[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7421899 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null The Resistance (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
I'm still unconvinced this gives us any information but I think if a spy is in the three they'd be crazy to lose on the first one. I feel less comfortable with BBMolla though so I'd almost prefer the next three go.
If I'm a spy I'm failing this mission because that's the kind of person I am.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #69 (isolation #12) » Fri Nov 27, 2015 11:48 am
Postby BBmolla »
In post 63, Save The Dragons wrote:So first test passes, and then what happens. The first three leaders are 3 random people. Nothing guarantees the leader has to be 100% involved in their test, right, so couldn't a majority choose 3 people they feel the most comfortable about and just negate any tests that don't reflect that?
If it succeeds we probably do same three + someone townish.
If it fails we figure it out from there.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #76 (isolation #16) » Fri Nov 27, 2015 12:43 pm
Postby BBmolla »
The only reason I bring that up is because who a player is can determine a lot, in face to face I have a very brash, risk taking friend who always takes the risk and fails a mission despite how obvious scum it makes him because he wants the fail
If you really want this to succeed, choose 3 players from our playerlist who are least willing to take big risks as spies.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #78 (isolation #17) » Fri Nov 27, 2015 12:47 pm
Postby BBmolla »
In addition there is no point to bring that up as town, I'd have just failed the mission and blamed the other two while saying I'd never take that risk.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
BBmolla wrote:The only reason I bring that up is because who a player is can determine a lot, in face to face I have a very brash, risk taking friend who always takes the risk and fails a mission despite how obvious scum it makes him because he wants the fail
If you really want this to succeed, choose 3 players from our playerlist who are least willing to take big risks as spies.
So you think Lilith and BNL are the type who wouldn't fail the first mission?
Neither seem like that type, nope.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
I'm still unconvinced this gives us any information but I think if a spy is in the three they'd be crazy to lose on the first one. I feel less comfortable with BBMolla though so I'd almost prefer the next three go.
If I'm a spy I'm failing this mission because that's the kind of person I am.
Don't see the town motivation behind this post.
Then reject the mission
I explained why I said it.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #114 (isolation #27) » Tue Dec 01, 2015 2:12 pm
Postby BBmolla »
Like that mission fails and we're left with jack shit
The same mission should go with the next towniest player, I think the first mission was all town and I don't see reason to change until proven otherwise.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #116 (isolation #28) » Tue Dec 01, 2015 2:16 pm
Postby BBmolla »
In post 115, StrangerCoug wrote:The problem is that I don't really trust you right now. Yes, I accepted the mission, but if that particular mission failed, then I would have a good lead. How would a team of FWTJR, STD, lilith, and me give us "jack shit" if the mission fails?
Who is scum if that mission fails
I think FWTJR and STD are equally scummy
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
I've been sort of reading along and should probably check out the setup, but wouldn't it be optimal play to just keep sending the same team again and adding the next person in the list until a mission fails?
Yes
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #172 (isolation #42) » Mon Dec 07, 2015 12:42 pm
Postby BBmolla »
In post 167, BNL wrote:Feeling a soft bus from scum here as my instinct. I'll still be sending out Molla and Lilith, after a quick iso I think I'll use Fluminator as the forth person, is that OK?
I think putting me on is a bad idea because I think the majority of people will reject it and it'll be a waste of your suggestion, sadly.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
In post 183, BBmolla wrote:If I'm being real I passed the second cause I didn't want to wait another week for mission 2 (selecting new mission, getting that one accepted, etc)
Huh?
I said
IF I'M BEING REAL I PASSED THE SECOND CAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO WAIT ANOTHER WEEK FOR MISSION 2 (SELECTING NEW MISSION, GETTING THAT ONE ACCEPTED, ETC)
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
In post 183, BBmolla wrote:If I'm being real I passed the second cause I didn't want to wait another week for mission 2 (selecting new mission, getting that one accepted, etc)
For me it was more about the first mission passing and I didn't see much wrong with the team (and thought we'd get lucky I guess). I'm more cautious about you from the perspective of shoving in the first 3 as the first team O.o
There seems to be a fair bit of agreement with this strategy so I wonder if I'm just missing something here.
Leaders are (almost?) always going to pick themselves and so what's the advantage to locking in the next two leaders as part of the first mission (which typically succeeds regardless of faction)?
Seems like an easy way to guarantee fails considering there are 4 spies and 10 players.
We can reject those missions if we want.
I just wasn't so vehemently against anyone on that mission to reject.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
Post
Post #245 (isolation #52) » Sat Dec 19, 2015 1:34 pm
Postby BBmolla »
In post 238, pablito wrote:I think jal is a clear "should reject", but I'm starting to wonder if bb might be a scapegoat for the scum - this aligns with my current gut that at least one of sc or bowser are scum
DUH DOY
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
