[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12050829 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Rata Mall - Bathrooms - Phase 2 - Locked - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #1 (isolation #0) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 9:30 am
Postby Green Crayons »
Some privacy.
enter women’s bathroom and then men’s bathroom to check if all alone and for anything weird or out of place
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #3 (isolation #1) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:00 am
Postby Green Crayons »
take matches, put in backpack
open all cupboards under all sinks
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #5 (isolation #2) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:06 am
Postby Green Crayons »
SON OF
that junkie is going to get it
try to free the loose pipe
put spare toilet paper in backpack
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #8 (isolation #3) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:19 am
Postby Green Crayons »
use lavender spray
wrap spray in some of the toilet paper so it hopefully won't leak everywhere, and put in backpack
keep +1 pipe
check to see if water works in the women's bathroom
look under cabnents for any secret switches to hidden laboratories
look at ceiling and surrounding area to see if there's any way for me to get into the ceiling
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #10 (isolation #4) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:28 am
Postby Green Crayons »
what kind of shady shit were they running here?
check to see if CCTV cameras have any signs of still operating
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #12 (isolation #5) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:34 am
Postby Green Crayons »
stand in front of the camera and speak into it
If you can hear me, I've got a proposition for you. Let's talk.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #14 (isolation #6) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 10:41 am
Postby Green Crayons »
yeah, well, you know where to find me
flush every toilet. check every stall in both bathrooms for switches, or for any interesting graffiti
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #18 (isolation #7) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:39 am
Postby Green Crayons »
I am completely discontent about these sequence of events!
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #19 (isolation #8) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:39 am
Postby Green Crayons »
Disconcerted.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #20 (isolation #9) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:40 am
Postby Green Crayons »
look for source if shuddering
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #25 (isolation #10) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 11:55 am
Postby Green Crayons »
escape the men’s room so i don’t get drenched
That was rude
Okay so there’s working water and water pressure
Had to come from somewhere
search the area between bathrooms for piping, or switches, cameras, or ceiling tiles that I can scurry up into
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #29 (isolation #11) » Sat Aug 15, 2020 12:08 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
The adventures I have!
Some might call them misadventures. But if I survived it was an adventure through and through.
check out drains to verify whether they are sized so someone less... rotund... could fit
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #34 (isolation #12) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 12:04 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
ponders whether there is anything more to find in the public bathrooms
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #36 (isolation #13) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 12:42 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Alright so there’s potential.
tap tiles on the wall with my kickin’ rad pipe, looking fit loose tiles or hidden switches or anything interesting
sing “Singing in the Rain” to the video camera
assess what the main area between the two bathrooms are like
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #37 (isolation #14) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 1:08 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Hm. I should get more creative.
take all tank lids off the backs of the toilets, look inside for goodies
remove drain pipes if possible; stick hands/arms down into to find goodies
inspect area where pipe was leaking and gushing water
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #39 (isolation #15) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 1:19 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
I will bring Noah back to life if I have to!
break more pipeage off for more weapons, also help ensure the second flood
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #41 (isolation #16) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 1:32 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Heh heh heh
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #42 (isolation #17) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 1:33 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Don’t I know it.
Anyway.
try to do whatever it was that caused the flood the first time
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #44 (isolation #18) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 2:27 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
I'm an idiot
grab spray paint, and write on walls where video that's recording can see:
Let's Talk
F
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #47 (isolation #19) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 2:48 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
That's right, robot overlords.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #48 (isolation #20) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 2:49 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
spray:
01101000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #49 (isolation #21) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 2:49 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
(because in all my travels, I know how to get crazy)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #50 (isolation #22) » Sun Aug 16, 2020 2:50 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
also, try to find where beeping is coming from
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #54 (isolation #23) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 1:39 am
Postby Green Crayons »
My old age is messing with my memory.
inspects bins, to see what delightful things others have thrown away. Also check underside of lids or other places where things could get taped and hidden away (not sure the bin configuration)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #55 (isolation #24) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 1:39 am
Postby Green Crayons »
Also,
checks my inventory so that I’m of one mind about what I do and don’t have
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #56 (isolation #25) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 1:42 am
Postby Green Crayons »
check out hand dryers to see if they operate
Not very eco friendly
if they work try drying off whatever got soaked from earlier. Also check and see if they have any weird switches or if their movable parts make any secret doors open up because I’m that kind of paranoid
Hm. Mirrors hunh?
look at each mirror’s edge to see if there’s any sign about whether it might be a one-way mirror
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #58 (isolation #26) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 3:57 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
HOLY HELL
use glass breaking hammer on mirrors
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #64 (isolation #27) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 4:38 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
alright alright alright
Load the 5000 in cash and shut the ATM if I can, to hide the money away from anyone just walking by
search body
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #66 (isolation #28) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 4:45 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
see if I can keep a nice, long shard of glass that would be good to stab people in the throat with
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #68 (isolation #29) » Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:13 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
truly from the gods
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #71 (isolation #30) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 1:39 am
Postby Green Crayons »
Am I required to return to the main eatery area, or can I move forward to the bank right now?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #73 (isolation #31) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:20 am
Postby Green Crayons »
take the 5000 in cash and put all belongings in backpack, except I wield my pipe because I’m going to get my glue back
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).