"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
(Oh my gosh, says Mr Crayons! BINS! They werent there before? *suspicious eye at amb*... No they weren't. We need *SOMEWHERE* to put entire rolls of mushy toilet paper dont we?)
inspects bins, to see what delightful things others have thrown away. Also check underside of lids or other places where things could get taped and hidden away (not sure the bin configuration)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
checks my inventory so that I’m of one mind about what I do and don’t have
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
if they work try drying off whatever got soaked from earlier. Also check and see if they have any weird switches or if their movable parts make any secret doors open up because I’m that kind of paranoid
Hm. Mirrors hunh?
look at each mirror’s edge to see if there’s any sign about whether it might be a one-way mirror
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
THe alley way leads around what would be the bookstore, and continues on to be between the bank and the Bookstore. You find yourself looking at the rear end of the ATMs in the Eatery.
One of the ATMS is open. And sitting there is 5000 in cash, waiting to be loaded - next to the dried/decayed body of the bank-employee. There is a door here into the bank.
Load the 5000 in cash and shut the ATM if I can, to hide the money away from anyone just walking by
search body
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
see if I can keep a nice, long shard of glass that would be good to stab people in the throat with
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Am I required to return to the main eatery area, or can I move forward to the bank right now?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
take the 5000 in cash and put all belongings in backpack, except I wield my pipe because I’m going to get my glue back
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).