn post 650, Detective Moonlight wrote:
So me questioning grovyle is okay? I hoped to get more reactions out of that, tbh.In post 647, Reasonably Rational wrote:@dm: I don't believe it was a nonsensical comment to make either, I was merely giving an example of a reason why a post might be concerning coming from one slot while being unremarkable coming from another.
Walk me through the "no clue about cowboy". He's easily one of the slots with the most actual content to go off of.
Also, your catchup post didn't register for me at all. As in, there was nothing stated in it that made me want to ask you specific questions on the first read.
-Cerb
I have no clue about cowboy as in: their actions are not scummy and possibly slightly townie. I dislike their tone and i find their tone scummy. That is why i doubt. Ill iso them if i have more time. Id also like some kind of case on them because im really not seeing it right now. It being town-ness or scummy-ness.
-S
still scummy tone
does not see case on them for town or scum
but wait didnt you just say in 649 that you and space cowboy share alignment?
koggz definitely town? definitely??? where this read come from? you have inside info?In post 769, Detective Moonlight wrote:
Why is this?In post 760, McMenno wrote:he would be okay with a worldzmine or d&d or detective moonlight lynch
Okay so i dont like the fact that grovyle avoids us and then asks someone else for a read on us.
Im starting to like koggz more and more. Koggz is definitely town.
@everyone why is cowboy scum? I genuinely dont see why theyre at L-2 already.
@jaereed wtf is the point of the ring? It just allows you to put a post restriction on someone? Wicked. And for how long will this nightmare last?
@worldzmine talk me through some of your reads please. Preferably the cowboy one in detail.
Pedit
@mathblade why is menno scum?
-S
does not see why spacecowboy at l2?
first time to mention mcmenno at all
note this comes 2 posts after math post 767
Spoiler: math767
is first to point out the matrix slipIn post 778, Detective Moonlight wrote:Basically
I found menno's ''who is in what PT'' definitely fishy because its rolefishing and it looks bad with this:
He also just posted in the matrix pt as if he was posting in a scum pt and then 'fixed' by saying it was the wrong pt. This was right after his post that implied multiple pt's.In post 369, Bold Vote Scientist wrote:All kills/heals must specify which PT a kill or heal is taking place in.
I know menno to be a memer so i dont mind that last part, i find the first to be more worrying.
Before moving votes, id like to hear from grovyle.
-S
Pedit: cowboy stop slipping and fight your stuff in your hydra pt. Its useless to see you argue here.
but if detective moonlight is scum it makes sense to out the slip first because it will come out sooner or later anyways
and yet leaves vote on grovyle
meme?In post 787, Detective Moonlight wrote:
Im not allowed to quote but he said that he slipped and asked cowboy to helpIn post 780, Reasonably Rational wrote:
So, we have confirmation that he has multiple PT's. 100%.In post 778, Detective Moonlight wrote:Basically
I found menno's ''who is in what PT'' definitely fishy because its rolefishing and it looks bad with this:
He also just posted in the matrix pt as if he was posting in a scum pt and then 'fixed' by saying it was the wrong pt. This was right after his post that implied multiple pt's.In post 369, Bold Vote Scientist wrote:All kills/heals must specify which PT a kill or heal is taking place in.
I know menno to be a memer so i dont mind that last part, i find the first to be more worrying.
Before moving votes, id like to hear from grovyle.
-S
Pedit: cowboy stop slipping and fight your stuff in your hydra pt. Its useless to see you argue here.
We don't know what these PT's are.
How did the post he made sound like it was intended for a scum PT?
-Cerb
YetI believe it was just a meme. A terrible one, but a meme. That does not change my opinion on the other points i made. Still waiting for grovyle, i dont like their semi lurking.
-S
attempt defending mcmenno
never changes voteIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
no ideaIn post 859, Reasonably Rational wrote:Koggz, you believe scum had two posting members of the Matrix PT at game start?
-Cerb
why not?
koggz not have good mod meta nor theme knowledge so this sort of thing not factor into koggz hunting
koggz prefer to hunt primarily by motive analysisIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
the great and powerful trixie broke post restrictionIn post 875, MathBlade wrote:The Great and Powerful Trixie must go to work.
VOTE: McMenno
Putting The Great and Powerful Trixie's vote back til I can come back and read what happened.In post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
in mcmenno space cowboy both scum scenario
sending partner to jail may not make sense on surface
but perhaps deeper look can make some sense of things
here is one possible explanation
mcmenno realizes both mcmenno and spacecowboy are caught because of slip
in desperation caught scum more likely to go for hail mary type strategy
so in desperation mcmenno gets trolly to add confusion which is proper scum play after scum slip
without any mechanic to return from jail then killing partner makes zero sense
however prison break mechanic and no flip at lynch changes everything
it gives caughtscum a longshot but at least possible out
exactly because it seems unlikely on the surface to dayvig his partner
town may decide mcmenno and space cowboy cant share alignment
at which point town could attempt to rescue 1 of them
then because of belief they cant share alignment when the jailed scum does flip scum the rescued scum could be wrongfully cleared to coast into win
so the motive behind vig partner would be a desperate attempt to clear a caughtscumIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."-
-
Koggz Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: December 15, 2015
perhaps is not so wise to invoke ockhams razor or wifomIn post 949, WorldzMine wrote:I just realized there could be an argument to the contrary where it could be argued that I was attempting some gambit to make it just *look* like I had no clue what was going on to clear myself. My only answers to something like that is that it's something I don't think I'd be able to pull off and wouldn't try as a result, Occam's Razor where the simplest answer is probably the truth, and the progression of my posts showing my thinking on all these subjects changing on the fly as I caught up and responded. Bed time for me now.
if scum is aware or newtons flaming laser sword
how hard would it be to dodge?
but then wifom can be invoked into infinite regression mindfuck
koggz tend to attempt avoid thinking too deeply into such things because is very not healthy for koggz mental state
koggz throwed off enough without logic bomb make koggz head splode
so please dontIn post 943, BBmolla: "I'm actually like 90% certain Koggz is the worst player I've ever seen."